National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC after Trump order
The president cast his actions as necessary to "rescue" Washington from a purported wave of lawlessness.
Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since.
It is the second time this summer that the Republican president has deployed troops to a city governed by Democrats.
A federal trial began yesterday in San Francisco on whether Mr Trump violated US law by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom.
"Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," Mr Trump said yesterday.
The Republican president has dismissed criticism that he is manufacturing a crisis to justify expanding presidential authority in a heavily Democratic city.
Hundreds of officers and agents from over a dozen federal agencies, including the FBI, ICE, DEA and ATF, have fanned out across the city in recent days.
Mr Trump said he would also send in the US military "if needed".
The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Mr Trump's claims that the city is a "hellscape", saying it is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year.
Violent crime fell 26% in the first seven months of 2025 after dropping 35% in 2024, and overall crime dropped 7%, according to the city's police department.
Over the past week, Mr Trump has intensified his messaging, suggesting he might attempt to strip the city of its local autonomy and implement a full federal takeover.
The District of Columbia, established in 1790, operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council.
Mr Trump said last week that lawyers are examining how to overturn the law, a move that would likely require Congress to revoke it.
In taking over the Metropolitan Police Department, Mr Trump invoked a section of the act that allows the president to use the force temporarily when "special conditions of an emergency nature" exist. Mr Trump said he was declaring a "public safety emergency" in the city.
The deployment of National Guard troops is a tactic the president used in Los Angeles, where he dispatched 5,000 troops in June in response to protests over his administration's immigration raids.
State and local officials objected to Mr Trump's decision as unnecessary and inflammatory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Starmer maintains Ukraine ceasefire is 'viable' ahead of London meeting with Zelenskyy
UK PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in London today Thursday, his office said, ahead of the key US-Russia summit in Alaska. Zelenskyy is to arrive at 9.30am at Downing Street, the prime minister's office said. Starmer has maintained there was now a 'viable' chance for a Ukraine ceasefire. Putin and Trump will meet tomorrow at an air base in Alaska, the first time the Russian leader has been permitted on Western soil since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine which has killed tens of thousands of people. Advertisement With such high stakes, all sides were pushing hard in the hours before the meeting. Zelenskyy, who has refused to surrender territory to Russia, spoke on thje phone with Trump yesterday, as did European leaders who voiced confidence afterward that the US leader would seek a ceasefire rather than concessions by Kyiv. Trump himself sent mixed messages, saying that he could quickly organize a three-way summit afterward with both Zelenskyy and Putin but also warning of his impatience with Putin. 'There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,' Trump told reporters. Russia, Trump said, would face 'severe consequences' if it does not halt its offensive. But Trump said: 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' involving both Putin and Zelenskyy. Related Reads Macron calls for the inclusion of Ukraine in planned talks between Putin and Trump next week Trump and Putin have agreed to meet in the next few days Putin pitched the meeting after Trump threatened sanctions on Russia. Trump has already ramped up tariffs on India, which has become a key buyer of Russian energy. Zelenskyy, after being berated by Trump at a February meeting in the White House, has publicly supported US diplomacy but made clear his deep skepticism. 'I have told my colleagues – the US president and our European friends – that Putin definitely does not want peace,' Zelenskyy said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who welcomed Zelenskyy in Berlin, said Ukraine is ready to negotiate 'on territorial issues' but stressed that legal recognition of Russian occupations 'would not be up for debate.' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte declared: 'The ball is now in Putin's court.'
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
High demand for Irish passports from US-applicants, with jump in UK requests post Brexit
A HIGH NUMBER of applicants from the US have applied for an Irish passport this year, with the latest figures for this year showing 26,111 applications have been submitted. While those numbers account for the first eight months of 2025, the year in which Donald Trump became American president for the second time, they have surpassed the 2022 figures. One of the more famous applicants is comedian Rosie O'Donnell, who is in the process of applying for an Irish passport through descent, according to The Irish Times. Advertisement Last year, a record number of 31,825 applications from US-based applicants were received. This is the highest number since 2016. In 2022, 25,736 were submitted from those based in the US, while in 2023, 29,014 applications were received. It is not just Americans that have been seeking to get an Irish passport in their pocket. Increase in UK applications post Brexit Numbers show that there has also been an increase in UK based applicants post Brexit. Since 2016, there has been continual growth in the number of applications from the UK. Related Reads Larry Donnelly: From Washington to the Áras, uncertainty reigns on both sides of the Atlantic Marion McKeone: Trump is truly rattled over Epstein - can he weather the storm? In 2016, the year those in the UK voted to leave the European Union, there were 131,633. The peak was in 2019, when there were 244,976 applications from those based in the UK. From 2022-2024, the figures are just shy off that mark. This year to date has seen 152,416 applications received. For context, the total passport applications received last year 1,000,640, with 603,782 applications being submitted so far this year. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What's at stake for Europe at the Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine?
