California Republicans sue to hold up Democratic redistricting plan
Aug 19 (Reuters) - Four California Republicans have filed a lawsuit seeking to block Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting plan, which would create five new Democratic U.S. congressional seats in his state to counter a similar move by Republicans in Texas.
The Republican lawmakers argue in their emergency petition to the California Supreme Court that the state constitution prohibits lawmakers from acting on the redistricting bills until Sept. 18 because new legislation requires a 30-day review period.
More: Why Democrats have limited power to fight Republican redistricting
The lawmakers asked the court to block Democratic lawmakers from moving forward with the legislation until Sept. 18.
The lawsuit comes as Newsom seeks a tit-for-tat expansion of California's U.S. House of Representatives delegation to match a redistricting in Texas that would net Republicans five more seats.
The Texas redistricting broke with a tradition where lawmakers only draw new electoral maps after the once-a-decade census. The move drew praise from Republican President Donald Trump but was criticized by Democrats, who said it was nakedly partisan.
The move by Texas led to a two-week standoff between Republicans who control the legislature and Democrats, who left the state to deny a quorum needed to advance the redistricting bill. Democrats returned to the statehouse on Aug. 18.
Redistricting, where lawmakers redraw electoral maps for partisan advantage, is not uncommon in the U.S. but typically happens after the census every 10 years. The next census is in 2030.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Host Has Lame Defense For Why Gavin Newsom's Tweets Are Bad, But Trump's Are Not
Fox Newshost Dana Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching towardCalifornia Gov. Gavin Newsom's trend oftrolling tweets on Tuesday's episode of'The Five.' But doing so required her to ignore the reason for the governor's recent mockery of Donald Trump's social media style and insisted Newsom is just being a copycat. Newsom has recently been mocking MAGA by mimicking the president's all-caps online posts, complete with insults and ludicrously narcissistic praise of himself. In the process, Trump lovers like Kid Rock have gotten themselves in a MAGA tizzy over the posts. On Monday, Perino suggested with a straight face that Newsom has 'to stop it with the Twitter thing,' claiming he was 'making a fool' of himself in the process. Many people on social media mocked Perino's complaints about Newsom's posts because many of them are direct copies of previous Trump posts. As a result, she faced accusations of hypocrisy and having a partisan double standard where mean tweets are concerned. Related: Newsom's Press Office responded with an all-caps post that began, 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching by saying, 'We get the joke,' though her excuse required her to be humorless. Related: 'He was reading tweets that were written for him by people that he is heavily investing in to try to help him look more like Trump, I guess,' she said. 'I mean, I thought they hated Trump, but they're trying to be more like him and they have to pay people to do it.' She also insisted that the problem she had with Newsom's posts is that they weren't authentic. She added: 'You're trying to do somebody else who you say is Hitler, and you think that we don't get the joke. Oh, no, we get the joke. It's just not funny.' Perino's co-host, Jesse Watters, also seemed a bit miffed at Newsom for following the lead of the GOP's fearless leader. 'They claim conservatives don't get the joke, we do ― we just think you look like a tool,' he said without irony. Both Perino and Watters' lame defenses of their partisan double standards were mocked by others on social media. Related... Fox News' Dana Perino Called Out For Hypocrisy Over Gavin Newsom Posts Kid Rock Goes Into Meltdown Mode After Getting Punked By Gavin Newsom's X Account Gavin Newsom's Troll Job Of Trump Is Working Incredibly Well Poli Sci Experts Predict What Exactly Gavin Newsom's Mockery Of Trump Could Achieve
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC
A National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car early Wednesday morning approximately a mile away from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. The D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department said in a statement that the crash occurred at the intersection of 8th Street SE and North Carolina Avenue SE. The civilian driver was trapped in the car, rescued and transported to a local hospital with minor injuries, the statement said. The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) said officers responded to reports of the crash at 6:18 a.m. EDT and 'upon arrival officers discovered a two-car accident involving a government vehicle.' The driver was 'conscious and breathing' when taken to the hospital for 'non-life-threatening injuries,' MPD said. The military vehicle was a D.C. National Guard Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected All-Terrain Vehicle and was part of a five-vehicle convoy and an MPD cruiser, the National Guard said in a statement reported by local news outlets. The National Guard is investigating the incident, the statement said. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) was asked about the incident at a press conference later Wednesday and said, 'I actually haven't gotten a readout on that collision yet, other than I know we had a person, I believe one person transported for medical attention. So I can't really say more,' NewsNation reported. The incident comes after President Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in an effort to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. Several Republican governors have joined his effort, bringing the total number of troops in the city to nearly 2,000.
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, but judge says government can release info
A judge denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman's Aug. 20 decision came as President Donald Trump has sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. (Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Daniel Wallis and David Gregorio)
