
US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities won't lead to another Chernobyl: experts
President Trump ordered strikes on three nuclear sites inside Iran, where International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors have found uranium purified to near weapons grade.
Bunker-buster bombs are believed to have wiped out the Fordow facility, while 30 Tomahawk missiles fired from submarines 400 miles away struck Natanz and Isfahan.
Advertisement
But the hits on Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow — Iran's most secure nuclear enrichment facility, which was buried 300 feet inside a mountain — shouldn't spark panic over possible nuclear fallout.
Experts in radiation hazards say there is little risk of widespread contamination such as what took place on April 26, 1986, when an infamous power surge and subsequent fire at Russia's Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant released massive amounts of deadly radiation into the air, killing 31 and causing widespread contamination and long-term health impacts.
3 President Trump addressed the nation Saturday after unleashing airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities.
Reuters
Advertisement
Chernobyl is widely considered the worst nuclear disaster in world history.
'This isn't a Chernobyl scenario,' author Aimen Dean posted to X.
'So, in layman's terms: this isn't 'hot' nuclear fuel undergoing fission,' he wrote. 'It's uranium in various stages of enrichment, and even a military strike that destroys centrifuges or disperses material is unlikely to produce a large-scale, long-lasting fallout event.
The US targeted enrichment facilities — not nuclear reactors — deep within Iran, buffered by mountains in the north and the Caspian Sea in the Northeast, so 'there may be localized contamination, but not a region-wide radiological disaster.'
Advertisement
'There's no fallout threat from this because it's all underneath,' according to Atlantic Council's Alex Plitsas.
'The president just prevented World War III with this decisive action. This is the 'strength' in 'peace through strength' boldly shown to the world at last.'
3 Iran's Ishafan facility was one of three hit by American airstrikes.
Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images
The nature of the material in Iran is a key reason a nuclear fallout-type event is unlikely.
Advertisement
'With uranium … the radiation doesn't really travel very far,' Prof Claire Corkhill, chair in Mineralogy and Radioactive Waste Management at the University of Bristol, told the BBC.
Uranium's toxicity would wreak havoc on the human body if it were ingested, or if the particles from the dangerous substances were inhaled — meaning those close to the site of the bombings could face some health risks, she noted.
But another expert insisted that while there might be impacts in a 'very local area,' the bombing shouldn't create 'a massive environmental fallout.'
'If there was an incident and the centrifuges were to release the uranium hexafluoride, the gas contained within the centrifuges, then it would be a really severe chemical incident,' Prof Simon Middleburgh, a nuclear materials scientist from Bangor University, told the outlet.
Iran's uranium was well on its way to being concentrated enough for a nuclear weapon, according to the IAEA.
3 Natanz was another facility struck Saturday night.
Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images
But blasting a rocket into stockpiles of enriched uranium would not pose risk of a 'nuclear incident.'
Advertisement
'Highly enriched uranium is about three times more radioactive than non-enriched uranium,' said Prof. Jim Smith, from the University of Portsmouth, who has studied the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster. 'But … neither of them are particularly densely radioactive.
