Study: Utah a ‘middle of the pack' state for military retirees
Sort of — when compared with other states and the District of Columbia.
The Beehive State ranks about in the middle of the country in its ability to provide a comfortable military retirement, according to a study released by WalletHub.
Utah is ranked No. 29 in the study — scoring a high mark in the 'Economic Environment' rankings category, but much lower in 'Quality of Life' and 'Health Care' rankings.
The top five states for American military retirees, according to WalletHub, are South Carolina, Maryland, New Hampshire, North Dakota and Virginia.
The bottom five? The District of Columbia, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington and Oregon.
'Transitioning from military to civilian life isn't easy, but the best states for military retirees make that adjustment as smooth as possible,' said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo.
'In addition to providing the conditions necessary for our veterans to thrive financially, they also have ample resources for taking care of military retirees' physical and mental health.'
The study notes that many American men and women who wore their country's uniform face major struggles 'including post-traumatic stress disorder, disability and homelessness, which are especially difficult to deal with during this period of economic difficulty.'
Veterans also must consider how state policies on military benefits vary — along with the 'relative friendliness of different job markets and other socioeconomic factors' when deciding where to live following military retirement.
WalletHub compared Utah with other states' abilities to provide a comfortable military retirement by analyzing a data set of 28 key metrics — ranging from the number of veterans per capita to the number of Veterans Affairs health facilities to job opportunities for veterans.
Analysts measured three key dimensions: first, economic environment; second, quality of life; and third, health care.
The 'economic environment' dimension included several economic metrics such as how the state taxes military pensions, the share of veteran-owned businesses, job opportunities for veterans, the number of military bases, housing affordability and academic credit opportunities offered to veterans.
Given the state's strong overall economy, it's little surprise Utah was listed as fourth in the nation in that dynamic.
Utah didn't fare nearly as well in the 'quality of life' and 'health care' rankings — scoring 31st and 47th, respectively.
The 'quality of life' metrics include a state's share of veterans, share of VA benefits-administration facilities per number of veterans, share of homeless veterans and idealness of weather.
The 'health care' metrics include the number of VA health facilities per number of veterans, quality of VA hospitals, veteran suicide rates, and physicians and mental health counselors per capita.
South Carolina secured the study's 'Best State for Military Retirees' top spot because of its many veteran-friendly policies.
'The state allows businesses to give preferential hiring to veterans, offers academic credit for military service, and has veteran treatment courts, which give services like treatment and mentoring to veterans in the criminal justice system,' according to WalletHub.
'South Carolina doesn't tax military pensions, either.'
Maryland, meanwhile, finished just behind South Carolina in the rankings, in part because it offers extensive health care options and has a large number of VA Benefits Administration facilities per capita, ensuring veterans receive support.
Maryland also allows employers to give preference to veterans when hiring and has veteran treatment courts.
Despite the presence of large military facilities such as Hill Air Force Base and Camp Williams, Utah still has a comparatively small number of veterans per capita — ranked 48th.
Alaska, Montana, Virginia, Wyoming and Maine have the nation's highest concentrations of veterans.
For housing affordability, Iowa and Kansas offer veterans the best opportunities. Hawaii and California are at the bottom of the list.
But Kansas offers the fewest job opportunities for veterans, according to WalletHub. New Hampshire and Alabama top the 'job opportunities' tally.
