PM tells World Bank delegation: India's IWT actions threaten key global pacts
In a meeting with Ousmane Dione, Vice President of the World Bank for MENAAP, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed what he described as the bank's 'principled' support for Pakistan's position on the water dispute with India.
He reiterated Islamabad's demand for adherence to international law, portraying India's conduct as reckless and destabilising.
'We will not compromise on our water rights or regional stability,' said Sharif, calling for dialogue but emphasising the need for justice.
Sharif offered strong praise to the World Bank for its longstanding partnership, specifically thanking Bank President Ajay Banga and former Pakistan Country Director Najy Benhassine for advancing the new Country Partnership Framework (CPF).
The CPF, he noted, focuses on critical sectors such as energy, climate change, governance, and human capital – areas in which Pakistan is seeking urgent transformation.
He also highlighted the World Bank's 'decisive' role during the catastrophic 2022 floods, which displaced millions. The bank's emergency funding, he said, was essential in kick-starting relief and reconstruction efforts.
In a carefully worded response, Dione commended Sharif's reform agenda and acknowledged Pakistan's fragile yet ongoing macroeconomic recovery. He credited Sharif's government with restoring investor confidence and steering the country towards more inclusive growth.
Both sides concluded the meeting with commitments to expand cooperation, with Dione describing the partnership as 'strategic' and long-term. But beneath the diplomatic formalities, Pakistan's message remained unambiguous: it will not remain silent while regional water security is put at risk.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
China and America — competitive coexistence
The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article Last week while discussing Sino-US rivalry, we concluded the improbability of a war over Taiwan. And although the US leads in many critical sectors, China is rapidly closing the capability gap, as capacity or scale has never been a problem for Beijing. This piece will discuss additional facets of Sino-US competition. The comparison of both countries' national power potential (NPP) becomes confusing, as there are strong arguments on both sides which gravitate to declare either side a winner. In the May-June 2025 issue of Foreign Affairs, Kurt M Campbell and Rush Doshi argue that China has the advantage of 'scale and mass' compared to a 'strategically distracted and politically paralysed US'. They define 'scale' as the ability to use 'size' for generating efficiency and productivity to outcompete rivals. They dispel the notion that 'an aging, slowing, and increasingly nimble China would not overtake an ascendant US in due course of time.' They make the case that on many critical metrics, PRC has already outmatched the US. And even if China falters and slows down, as many pundits believe, it remains formidable technologically, militarily and economically. For China, scale or 'quantity has a quality all its own' as the Soviet leaders used to say about the USSR. To undo the Chinese advantage of scale — the cited writers recommend - Washington should revamp its alliances, shunning the legacy approach of treating allies as 'dependent recipients of protection'; and instead consider its alliance architecture as a collection of 'managed relationships' for pooled and integrated capacity across military, economic and technological domains. They posit that the US must play for 'cohesion and collective leverage' against Beijing, playing for 'time and mass'. The combined economies of America, together with its main anti-China allies including Canada, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand and EU are $60 trillion, compared to China's $18 trillion. In the absence of cited alliance, China is destined to win the race for power and hegemony all over the world, except Europe, where the US power is likely to be confined, in the mid to long-term. Despite China's challenges such as demography, dependency ratio (adult workers to children and retirees), labour shortfalls (compensated by AI and robotics in future) and debt, China will continue to play the long game. Using the World Bank methodology, China economically 'surpassed' the US about a decade ago and is 25% larger today. PRC's productive capacity is three times larger than the US; its share of global manufacturing is 30% compared to America's 15% (projected to come down to 11% by 2030); China's cement production is 20 times, steel 13 times, cars 3 times, power generation 2 times larger than the US. China produces almost half of the world's chemicals, three quarters of electric batteries, more than two-thirds of electric vehicles, half of the world's ships, 80% of consumer drones, 90% of solar panels and almost monopolises rare earths' supply chain. China has helped install half of the world's industrial robots (seven times larger than the US) and is way ahead of the US in fourth-generation nuclear technology. So, rise of the Middle Kingdom to Global prominence is only a matter of time. Realising the above inevitability, another analyst, Rana Mitter in the cited magazine, emphasises co-existence with China urging the West Plus to avoid policies that make conflict inescapable. To him, China ardently follows the Qing Dynasty (ruled 1644-1912) slogans of "Rich Country and Strong Army" and "Chinese for Essence and Western for Usage". Under President Xi Jinping, China has continued to pursue a 'harmonious world'; democracy with Chinese characteristics; and material progress without becoming Western. