Petition in Supreme Court Against Order to Display Eatery Owners' Names During Kanwar Yatra
19 minutes ago
The state governments of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand have also asked to display QR codes which would reveal the names of the owners of the restaurants. This would lead to 'discriminatory profiling that was previously stayed by the Supreme Court', the petition contended.
New Delhi: Delhi University professor Apoorvanand and rights defender Aakar Patel have filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking a stay on the directives issued by Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand state governments asking restaurant and dhaba owners to display their names at prominent places if their shops were on routes to be taken by kanwariyas on their annual yatra.
The state governments have also asked to display QR codes which would reveal the names of the owners of the restaurants. This would lead to 'discriminatory profiling that was previously stayed by the Supreme Court', the petition contended.
According to The Tribune the matter is likely to be heard on July 15. Bar and Bench reports that it is likely to be heard by a bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N.K. Singh this week.
Apoorvanand's petition says that the orders of the two state governments were violative of several constitutional provisions as well as an earlier order of the Supreme Court had passed on July 22, 2024. The court had granted interim stay on the enforcement of such directives, observing that "the display of personal identity was neither backed by law nor necessary for the stated purpose of public order or food safety compliance."
Apoorvanand and Patel, along with Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, had been petitioners of the 2024 case as well.
The petition stated that in an earlier order the apex court had stated that state actions impacting privacy and dignity must satisfy the test of legitimate aim, suitability, necessity, and proportionality. The petitioner contended that the directives of both the governments fail all these principles. Nor do they fall under any statue, and they will be discriminatory and stigmatising
The petitioner said such a directive was a breach of privacy rights.
'The requisite license is a self-contained certificate, which although reveals the name of the owner, is displayed inside the premises at a place where it may be accessed. Equating this requirement to display a normal-sized license with the directive to display name of owner, manager and other employees on billboards outside, or to not give eateries names which do not reflect the religious identity of the owner are de hors [outside the context of ] the license requirements,' the petition says.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HC stays Oranland allocationfor solar projectsin Jaisalmer
Jaisalmer: Rajasthan High Court has stayed the allocation of thousands of bighas of Oran pasture land in Jaisalmer district for large-scale solar power projects, directing the state govt and district administration to respond to concerns about the protection of these ecologically and culturally significant lands. In an order issued on July 30, Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Sandeep Taneja, stayed the land allocation following a PIL by advocates Manas Ranchhod Khatri and Sunil Paliwal on behalf of petitioner Shyam Singh Sodha. The petitioner challenged the allocation of Oran and Aagor land in the Fatehgarh subdivision, particularly in Sitodai village, for the establishment of a 12,500 megawatt solar park by Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited (RVUNL). According to the petitioner, the Jaisalmer district collector, acting on state govt directives, proceeded with land allocation without proper physical verification or site inspection. The land includes ancient Oran, Talai, embankments, and Aagor areas, which, while not officially recorded in revenue documents due to clerical errors, are recognized by villagers as sacred and protected spaces. These lands are traditionally safeguarded by local communities, who prohibit encroachment, tree cutting, and hunting, and regularly worship at these sites. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Health Insurance for Senior Citizen Living in India Policybazaar Get Quote Undo The petition highlighted that the allocation process overlooked several significant areas, including Malan Baisa Oran, various Talais (water bodies), embankments, and Aagor lands that exist on ground but were not accounted for in official records. In Sitodai village, the Oran of Tanot Mata and Malan Baisa is particularly revered, featuring trees like Khejri, Jal, Kumat, Ker, and Ber, which play a vital role in wildlife conservation and maintaining local ecology. In response to these concerns, the high court issued notices to Jaisalmer district collector, Rajasthan Renewable Energy, and the director of the Arid Forest Research Institute, ordering that status quo be maintained on site and in official records until further orders. The court also referenced a Dec 18, 2024, Supreme Court directive, which instructed the Rajasthan forest department to conduct detailed ground and satellite mapping of all sacred forests, including Orans, and to consider granting them protection under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, as community reserves. The Supreme Court further directed the ministry of environment, forest and climate change to form a five-member committee, in collaboration with the Rajasthan's forest department, to oversee the identification and protection of these areas. The high court stay order mandates compliance with the apex court's instructions and has sought submission of a report regarding the committee's formation and progress. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Ministers likely to meet governor today