Meanwhile, based on how states voted in the 2024 presidential election, red states are more friendly towards military retirees than blue states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Popular Fast Food Chain to Close Dozens of Locations: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Noodles & Company is set to close up to 32 of its restaurants across the United States by the end of 2025, the restaurant chain announced on Wednesday. The Colorado-based chain said in its 2025 second-quarter financial results that it will shutter between 28 and 32 company-owned restaurants this year and will open two sites. It comes as the company reported nationwide comparable restaurant sales growth, but a net loss and tighter liquidity. Newsweek reached out to Noodles & Company for comment via email outside of regular working hours. Why It Matters The expected 2025 closures represent around a 7 percent reduction in the company's footprint. The chain, which has been running since 1995, has around 400 restaurants across the U.S., according to the company. Several other American restaurant chains, including Denny's, Applebee's, TGI Fridays and Red Lobster, have also closed dozens of branches or filed for bankruptcy within the last year. Stock image of pasta. Stock image of pasta. GDA/AP What To Know Noodles & Company reported on Wednesday that comparable restaurant sales increased 1.5 percent overall in the second quarter, including a 1.5 percent increase at company-owned restaurants and a 1.6 percent increase at franchised sites. But total revenue decreased in the second quarter by 0.7 percent to $127.4 million. Net losses also stood at $17.6 million, compared to a loss of $13.6 million in the second quarter of 2024. As of July 1, the company had $2.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and outstanding debt of $108.3 million. In the second quarter, the company closed six company-owned restaurants and two franchise restaurants, but opened one new company-owned site. The restaurant closures come amid an attempted turnaround at the company, which included an overhaul of its menu in March. What People Are Saying Drew Madsen, Noodles & Company chief executive officer, said in a statement: "We are encouraged to have delivered positive comparable restaurant sales of 1.5 percent in the second quarter despite a challenging consumer environment that has led to heightened discounting and promotional activity across the industry. Our sales and traffic moderated after the initial successful rollout of our new menu due to the strong value-conscious climate as well as slower guest adoption of the upgrades made to some of our historic menu items. "We have been moving decisively to address these factors, particularly around guest value perception. Our new Delicious Duos value-focused platform, that launched at the beginning of August, is off to a great start. Comparable restaurant sales have increased to an average of positive five percent over the past two weeks, demonstrating that our value-focused initiatives are resonating with guests." Mike Hynes, Noodles & Company chief financial officer, said in a conference call on Wednesday, according to Restaurant Business Magazine: "We're very pleased with the results from closing under-performing restaurants. The closures have removed restaurants with negative cash flow from our system, and post closure, we've seen nearby Noodles restaurants experience an increase in sales and profits." What Happens Next Madsen is stepping down as the company's CEO this month and will be succeeded by Joe Christina, who will oversee the ongoing restaurant closures and openings this year.
Atlantic
15 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Trades National Security for a Deal With China
After making a show of getting tough on China, President Donald Trump desperately needs a trade agreement to prove that his disruptive tactics get results. This week, the United States and China agreed to extend their negotiations, avoiding—for now—another round of tariffs that would have hurt business between the world's two largest economies. But the president's newfound willingness to allow the export of vital AI chips to China indicates that an eventual deal could imperil American interests. Eager for a pact, Trump may give up more than he receives. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden prohibited the export of advanced AI chips to China. Just four months ago, Trump expanded those restrictions. This week, though, Trump confirmed the details of an unusual arrangement effectively reversing that move: The American companies Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices will be allowed to sell certain chips to Chinese firms if the companies give the U.S. government a 15 percent cut of the revenue from these sales. In essence, Trump sold exemptions to technology-export controls that many experts consider crucial to protecting American security. In a letter last month, Matt Pottinger, who was Trump's deputy national security adviser during the president's first term, and 19 other policy professionals urged the administration not to allow the sale of Nvidia's H20 chip to China, calling the decision a 'strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence.' Derek Thompson: The disturbing rise of MAGA Maoism Trump may see the arrangement not as a national-security issue but as a business deal: There's a lot of money to be made selling chips to China, and now the U.S. government will materially benefit. But Trump must also realize that he's made a concession to Chinese President Xi Jinping. Beijing has persistently demanded that Washington remove U.S. export controls on advanced chips, and Xi personally pressed Biden for relief without success. Trump justified his flip-flop by arguing that the H20 chip is not among Nvidia's most high-powered products. He's right about that, but it's far from outdated. Chinese companies crave the H20 to help them deploy AI services. Indeed, the demand for the H20 appears to have alarmed Chinese authorities, who would prefer that local companies use homemade alternatives. Even as Beijing fights the U.S. restrictions, officials have tried slowing the rush by signaling in state media that the Nvidia chip is unsafe. Although Chinese designers have developed a similar chip, they are unable to produce enough, also due to U.S. restrictions that prevent them from using the top chip manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Trump has left the door open to further concessions. Because China's tech industry still can't match Nvidia's AI chips, Beijing is likely to prod Trump to ease restrictions on more advanced semiconductors. Rather than firmly committing to export controls, Trump suggested on Monday that he would be open to permitting Nvidia to sell China downgraded versions of its most powerful chips. Xi has every reason to ask for more. Trump's desire for a deal gives Chinese leaders leverage. And given Trump's pattern of sudden policy reversals, he has likely left an impression that anything could be on the table. Beijing is clearly all in on the negotiations. According to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the Chinese government sent 75 officials to the most recent round of talks, in Stockholm in late July, compared with his own skeleton crew of 15. 