Rachel Reeves refuses to rule out MORE tax hikes after spending spree plunged into turmoil
The Chancellor insisted she wasn't going to write Budgets for the next four years after the UK economy for shrank by 0.3 per cent in April - the biggest monthly drop for 18 months.
1
Chancellor Rachel Reeves insisted today she's not going to write the next four Budgets after being pressed on autumn tax rises
Credit: Sky News
The move came after she hit back at suggestions she was the 'Klarna Chancellor' after accusations her spending review was buy now and pay later.
Ms Reeves told LBC News: "I am not going to write four years worth of budgets... It would be very risky for a Chancellor to write a budget in a world as uncertain as this.
"I can say I won't have to repeat a budget like last year, I wiped the slate clean. We do now have that path to lower borrowing and debt".
The Chancellor was speaking after she revelled in a £300 billion spending splurge increasing spending for health and defence and outlining new infrastructure projects.
But Ms Reeves pointed to "uncertainty about tariffs" had led to the fall in GDP for April following Donald Trump''s global tariff war.
The world trade war combined with stubborn inflation and slow growth are likely to see tax rises or major spending cuts at the Budget this autumn.
She said: 'We know that April was a challenging month.
"There was a huge uncertainty about tariffs, and one of the things if you dig into those GDP numbers today is exports weakening and also production weakening because of that uncertainty in the world around tariffs.'
Analysis: Growth figures are wake up call after spending splurge
By Ryan Sabey, Economics Editor
Rachel Reeves revelled in a major spending splurge yesterday - but this morning she wakes up to a reality check.
The Chancellor says that the figures are "clearly disappointing" but its a stark reminder of the fragility of the UK economy and how difficult it will be to turbo-charge growth.
The effects of 'Awful April' - when a slew of added costs for business including that national insurance rise came in - has hit home.
This Labour government has put that push for growth as their number one mission which will have the knock-on effect of driving up living standards.
After a positive start to the year - where we saw growth up by 0.7 per cent - today we see it drop by 0.3 per cent for April.
We shouldn't take one month's figures in isolation but the fear is conditions for business and entrepreneurs have hit them hard.
The hike to national insurance contributions and minimum wage for firms kicked in at the start of April and this is how the economy has reacted.
As the British Chambers of Commerce outline the NI rise has hit investment, recruitment and prices.
The uncertainty of Donald Trump's tariffs is also a drag on the UK with the largest monthly fall on record in goods exports to the US.
With dismal economic growth, the global trade war and stubborn inflation, the Chancellor will surely be left with little choice but to cut spending or raise taxes in the autumn.
She has iron-clad fiscal rules she insists are non-negotiable so it feels inevitable something will have to give.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at Ministers saying they were waging a "war" with business.
She highlighted how 'Awful April' when National Insurance contributions for business were hikes and minimum wage payments went up.
The party leader said: "This is a war on the private sector, where private businesses are having to cut their coat according to their cloth.
"They're having to downsize. They're having to let go of staff, but no reforms are being asked for any parts of the public sector.
'Of course, we want to fund public services, but we need to make sure that we're doing things better.'
Ms Reeves outlined her spending review yesterday saying it was time for national renewal.
She told Labour MPs at an event last night that she needed to "sell" the benefits of her plans to voters on the doorstep.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Rachel Reeves eyes up inheritance tax changes - what you can do NOW to protect your finances
We explain what is happening and YOU can protect your finances DEATH TAX Rachel Reeves is eyeing up inheritance tax changes – what you can do NOW to protect your finances Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RACHEL Reeves is rumoured to have set her sights on changes to inheritance tax as a way to fill the £50billion blackhole in finances. Parents could be stopped from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids, under proposed plans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Chancellor Rachel Reeves is planning inheritance tax changes Credit: Reuters 2 Currently you can give away unlimited amounts of cash to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. The Chancellor is reportedly also considering changing the tapered rate at which the tax is charged, according to The Guardian. Plus, inheritance tax will be charged on pension pots for the first time - a change that was announced in last year's Budget. Rachel Reeves said today that any decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget - but what can YOU do now to protect your finances and how does inheritance tax affect your wallet? Read more on tax TAX IT HMRC spying on workers' social media posts in tax crackdown What is inheritance tax? IHT is a 40% tax on your estate when you die. Currently, your estate includes your house, cash savings and any other possessions. Your pension is exempt. You can pass on up to £325,000 in assets before any IHT is due, or up to £500,000 if you pass your property to your children or grandchildren. There is also no IHT due between spouses, and you can leave