Govt onboards private trainer DPI Academy to train officers in digital public policy
The move comes through a collaboration between Karmayogi Bharat—a special purpose vehicle under the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT)—and the DPI Academy. The latter is backed by policy think tank Artha Global and the non-profit eGov Foundation.
ADPI assumes importance as the government is rapidly scaling up the usage of tools such as Aadhar, DIKSHA, and COWIN, at a time when the world is focused on digital public policy.
Former secretaries of the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) Aruna Sundararajan, RS Sharma, Ajay Sawhney, and J. Satyanarayana, along with other former bureaucrats will train bureaucrats under these courses.
The first course, focused on DPI fundamentals and implementation strategies, has gone live following a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in Delhi on 30 July 2025 between Karmayogi Bharat and DPI Academy, according to the press statement.
J. Satyanarayana, who chairs the DPI Academy, and has previously served as Secretary of the MeitY and Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), delivered the inaugural course and said:
'One of our key messages is that Digital Public Infrastructure is a means—not an end—in the journey of digital transformation. Our goal is to help civil servants understand that DPI is a foundational tool that can be applied across sectors to achieve meaningful outcomes.'
Viraj Tyagi, CEO of eGov Foundation, noted that the curriculum is designed to go beyond theory:
'The courses go beyond conceptual frameworks, as we jointly bring expertise from having implemented DPI projects with governments across the world.'
He added that real-world case studies would be used to bridge theory and practice.
The iGOT portal started in 2018, followed by the kickstarter of Mission Karmayogi in 2020, a DoPT circular said. It added that the goal of Mission Karmayogi is to train 46 lakh central government officers at first, and eventually cover 1.5 crore government officers in central, state, and municipal governments. The Karmayogi programme also provided online training to about 13 lakh officers during the COVID-19 pandemic, the DoPT circular said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
EC says those aggrieved at being left out of draft Bihar voter list can file claims using Aadhaar
The Election Commission on Tuesday said that those aggrieved at being left out of the draft voters' list in Bihar after the special intensive revision exercise can file claims using their Aadhaar cards. This comes after the Supreme Court on August 14 directed the poll panel to specify in public notices that persons excluded from the draft list released on August 1 can furnish their Aadhaar cards at the time of submitting their claims for inclusion in the final list. The document was not among the poll body's 11 accepted proofs of identity. Several petitioners had objected to the exclusion of Aadhaar, the most widely held ID, from the list of permissible documents, calling it ' absurd '. In a notice on Tuesday, the Election Commission said that the list of names not included in the draft list, along with the reasons for the deletion, is displayed on the websites of the district election officers and the chief electoral officers in a searchable mode with an Electors Photo Identification Card number. 'Aggrieved persons may submit their claims along with a copy of their Aadhar card,' the notice said. A day earlier, Bihar Chief Electoral Officer Vinod Singh Gunjiyal also said in a notice that the list of voters excluded from the draft list had been displayed at all block offices, panchayat offices, municipal bodies offices and polling stations, The Indian Express reported. The draft roll published on August 1 showed that 65.6 lakh names were removed from the list. Of these, 22 lakh were due to deaths, 36 lakh were of people who had permanently shifted or were untraceable and seven lakh were duplicate entries, the Election Commission had said then. In its order on August 14, the court also directed the poll panel to publish a district-wise list of the voters whose names were deleted from the draft list, along with the reason for each deletion, such as death, migration or double registration. Sharing the list as well as the reasons for deletions would improve 'voter confidence' in the institution, it had said. The court passed the directions in response to petitions challenging the voter roll revision in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, expected in October or November. Following the order, the Election Commission on Sunday published the names of the 65 lakh voters removed from the draft electoral rolls. Please Read #Bihar SIR DAILY BULLETIN: 1st Aug(3 PM) till 19th Aug (11 AM)at Other Ref. Links: Link 1: Link 2: Link 3: Link 4: Link 5: — Election Commission of India (@ECISVEEP) August 19, 2025 Bihar voter roll revision The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote. Voters born before July 1, 1987, were required to show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, had to also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, needed proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. The draft voter list, published on August 1, comprises electors who submitted their enumeration forms to the poll panel between June 24 and July 26. They will now have to produce proof of citizenship to make it to the final list that will be published on September 30.
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bihar SIR: Those aggrieved at being left out of voter list can file claims using Aadhaar, CEO says
Following the Supreme Court's interim order to the Election Commission (EC) that those aggrieved at being left out of the draft voters' list in Bihar should be allowed to file claims using their Aadhaar cards, Bihar Chief Electoral Officer Vinod Singh Gunjiyal on Monday issued a notification to that effect. '…All such voters, who are not included in the draft list, can get information about their entry in this list along with the reason through their EPIC number. The list related to such voters who are not included in the draft list published on 01.08.2025 has also been displayed at all block offices, panchayat offices, municipal bodies offices and polling stations, through which such voters can get information and information related to their entry along with the reason. Dissatisfied persons can submit their claim with a copy of their Aadhar card,' the Bihar CEO said in his order. However, it is not clear whether such voters need to produce one of the 11 EC-mandated documents to get their names enrolled into the list again. On Sunday, the Bihar CEO had published details of 65 lakh names deleted from the draft electoral rolls in the first phase of the special intensive revision (SIR). This came after the Supreme Court, while hearing petitions against the SIR, had directed the Election Commission to publish the details of those whose names were deleted from the draft rolls and the reasons for the deletion. Opposition parties and other activists have raised concerns over potential wrongful deletions during the SIR process. They have claimed that several people declared dead during the process, and have had their names deleted, are in fact alive. Out of 7.89 crore voters in Bihar, 7.24 crore were enrolled in the first draft. Out of the 65 lakh names deleted from the list, 36 lakh were shown to have permanently moved elsewhere, and 22 lakh were said to be dead.