'Xi now feels more emboldened to probe for a wider range of potential concessions, not only economic but also security concessions,' Ali Wyne, an expert on U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group, told me. Wyne fears this could lead to a 'lopsided bargain' in China's favor. Thomas Wright: Trump wasted no time derailing his own AI plan Xi has already gained on his top-priority issue: Taiwan. He urged Trump to approach Taiwan 'with prudence' during a phone conversation in June, according to the Chinese government's official summary. Washington then reportedly canceled meetings with Taiwan's defense minister, a step that surely pleased Beijing, which strives to isolate the island's government. The Trump administration also appears to have discouraged Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making stopovers in U.S. cities while en route to Latin America for diplomatic visits. Xi has done little in exchange. Beijing's most significant goodwill gesture was a June decision to restrict the sale of two chemicals that are used to make the illegal fentanyl circulating on American streets, an issue of utmost importance to the Trump team. But Beijing's action on curtailing the fentanyl trade will likely remain conditional on Trump's good behavior. Trump recently called on Xi in a social-media post to buy more U.S.-grown soybeans—which would be great for some American farmers, but is hardly an even swap for China's access to high-tech chips. Meanwhile, Xi has deftly created and deployed levers of pressure. Amid the escalating trade war in April, Beijing imposed controls on the export to the U.S. of rare-earth metals—an industry that China dominates—and then used their easing as a negotiating tool. In the end, Xi may not get all he wants. But he is winning just by talking. China's leaders have apparently learned that they can distract Trump from more strategic issues by haggling with him over tariff rates and soybean sales. The desire for a deal has so consumed the Trump team that any grander strategy to contend with China's growing power seems to have gotten lost. Last week, Trump imposed high tariffs on India in an attempt to compel New Delhi to curtail purchases of Russian oil—angering a potential partner in the global competition with China. Friendlier relations with China are certainly better than open hostility. The question has always been: At what cost? Trump may eventually seal a trade deal with China that benefits him, but not necessarily the nation.
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Investing In Pet Benefits Can Help Companies Win The Talent War
Cerys Goodall is the Founder and Principal at The Goods and advisor to Vetster. There are currently five generations in the workforce, which makes it nearly impossible to find benefits that appeal to all. Benefits like childcare assistance typically resonate with Gen-X, but for the growing number of Millennials and Gen-Z choosing not to have kids, these family-centric benefits offer little to no value to an increasing portion of the workforce. As HR teams look for universally resonant benefits, one overlooked area can offer a cross-generational appeal: pet care. According to recent research, 66% of American households own a pet. Given that over half of a company's workforce is likely to fall into this category of pet ownership, HR teams can leverage this to offer financial and wellness benefits that appeal to a wider range of employees. Easing Financial Burdens With rising veterinary costs and unstable economic times, many people are struggling to cover unexpected pet expenses, which I've found makes employer support in this area especially appreciated. A recent study by our company found that Gen-X and Gen-Z would both happily spend nearly $6,000 if it meant providing life-saving care to their pet, but the resources available to them to fund the expense vary widely, from Gen-X tapping their savings to Gen-Z selling their car or crowdfunding. Everyday pet expenses can add up quickly, even without factoring in emergency care situations that pop up. In our same study, pet parents who work from home reported saving an estimated $215 per month on pet care. Offering pet benefits is a remote-friendly option that can not only support employee well-being but also ease the financial pressures of modern pet ownership that all generations face. Supporting Mental Health Initiatives as simple and common as implementing a work-from-home model allow employees to spend more time with their pets, which can also help reduce anxiety. In fact, 51% of pet owners who work from home reported reduced stress levels, and 42% claimed they are "less worried about their pet's well-being." When in-office days are required, consider allowing your employees to bring pets into the office. This can offer similar emotional benefits, helping employees feel more supported and relaxed throughout the workday. Coworkers who don't have pets can reap the benefits, too, as we found that 73% of employees report having reduced stress when there are pets in the office. These mental health benefits can resonate across a multigenerational workforce, whether it's Gen-Z employees managing early-career stress, Millennials balancing young families or Boomers navigating caregiving roles. Implementing Pet Benefits Knowing that more than three in five employees (registration required) would consider leaving their job for a new role that offers more robust benefits and potentially lower pay, there is pressure on HR teams to find a benefits solution that appeals to everyone, regardless of demographic. Moreover, according to a OnePoll survey of 1,800 pet-owning employees (done on behalf of our company), 60% of pet parents "would consider leaving their job if it conflicted with their ability to care for their pet," and almost 10% already have. If you want to begin offering benefits for pet owners in your workforce, consider options like stipends for veterinary care, access to pet insurance and pet-friendly office spaces. While it is not possible to please everyone, tailoring benefits to the pet owners can be an effective way to create a balanced benefits option that provides both financial and mental health support. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