'It wouldn't cause a major environmental contamination problem.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's school pressure campaign
Presented by THE CATCH-UP SCHOOL DAZE: The Trump administration has partially backed down from its hold on almost $7 billion in federal funding for states and local schools, following a rare and ideologically broad backlash from Senate Republicans and a lawsuit from Democratic-led states. But most of the money is still being held back for now, pending further review, POLITICO's Juan Perez Jr. reports for Pros. Out of the freezer: Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who led the letter, announced that OMB Director Russ Vought told her the money would be released. The funds for after-school programs, summer school, teacher training and English-language learners were originally expected to be disbursed at the start of the month, and advocates warned that their loss could upend school-district budgets and programming. Testifying in Congress last month, Vought declined to rule out the prospect of including the congressionally approved funding in a future rescission package. Back in black: About $1.3 billion for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program is being released, after OMB finished a review of it, Juan reports. That 'could help ease an immediate budget crunch.' But Democrats said the freeze on the other dollars remained illegal and damaging: 'Every penny of this funding must flow immediately,' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said in a statement. More cuts: As the administration dismantles large parts of the Education Department, data shows that the number of civil rights cases resolved by the agency has plunged this year, AP's Collin Binkley reports. Education Secretary Linda McMahon told Congress last month that the pace wasn't slowing despite reduced staff, but the numbers tell a different story. Parents say they've felt the change. On campus: President Donald Trump's highest-profile education fights, though, remain with elite universities — and some of them are reaching a crescendo. The White House is reportedly close to finalizing a deal with Columbia, but its fight against Harvard is heading back to court for a high-profile hearing Monday, NYT's Alan Blinder and colleagues preview. Turning the Crimson tide: A deal with Harvard that Trump indicated last month was near still hasn't come together; in the meantime, the administration has continued to withhold research funding and repeatedly tried to increase its leverage with new demands and attacks. Negotiations are ongoing but 'have made limited headway,' the Times reports. 'Trump administration officials are looking to secure the most significant victory of their ongoing pressure campaign on academia.' But whether the judge rules for or against Harvard in its lawsuit over frozen funding could be pivotal to determining the contours of a deal. The man in the middle: Alan Garber is the subject of a big new profile by The Atlantic's Franklin Foer, who writes that the mild-mannered Harvard president has 'positioned himself as an institutionalist and an opponent of illiberalism in all its forms: its Trumpian variant, yes, but also illiberal forces within his own university.' That makes him a partially unlikely target of Trump's crackdown on universities. But on campus at least, 'having been cast as a figure of resistance, Garber has earned the political capital to pursue his agenda.' The big picture: 'Inside the powerful task force spearheading Trump's assault on colleges, DEI,' by WaPo's Laura Meckler and colleagues: 'The administration established the [Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism] in February to counter what it describes as widespread failure by universities to protect Jewish students since the start of campus protests against the Israel-Gaza war. In reality, many of the task force's unprecedented demands and punishments have nothing to do with antisemitism. Instead, they seek hiring and programming changes to strip long-standing conservative targets including DEI and a liberal worldview from higher education.' Happy Friday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Drop me a line at eokun@ 9 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW 1. KNOWING THE DISAPPEARED: 'He Came to the U.S. to Support His Sick Child. He Was Detained. Then He Disappeared,' by Melissa Sanchez and colleagues for ProPublica, The Texas Tribune, Alianza Rebelde Investiga and Cazadores de Fake News: 'Most of the men [deported to El Salvador without due process] were not hiding from federal authorities but were instead moving through the nation's immigration system. They were either in the middle of their cases, which normally should have protected them from deportation, or they had already been ordered deported and should have first been given the option to be sent back to a country they chose.' 2. THAT'S GONNA HURT: Affordable Care Act rates are set to surge next year — with large plans in Illinois, Texas, Washington, Georgia and Rhode Island seeking double-digit increases as high as 27 percent, WSJ's Anna Wilde Mathews scooped. The insurers blame rising costs as well as federal subsidy cuts. But the changes could be a rude awakening for consumers who have mostly seen single-digit hikes in recent years. 