A jogger in San Antonio, Tex., runs at dusk in this photo from July. Undercover female police officers in the U.K. have been posing as joggers for the last month, running in areas identified as high-risk.
As experts have previously pointed out, there's a lot of onus on women to stay safe in public spaces. And that's likely part of why a new police campaign in the U.K., which is aimed at stopping people from harassing women runners in the first place, is getting so much attention.
For the last month, undercover female police officers in Surrey, a county in southeastern England, have been posing as joggers in areas identified as high-risk. If they experience harassment, including cat-calling or sexually suggestive comments, a support team steps in.
"The change I'd like to see is for people to recognize that it's not right. It's not just a small act. It's a thing that can make someone feel really quite uncomfortable," said Const. Abby Hayward, one of the officers who went undercover, in an Instagram video posted by Surrey Police.
CBC News has contacted Surrey Police and has not heard back. But according to local news outlet LBC News, Surrey Police made 18 arrests in the last month in its operations, including the jogging patrols, to tackle violence against women and girls.
"One of our officers was honked at within 10 minutes," Surrey Insp. Jon Vale, who runs the operation, told LBC News on Wednesday. "Then another vehicle slowed down, beeping and making gestures just 30 seconds later. That's how frequent it is."
The initiative has made headlines around the world and elicited strong reactions online. But amid a wave of both praise and criticism, with the U.K.'s Free Speech Union reportedly calling it a "bizarre social-psychology experiment," some experts say the campaign misses the point and raises new concerns.
"I don't want to downplay how unpleasant or scary these moments can be, especially for joggers who just want to stay in the zone without dealing with obnoxious men," Ummni Khan, an associate law professor at Carleton University in Ottawa who researches gender, sexuality and the law, told CBC News.
"But I worry about directing resources this way ... [and] reinforcing stereotypes of who is 'dangerous.'"
Women frequently engage in 'safety work' on runs
Running is arguably one of the most rewarding physical activities, with time spent outdoors, a sense of personal accomplishment and a supportive community cheering you to push just a little faster or tiny bit further.
But for many women, the rewards are tempered by the potential risks. An empirical study published in May in the British Journal of Criminology, for instance, found "high levels of abuse" reported by female runners, ranging from verbal comments to being physically and sexually assaulted.
"Although women rarely report incidents to the police, their frequent experiences lead to the normalization of abuse, high levels of fear and women runners engaging in significant 'safety work' in order to avoid such intrusions," wrote the authors.
WATCH | Many women report they're afraid to run on trails:
Another recent U.K. survey found that 70 per cent of women said they experienced an intimidating incident while jogging, such as being followed or honked at. An Adidas survey in 2023 found that 92 per cent of 4,500 women in nine countries reported feeling concerned for their safety when they go for a run.
According to Statistics Canada data released in 2019, one in three women reported experiencing unwanted sexual behaviour in public. And survey data released by the Canadian Women's Foundation (CWF) last summer found that just 32 per cent of women said they felt safe walking or running on or in a recreational trail, park or forest, compared to 61 per cent of men.
It's a fact that women are disproportionately affected by gendered violence, said Jean Ketterling, an assistant professor in the women's and gender studies program at the University of Saskatchewan, and a runner herself.
While the Surrey Police campaign doesn't put the onus on women to prevent violence against themselves by changing their behaviour, Ketterling also doesn't think it's going to be particularly effective. That's in part because it doesn't address the deeper issues, she said.
"It focuses on individual perpetrators, not the structural conditions that make such violence quotidian, especially in intimate and family relationships," Ketterling said.
"While I agree that education is an important part of the solution, I want to see resources go to quality, comprehensive sexual health education done in classrooms by trained and well-resourced educators."
The problem with 'catching' harassers
Surrey Police explained in a news release that harassment is significantly under-reported. Insp. Jon Vale said they'd already made a "number of interventions following reports of harassment of our plainclothes runners."
"The next time you see a female jogger, just think, they could be a police officer with colleagues nearby ready to stop you. Your behaviour is not welcome in Surrey," he said.
And many people online have expressed enthusiasm for the campaign.
"We need this! I've had two catcalls this week while out," wrote a commenter on a recent Instagram post from Canadian Running Magazine..