Thiruvananthapuram : Amidst the widening rift between Governor Rajendra Arlekar and state govt, higher education minister R Bindu and law minister P Rajeeve are scheduled to call on the governor at Raj Bhavan on Sunday. Since governor reappointed Ciza Thomas and K Sivaprasad as interim vice-chancellors (VCs) of Digital University Kerala (DUK) and APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU) respectively, overlooking the panels submitted by govt, the meeting with ministers isn't expected to bring about a significant change in the strained relations. The ministers were given time to meet the governor at chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan 's request to discuss the way forward in view of the Supreme Court directive to initiate proceedings for appointing regular VCs at the earliest. Vijayan had conveyed his disapproval of the new interim VCs and wanted candidates from govt's list to be appointed. "The ministers may only repeat what CM conveyed to governor through a letter. Govt is unlikely to soften its stand unless the first move towards reconciliation comes from Raj Bhavan," said govt sources. However, Raj Bhavan sources said state govt was taking the media for a ride by falsely accusing governor for reappointing interim VCs in the two universities. "Unlike what govt claims, the persons whom govt recommended as interim VCs were not eligible to the posts, as per conditions laid out in the respective acts and rules of the two universities," sources added. According to KTU and DUK acts, either a VC of a nearby university or the pro-VC of the same university can be appointed as interim VC. Though the acts say that the secretary of higher education can also be considered as interim VC, the Supreme Court has already ruled against such a proposition. "The chancellor can appoint persons recommended by govt only if govt recommends persons who fulfil the conditions stipulated in the university acts. Since none of the persons in the govt panel were eligible, the chancellor had no option but to reappoint the former VCs in charge. The SC also mentioned in the order that the chancellor is free to reappoint the former interim VCs for a six-month period," Raj Bhavan sources said. Meanwhile, state higher education principal secretary Sharmila Mary Joseph, who obtained an appointment to meet the governor at Raj Bhavan on Saturday, didn't turn up for the meeting. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Over 2 lakh forms requesting Mahadevi's return to Nandani Jain mutt sent to President
Kolhapur: An online petition initiated by MLC Satej Patil garnered 2,04,421 signatures nationwide, demanding the relocation of the elephant, named Mahadevi alias Madhuri, to the Jain mutt in Nandani. On Saturday morning, the signed petition forms were sanctified by Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya, the chief of the Jain mutt, and sent to President Draupadi Murmu via post from Kolhapur's Ramanmala post office by Satej Patil and former MLA Ruturaj Patil. Speaking on the occasion, Satej Patil said, "After the Supreme Court's decision, a lot of disappointment spread among the people. This discontent can be seen as within 48 hours, 2,04,421 people from across the nation signed the petition supporting the call to bring the elephant back to the Nandani Jain mutt. We took printouts of all these forms, sanctified them by the chief of the mutt, and then sent them to the President. We request President Draupadi Murmu to give attention to this and resolve thë issue." Patil also commented on Vantara CEO Vivaan Karani's visit to Kolhapur on Friday, saying, "We were not invited. Only Mahayuti party MLAs and MPs were invited for the meeting when the CEO of Vantara arrived in Kolhapur. Therefore, we do not know anything about what discussions were held, what agreement took place or whether a settlement was done. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The guardian minister has said it is a legal issue and legal procedure will have to be followed, but Mahayuti MLAs and MPs should declare in how many days the elephant will be brought back. As an opposition party member, we have done the work of showcasing public sentiments in front of the President." He added, "Elephants causing menace in Ajara, Chandgad, and Bhudargad regions should be taken to Vantara instead of this tamed temple elephant. If they give a protocol, then we assure them that the elephant will be taken care of as per their guidelines. This is an issue of religious and traditional beliefs. If over 14,000 cow shelters are run by Jain communities across the world, then how can someone say that they can't manage a single elephant?" Meanwhile, several villages in Kolhapur and Sangli districts observed a village bandh on Saturday, shutting down businesses and schools. Rallies were held in these villages demanding the return of the elephant to Nandani. The elephant's rehabilitation from the mutt to a Jamnagar facility, carried out on the night of July 29 after the Supreme Court dismissed the mutt's appeal against the Bombay high court order directing such relocation, prompted an emotionally and politically charged campaign to bring Mahadevi back. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