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made PRC militarily strong and economically secure. It has pursued the 'Confucian Canon Project', stressing the importance of harmony in public life. China's upward trajectory is likely to continue unless it involves itself or is drawn into military conflict. Although, Chinese nationalists would want Beijing to have a more muscular, aggressive and assertive international and regional posturing, shunning the image of a 'hesitant power'. A conflict would scare away China's neighbours especially in Southeast Asia, with whom China has territorial disputes, driving them to anti-China camp more staunchly. Conflict also erodes China's soft power. CCP understands this, hence, believing in peaceful rise, it would avoid conflict over Tiawan, as argued last week. The Party in all pragmatism, would de-prioritise its quest for unification of Taiwan with mainland and continue with military 'posturing' only. China's present and future leadership see value in 'cooperative existence' within an inter-connected and inextricably linked world. Beijing has recently moved to that position by becoming peacemaker in the Middle East like other cooperative actors Türkiye, Qatar, the UAE, etc, even though their internal policies are not reflective of democracy and other trappings of Western-styled governance. China would need to overcome global scepticism about its intentions, as some analysts argue. And sell itself abroad like America does, despite internal discord within the US over various issues. As the world sees more strongmen in positions of power and democracy eroding, China's humanistic values steeped in Confucianism can lead to greater peace and amity under some sort of 'authoritarian welfarism'. Beijing can champion clean and green energy, for example, humanise AI, emerge as a technology hub and a centre of hybrid cultures fusing elements from China and the West, creating a more peaceful Global Order than the one that brought wars, destruction, pain and suffering. A Wess Mitchel partially emphasises the above sentiment by stressing "The Return of Great-Power Diplomacy" as a way forward. Since the US is increasingly becoming militarily incapable to fight forever wars, especially in the future against China and Russia simultaneously, it must return to 'strategic diplomacy' by containing the weaker (Russia) partner through détente and focusing against the stronger (China) and nudge Europe along. He also emphasises building the largest possible coalition against China, starting in Aisa. From the above discussion, one thing is clear. Chinese power is unsettling to the West with strong contenders for containing it or coexisting with it competitively. Drawing Beijing into war may be necessary for Western hawks, and CCP needs to reckon with it.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Federal cabinet approves National AI Policy 2025
The federal cabinet on Wednesday approved the National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy 2025, aimed at transforming Pakistan into a digitally empowered economy by establishing a full-fledged AI ecosystem and promoting inclusive access to emerging technologies, the Prime Minister's Office said in a statement. Chairing the meeting, PM Shehbaz Sharif said that youth are Pakistan's most valuable asset, and providing them with modern education, especially in AI, is a national priority. He noted that the government is already leveraging AI in tax reforms to enhance revenue and improve governance. The policy lays out a strategic roadmap to integrate AI across public services, education, agriculture, and economic development, while addressing data security, ethics, and environmental concerns. Key highlights of the AI Policy 2025 include: Creation of a comprehensive national AI ecosystem. Establishment of AI Innovation Fund and AI Venture Fund to support private sector development. Training of 1 million AI professionals by 2030. 3,000 scholarships annually, 50,000 AI-enabled civic projects, and 1,000 local AI products over the next five years. Focused inclusion of women and differently-abled persons in the AI workforce. Strengthening of cybersecurity and national data protection frameworks. Alignment with global AI regulations and international partnerships. The policy was developed through extensive consultation with stakeholders from the public sector, academia, industry, and civil society. To ensure implementation, the government will establish a high-level AI Council and a detailed Master Plan with Action Matrix. The prime minister praised the Ministry of IT and allied institutions for their forward-looking work in preparing the policy and underscored the importance of timely policymaking to harness AI's global potential.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Cabinet approves Hajj policy 2026: govt-private quota set at 70:30
The federal cabinet, chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, on Wednesday approved the Hajj Policy 2026 with a focus on full digitization of Hajj operations and enhanced pilgrim facilitation. As per the new policy, Pakistan's total Hajj quota for 2026 will be distributed with 70% allocated to the government scheme and 30% to private Hajj operators, officials from the Ministry of Religious Affairs informed the cabinet. The prime minister lauded the digitization efforts, saying that ensuring seamless services for pilgrims remained a top priority. He directed the Ministry of Religious Affairs to strictly implement the policy and ensure transparency and convenience for all intending pilgrims. Umrah or Hajj: Govt seeks CII's guidance on 'Mehram requirement' for female pilgrims Key features of the Hajj policy 2026 include: Full digitization of the Hajj process with real-time monitoring of applications, payments, and services. Third-party validation of both public and private Hajj operations. Minimum quota of 2,000 pilgrims per private operator to ensure accountability. 1,000 seats reserved for hardship cases. Accommodation, meals, SIM cards, digital wristbands, and emergency compensation for all pilgrims. Upgrade of the Pak Hajj mobile application for training, complaints, and payment tracking. It was also disclosed that private companies responsible for mishandling Hajj 2025 arrangements will be required to accommodate affected pilgrims in 2026. The cabinet unanimously approved the policy and appreciated the efforts of relevant ministries and officials involved in its formulation. The Prime Minister also directed the Ministry of IT to support the Ministry of Religious Affairs in ensuring complete digitization of Hajj operations