Indian Express
15 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Centre is considering ‘equivalence' in application of ‘creamy layer' condition in OBC quota
The government is considering ways to ensure 'equivalence' in the application of the 'creamy layer' condition in reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) across a range of jobs at central and state government organisations, public sector enterprises, universities, etc. A proposal has been prepared after consultations among several government ministries and departments, and bodies such as NITI Aayog and the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), The Indian Express reported last week. The concept of 'creamy layer' In its landmark verdict in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India (1992), the Supreme Court upheld the government's decision to implement the recommendations of the Mandal Commission, but said that affluent sections among the socially and educationally backward classes, the so-called 'creamy layer', must be excluded from job quotas. Thereafter, on September 8, 1993, DoPT issued a circular identifying the creamy layer that would be ineligible for OBC reservation. Sons and daughters of high constitutional functionaries, and government, PSU, and armed forces officers were included in the list, along with 'professional class and those engaged in trade and industry', and 'property owners'. An 'income/ wealth test' was also mentioned. Specifically, an individual either of whose parents was a direct recruit to a Group A/ Class I government job, or if the parent was promoted to Group A before the age of 40, was not eligible for the OBC quota. An individual both of whose parents were direct recruits to Group B jobs would be part of the creamy layer. Children of armed forces officials only up to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel could avail of the quota. For those outside the government sector, the income ceiling was set at Rs 1 lakh per annum. It was subsequently revised upwards, and the limit has been Rs 8 lakh since 2017. However, income from salary and agricultural income is not included. 2004 'clarification' and after The above criteria were not comprehensive, especially with regard to jobs outside the government sector. So, on October 14, 2004, DoPT issued detailed 'Clarifications regarding creamy layer amongst OBCs' in order to determine 'the creamy layer status of sons and daughters of persons employed in organisations where equivalence or comparability of posts vis-à-vis posts in Government has not been evaluated'. It was determined that: 'Income of the parents from the salaries and from the other sources (other than salaries and agricultural land) is determined separately. If either the income of the parents from the salaries or the income of the parents from other sources (other than salaries and agricultural land) exceeds… Rs 2.5 lakh per annum [which was the creamy layer income ceiling for private persons at the time] for a period of three consecutive years, the sons and daughters of such persons shall be treated to fall in creamy layer…' However, these 'clarifications' were not widely implemented to deprive individuals of reservation benefits during the UPA years (2004-14), as the government sought to woo OBCs in pursuit of various social justice goals. In late 2014, DoPT started examining caste certificates issued by various authorities to determine their compliance with the 2004 'clarification'. Between the Civil Services Examinations (CSE) of 2015 and 2023 (batches of 2016-24), DoPT rejected caste certificates of more than 100 successful candidates who would have qualified as OBC under the September 1993 criteria, but who were put in the creamy layer in accordance with the new criteria. Interestingly, many of these individuals have appeared in other competitive examinations, and have been considered OBC on the basis of the same caste certificate. Efforts to find 'equivalence' The unresolved case of the more than 100 candidates determined by DoPT as being in the creamy layer led to consultations among various stakeholder ministries. While 'equivalence' has been established with regard to the various central PSUs, the process remains pending for others — and the sons/ daughters of a wide range of employees are put in the creamy layer based on their incomes, thanks to 'clarification' issued in 2004. In June this year, Home Minister Amit Shah and NCBC chairman Hansraj Ahir recommended to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment that the policy under consideration should be implemented retrospectively so that these more than 100 candidates are also able to benefit. Views of the Ministries of Social Justice, Education, Law, and Labour, the Department of Public Enterprises and DoPT, as well as NITI Aayog and NCBC were sought in the matter. According to sources in the government, some of the issues in the proposal to establish 'equivalence' are: * Since the salaries of university teachers from assistant professor upward typically start from 'Level 10', which is equivalent to entry-level Group A posts in the government, it has been proposed that children of university teachers be categorised as creamy layer. *For central/ state autonomous and statutory bodies, it is proposed to establish 'equivalence' with central government officials, depending on their level/ group/ pay scale, which is aligned with the corresponding pay in central and state governments. * Non-teaching staff of universities are proposed to be placed in the creamy layer depending on their level/ group/ pay scale. * It is proposed that all executive-level positions in state PSUs be treated as creamy layer, akin to the 'equivalence' that has been in force for central PSUs since 2017. However, it has been proposed that executives whose income is within Rs 8 lakh — which is the ceiling for private persons — will not be categorised as creamy layer. * It is proposed that employees of government-aided institutions, which usually follow the service conditions and pay scales of the central or respective state government, be placed under appropriate categories based on the 'equivalence' of their post and service conditions and pay scales. The likely beneficiaries If the proposals are implemented, sons/ daughters of lower-level government employees with annual salaries of more than Rs 8 lakh are likely to benefit the most. It will correct the anomaly by which children of government teachers get the benefit of OBC quota, but children of employees of similar rank at government-aided institutions are denied on the basis of income. A similar situation exists in several state government organisations. In one of the cases before the government, the children of an individual who fills fuel in vehicles at a pump run by a state-owned oil marketing company have been declared creamy layer on the basis of income. Not much is expected to change for children of employees in the private sector. Sources in the government said it is noted in the proposal that it is difficult to establish 'equivalence' given the vast range of positions, pay, and perquisites in private employment, and creamy layer can be determined based on the income/ wealth criteria. The income ceiling was revised in 2004, 2008, 2013, and 2017.