Analysis: The build-up to the summit highlights European doubts and concerns about Russia's sincerity to halt aggression in Ukraine The end of the Cold War was once greeted in Europe as " the end of history". Both Naziism and communism - extreme ideologies that had caused violent turmoil and oppression during the 20th century – had collapsed. Liberal democracy had persevered and was unrivalled by the 1990s. Western governments viewed liberal political and economic reform as vital to nurture peace and security in post-communist Europe. An enlarged security community covering much of the northern hemisphere " from Vancouver to Vladivostok" was an active political aspiration to reduce risks from violent conflict. Institutionalised through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), this community aimed to enshrine the principles of the Helsinki Final Act agreed in 1975, most notably exclusive adherence to peaceful conflict resolution and no border changes by military force. All has changed. This vision for a pan-European security order defined by enduring peace has been shattered by Russia's military aggression, first in Georgia in 2008 and subsequently in Ukraine after 2014, with Moscow escalating its offensive in 2022. Ukrainians have suffered the most by far, but this war has also caused many reverberations that weaken wider security in Europe. When campaigning for a second US presidential term in 2024, Donald Trump claimed that he would resolve the war in Ukraine " in one day". But after his second term began in January 2025, Trump's administration has instead grappled with many arduous complications inflicted by Russia's aggression. In recent days, Trump has outlined his exploratory expectations for the US-Russia summit with Russia's president Vladimir Putin in Alaska this week. Describing the summit as a " feel-out meeting", Trump claims that he is seeking a measure on Putin's seriousness for peace in Ukraine. His US administration describes the summit as a " listening exercise". Efforts to assist peace in Ukraine must be welcomed once these efforts are sincere. From RTÉ News' Behind the Story podcast, why meeting Trump in Alaska is 'handing Putin victory' But the build-up to the summit highlights many continuing doubts on Putin's sincerity to halt Russian aggression. In Kyiv, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has raised concerns that Putin is "bluffing"about his intent to make peace. In Brussels, EU leaders fear that Putin will gain a diplomatic advantage over Trump to slowly ease Russia closer to the strategic aims it defined when it escalated its war in Ukraine in 2022. These aims included a forceful overthrow of the Ukrainian government; stifling stronger links between Ukraine and the EU and NATO; and consolidating a sphere of influence to insulate Russia's authoritarianism from the West's liberal democratic influences. Putin is considered to have got the better of Trump at the Helsinki Summit between the two presidents in 2018. After this meeting, Trump appeared to publicly support the Russian president's view that Moscow had not interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, despite contrary information communicated to him by America's own security agencies. Seeking to avoid being out-manoeuvred by Putin again, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences", meaning further sanctions will be proposed, should Russia refuse to take US peace efforts seriously. Missing the military power that converts into diplomatic clout, the EU is forced to watch a summit that will likely impact its future security from the sidelines. Trump has discussed " land swapping" as a means to settle the conflict while insisting that such arrangements can only be confirmed by direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. De jure border change is unacceptable for Ukraine. However, Kyiv might still painfully accept some de facto compromises understood as temporary until future political circumstances change to allow Ukraine to restore full functional sovereignty within borders benchmarked from its independence in 1991. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, 26 EU leaders say Ukraine should have freedom to decide its future Should Russia retain de facto military control over territories in eastern Ukraine, a large risk remains that Moscow will use this presence to slowly grind away to coerce and undermine Kyiv in its aims to accelerate Ukraine's democratisation and EU integration. The Trump administration has frustrated Ukrainian attempts to gain a clear pathway towards NATO accession. According to US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, "the United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement". The Alaska summit also offers Putin an opportunity to propose limitations on Ukraine's future military strength as a condition for Russia's consent to progress settlement talks. Washington is Ukraine's most important military supplier, handing Trump some leverage to pressure Zelenskyy to accept limits on Ukraine's future defence capabilities. This would undercut Ukraine's potential for independent deterrence but with Russia remaining free to replenish its military power to threaten Ukraine again. Observing developments on Ukraine, EU member states at the bloc's frontline with Russia remain concerned that Putin will skilfully manipulate Trump's peace efforts to instead piecemeal towards the aggressive aims he originally revealed in 2022. Should Russia gain such momentum, EU governments in Finland, the Baltic states and Poland anticipate that Moscow's military aggression will only gain further impetus. From RTÉ Radio 1's This Week, Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin from DCU on whether Russia is ready to end the war in Ukraine or is simply stalling for time Putin's mistakes directed Russia into an unexpectedly long and attritional military campaign where a staggering one million Russian soldiers have died by 2025. However, a negotiated reprieve in Ukraine matched with Trump's ambivalent commitment to NATO will have retrieved Putin's ambitions to eventually challenge the alliance. If a frozen conflict is the most likely compromise to emerge from current negotiations on Ukraine, tensions simmering at the fault line that Russia has created there will endure to undermine European security. Unpredictable and unstable, this order contrasts starkly with optimistic aspirations of peace "from Vancouver to Vladivostok" expressed after the Cold War. In the sentiments of Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Europe's " holiday from history" is now over.