"Police everywhere: make this a widespread practice, please. So much violent stranger crime against women originates in men following and harassing women in the wild," wrote Elle Kamihira, a women's rights podcast producer, on X.
WATCH | Victoria's Queer running club aims to race past exclusion:
Khan, with Carleton University, said catcalling or street interactions can be experienced as deeply invasive, frightening and unwelcome.
But she has concerns about the approach of using undercover police to "catch harassers," explaining that these kinds of interventions risk disproportionately targeting lower-income and racialized men, as well as reinforcing "stranger danger" narratives.
Plus, some people may come from places or contexts where greeting one another in public is considered friendly, she added, and women might interpret encounters in a variety of ways based on race, class, identity and past experiences.
"A 'good morning,' a compliment, solicitation for a date and even a hateful epithet all get lumped into a single category of harassment," Khan said. "It's reductionist, to say the least."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palestine Action's violent criminality is not lawful protest
Faced with the intolerable scenes of suffering and devastation in Gaza, people across the country are feeling desperate and angry about what is happening and many have joined protests on the street. Each month, the police work with organisers to facilitate safe, lawful protests, and will continue to do so. Over the last 18 months, hundreds of thousands of people have joined pro-Palestinian protests, while only a tiny minority have been arrested for breaking the law. Protest and free speech are an important part of our democracy and those freedoms will always be protected. So anyone who wants to protest against the catastrophic humanitarian situation and crimes against humanity in Gaza, to oppose Israel's military offensive, or to criticise the actions of any and every government, including our own, has the freedom to do so. The recent proscription of the group Palestine Action does not prevent those protests, and to claim otherwise is nonsense. That proscription concerns one specific organisation alone – a group that has conducted an escalating campaign involving not just sustained criminal damage, including to Britain's national security infrastructure, but also intimidation, violence, weapons, and serious injuries to individuals. The clear advice and intelligence given to me earlier this year from the UK's world-leading counter-terrorism system, based on a robust assessment process, was that Palestine Action satisfies the relevant tests in the Terrorism Act 2000 and should be proscribed. Some may think it is just a regular protest group known for occasional stunts. But that is not the extent of its past activities. Nor does it reflect disturbing information given to me that covered ideas and planning for future attacks. Many of those important details cannot yet be publicly reported because of criminal proceedings. But if stunts were the only concern, its proscription would never have been considered in the first place, and it certainly wouldn't have become the unanimous recommendation to ministers from the cross-government security expert review group. Palestine Action has claimed responsibility for – and promoted on its website – attacks that have seen those allegedly involved subsequently charged with violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent, actual bodily harm, criminal damage and aggravated burglary. Charges that include, in the assessment of the independent Crown Prosecution Service, a terrorism connection. Many people will also know about the attack on RAF planes at Brize Norton, but fewer will have read about the Jewish-owned business in north London badly vandalised in the dead of night by masked men just three weeks before. Or the attack on a Glasgow factory that caused the sentencing sheriff to say: 'Throwing pyrotechnics into areas where people are being evacuated could hardly be described as non-violent.' 'For a home secretary to ignore all the security assessments, advice and recommendations on Palestine Action would be irresponsible' Or the 'underground manual' that encourages the creation of cells, provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement. These are not the actions of a legitimate protest group. For a home secretary to ignore all those security assessments, advice and recommendations would be irresponsible. Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do. Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe. Public protests on the Gaza crisis will continue through the summer, and the overwhelming majority of those involved do not and will not endorse violent and criminal tactics. That is why the proscription of this group is not about protest or the Palestinian cause. In a democracy, lawful protest is a fundamental right but violent criminality is not. Some of those holding placards in direct support of Palestine Action may not know the kind of organisation they have been promoting: its violence, intimidation, or future plans and aspirations. But that is all the more reason why no one should allow desperate calls for peace in the Middle East to be derailed into a campaign to support one narrow group involved in violence here in the UK. Because it is those calls for peace that should be the most urgent focus now. Each day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens, the conditions for hostages deteriorate, the prospects for peace are diminished, and the scenes of children being shot and starved get ever more horrific. An immediate ceasefire, release of the hostages and urgent humanitarian aid are vital. So too is the pathway the prime minister has set out to the recognition of a Palestinian state, now supported by Australia and Canada as well as France. Yvette Cooper is home secretary. Photograph by @FLO360aero
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘My daughter Zoe is not a terrorist. Why has she spent a year in prison?'