them your IHT exemption when you die, so they could pass on up to £1million. However, from April 2027, pensions will become part of your estate, which means they will also be liable for IHT. This week Labour also confirmed it will charge inheritance tax on workers' retirement pots even if they die before they reach the minimum pension age, which is currently 55. And from 2026, agricultural and business relief, which protects farms and businesses from IHT, will only apply up to £1million of assets. After this, 20% tax will be due. These changes could see people inheriting large pensions, farms or businesses being pulled into the net. What are the rules on gifting? YOU can currently give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. If you pass away within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate. For example, gifts that were given three years before you pass away are subject to 40% inheritance tax. But those that are handed over five years before your death are subject to inheritance tax at 16%. How many people does IHT affect? IHT is a big concern for many families, but figures suggest Brits hugely overestimate how many people are affected. A YouGov poll in 2023 found that 31% of people thought their assets would be subject to IHT, while 28% said they weren't sure. In reality, around 5% of estates are impacted, according to HMRC. 'A lot of people are concerned about it when it probably won't affect their family,' said Charlene Young, senior pensions and savings expert at AJ Bell. 'In 95% of cases, no IHT is due whatsoever.' However, the upcoming changes could see more people owing the tax, which has sparked fresh concerns. The number of estates owing IHT is set to double to 10% by 2030, according to government estimates, with around 1.5% more estates impacted because of pension rule changes. Matt Smith, chartered financial planner at Buckingham Gate, said: 'We are seeing people being pulled into the net now who don't feel wealthy, they just see themselves as normal people who have saved diligently.' Who is likely to be affected most by the changes? The people most likely to be impacted by the IHT changes are those inheriting large businesses, farms or pension pots. Mr Smith explained: 'People who have most of their assets in their pension will go from having no liability to having a chunky liability. 'Farms are particularly likely to be affected as they often have expensive assets such as land, machinery and livestock, even if they don't have much actual cash." If you have a modest-sized pension and a typical home, your estate is still not likely to be impacted, particularly if you are planning to leave most of your assets to your spouse or children. For example, if your home is worth £268,000 - the average UK house price, according to Zoopla - and you have a private pension worth £111,700, which is the average pot size, according to Hargreaves Lansdown, you would have £379,700 of assets to pass on. If you left this to your spouse or kids, your estate would still be well below IHT thresholds. 'While plenty of people might be worried about the changes - particularly those who have worked hard to build up big pensions – most people will still remain unaffected,' Ms Young said. Tips and tricks to avoid paying IHT If you, your parents or your grandparents are concerned about IHT, there are a number of steps you can take to protect your assets. Make a will First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young. 'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill. 'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.' Check how to make one in our guide. Get financial advice If you're worried it could be worth speaking to a financial adviser specialising in estate planning. They will ensure you have used all of your allowances and aren't paying more tax than you should. You can find one using - but remember, you will pay a fee. Utilise gifting allowances Until recently, pensions have been used as a way to harbour money to pass it on to loved ones, but experts say it may be more sensible to gift the money now if that was your plan. If your in retirement and income is more than you spend, then consider setting up a plan for utilising gift-free allowances. 'The 'annual exemption' lets you give away a total of £3,000 each year, either to one person or split between several, and you can bring forward unused annual exemption for one year,' Ms Young said. 'Unlimited 'small' gifts of up to £250 per person can also be made, if you haven't already used your annual exemption on the same person.' You can also gift up to £5,000 to a child tax-free or £2,500 for a grandchild if they are getting married. However, families with modest pensions and assets likely won't be affected by the changes, so don't give away any money unless you are sure you can afford to. Get life insurance Another way to ensure your family does not foot an IHT bill is to take out a life insurance policy. Mr Smith said you could use any extra income to pay the premiums, and this will pay out a lump sum to cover your IHT bill when you die. "You basically pay it at a discount, as what you pay in premiums is usually only 40% to 60% of what your beneficiaries would pay in IHT," he explained. Read our guide to getting protection. Invest for your children and grandchildren If you're got children or grandchildren, then you could invest for their future. You can save up to £9,000 a year tax-free into a Junior Isa - they will thank you for this in the future. A £50 a month investment could grow to almost £18,000 in 18 years - a nice chunk of cash for your loved ones.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
So the economy isn't shrinking… but when will we feel any benefit, chancellor?