3. CLIMATE FILES: 'Trump administration memo could strike fatal blow to wind and solar power,' by POLITICO's Zack Colman and Josh Siegel: 'The directive could have a much broader impact, affecting scores of projects on private land that must pass through or connect with projects on Interior-managed federal land … Some companies and clean energy advocates worried the directive would slow solar and wind approvals to a crawl by creating a bottleneck at [Secretary Doug] Burgum's office.' 4. RESCISSIONS FALLOUT: Having now made it through Congress, the rescissions package's $1.1 billion in cuts to public broadcasting funding have local news operations worried about their survival, NBC's Megan Lebowitz and Raquel Coronell Uribe report. The fear is especially acute for smaller and more rural stations, where leaders are already making tough decisions about what to cut, AP's Mark Thiessen and David Bauder report from Anchorage, Alaska. For kids, the result could be a faster shift to less educational content on YouTube, streaming and social media, WaPo's Tatum Hunter reports. GOP victory: For conservatives, cutting PBS and NPR money is the attainment of a goal Republicans have tried but failed to reach for decades, NYT's Jim Rutenberg reports. Democrats see it as part of a Trump crackdown on journalism. But public media was also more vulnerable as Americans' information ecosystems have moved away from local news, eroding their support from Republican politicians who protected the funding in previous debates. 5. DEMOCRACY WATCH: 'Trump-Driven Chaos Comes to U.S. Attorney's Offices in Waves,' by NYT's Santul Nerkar and Jonah Bromwich: 'On Wednesday afternoon, the highest ranking federal prosecutor in Manhattan, Jay Clayton, was blindsided [by the firing of Maurene Comey] … Mr. Trump has concentrated power within the Justice Department in Washington and, in two of the [New York-area] offices, has elevated loyalists with little prosecutorial experience, leading to confusion and plummeting morale within the rank and file. His moves raise the question of what, exactly, a U.S. attorney is empowered to do, beyond serving Mr. Trump's chosen agenda.' One to watch: Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba could find out her fate at a federal judges' meeting Monday, just before her interim stint expires, the New Jersey Globe's David Wildstein reports. Habba told staffers that she hopes to stay in the role but doesn't know if she will. 6. ESCAPE TO ALCATRAZ: Trump is dead serious about trying to turn Alcatraz Island back into a new maximum-security prison — and the costliest option would top $2 billion, Axios' Marc Caputo scooped. 'Trump's interest in Alcatraz is motivated more by symbolism than necessity,' and it's early yet in the planning. Another possibility would cost $1 billion to build a smaller facility on part of the island. Trump hasn't made any final choices. 7. TRADING PLACES: Trump is taking a tougher tack in trade negotiations with the EU, demanding that a deal include tariffs of at least 15 to 20 percent, FT's Andy Bounds and colleagues report. That's higher than the 10 percent threshold they'd been discussing, and Trump doesn't want to move on auto tariffs either. The shift left European negotiator Maroš Šefčovič 'downbeat' in an evaluation today of how the talks are going. 'We don't want a trade war, but we don't know if the US will leave us a choice,' says one EU diplomat. 8. FED UP: As some conservatives seek to use concerns about the Fed's headquarters renovations as justification for Trump to fire Chair Jerome Powell, AP's Christopher Rugaber and Josh Boak report that Trump appointees pushed for more white marble to be included. In Trump's first term, his picks on the Commission of Fine Arts advocated for marble over the glass walls the Fed wanted, for aesthetic/historical reasons. 'The marble does not explain the roughly $600 million in cost overruns … But the roots of its extensive use further muddies the White House's attempts to use the renovation to paint the central banker as [a] profligate spender as a possible pretext to removing him.' 9. PLEADING THE FIFTH: Annie Tomasini today became the third former Joe Biden aide to invoke her Fifth Amendment right in the House Oversight Committee's probe of Biden's mental fitness. Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) slammed Tomasini as trying to hide the truth, while her attorney said there was no evidence of her wrongdoing — and that Biden made his end-of-term clemency decisions himself. The growing trend reflects Biden aides' 'fear that they have become targets for political retribution,' WaPo's Toluse Olorunnipa reports. Republicans allege a cover-up. TALK OF THE TOWN IN MEMORIAM — 'Ernest 'Pat' Furgurson, former Baltimore Sun columnist and historian, dies,' by The Baltimore Sun's Jacques Kelly: He was 'a former Baltimore Sun national affairs columnist, Washington bureau chief and a Civil War historian who also held posts in Moscow and Saigon … He was 95. … He was elected to Washington's Gridiron Club in 1977 and was its historian from 1992 to 2002.' — Andrew Schwartz, chief comms officer for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, died Wednesday. The