logo
Will the Federal Courts Ignite a Stock Market Rally by Nixing Trump's Tariffs?

Will the Federal Courts Ignite a Stock Market Rally by Nixing Trump's Tariffs?

Yahoo20-04-2025
You might have noticed an interesting phenomenon in recent weeks. News about the implementation of President Donald Trump's tariffs tends to cause the stock market to sink like a brick. However, even the slightest hint that those tariffs will be relaxed or delayed usually causes stocks to rebound.
It stands to reason that a complete reversal of the Trump administration's tariffs could serve as a significant catalyst for the stock market. The chances that the president will make such a move on his own seem very low. With the GOP in control of the Senate and the House, don't expect Congress to halt tariffs, either.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
However, there is one other mechanism for checks and balances built into the U.S. Constitution. Will the federal courts ignite a stock market rally by nixing Trump's tariffs? The answer: It's a definite maybe.
We could soon find out whether the "definite maybe" answer becomes a "definite yes." Multiple lawsuits have been filed in recent days seeking to overturn the Trump administration's tariffs.
One of those lawsuits was filed by the New Civil Liberties Alliance on behalf of a small business in Florida named Simplified. The company sells home management products, organizational tools, and planners. The New Civil Liberties Alliance and Simplified are arguing that President Trump's tariffs will cause Simplified financial harm by requiring it to pay significant tariffs and change its supply chain.
The Liberty Justice Center filed a similar lawsuit on April 14, 2025, in the U.S. Court of International Trade. This lawsuit was initiated on behalf of five small businesses: New York-based wine, spirits, and sake importer VOS Selections; sportfishing products e-commerce retailer and wholesaler FishUSA; Utah pipe manufacturer Genova Pipe; Virginia educational electronic kits and musical instruments company MicroKits; and Vermont women's cycling apparel company Terry Precision Cycling.
On April 16, California became the first state to sue the Trump administration over its tariffs. California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a statement, "President Trump's unlawful tariffs are wreaking chaos on California families, businesses, and our economy -- driving up prices and threatening jobs. We're standing up for American families who can't afford to let the chaos continue." California, which ranks as the fifth-largest economy in the world, with several major industries involved in global trade, could be significantly impacted by tariffs.
All these lawsuits share common legal arguments against President Trump's tariffs. Most importantly, they all maintain that the tariffs are unconstitutional.
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive right to levy tariffs. However, Congress has passed legislation in the past that delegates some of its authority to the president in certain circumstances. President Trump used one of those pieces of legislation, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), as the basis of his executive order implementing steep reciprocal tariffs on most countries.
But the IEEPA grants the president only the power to take financial actions against other countries to "deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat" by declaring a national emergency. The Liberty Justice Law Center's lawsuit argues that trade deficits, the justification used by President Trump to impose tariffs, are "neither an emergency nor an unusual or extraordinary threat."
The organization argued that "Trade deficits have existed for decades, and do not constitute a national emergency or threat to security." Its lawsuit noted that the Trump administration's tariffs even apply to countries with which the U.S. doesn't have a trade deficit, which further undermines the White House's justification.
California is taking a similar approach. The state's lawsuit argues that the president is misusing the emergency powers granted by the IEEPA and that Congress must approve the type of tariffs the White House is levying.
The New Civil Liberties Alliance's lawsuit doesn't challenge the president's power to declare a national emergency. Instead, it argues that the IEEPA doesn't mention tariffs and that the Trump administration can't demonstrate that tariffs are necessary to address the "emergency" on which they're based.
Could these lawsuits really reverse the Trump administration's tariffs? Again, it's a definite maybe.
George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin wrote in Reason magazine earlier this year (before the various lawsuits were filed) that the constitutional arguments against using the IEEPA to impose tariffs "are strong." Somin said that the Supreme Court's "major questions" doctrine requires Congress to "speak clearly" when it empowers the executive branch to make decisions that have a major economic and political impact. Since the IEEPA doesn't specifically grant the president the power to levy tariffs, this argument could be compelling to the federal courts.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court will probably have to determine whether President Trump's tariffs are constitutional. If at least five justices decide the administration has gone beyond its authority, the tariffs will go away. And the stock market will almost certainly take off again.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $263,189!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,346!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $524,747!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of April 14, 2025
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Will the Federal Courts Ignite a Stock Market Rally by Nixing Trump's Tariffs? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Apple's 'made-in-America' strategy led to big market gains
How Apple's 'made-in-America' strategy led to big market gains

