Man gets 10 years for abetting wife's suicide over dowry
Bhopal/Jabalpur: A sessions court in Jabalpur has sentenced a man to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment, and imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh for dowry harassment and abetment of his wife's suicide.
Two of his cousins, named as co-accused, were also found guilty, and handed one-year jail terms along with fines of Rs 1,000 each.
According to the prosecution, the victim, Titiksha Tiwari, was married to Nitin Shukla on Feb 6, 2013. Both are residents of Jabalpur but her husband had a job in Tamil Nadu and was posted at Kanchipuram. Her in-laws demanded Rs 8 lakh in cash and other goods in dowry but the girl's family expressed inability to meet their demand.
Ultimately, both the parties agreed to marriage with the woman's family paying Rs 4 lakh in cash and giving other household goods worth Rs 2.5 lakh.
Appearing for the family of the deceased woman, who committed suicide on Sept 18, 2023 at their house in Kanchipuram, advocate Narendra Jain said Titiksha had moved to Kanchipuram after marriage but she was being constantly subjected to torture by her husbsand Nitin Shukla, her mother in-law Kalpana Shukla and maternal cousins of her husband Anup Tiwari and Atul Tiwari.
She had apprised her parents of the pain and anguish she was going through because of their ill-treatment. Fed up with the torture, Titiksha committed suicide by hanging at her house in Kanchipuram on September 18, 2013. A suicide note was also recovered from her person following her death.
Family of the woman had lodged an FIR at Kotwali police station in Jabalpur. Following investigation, police accused her husband and her two cousins of dowry harassment and abetment of suicide in the charge-sheet presented in the court.
The trial court of judge Abhishek Saxena based on evidence produced in the court and statements of witnesses held the accused guilty and sentenced the husband of the woman to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and his cousins to 1 year each.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is a pen drive at centre of SMC-CID clash?
Ahmedabad: The dust may just be beginning to settle over the clash between two Gujarat police units, State Monitoring Cell (SMC) and CID (Crime), last week. In the meantime, new details emerged, suggesting that a pen drive could be at the centre of the flashpoint between the two units. According to sources, two relatively junior officers walked into the office of CID (Crime) chief Parikshita Rathod — a DIG-rank officer from the state police service — and questioned her about pending applications with the department. Alongside those inquiries, the two junior officers reportedly asked about a pen drive linked to a project in Gandhinagar. The pen drive had reportedly been in CID custody long before Rathod assumed her post, and she is said to have denied any knowledge of it. "It is obvious that the contents of the pen drive hold immense value to some officers," said a source close to the development. It is learnt that top bosses in the state govt are upset and seek to get to the bottom of the entire episode. On Monday, minister of state for home Harsh Sanghavi held a meeting with all the cops involved in the operation, seeking an account of what transpired during last week. Sources say this is not the first time details were sought from the CID (Crime) office. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo While Rathod was on leave last week, a police team from a different department reportedly approached her office to seek details about some pending inquiries. Neither DGP Vikas Sahay nor SMC DIG Nirlipt Rai responded to queries regarding the incident. For the uninitiated, the matter traces back to a complaint filed by a Vadodara-based businessman over a Rs 15 crore fraud involving a foreign company. Dissatisfied with CID's response, he is believed to have sought help from a 2013-batch IPS officer, who informed DIG Rai, leading to the SMC's intervention. The confrontation peaked when two SMC constables questioned Rathod and a fellow officer in her office. Following objections from CID officials, the constables were asked to leave. The internal discord prompted emergency meetings and the suspension of a police sub-inspector.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
400 sanitary workers arrested for holding road blockade protest in Coimbatore
COIMBATORE: The city police on Tuesday arrested more than 400 contract sanitary workers of the Coimbatore corporation for blocking the State Bank Road while conducting a sit-in protest in front of the district collectorate. It was the second consecutive day of the protest. Garbage was not collected in many areas of the city in the last two days due to their protest. More than 3,700 sanitary workers, vehicle drivers and other cadres are working in the city municipal corporation on a contract basis. The corporation was paying their salaries through private contractors. The district administration has fixed a daily wage of Rs 770 for the temporary sanitary workers and other cadres, but the contractors allegedly failed to provide the amount to the sanitary workers. Sanitary workers boycotted work and staged a sit-in protest in front of the district collectorate on Monday morning. They demanded that district collector Pavankumar G Griyappanavar intervene in the issue immediately. On Tuesday morning, more than 400 sanitary workers gathered in front of the district collectorate and sat on the busy State Bank Road. They staged a road roko, and traffic was badly affected. The police held talks with them, but the protesters refused to disperse from the place. The police arrested more than 400 sanitary workers and taken them away from the protest venue in vehicles. The sanitary workers said they would intensify their protest if their demands were not met.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gujarat court denies maintenance to woman who willingly resigned from job
Ahmedabad: A court turned down a woman's application seeking maintenance from her husband on the grounds that she had willingly resigned from her regular job. The JMFC court in Rajkot had first rejected the woman's request for maintenance in March 2023 because she was gainfully employed. Four months after this order, she resigned from her job and filed another application seeking maintenance, but the court dismissed the second application as well. The couple engaged in the legal battle got married in 2017. While the woman is from Rajkot, the husband lives in Gandhinagar. The woman, who is a PhD holder, got a job as an assistant professor in a Gandhinagar college. The couple lived together for eight months, and marital discord began, resulting in the woman filing multiple litigations against her husband and an FIR against him and the in-laws. O by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo ne of the applications filed in the court in 2019 was under Section 125 of CrPC seeking maintenance. She sought interim maintenance from her husband, claiming that he was earning Rs 1.50 lakh per month. The husband established that his salary was Rs 66,000, while the wife was earning Rs 31,000 per month. He also claimed that his wife was a careerist, and she did not want a child, and therefore left her matrimonial home. Moreover, the woman had several FDs in her name, and she admitted that she had no other liability. Four months after the court rejected the woman's application for interim maintenance, she voluntarily resigned from her job and filed another application on the grounds that she was unemployed and did not have any regular income. After perusing the resignation letter and relieving order, the court said, "The applicant left her job willingly. She holds a high degree and was getting a good salary of Rs 31,000 in this job… Considering all the circumstances, it does not appear proper to grant the applicant's application at this stage. A final decision on her application will be taken after the final hearing by considering all the evidence."
