Wellington's Well Sushi fined after not paying 'vulnerable' migrant worker minimum wage
Photo:
lev dolgachov
The employment watchdog has ordered a Lower Hutt sushi restaurant pay $30,000 in penalties after it didn't pay a migrant worker the minimum wage and failed to pay for some of their leave.
The Employment Relations Authority found that Well Sushi failed to meet a range of employment standards which negatively affected a vulnerable migrant worker.
These were failing to keep accurate time records, not paying the minimum wage, not providing the full annual holiday entitlement, not paying time-and-a-half for holiday work and not paying for sick leave.
The business was ordered to pay $53,940 in wage arrears which has since been given to the worker who was now a permanent resident of New Zealand.
On top of that Well Sushi now had to fork out $30,000 for the breaches.
The labour inspector responsible for the case said the restaurant had fallen short of good behaviour expected of employers.
"Well Sushi's conduct has undermined the obligations of mutual trust and confidence that should exist in any employment relationship."
The inspector noted the affected employee was a migrant worker on a work visa, sponsored by the business.
They said it made the worker "inherently vulnerable" particularly due to little personal experience of New Zealand employment standards and little ready access to support and information about those standards or enforcement of them.
The restaurant argued that penalties should not be imposed and that the breaches were partly "inadvertent".
Labour inspectorate investigations manager for the central/southern region, Taahera Begum said while it was pleasing Well Sushi had paid the worker the arrears owed, it was important employers realised breaching employment standards could have serious consequences.
"The fact that the wage arrears in this case amounted to more than $50,000 is a sign of how much this employee was disadvantaged by his employer, someone he no doubt trusted."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Should Eftpos and cash-users get a discount?
The government plans to ban surcharges on card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. Photo: RNZ / Leonard Powell Don't expect a discount if you're paying with Eftpos or cash when the new contactless surcharge ban takes effect - but businesses are being put on notice that they shouldn't need to raise prices by more than 1 percent. It was announced on Monday that legislation would be introduced to Parliament to ban surcharges for in-store credit card transactions by the end of the year . Café and roastery owner Richard Corney said it would prompt him to put up prices because he could not absorb the cost himself. He said he paid $12,000 in merchant fees in 2023. Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young said the cost to businesses could be significant and all customers would end up bearing it, rather than simply those using contactless cards. "If businesses have to increase their prices to take into account those that pay by contactless and you pay by cash or Eftpos, you're still swiped." She said it was unlikely that retail businesses would offer discounts to those using other payment methods. Recommended retail prices were set at a level that took into account all the business's costs, she said. Small businesses had limited power to negotiate on the card fees they were charged, she said, and they had to be able to accept the payment methods to be able to do business. Corney said he would not offer discounts to those using cash or Eftpos. "Given the government is removing a cost recovery mechanism for merchant fees in general, there's still a net cost to businesses like ours, despite the regulated interchange fees." Infometrics chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan said cash transactions were not free for businesses, either. "I imagine in today's world where very few people pay in cash, the implicit cost associated with the hassle of needing to have appropriate change, finding time to taking money to the bank is reasonably high as a proportion of each transaction. For a small business, that cost is probably not properly accounted for, and might even be zero in accounting terms because the owner is effectively doing it in their own time. "The subsidisation by Eftpos transactions is probably more clear-cut, because there is a reasonably obvious gap in the charges for credit/PayWave transactions vs debit/Eftpos, with little or no difference in the associated work for the business receiving payment. I'd expect to see some more retailers reverting to not accepting credit cards, assessing that the possible inconvenience for their customers is outweighed by the cost savings for their business." But how much can prices reasonably rise? Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson said the change would take effect after interchange fees were capped, so they should not be as high as they have been. Consumer NZ spokesperson Jessica Walker said the fee reduction that was expected from late November should reduce the cost to business significantly. "Our stance is that those costs are going to be lower so even if businesses decide to increase prices because of the surcharge ban, that increase should be about 1 percent." She said that was preferable to some of the complaints Consumer received, which reported surcharges up to 25 percent. "The current situation is a mess, it's not working." She said a change in 2022 when the Retail Payment Systems Act took effect was meant to save money but those savings had not been experienced by shoppers. "The decision to ban surcharges should mean there is more money in shoppers' back pockets. Without a ban, there's no guarantee the savings will be passed on." But Young said it was likely that the surcharge ban would prompt more people to move to contactless payments, which would increase the costs overall, even if each charge was smaller. "It would have been great for the minister to let the Commerce Commission go through a proper consultation process." She said a range of surcharges were being charged at present but it would have been useful to allow the interchange caps to take effect and see what the effect was. "The Commerce Commission was going to run a consultation around surcharges," he said. Young said she had expected that could lead to new limits. Walker said open banking should also help to reduce the cost of payments.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Cabinet Ministers defend hiking board fees for Crown bodies