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Apple's 'made-in-America' strategy led to big market gains

Apple (AAPL) stock gains after the iPhone maker announced an additional $100 billion investment in the US. Apple CEO Tim Cook joined President Trump at the White House to announce the details of the investment. Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer examines the stock's roughly 13% rise this week, and Yahoo Finance Tech Editor Dan Howley explains why the multibillion-dollar investment is so significant for the company in the context of Trump's tariff policies. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Apple stock getting rewarded this week after President Trump and CEO Tim Cook announced that the tech giant is making an additional hundred billion dollar US manufacturing commitment. And I want to take a look at how shares have performed this week. So Apple now up 13% on the week, it is up another 4% today. And what's interesting with this Apple move, of course, this main move coming Wednesday after Tim Cook and President Trump were at the White House on that day and the rally is really sort of continued. But what's interesting in this move with Apple is if we zoom out on the year and we talk about this mag 7, this big tech rally that we've seen for really two years now, but you take a look at a year to date at Apple, Apple had not been participating in this rally. Apple was down more than 15% on the year, a clear laggard among big tech. Now it's starting to come up positive. Our friend Jerry Blickary has pointed out that a 215 level on Apple was a very interesting remembrance point for investors. Apple has surged past that. Now, that of course begs the question of if Apple can get back to positive this this year and keep rallying. And I do want to bring in our Yahoo Finance tech editor Dan Howley to break this down a little bit more. Dan, just interesting to see the move in Apple this week. Of course, shares reacting well to this investment. I mean, how does this sort of add to their overall US investment and how have you sort of made sense of the Apple story this week? Yeah, it does add to their US investment. Uh they they obviously are pushing this uh you know, building in America uh kind of narrative. And yes, they are investing in America. They are going to be doing certain things in America. Um they're not building the iPhone in America. Uh that's not going to be happening. They're going to continue to build that overseas, but they are sourcing more or investing more in some of their uh supply chain partners in the US. That includes things like Samsung, Corning, uh what have you. Uh this is really a move, a strategic and political move by uh Apple. They were under the gun uh when it came to uh their relationship with Trump. Uh there was calls for them to build in the US. There were uh discussions on, you know, uh I think at one point Peter Navarro had gone on CNBC and said that it was the biggest soap opera in Silicon Valley that the company couldn't build uh in the US. Experts that I spoke to said no, it really is uh an untenable question to ask them to to build in the US now at least within the next four years. The issue being that the supply chain isn't there, the workers aren't there, the skills don't really translate. Um there was an article in CNN uh discussing how Motorola had tried to have its own plant uh in the US where they were building smartphones and that folded in a year because the workers just had the choice between uh you know, working in a factory, having to develop skills or working in the restaurant industry. And it's you know, the question was, okay, what's going to take more time to learn? Uh and so that was an ongoing problem. They had initially said they were investing 500 billion in February. Then the the idea of building in the US became an issue, especially around the time the tariffs came out. Uh Tim Cook had kind of made the idea to move US bound iPhones out of China and into India to get around those tariffs. And the Trump administration didn't really appreciate that. And that's when you had these calls uh for Apple to, you know, build in the US. Uh there were some remarks that Trump had made about Tim Cook saying uh that he wasn't very happy with him uh at certain points. And so you have this hundred billion dollar investment, this meeting at the White House. Uh and then the same day, uh President Trump had said at that meeting that he was going to be doing the 100% tariff on semiconductors unless companies build in the US and that Apple would likely avoid that tariff because of the moves that it's making. So obviously, you know, Tim Cook is a smart executive. obviously he's been the CEO for Apple for years because of that. and this is just kind of the the latest show of that kind of uh gamesmanship that he's he's able to work through. Related Videos Trump's ongoing trade deals lack clarity: 3 unanswered questions CoreWeave rises ahead of earnings, Firefly sinks: Trending Tickers Trump to remove IRS commissioner, NYT reports Chime CEO Says User Growth 'Seasonal' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Billy Long out as IRS commissioner after just 2 months
Billy Long out as IRS commissioner after just 2 months

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Billy Long out as IRS commissioner after just 2 months

