Access and usage rules changing for Huntsville public buildings
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — The Huntsville City Council voted unanimously Thursday to change public access and usage rules for public buildings around the city.
The decision comes on the heels of what council members say was an ambush by people self-proclaimed as 'First Amendment auditors' just a few weeks ago.
Huntsville police say crime rates have gone down, while population has gone up
These auditors visit public facilities across the nation, recording officials and demanding answers. City leaders in Huntsville said the goal of these auditors is to provoke said leaders and catch it on camera.
'The advent of popular thing that's occurring across the country, the so-called First Amendment auditors who sweep into a building and, they kind of overwhelm your security staff,' Huntsville City Attorney Trey Riley said. 'And the next thing you know, they're all over the building sticking cameras in people's faces. And as a general rule, trying to incite anger or misconduct on the part of employees.'
District 1 Councilmember Michelle Watkins was not at City Hall when the so-called ambush happened a few weeks ago, but she details the event based on what her colleagues told her.
'Individuals just coming in, you know, saying that they were in a public facility, they had a right to record,' Watkins said. 'And they have a right to record, but in certain areas. You can't go in while someone's conducting business.'
📲 to stay updated on the go. 📧 to have news sent to your inbox.
It's not the first time people have done this in Huntsville. 'Reba Audits 51-50 5-0' filmed her First Amendment audits and posted them to YouTube in 2019. She visited buildings all over the city from the Madison County Sheriff's Office to the West Precinct.
The encounters drove city leaders to now take action.
'We just want to make sure that we're protecting our employees and that we're just providing a safe environment for people to walk in,' Watkins said. 'That they don't feel, you know, like someone's threatening them or being up in their face.'
The new ordinance restricts when and how the public can access buildings around the city, but it doesn't stop there.
'Simply put, it is an ordinance designed to control physical access to many of the city's public buildings and facilities, especially City Hall, as well as access to information within those facilities,' Riley said. 'And by that, I mean the ability to photograph and video, record and do things of that nature.'
Watkins said residents of Huntsville should not be concerned and that the ordinance is set in place solely to handle situations like the auditors.
'I just want to make sure we don't tread on that nod of freedom of information,' Watkins said. 'If someone wants to exercise their First Amendment right, that they had that opportunity.'
Watkins added that recording inside of a city council meeting is still permitted, but recording inside of an employee's office unauthorized is not.
Riley said that the city is working on signage to help clarify the statute depending on the situation. It will apply inside other public buildings across the city, with him giving the example of the Solid Waste Disposal Authority.
Riley also said he believes the punishment will be fines up to $500 for not complying. The ordinance also states that if someone does not leave after they are instructed to, they could be subject to criminal trespassing charges.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Over the finish line': Tuberville says passing spending bill bolster economic growth
ALABAMA (WHNT) — As the Big Beautiful Bill is under consideration in the Senate, an Alabama Senator says his top priority is to get the spending bill passed. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday the legislation is likely to undergo some significant changes while in the Senate, but he said his ultimate goal was to get the bill over the finish line. Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Rick Pate to run for lieutenant governor 'The number one priority in this bill is getting the jobs and tax cuts done,' Tuberville said. The spending bill has received criticism from conservatives over the past few days, including the former head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency. Elon Musk has called the bill an 'abomination,' posting on social media platform X about how the spending bill will significantly increase the national debt. 'The problem that Elon Musk looks at, I look at it different,' Tuberville told members of the press on Thursday. 'Number one, the way to grow this country is to get the tax cuts done and that tax cuts are in this bill and we need to make them permanent.' Tuberville said he and his colleagues have complained that Democrats spend too much money. He said he wants to cut back on how much can be cut from this bill. 'There's a lot of things the federal government, in this bill, is trying to send down to the states,' Tuberville said. 'We can't afford it in Alabama. We can't afford to pick up the tab for a federal government agency that was started years ago by the federal government. We don't need it in the state.' Tuberville said he is looking to the future to make changes. 'Remember, we will do another reconciliation after this,' Tuberville said. 