center remembered him as 'a mentor, a coach, a brother to everyone in the CSIS family,' with a 'network in Washington [that] was far and wide.' Wrote Neal Urwitz, Schwartz was 'a Democrat who worked for Fox News, an adopted son of New Orleans who worked at a suit-and-tie think tank, and a digital-first communications pioneer who could barely turn on his computer.' OUT AND ABOUT — SPOTTED at Dentons' third annual summer bash Wednesday evening at Royal Sands Social Club: Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Jason Smith (R-Mo.), Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), Mike Collins (R-Ga.), Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), Dave Joyce (R-Ohio), Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), David Valadao (R-Calif.), Brian Babin (R-Texas), Andy Barr (R-Ky.), Vince Fong (R-Calif.) and Ron Estes (R-Kan.), Joe Crowley, Jeff Denham, Eric Tanenblatt, Matthew Cutts, Stephen Lawson, John Holahan, Mike Zolandz, Andrew Renteria, Terry McAuliffe and Kevin McCarthy. — Coinbase and Circle hosted a reception last night at The Ned to celebrate House passage of the GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act. SPOTTED: Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Reps. French Hill (R-Ark.), Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), Andy Barr (R-Ky.), Jim Himes (D-Conn.), Jeff Crank (R-Colo.), Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), Tim Moore (R-N.C.), Troy Downing (R-Mont.), Nick Begich (R-Alaska), Dave Taylor (R-Ohio) and Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.), Brooke Bennett, Brooke Nethercott, Grace White, Megan Guiltinan, Max Raymond, Ashley Gunn, Julia Krieger, Kara Calvert, Nick Carr, Darin Carter, Veronica Hash, Robin Cook, Faryar Shirzad, Paul Grewal, Andrew Gallucci, Ashley Scott, Caroline Hill, Lulio Vargas-Cohen, Dante Disparte, Amy Dudley, Heath Tarbert, Erik Rosenblatt, Anthony De Abreu, Alex Côté and Garrett Brock. TRANSITION — Mark Wetjen is now global head of policy and regulatory affairs at OKX. He previously was a partner at Dentons and is a former acting CFTC chair. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here. Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.


Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Bryson DeChambeau lobbies for British Open to return to Trump-owned Turnberry
PORTRUSH, Northern Ireland — Bryson DeChambeau appears to have a good relationship with President Donald Trump, with the pair once enjoying a round of golf that has been watched more than 15 million times on YouTube. Now the two-time major champion is doing some British Open campaigning for him. DeChambeau said Friday he's all for Trump's Turnberry course in Scotland hosting an Open for the first time since 2009. Turnberry has hosted four Opens — in 1977, 1986, 1994 and 2009 — but infrastructure hurdles have kept it from appearing more frequently in the rotation. Trump bought the resort in 2014. 'I look at it as a golf course,' DeChambeau said of the stunning links venue along the Ayrshire coast. 'It's one of the best golf courses in the world, and I'd love for it to be a part of the rotation. 'Albeit I haven't played it, I've heard so many great things about it, and anytime you get to play a special historical golf course like that, I think it's worthy of it, for sure.' Turnberry is still in the R&A's 10-venue Open rotation but isn't playing an active role. It last hosted the Open 16 years ago — before Trump bought the resort — when 59-year-old Tom Watson bogeyed the 72nd hole and lost in a playoff to Stewart Cink. Watson won the first Open at Turnberry 32 years earlier in the famed 'Duel in the Sun' with Jack Nicklaus. Speaking before the Open this week at Royal Portrush, R&A chief executive Mark Darbon said transportation and other issues had to be addressed before Turnberry gets its hands on the oldest major championship again. Darbon said the R&A met with Eric Trump and other leaders of Trump Golf a few months ago regarding the 'big logistical challenges' facing Turnberry and that the talks had been constructive. DeChambeau believes Trump would make Turnberry a special Open venue. 'He'd still probably respect the R&A and what they're trying to accomplish,' DeChambeau said. 'I can't speak on his behalf, but what I can say is knowing him, he'll do his best of a job as he possibly can.' DeChambeau's relationship with Trump is such that he joined him on stage at an election party in Florida in November before Trump was declared president again. DeChambeau also had a round of golf with Trump and some short-game practice on the South Lawn of the White House a few months ago. Around this time last year, they attempted to break 50 off the forward tees at the president's Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey using a scramble format. It went on YouTube and was a huge success. 'Got like 15 million views or something,' DeChambeau said. 'It was fun.' DeChambeau was speaking after shooting a 6-under 65 in the second round Royal Portrush in a bid to make the cut, having opened with a 78.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
The scandal that could finally end Trump