UK plc delivered a welcome, and largely unexpected, shot in the arm for Rachel Reeves, with the Office for National Statistics recording second quarter growth of 0.3 per cent, comfortably beating the City's consensus forecast of 0.1 per cent. After a gloomy April and May, the summer sunshine warmed June, during which the economy expanded by 0.4 per cent. The quarterly figure was also boosted by April's contribution being revised up from a contraction of 0.3 per cent to a smaller fall of 0.1 per cent. While cheerier than expected, these figures still aren't enough to solve Reeves's wider problems. The Resolution Foundation, a think tank focussed on the plight of low income Britons, put it well. The economy isn't shrinking, it said – but it is slowing, and quite a bit from the 0.7 per cent growth recoded in the first three months of the year. The first quarter was powered by manufacturers racing to get product made and sent across the Atlantic ahead of Donald Trump's tariffs. That effect went into reverse after Trump's 'Liberation Day' on April 2, when most of his levies on imports kicked in. The UK economy contracted as manufacturers paused for breath and the tax increases announced in Reeves's Budget gave industry pause. The initial chaos delivered by Trump has now washed through the economy and it has found a level. However, the negative impact of Reeves's tax rises is still casting a pall. Economists said it had resulted in a sharp fall in business investment, which is something the government wants and needs. It rose by 3.9 per cent in the first three months of the year, but then went hard into reverse, falling by 4 per cent in the second. Businesses inevitably responded to the increases in their taxes, as businesses are wont to do. They focussed on reducing their costs to mitigate the impact of the increased labour costs caused by Reeves's decision to raise employer national insurance. And they shelved their investment plans while they were at it. Higher government spending helped to offset these effects. But that isn't sustainable if the private sector continues to stutter. The danger now is that the Office for Budgetary Responsibility downgrades its forecasts. That matters because it uses those forecasts to check the Treasury's sums, and whether the chancellor's tax and spending plans comply with her fiscal rules. The latter requires that day-to-day government spending is funded by taxation. Ministers can only borrow more to invest. If the OBR forecasts are downgraded, then the fiscal hole Reeves is in only deepens, requiring more tax rises to fill it. The chancellor got another unexpected boost as it emerged that the decision to scrap non-dom status, a controversial tax break available to some wealthy people who live here but are considered to be domiciled overseas for tax purposes, has not led to the sort of mass exodus of millionaires some had predicted. A number have left – but the numbers are broadly in line with Treasury projections. File under 'small crumbs of comfort'. Reeves, naturally, has hailed the fact that the UK's performance beat expectations – but she is right that there is 'still more to do'. Some of that must include more pro-business policies to get investment flowing again. Promises not to further increase the tax burden on them must also be kept. Yes, the chancellor needs revenue. But she needs growth to sustainably deliver it. Adding to the burdens on businesses now would simply be cutting off her nose to spite her face. A year in, and it is hard to grade her economic stewardship at much better than, say, C+. True, these figures do show that Britain is still outpacing the rest of the G7 – something Reeves highlighted and a line you will hear a lot if you can stomach spending any time listening to debates in the House of Commons (it isn't an edifying activity). But just because the neighbours are doing badly doesn't mean the UK is doing well. It isn't. It needs to do better. The chancellor faced a challenging situation when she took office, true. But she also needs to do better. She can't keep blaming the other lot. It won't wash with the voters. Finally, a word or two about mortgages. While the Bank of England is primarily focussed on inflation, the labour market and wage settlements, these figures will nonetheless add to the case of the interest rate hawks when it comes to the question of further cuts following the Bank's recent decision to lop a quarter point off base rates to 4 per cent (which they opposed). That's bad news if your mortgage tracks base rates, and bad news if you're looking for a fixed-rate deal, the price of which is dependent on the City's interest rate swaps market. The expectation there is that the rate cut curve will be shallower than had previously been hoped. Barclays recently delivered a fillip to would-be borrowers by cutting the price of some of its deals. However, I wouldn't expect to see many more announcements like it, at least not until we see signs that inflation is on a downward track. And that isn't currently the case.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fintech Klarna's second-quarter revenue up 20% year-on-year
OSLO, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Swedish fintech Klarna, which in April paused plans for an initial public offering in the United States, said on Thursday its second-quarter revenue grew 20% from a year ago on a like-for-like basis while adjusted profits increased slightly. Klarna's April-June revenue grew to $823 million in the quarter, while its adjusted operating profit stood at $29 million, an increase of $1 million from the same quarter of last year, its earnings report showed. The number of active Klarna customers rose to 111 million in the quarter, an increase of 31% year-on-year, the company said. Klarna, which helped reshape online shopping with its short-term financing model, in April halted its plans for a U.S. stock market listing amid recession fears and uncertainty over tariffs, sources familiar with the situation said at the time. The company had made its paperwork public in March for a long-awaited stock market debut, after it started the process of going public for a second time in three years in November 2024. Klarna did not say when it might resume an initial public offering. Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, last month reported that the company's IPO could take place as soon as September.