Nicola Willis says the very best people need to be making governance decisions. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Cabinet ministers are defending a move to hike board fees for Crown bodies by up to 80 percent, insisting those in the roles are overseeing billions of dollars - not just "beer and skittles." Labour says the decision proves the government is out-of-touch with the cost-of-living crisis and has accused it of trying to sneak the news by the public. A Cabinet document, quietly uploaded online on Monday, shows ministers agreed to lift the maximum annual fee for chairs of governance boards from $90,000 to about $162,000. The "Cabinet Fees Framework" is not binding but provides guidance to ministers when deciding compensation for those on a range of bodies, such as royal commissions and ministerial inquiries. Speaking on Tuesday, Luxon said public sector fees had become completely "out of whack" with private sector rates and needed a reset. "We need to make that a little bit more competitive, so that we can actually attract good talent," he said. Luxon said paying more to ensure "really good governance teams" could save billions in the long run. Finance Minister Nicola Willis echoed the point, stressing that New Zealanders deserved value for money. "This isn't beer and skittles. This is billions of dollars of public money. We need the very best people making governance decisions about it." Public Service Minister Judith Collins told reporters that the updated fees still fell short of private sector rates - around 80 percent of the going rate. "A lot of people who are experienced directors don't want to do these jobs in the public sector because they know they're going to lose money," she said. Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Collins said she did not think the public would be worried by the news. "One of the problems is that we've had an underperforming public service that's taken a hell of a lot of taxpayers' money, and so it is very important that we have the right people in charge of that." Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the decision revealed the government's "twisted priorities" at a time when households were doing it tough. "They're saying that board members can get up to 80 percent increases in their pay, whilst nurses and teachers are being told to settle for 1 pecent or less," he said. "They've said everyone needs to tighten their belts - apparently except for the people who they hand-picked to put on public sector boards." Hipkins rejected the idea that higher fees were necessary to attract quality candidates, calling it "absolute nonsense." Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He said many public appointees had altruistic motivations and were already sitting on "very well paid directorships" in the private sector as well. "They're not doing it for the money," Hipkins said. Hipkins accused the government of trying to "slip this [announcement] out quietly" without scrutiny. But Luxon denied any secrecy: "It's normal practice... how it's been communicated."
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Builders awaiting detail on government's bid to drive costs down
A carpenter working in a workshop. Photo: 123rf Builders dealing with astronomical prices for building supplies are keenly waiting to see if the government's intervention will make any difference. The government has opened the door for builders to access approved supplies from overseas - such as plasterboard, cladding systems, external doors, and windows - in an attempt to bring down costs for consumers. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the list would have the potential to reduce total building costs by thousands of dollars when building a home. Builders across New Zealand have faced increasing cost pressures. For example, New Zealand has some of the most expensive plasterboard in the world, paying around 38 percent more than Australia and 47 percent more than the UK, Penk said. Builder and managing director of Substruct Steve Brown said the government's changes were a good thing but wanted to see how it would play out. "Building prices just like everything has pretty much doubled over the last few years," Brown said. He said it is hard for builders to choose a new product that's "not tried and tested". "I've been in the industry for 30 years, there's some products that work and some that don't. So, to pick up a new product is kind of, a little bit scary when you gaurantee something for 10 years," Brown said. Registered Master Builders Association chief executive Ankit Sharma said the government's announcement would help to reduce the construction costs and increase product availability across the sector. "By allowing overseas products that meet standards to be used more readily, we can improve supply chain resilience, reduce delays and ultimately deliver more homes, faster and more affordably," Sharma said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
