logo
The trouble with MAGA's manufacturing dream

The trouble with MAGA's manufacturing dream

Hindustan Times29-04-2025

In the late 1940s, as the industrial capacity of Europe and Japan lay in tatters, America accounted for over half of global manufacturing output, with much of the world heavily reliant on its wares. Last year it accounted for little over a tenth, and imported $1.2trn more in merchandise than it exported—to the displeasure of its president.
Start with the labour supply. The average pay for a production worker in America is more than twice the level in China and nearly six times that in Vietnam. Yet those wages are still not attracting enough Americans into manufacturing. In the Census Bureau's most recent survey of factories, a fifth said that an insufficient supply of labour was contributing to their inability to operate at full capacity.
Foreign bosses hoping to manufacture in America lament the paucity of skilled workers such as welders, electricians and machinery operators. This month C.C. Wei, boss of TSMC, a Taiwanese chipmaker, said its effort to produce chips in Arizona was 'being constrained by the labour shortage' in the state.
Anyone counting on automation to solve the problem risks being disappointed. Howard Lutnick, Mr Trump's commerce secretary, recently insisted that 'the army of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little, little screws to make iPhones' would soon come back to America, where the work could be automated.
Yet a robotic overhaul of American manufacturing may still be a long way off. In 2023 there were just 295 industrial robots for every 10,000 manufacturing workers in the country, according to the International Federation of Robotics, an industry association. Although that was up from 255 in 2020, it was dwarfed by China's 470 and South Korea's 1,012 (see chart 1). Contrary to Mr Lutnick's claim, Apple is now said to be planning to assemble America-bound iPhones in India.
The difficulty of building factories is a second barrier to manufacturing in America. Annualised spending on factory construction has doubled, adjusting for inflation, over the past four years, spurred on by subsidies offered by the previous administration to makers of chips and various green technologies. Many of the resulting projects, however, have been mired in delays or shelved altogether. Solvay, a European chemicals firm, has paused construction of a plant in Arizona intended to make electronics-grade hydrogen peroxide for semiconductors. Pallidus, an American manufacturer of chip components, has axed plans to build a factory in South Carolina.
That reflects the troubled state of construction in America. According to a 2023 paper by Austan Goolsbee and Chad Syverson of the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, productivity in the sector, measured as output per worker, has fallen by two-fifths from its peak in the 1960s (see chart 2). The authors blame excessive regulation, NIMBYism and a lack of incentives to deliver projects on time, among other things. Labour shortages have also buffeted the construction sector in recent years.
In the meantime, America's existing factories are ageing. Over half of the roughly 50,000 manufacturing facilities across the country are more than three decades old; the average plant was built some 50 years ago.
America's inability to build has also resulted in ageing and overextended infrastructure—a third barrier to manufacturing in the country. Much of the electricity grid was constructed in the 1960s and 70s and is at or near the end of its useful life, a factor behind increasingly frequent power outages. Meanwhile, factories seeking a new connection to the grid face years of delay. Transport infrastructure is no better; one in three bridges in America needs to be replaced or repaired, according to a study last year by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association, an industry group. It is a far cry from the slick transport networks that grease supply chains in East Asia.
Spanners in the works
Instead of fixing these problems, Mr Trump looks likely to make manufacturing in America an even trickier proposition. His efforts to clamp down on immigration and deport those who have made their way into the country illegally risk worsening labour shortages both in factories and on construction sites. His tariffs are raising the cost of everything from the steel needed to build manufacturing facilities to the machinery that fills them. They are also making it more expensive to import raw materials and parts; almost a third of the intermediate inputs used in American manufacturing are imported.
Then there is the uncertainty created by Mr Trump's tariff flip-flopping. Many bosses say they are still waiting for clarity on what duties will be imposed on which countries before they make any changes to their production footprints.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi now in the line of fire - here's what happened and why it matters
Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi now in the line of fire - here's what happened and why it matters

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi now in the line of fire - here's what happened and why it matters

It has been a tumultuous week for American politics, memory, and conscience. Another battle rages within the justice system. Pam Bondi , President Trump's Attorney General, has come under fire for what critics call serious ethical misconduct. The incident highlights broader tensions in Washington regarding justice, power, and political accountability. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Air conditioners without external unit. (click to see prices) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now What exactly is Pam Bondi being accused of? In a 70-person ethics complaint submitted to the Florida Bar , US Attorney General Pam Bondi is charged with " serious professional misconduct ." Law professors, lawyers, and former chief justices of the Florida Supreme Court who lean liberal or moderate are among the signatories. They charged Bondi with misbehavior that "threatens the rule of law and the administration of justice,' as per a report by the Miami Herald. Live Events According to the Herald, the group's complaint claims that Bondi has violated her ethical obligations in her current position. Critics claim she is pressuring DOJ lawyers to act unethically. The complaint also claims that Bondi "sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy,'" as reported by the Herald. Why was the complaint dismissed so quickly? The petition was swiftly dismissed by the Florida Bar on jurisdictional grounds, but in Washington, one of the young punks who now work for the federal government, particularly at the Department of Justice (DOJ), sneered at it. In a statement given to the Miami Herald, Chad Mizelle, chief of staff for the Justice Department, stated that the Florida Bar has twice turned down performative attempts by these out-of-state attorneys to use the bar complaint procedure against AG Bondi. The signatories' lack of intelligence and independent thought will be the only outcome of this third futile attempt. ALSO READ: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just entered the Trump–Musk fight, and the Internet can't get enough Pam Bondi, a native of Florida, was the first female attorney general of the Sunshine State. According to the Florida Bar, "Pamela Jo Bondi" is a member "in Good Standing,' as per a report by The Hill. During her confirmation hearing a few months ago, Bondi was questioned by Democrats about her capacity to oppose Trump, who had repeatedly declared that he would come for his enemies and that he had the "absolute right" to do as he pleased with her department. FAQs Why is Pam Bondi facing criticism right now? She is accused by dozens of legal experts of pressuring DOJ lawyers to violate ethical standards, particularly in a contentious Feb. 5 memo encouraging aggressive tactics. Has the Florida Bar taken action against Bondi? No, it dismissed the complaint due to a lack of jurisdiction, though the criticism sparked a national debate.