Zoe Rogers has not been charged with a terrorist offence. on Saturday, she marked a year in detention without trial inside HMP Bronzefield, a high-security prison in Surrey. Rogers, 21, was arrested during a Palestine Action raid on a site run by Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit in Filton, near Bristol, last August. 'My daughter is not a terrorist,' said her mother, Clare Hinchcliffe. 'They charged them with violent disorder, criminal damage and aggravated burglary,' she added, referring to her daughter and her co-defendants, who are collectively known as the Filton 24. Palestine Action had not yet been banned as a terrorist organisation – a move that has seen more than 700 people arrested for public displays of alleged support for the group since 5 July, when it was proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. Shy and autistic, Rogers is one of two dozen defendants in that case who have been denied bail. She has pleaded not guilty. Hinchcliffe, a senior campaigner for the London Cycling Campaign, said her daughter had been questioned by counter-terrorism police for five days and that she and others had faced 'the full force of the counter-terror police against them', adding: 'That has been absolutely terrifying.' The Crown Prosecution Service said that it would be seeking to argue that the alleged offences had 'a terrorist connection'. Under legislation drawn up in 2020 in response to two Islamist knife attacks, a terrorist connection is an aggravating factor, meaning that it could be applied by a judge when sentencing. The allegations in the case have been seen as a key part of the decision to proscribe Palestine Action and have contributed to the secrecy in the government's repeated defence of the ban, with ministers attempting to distinguish the issue from the broader right to protest and from deepening public outrage at what is happening in Gaza. Central to efforts to shore up the ban are as yet unproven accusations of violence against individuals. The attack on the Filton factory allegedly involved a ram-raid, using a decommissioned prison van to breach a loading bay. Samuel Corner, 23, faces charges of grievous bodily harm, and two counts of actual bodily harm involving injuries to two police officers. The charges are the only significant acts of violence against a person in the group's 356 actions since it was established in 2020. Corner has pleaded not guilty. Hinchcliffe said she had been angered by what she viewed as the Home Office attempting to cloud matters with smears against the defendants. The first officers who knocked on Hinchcliffe's door in Southgate, north London, last August explained that her daughter had been arrested and they had a warrant to search her room. 'When I got over the shock of having four police officers standing on my doorstep early one morning, they told me she was under arrest in Bristol police station. I asked when I could speak to her and they said it was usually after 24 hours.' That night, Rogers, who was then 20 and had secured a place to study interdisciplinary problem solving at university, was rearrested by counter-terrorism officers. It would be another five days before she saw her mother. 'It was very emotional, seeing her through two layers of security glass because I was in a box and she was in a box. She was with two others, flanked by officers. I'm so proud of her. She was sitting between the other two. The other two looked very distressed and she was looking strong. She was holding their hands.' Their lawyer saw no legal reason Rogers would not be granted bail and her grandparents had offered a large amount of money in surety, but it was denied. Hinchcliffe said: 'But then the judge decides: 'No, I'm refusing bail' – something about the risk of reoffending – and within seconds they were being led out of the room and I just felt viscerally like she was being ripped from my arms.' After almost two weeks, mother and daughter finally managed their first phone call, Hinchcliffe said. 'I guess the feeling was relief to have finally spoken to her, relief that she sounded kind of OK, and anger – why was she in prison? Those first few weeks, I was just in shock.' She added: 'I had a Fitbit at the time. My resting heart rate was constantly higher than it used to be. I was kind of in fight-or-flight mode. I remember just lying down and trying to sleep and my heart pounding. You've got this kind of irrational sense of: 'I have to go and save her and I can't.'' Soon after, the house was raided by a dozen counter-terrorism officers. 'They were trying to be discreet but that's a bit hard with 12 officers in forensic aprons and gloves going in and out. My neighbours just thought someone had been murdered.' She said they seized a laptop belonging to her younger daughter, Ffion, as well as her classics homework. Hinchcliffe, a devout Christian, said her minister was among the hundreds of protesters arrested just over a week ago for holding signs in support of Palestine Action. 'It's been surreal. I think it's great to see how ridiculous a government's being made to look by all these brave people who are prepared to face arrest.' She said that in the weeks after Hamas's surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, her daughter had started attending marches. Hinchcliffe remembers, too, when Rogers began to lose hope after months of protests as the bombing and aid blockades continued in Gaza. 