President Trump has survived everything. Two impeachments, four criminal indictments, a conviction on 34 felony counts, civil lawsuits, the 'Access Hollywood' tape, Jan. 6, classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, and an assassination attempt that left him bloodied but unbowed. If cats have nine lives, Trump seems to have 900. He is political kryptonite in reverse — every scandal that should have destroyed him only made him stronger. But Jeffrey Epstein might be different. For the first time in his presidency, Trump isn't fighting the media, the Democrats or 'the deep state.' He's fighting his own base. The MAGA faithful — who stood by him through porn actress payouts, impeachments, indictments and insurrections — are now asking if they were played. When your most loyal believers start calling you a liar, the ground doesn't just shift. It cracks. The scandal exploded when Trump's Justice Department concluded that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and had no 'client list.' The MAGA base was blindsided. These are people who spent years convinced that Epstein was murdered to protect powerful pedophiles, that a client list existed, and that Trump would be the one to expose it all. Instead, they got Attorney General Pam Bondi telling them to move on. Trump's response has been characteristically tone-deaf. 'LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!' he raged on Truth Social, dismissing Epstein as 'somebody that nobody cares about.' He got ratioed on his own platform — a first. When Trump loses control of the narrative on his own platform, it's not just noise — it's rupture. Something deep is breaking. This scandal isn't political theater — it's personal history clawing its way back to the surface. Trump's ties to Epstein weren't fleeting. They were familiar, consistent and laced with shared indulgence. The same circles. The same parties. The same taste for excess. Epstein didn't just pass through Mar-a-Lago. He was part of the furniture. The paper trail and testimonies don't hint. If anything, they scream. This wasn't a one-off handshake. It was a bond forged in secrecy, in appetite, and in mutual silence. Trump insists he cut ties. The evidence suggests otherwise. These weren't just two men in proximity. They were two men who understood how to navigate the same shadows. And now the believers — those who thought Trump would expose the filth — are staring down a truth they can't absorb. The man they believed was fighting the cabal may have been keeping its secrets. The disillusionment is no longer political. It's existential. The myth is cracking. And the messiah is starting to look like just another man. The fractures are spreading. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino clashed with Bondi at the White House over the handling of the Epstein files and took a day off work after the confrontation. When your own FBI leadership is publicly feuding with your attorney general, you've lost control of the narrative. Trump's usual survival tactics won't work here because he can't blame the 'fake news media' when his own supporters are demanding answers. He can't deflect to his political opponents when the questions come from within his own movement. He can't claim persecution when he's the one controlling the Justice Department. The establishment Republicans are rallying around him, as they always do. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) have expressed confidence in Bondi. But establishment support means nothing when you've lost your base, and Trump's power doesn't come from senators and congressmen — it comes from the millions of Americans who see him as their champion against corruption. Now those same Americans are asking what they never thought they would: Was it all a lie? If Trump came to drain the swamp, why is he shielding its filthiest creature? If he vowed to expose the elite, why is his Justice Department sweeping away the evidence? If he was the outsider, the hammer against corruption, why does he now sound like every other politician begging people to forget? The Epstein scandal strikes at the heart of Trump's identity. He didn't just promise change — he promised retribution. To be the wrecking ball, the purifier, the one man who couldn't be bought or compromised. But when it came time to prove it, he didn't choose justice. He chose silence. And now, his base is waking up to the betrayal. The armor has cracked. The mask is slipping. And the man they thought was different is starting to look just like the rest. Every other scandal in Trump's career involved actions that occurred in the political arena or could be dismissed as partisan warfare. But Epstein operates in a different moral universe. This isn't about tax returns or classified documents. This is about the sexual exploitation of children by powerful men who thought they were untouchable. Trump has always survived by attacking his accusers and changing the subject. But how do you attack grieving parents? How do you change the subject from child trafficking? How do you spin your way out of enabling a monster? The answer is: you don't. For the first time in his political career, Trump faces a scandal that cannot be tweeted away, litigated into submission or dismissed as a political hit job. The Epstein files represent the one truth that even Trump cannot deny or deflect.