US' G-III Apparel holds FY26 sales forecast, posts higher Q1 earnings
US' G-III Apparel holds FY26 sales forecast, posts higher Q1 earnings

Fibre2Fashion

time35 minutes ago

  • Fibre2Fashion

US' G-III Apparel holds FY26 sales forecast, posts higher Q1 earnings

American clothing company G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its net sales outlook for fiscal 2026 (FY26) at approximately $3.14 billion, slightly below the $3.18 billion recorded in fiscal 2025. However, it has withdrawn its net income, non-GAAP income, and adjusted EBITDA guidance issued in March due to uncertainty surrounding tariffs and broader macroeconomic conditions. As of June 5, 2025, current tariff rates are expected to add around $135 million in unmitigated costs, largely in the second half of the year. The company aims to offset these impacts through diversified sourcing, selective pricing adjustments, and cost-saving measures, it said in its financial statement. G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its FY26 net sales outlook at $3.14 billion but withdrawn earnings guidance due to tariff-related uncertainty, which may add $135 million in costs. Q1 FY26 sales dipped 4 per cent, but net income rose to $7.8 million. Q2 sales are projected to decline year-on-year. The company cut debt by 96 per cent and repurchased $19.7 million in shares. For the second quarter (Q2) ending July 31, 2025, net sales are projected at $570 million, down from $644.8 million year-on-year, impacted by supply chain disruptions and timing shifts in key programmes. Gross margin is expected to remain stable. Net income is forecast between $1 million and $6 million, or $0.02–$0.12 per diluted share, sharply down from $24.2 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, in Q2 FY25. For the first quarter (Q1) ended April 30, 2025, G-III Apparel Group has reported a 4 per cent year-on-year decline in net sales to $583.6 million, down from $609.7 million in the same period last year. Despite the revenue drop, net income rose to $7.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, compared to $5.8 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in Q1 FY25. On a non-GAAP basis, net income per diluted share came in at $0.19, excluding $1.0 million in one-time severance expenses related to a closed warehouse. This adjustment accounted for a $0.02 per share impact. There were no non-GAAP adjustments in the prior year's first quarter. As of the end of the quarter, inventories declined 5 per cent to $456.5 million, while total debt was slashed by 96 per cent to $18.7 million from $426.4 million. The sharp reduction followed the company's voluntary redemption in August 2024 of its $400 million senior secured notes, financed through cash reserves and borrowings from its revolving credit facility, the statement added. Additionally, the company repurchased 807,437 shares for $19.7 million during the quarter, underscoring its continued commitment to shareholder returns. Morris Goldfarb, G-III's chairman and chief executive officer , said, 'G-III delivered solid first quarter results, marked by earnings that exceeded the high end of guidance. Our performance was fuelled by double-digit growth of our key owned brands, DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld and Donna Karan, which largely offset the exit of the Calvin Klein jeans and sportswear businesses. These results underscore the strong demand and desirability of our brand portfolio and are a testament to our team's outstanding execution.' Goldfarb concluded, 'We are reaffirming our net sales guidance for fiscal 2026 and working diligently to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Our experienced management team has a proven track record of successfully navigating periods of uncertainty, and we view the ongoing disruptions as an opportunity to strengthen our competitive position and capture incremental market share. As we advance our strategic priorities, we have never been more confident in the global resonance of our brands and the significant growth potential ahead to drive long-term profitability and shareholder value.' Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One - but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 가입추천! "주요 보험사별 맞춤견적+가성비 굿"... 굿리치 보험대리점 (등록번호:제2006038313호) 가입하기 Undo Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than $400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. Live Events A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts, and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet "for free," saying, "We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done." Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What makes a plane worthy of being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list - survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. "The point is, it remains in flight no matter what," she said. Will Trump want all the security bells and whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means "you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch." Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service , expects the president would get the final say. "The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk," he said. "It can never eliminate it." If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because "you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be." It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What happens next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee , said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane "without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack." "It's a waste of taxpayer dollars," she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. "The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications," she said. "But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store