'It's the deaths of the children that she cannot bear. She decided she was going to write all the names of the children who'd been killed so far and their ages on this big bedsheet. And she never wrote a single name. She just couldn't face it. 'She just became overwhelmed. She didn't go to the march, she didn't leave her bedroom the whole weekend. I think that was the point when she decided: the marches aren't working; our government's not listening.' Standing in her daughter's undisturbed bedroom, Hinchcliffe unfurled a black screenprint that showed the text of a poem Rogers, who faces trial in November, wrote from prison. 'When they ask why,' she wrote, 'I tell them about the children…I tell them about the boy found carrying his brother's body inside his bloody backpack. I tell them about the girl whose hanging corpse ended at the knees. I tell them about the father holding up his headless toddler.' The final line reads: 'It was love, not hate, that called me.'
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation
San Bernardino police responded to what they described as "an officer-involved shooting" involving federal immigration officers Saturday morning. When police officers responded to the area of Acacia Avenue and Baseline Street shortly before 9 a.m., they encountered immigration agents who said they had fired at a suspect who then fled the scene. Soon after, according to the San Bernardino Police Department, a man — who has not been identified — contacted the dispatch center, saying that masked men had tried to pull him over, broke his car window and shot at him. He said he didn't know who they were and asked for police assistance. In a statement Saturday night, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said agents had been conducting a targeted enforcement operation in San Bernardino and said that "[Customs and Border Protection] officers were injured during a vehicle stop when a subject refused to exit his vehicle and tried to run them down." "In the course of the incident the suspect drove his car at the officers and struck two CBP officers with his vehicle," the statement read. Because of that, the official said, a CBP officer discharged his firearm "in self-defense." According to a press release from the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice, federal agents broke the driver and passenger windows of the vehicle and fired three times. Video the group uploaded on Facebook appeared to capture the interaction, showing agents wearing "police" vests and shouting at those inside to roll down the window. "No la voy a abrir," the man said from inside, saying he wasn't going to open it. Soon after, the video captured the sound of shattering glass and what sounded like three shots being fired. The video showed a man wearing a hat with CBP on it. The video appears to show the vehicle move a short distance after the windows are smashed, but does not capture the driver striking the officers. "This was a clear abuse of power," the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice said in its release. "Firing at civilians, harassing families without cause, and targeting community voices must stop." According to the San Bernardino Police Department, officers later located the vehicle in the 1000 block of Mt. View Drive and made contact with the man, but they said it was unclear what federal agents wanted him for. "Under the California Values Act, California law enforcement agencies are prohibited from assisting federal officials with immigration enforcement, so our officers left the scene as the investigation was being conducted by federal authorities," police said in a news release. In a statement, a DHS spokesperson misidentified the police department, describing it as the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, and said local authorities had the man in custody but then set him free. "This decision was made despite the subject refusing to comply and wounding two officers — another terrible example of California's pro-sanctuary policies in action that shield criminals instead of protecting communities," the unidentified spokesperson said. At 1:12 p.m., federal officials requested assistance from the department because a large crowd was forming as they attempted to arrest the suspect, the police said. At that time, federal agents told police he was wanted for allegedly assaulting a federal officer. Police responded and provided support with crowd control, according to the department. The Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice said in a news release that the agents didn't present a warrant and remained outside the home until 3:45 p.m., "pressuring the individual to come outside." The group added that two community members "were detained using unnecessary force, including one for speaking out." "Federal agents requested assistance during a lawful arrest for assaulting a federal officer when a crowd created a potential officer safety concern," the police department said in a statement. "This was not an immigration-related arrest, which would be prohibited under California law." Federal investigators are currently investigating the circumstances surrounding the shooting, according to the police. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.