logo
Policies of Australia's political parties at a glance

Policies of Australia's political parties at a glance

Straits Times02-05-2025

FILE PHOTO: A sign points towards ballot boxes at a pre-polling place in Sydney, Australia, April 30, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams/File Photo
Australians will vote on Saturday in a close-run national election marked by concerns over the cost of living and housing affordability, as well as trade tensions triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.
Here's how Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's centre-left Labor party and the conservative Liberal-National coalition, led by Peter Dutton, compare on key policies:
HOUSING
Labor:
Would let all first-time home buyers enter the property market with a 5% down payment and has pledged to spend A$10 billion ($6.40 billion) to build up to 100,000 new homes.
Liberal-Nationals:
Would allow first-time home buyers to access up to A$50,000 from their government-mandated retirement savings for down payments. Mortgage interest payments would be made tax deductible. It has also pledged A$5 billion to fund housing infrastructure.
HEALTH
Labor:
Has pledged A$8.5 billion for an extra 18 million subsidised general practitioner visits each year as part of strengthening Medicare, the universal healthcare system, along with A$1 billion for more free-of-charge public mental health services.
Would open an additional 50 free urgent care clinics to ease pressure on hospitals.
Liberal-Nationals:
Has matched Labor's A$8.5 billion funding boost to Medicare, pledged A$400 million for youth mental health services, and plans to double Medicare-subsidised psychology sessions to 20 from 10.
ECONOMY
Labor:
Would give taxpayers a one-off, instant A$1,000 deduction for individual work-related expenses and cut student debt by 20%. It also passed legislation to cut the lowest marginal tax rate before calling the election.
Liberal-Nationals:
Has vowed to undo Labor's tax cuts and instead introduce an offset that would let taxpayers earning up to A$144,000 receive up to A$1,200 in tax relief.
Would lower fuel costs by A$0.25 per litre (0.26 gallon) for 12 months by reducing government duties.
Wants to shrink the public service by 41,000 jobs through a hiring freeze and natural attrition, which it estimates would save A$7 billion each year.
ENERGY
Labor:
Committed A$2.3 billion to subsidise household batteries to store solar power and pledged to extend rebates on energy bills for households and small businesses.
Announced an A$2 billion increase in clean energy technology funding through its green bank to achieve a majority-renewables grid, which would be backed up by power from gas, batteries and hydropower.
Liberal-Nationals:
Aims to bring down gas and electricity costs through a reservation scheme forcing liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters on Australia's east coast to sell a portion of their uncontracted gas into the domestic market.
Pledges to cut "red and green tape" for new gas projects and fast-track a decision on extending the life of Woodside's North West Shelf LNG plant.
Long term, wants to build a nuclear industry with seven plants across the country. Nuclear power is currently banned in Australia.
DEFENCE
Labor:
Has not pledged any new defence funding, pointing to an existing commitment to an A$50 billion increase over the next decade that would boost spending to 2.3% of gross domestic product from 2%.
Liberal-Nationals:
Would spend A$21 billion more than Labor over five years to reach 2.5% of GDP within five years and 3% within a decade. Has pledged A$3 billion to acquire extra joint strike fighter jets.
MIGRATION
Labor:
Has not announced any election pledges specific to migration.
Liberal-Nationals:
Promises to cut the permanent migration programme, now at 185,000 per year, to 140,000 for two years, then 150,000 in year three and 160,000 in year four.
Also would cut net migration by 100,000 below Labor's yearly levels and reduce the number of international students commencing at public universities by 30,000 per year. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese managers take reins at TikTok Shop in US as sales miss goal
Chinese managers take reins at TikTok Shop in US as sales miss goal

Business Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Chinese managers take reins at TikTok Shop in US as sales miss goal