Washington — Billy Long, the commissioner of the IRS, is leaving his post after just two months on the job, a White House official confirmed to CBS News. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the IRS temporarily, the official said. President Trump is expected to nominate Long for an ambassadorship. The news was first reported by The New York Times. Long was confirmed by the Senate in mid-June and took over the IRS after some tumult for the tax collection agency's leadership. The IRS has had several interim commissioners since Mr. Trump's return to office in January, including one who lasted for just 48 hours. The Trump administration has aimed to dramatically trim the agency's workforce. A former auctioneer and Missouri Republican congressman, Long was chosen to take over the IRS late last year after previously pushing to repeal much of the tax code during his time in the House. Long isn't an accountant by trade, but Mr. Trump touted his time as a tax adviser. After retiring from Congress in 2023, Long advised businesses on the Employee Retention Tax Credit, drawing criticism from Democrats who noted the credit's high rate of fraud. The IRS has been a focus of the Trump administration's government-wide staff cuts. The agency drew up plans earlier this year to cut its 102,000-person workforce by as much as 40% through a combination of layoffs and voluntary resignations, according to an internal memo obtained by CBS News in April. The cuts were set to begin after April 15, which is the deadline for most Americans to file their taxes. As of May, some 25,000 staffers had left the IRS, a 25% decrease from February levels, according to a report by the IRS's internal watchdog, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Around 26% of the IRS's revenue agents — the staff who conduct audits — had left the agency by May, the report found. Meanwhile, staff from the Department of Government Efficiency — a cost-cutting team once led by billionaire Elon Musk — sought access to the IRS's tax data system, sparking a lawsuit. Former IRS acting head Melanie Krause left the agency in April over a plan to share tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help identify undocumented immigrants. She was replaced by Gary Shapley, a longtime IRS agent who became well-known for speaking about alleged political influence in the Hunter Biden tax investigation. But Shapley was ousted after just two days following a dispute between Musk and Bessent. Bessent complained to Mr. Trump that Shapley had been installed at the urging of Musk and sought the president's approval to undo the decision, multiple sources told CBS News at the time. Global stock markets react to Trump's sweeping tariffs in effect now Sean "Diddy" Combs wants to go back to Madison Square Garden in the future, attorney says Israel's Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza City

Tariff Uncertainty on Gold Bars Sparks Chaos in Bullion Market
Tariff Uncertainty on Gold Bars Sparks Chaos in Bullion Market

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tariff Uncertainty on Gold Bars Sparks Chaos in Bullion Market

Key Takeaways Gold futures prices in New York jumped to record levels early Friday after it was reported that the U.S. had placed tariffs on gold bars from Switzerland. Financial Times reported Thursday that the levies had been placed on the most common weight of gold bullion from Switzerland as of early April. Gold mining stocks closed higher Friday, while gold futures pared earlier gains on news of the Trump administration's plans to clarify that no levies would be imposed on gold market was whiplashed by on-and-possibly-off again tariffs imposed on Swiss bullion. The Financial Times first reported on Thursday that the U.S. had placed levies on gold bars. On Friday morning, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection service's website showed a letter ruling from the service dated July 31, saying cast gold 1-kilogram bullion and 100-troy-ounce bullion bars from Switzerland should be placed under customs classifications that are subject to tariffs that were effective as of April 5. Gold futures prices in New York rose to record levels, briefly hitting a high of $3,500 per troy ounce on Friday, and were trading at a premium over benchmark spot prices in London. That futures prices spiked over spot would make sense—they typically trade at a premium, because there is no carry cost embedded in spot. Buyers of gold futures, however, are locking in a price for delivery at a future date, which, for gold bars, would include relevant expenses like the cost of storage. Gold futures pared gains to around $3,450 per troy ounce, pushing its premium to spot down to normalized levels, following a Bloomberg report that the Trump administration would in the "near-future" issue an executive order clarifying that there would be no duties imposed on gold bars from Switzerland. News of Swiss Gold Bar Tariff Also Boosts Mining Shares Gold mining stocks, including Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Royal Gold (RGLD), and US Gold Corp. (USAU), closed higher on Friday, outperforming the broad market. Trump announced levies of 31% for Switzerland in April, but raised the rate to 39% last week. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter reportedly left Washington, D.C., without a deal in hand earlier this week, according to Reuters. One-kilo bars are the most commonly traded size of gold bars on the world's largest gold futures market, COMEX. If tariffs on gold are imposed, Switzerland would be in a tight spot. According to statistics for 2024 compiled by Trading Economics based on the United Nations international trade database, pearls, precious stones, metals, and coins are the country's second-highest imports to the U.S. by value, behind only pharmaceuticals. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store