'We have two more in the next year and a half, so whatever we don't get done in this bill, hopefully we can get done in the next.' The president has given Republicans in the Senate a tight deadline to pass the spending bill, asking them to have it on his desk by July 4th. The Tax Foundation estimates the bill passed by the House of Representatives will add more than $2 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R–Tenn.) introduced a bill Wednesday that would make it a federal felony punishable by up to five years in prison to publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct an investigation. Blackburn unveiled the "Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act" as masked Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are carrying out nationwide raids under the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts. These raids have sparked public protests and pushback from local officials, including Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell, who has released records of local police interactions with ICE that include the names of ICE agents. "Blue city mayors are doing everything they can to obstruct the Trump administration's efforts to deport criminal illegal aliens," Blackburn said in a press release. "Just last week, Nashville Mayor O'Connell and his office doxxed federal law enforcement officers after the Trump administration worked with Tennessee Highway Patrol to arrest criminal illegal aliens." However, press freedom groups say the bill raises serious First Amendment concerns. "Public oversight and accountability relies on accurate news about law enforcement activity," Gabe Rottman, vice president of policy at the Reporter's Committee for Freedom of the Press tells Reason. "The bill is dangerously overbroad and could be used to chill newsgathering and reporting that is clearly in the public interest." Government employees, including law enforcement officers, generally don't have the presumption of privacy when it comes to information such as their names, salaries, and business conducted in public. Nevertheless, that hasn't stopped police and politicians from accusing people of "doxxing" officers for releasing public information. Last month, ICE agents stormed a house in Irvine, California, executing a search warrant for a man accused of putting up flyers around Los Angeles with photos, names, and phone numbers of several ICE agents operating in the area. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests for comment from Reason to state what law the man was accused of violating. While the requirement in Blackburn's proposed law for an intent to obstruct an investigation would appear to provide some safeguard against abuse, Blackburn and other Republicans' comments make clear that their goal is to insulate ICE from transparency. When asked by reporters on Friday if he was OK with ICE agents not identifying themselves, House Speaker Mike Johnson responded, "Why, so they can target them? So they can put names and faces online and dox them? That's what these activists do." What Blackburn and Johnson's comments ignore is that an anonymous police force is an unaccountable police force. For example, when New York City's Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) attempted to investigate the hundreds of complaints of police brutality and misconduct during the 2020 George Floyd protests, it was forced to close a third of the cases because it couldn't identify the officers involved. The CCRB noted that it faced "unprecedented challenges in investigating these complaints" due to officers covering their names and badge numbers, failing to turn on their body-worn cameras, and failing to file reports. Of course, it's already functionally impossible to sue a federal law enforcement officer for a civil rights violation thanks to the Supreme Court's evisceration of the Bivens doctrine, but the normalization of anonymous federal agents will further immunize them from other forms of oversight such as media, inspector general, and congressional investigations. There are already laws on the books to handle those who threaten federal officers or interfere in investigations. It's essential for government transparency, public trust, and the rule of law that the officials dictating and enforcing public policies can be identified by media outlets and citizens without fear of retribution. The post Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police appeared first on


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
White House ban on Associated Press can continue, appeals court rules
A federal appeals court will allow the White House to exclude the Associate Press from access to the Oval Office, Mar-a-Lago and Air Force One if it chooses, according to a new court order in the ongoing legal battle over press access. The decision hangs on a court finding that some White House spaces are not open to the broader public or large groups of press, and so the White House can choose which journalists it chooses to admit. A lower court judge previously blocked the administration from excluding the Associated Press, and the appeals court has sided with the White House at this time. The decision could bring about more appeals over the White House press corps and its access around the president. 'These restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' DC Circuit Judge Neomi Rao wrote Friday. 'No one suggests the Oval Office is a traditional public forum such as a park or sidewalk held in trust for expressive activity.' The court, in a split 2-1 decision Friday, didn't include excluding the AP from the larger East Room space. CNN has reached out to the White House and AP for comment. The AP has claimed the White House is discriminatory against it because of a First Amendment-protected viewpoint –specifically not changing its editorial style guide to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America, as President Donald Trump has directed.