Cabinet Ministers defend hiking board fees for Crown bodies
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
Cabinet ministers are defending a move to
hike board fees for Crown bodies
by up to 80 percent, insisting those in the roles are overseeing billions of dollars - not just "beer and skittles."
Labour says the decision proves the government is out-of-touch with the cost-of-living crisis and has accused it of trying to sneak the news by the public.
A Cabinet document, quietly uploaded online on Monday, shows ministers agreed to lift the maximum annual fee for chairs of governance boards from $90,000 to about $162,000.
The "Cabinet Fees Framework" is not binding but provides guidance to ministers when deciding compensation for those on a range of bodies, such as royal commissions and ministerial inquiries.
Speaking on Tuesday, Luxon said public sector fees had become completely "out of whack" with private sector rates and needed a reset.
"We need to make that a little bit more competitive, so that we can actually attract good talent," he said.
Luxon said paying more to ensure "really good governance teams" could save billions in the long run.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis echoed the point, stressing that New Zealanders deserved value for money.
"This isn't beer and skittles. This is billions of dollars of public money. We need the very best people making governance decisions about it."
Public Service Minister Judith Collins told reporters that the updated fees still fell short of private sector rates - around 80 percent of the going rate.
"A lot of people who are experienced directors don't want to do these jobs in the public sector because they know they're going to lose money," she said.
Judith Collins.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Collins said she did not think the public would be worried by the news.
"One of the problems is that we've had an underperforming public service that's taken a hell of a lot of taxpayers' money, and so it is very important that we have the right people in charge of that."
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the decision revealed the government's "twisted priorities" at a time when households were doing it tough.
"They're saying that board members can get up to 80 percent increases in their pay, whilst nurses and teachers are being told to settle for 1 pecent or less," he said.
"They've said everyone needs to tighten their belts - apparently except for the people who they hand-picked to put on public sector boards."
Hipkins rejected the idea that higher fees were necessary to attract quality candidates, calling it "absolute nonsense."
Chris Hipkins.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
He said many public appointees had altruistic motivations and were already sitting on "very well paid directorships" in the private sector as well.
"They're not doing it for the money," Hipkins said.
Hipkins accused the government of trying to "slip this [announcement] out quietly" without scrutiny.
But Luxon denied any secrecy: "It's normal practice... how it's been communicated."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic
The Treasury briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Photo: FANATIC STUDIO / SCIENCE PHOTO L The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4 percent of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35 percent of the costs of the response. A further 18 percent came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. RNZ has approached Labour for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Dangers Of Excessive Spending Highlighted
Minister of Finance Treasury's latest report highlights the dangers of excessive government spending, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The Treasury's Long-term Insights Briefing released today explores the role of fiscal policy in economic shocks and crises including the way government finances were used during and after the Covid-19 pandemic. It says the response, which wound up costing $66 billion, about twice the cost of the Canterbury earthquakes (as a proportion of GDP) also shows the challenges of using big spending measures to respond to one-off shocks. 'Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning,' Nicola Willis says. 'The report makes clear significant errors were made in the fiscal response to Covid. Treasury is urging policy makers not to repeat those mistakes. Our Government will not. 'The briefing notes that the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund was established in May 2020 to 'support a timely economic response and public confidence' but as the economy recovered, the then-government was advised against further stimulating in favour of more targeted support. 'Unfortunately, the Labour government ignored that advice. The consequence was undisciplined spending that pushed up inflation, eroded New Zealand's previously low public debt position, and fuelled a cost-of-living crisis. 'The briefing makes particular mention of programmes 'not tied to the shock (that) had a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years'. 'That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach initially intended for a pandemic response. 'The lesson from Labour's mishandling of the Covid response is that while there are times when governments have to increase spending in response to major events the fiscal guardrails should be restored as soon as possible. 'Kiwis can take confidence from the current Government's commitment to strong and responsible fiscal and economic management.'
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Review ordered into product labels
The government has officially labelled product labels a problem and ordered a review. It said we currently have 30 codes, standards and regulations, and that is too many, with the current requirements costly, frustrating, complex and outdated. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