[SEATTLE] ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, has been replacing US-hired staff near Seattle with managers connected to China, aiming to replicate its e-commerce success in Asia after sales fell short in America. TikTok Shop initially set a goal to increase its US e-commerce business tenfold last year to US$17.5 billion in transaction volume, but had to drastically lower that objective, according to people familiar with the plan who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk publicly. TikTok established its Shop business in the Seattle area near the online retail giant it was aiming to displace. Meetings that used to be held in English are now often conducted in Mandarin and managers increasingly write in Chinese when communicating on Feishu, ByteDance's internal Slack-like app, with English-speaking staff forced to rely on the built-in translation function. 'We continually assess our business needs and have made recent team adjustments to strengthen our organisation, remaining confident in the future ahead,' a TikTok Shop spokesperson said. The company previously called the reported e-commerce transaction target 'inaccurate.' More than 100 TikTok Shop employees in the US have been fired or have left amid confusion between leaders that has worsened the work environment, according to people familiar with the company. The cultural transition taking place in the firm coincides with its fight for survival in the US – due mainly to the app's Chinese ties. A national security law passed by Congress last year requires TikTok's US business to be spun off from its Chinese parent company or it will face a ban. Lawmakers warned that TikTok's ties to China pose a threat to the safety and security of American users. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up President Donald Trump has twice delayed the ban – with legal assurances from his attorney general – and another deadline for divestiture looms later this month, though that might also be extended, the Wall Street Journal reported. ByteDance said during the Biden administration that it had no plan to sell TikTok, but in April the Beijing-based company confirmed that it had been in discussions with the Trump government regarding a potential solution for TikTok US. It said any agreement would be subject to approval under Chinese law. The TikTok Shop near Seattle in February began requiring workers to be in the office five days a week for eight hours a day, according to a memo reviewed by Bloomberg. The change is in contrast to some other major tech companies that still offer flexible work schedules, and has been particularly burdensome for employees who often join late-night calls with colleagues in Asia after they leave the office, according to former employees. US-based staff require human resources and manager pre-approval to work from home. The changes were introduced after Bob Kang, China-based global head of TikTok's e-commerce division, visited the office in Bellevue, Washington, earlier this year and found there weren't enough staff present on a work day, according to multiple people who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. Assigning Chinese executives to run TikTok's fastest-growing business may raise questions about its previous corporate promise to distance the US operation from China. After Trump initially tried to ban the app during his first term, the company announced a security plan dubbed 'Project Texas' and vowed to wall off the app's US data and operations from any Chinese oversight. TikTok Shop is the biggest source of revenue for the video-sharing app besides advertising, and it has become a major investment area for ByteDance. Adding full-scale commerce to its eye-catching content and popular influencers sets it apart from rivals like Instagram and YouTube. The company still aims to challenge Amazon in major markets. Recruited aggressively To better compete, TikTok Shop recruited aggressively near Seattle over the past three years, targeting people with experience at Amazon, according to a review of Linkedin profiles and people who worked at both companies. In some corners of TikTok's Bellevue office of about 1,000 employees, the workflow felt like a remix of previous Amazon teams, the people said. But since January, growing tension in the teams below Kang and Nico Le Bourgeois, who oversaw TikTok's e-commerce operations in the US, became a distraction for staff who were often unsure about whose orders to follow, the people said. TikTok's uncertain fate in the US also weighed on morale. The company carried out a round of layoffs in April. A second batch followed in May. In the first round, Le Bourgeois was demoted when Mu Qing, a Chinese executive from ByteDance's e-commerce platform Douyin moved to the Seattle area to run TikTok Shop in the US. After the second bout, Mu sent an internal message saying Le Bourgeois was leaving to pursue other opportunities, according to a copy of the message seen by Bloomberg. Those cuts were intended to improve TikTok's 'efficiency,' according to former employees, though it wasn't clear to staff what factors contributed to a worker's efficiency rating. With these changes, ByteDance leaders are bringing in people who are familiar with what worked for the company in China, where Douyin, its TikTok clone for the Chinese market, has evolved into a US$490 billion shopping phenomenon. In addition to Mu, who was the head of Douyin's e-commerce, six other leaders with Chinese backgrounds were appointed in April, according to a different internal memo from Kang viewed by Bloomberg. Possible ban One challenge is that habits of many American users trend towards passive TikTok scrolling as opposed to making purchases in the app. Some US sellers told Bloomberg that they have also been reluctant to invest in the platform, given the possible ban. The final tally for the US e-commerce business's 2024 sales came in at around US$9 billion, according to an estimate by Singapore-based consultancy Momentum Works. TikTok Shop's US struggles have not halted the company's global shopping ambitions. ByteDance in 2021 rolled out e-commerce services in countries including Indonesia, Vietnam and the UK. In South-east Asia, it's already the region's biggest shopping platform after Shopee, according to Momentum Works. Last year, TikTok Shop opened in five countries in Europe, including Germany and Spain. The Europe expansion was delayed because the company first prioritised US growth, Bloomberg reported. This is a crucial month for TikTok in the US. The company will host merchants and creators in Los Angeles next week for a summit featuring some of the new leaders of the e-commerce unit. The current deadline for ByteDance to sell the TikTok's US operation is June 19 and there have been several interested suitors. The company came close to a possible spinoff in April to a consortium of investors that included Oracle, but the deal was scuttled in part because of Trump's trade war with China. Meanwhile, the churn of e-commerce employment continues in the Seattle area. Current and former TikTok Shop employees told Bloomberg that they get hounded by recruiting messages from Temu, another Chinese e-commerce competitor. BLOOMBERG

Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg
Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg

Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg (far left and far right) on the Gaza-bound aid boat on June 1. PHOTOS: REUTERS – Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz on June 8 ordered the military to block an aid boat headed for Gaza with 12 activists on board, including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg. 'I have instructed the military to prevent the Madleen flotilla from reaching Gaza,' he said in a statement from his office. 'To Greta the anti-Semite and her companions, Hamas propaganda mouthpieces, I say clearly: turn back because you will not reach Gaza,' Mr Katz said. The organisers of the Madleen's voyage said on June 7 that they had reached Egyptian waters and were nearing Gaza, where the war between Israel and Hamas has entered its 21st month. The Madleen, a sailing boat operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, left Italy on June 1 with the stated aim of delivering humanitarian aid and breaking the Israeli blockade on the Palestinian territory. 'Israel will not allow anyone to break the naval blockade of Gaza, which is aimed at preventing weapons from reaching Hamas – a murderous terrorist group holding our hostages and committing war crimes,' Mr Katz said. 'Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or support terror groups – by sea, air or land,' he added. The war was sparked by Hamas' Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. On June 8 , the Health Ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said the overall toll for the Gaza war had reached 54,880, the majority of whom were civilians. The UN considers these figures reliable. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US companies delay impact reports with DEI, ESG under attack
US companies delay impact reports with DEI, ESG under attack

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

US companies delay impact reports with DEI, ESG under attack

IT WAS just over a year ago when Nike's then CEO, John Donahoe, trumpeted a flashy 90-second video, hyping a report about the company's efforts to improve diversity and equality. The report, he said in a LinkedIn post, is 'a testament to our belief in the transformative power of sport'. Nike had released some version of it since at least 2001, often with similar fanfare. But this year, the company won't publish that report. Nike joins a growing list of companies that includes JPMorgan Chase, Constellation Brands and Akamai Technologies that are either cancelling or delaying publication of their so-called sustainability or corporate impact reports for shareholders. While companies aren't legally obliged to disclose such information, most S&P 500 members did so in 2024. For more than a decade, this is usually the time period when companies tout the steps they're taking to lower carbon emissions and improve the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) of their businesses. Opposition to these reports first surfaced about three years ago when GOP lawmakers and activists began pressing companies to scale back such efforts. And some companies have reacted by taking steps such as scrubbing ESG (environmental, social and governance) and DEI-related words from public documents. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Anti-DEI movement The election of President Donald Trump has further empowered the anti-DEI movement. During his first week in the White House, he signed executive orders ending federal diversity programs and restricting gender definition to two sexes – male and female. None of the companies contacted said Trump's actions changed their planning for releasing sustainability reports. 'The consequences of reported information are much greater now than they were a decade ago,' said Martin Whittaker, chief executive officer of Just Capital, noting that both progressive and conservative activists are searching for evidence of companies' missteps. He estimates that about 25 per cent of sustainability-related corporate reporting is behind schedule this year. Here are some of the S&P 500 companies that have yet to publish sustainability reports, according to researchers at DiversIQ. Nike, JPMorgan, Constellation Brands and Akamai Technologies have different explanations for why their sustainability reports haven't been published this year. Nike said in an e-mail that it still plans to share the work it's doing to create a more inclusive and sustainable world for athletes in other formats and that its commitment to diversity goals for 2025 hasn't changed. In a regulatory filing, JPMorgan said it plans to release a consolidated report on ESG and climate topics later this year. However, the bank added that it will 'monitor the evolving disclosure landscape as we iterate on our approach to disclosure'. JPMorgan published its '2024 Climate Report' in November. At Constellation Brands, a spokesperson said the timing of the publication's release was adjusted after receiving 'stakeholder feedback', and that the next report is scheduled to be issued next month. Cloud computing and cybersecurity company Akamai said its data-centre vendors were partly to blame for a delay in publication until the end of this quarter. The company wasn't more specific. For the past several years, Pfizer had published an impact report by April. When contacted last week about the delay in publication, a company spokesperson said the timing was adjusted to 'allow for necessary internal processes in preparation for evolving global ESG reporting requirements'. The company released its report this week. The lack of information is a blow, even if temporary, to corporate transparency. Many shareholders rely on the disclosures to gauge how serious companies are about addressing ESG issues, inequities in the workforce, and other factors that can impact the short and long-term value of their investments. Activist investors who've pressed companies to release more data on DEI and climate initiatives have been willing to cut companies some slack this year, given the heightened scrutiny from the Trump administration. At risk Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow, which supports social responsibility, said executives have been asking him privately for some flexibility in what information they release this year. 'We told them to not put themselves at risk right now,' he said. 'That isn't good for anyone.' And the caution is warranted, said GianCarlo Canaparo, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that has warned against possible discrimination in company DEI programmes. Corporate leaders are aware that Trump has asked agency heads to identify nine companies or organisations that should be investigated for possible illegal DEI activities, he said. So far, the names haven't been made public, but it's clearly on companies' radar, he added. 'If you have been using race preferences, you really want to make sure you don't get caught,' Canaparo said. 'And if you haven't, you want to make sure you aren't dragged into litigation to explore whether you have.' BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store