logo
Nail bars, trendy brands: 125-year-old department store Myer promises major facelift

Nail bars, trendy brands: 125-year-old department store Myer promises major facelift

The Age28-05-2025
Flashy store displays, on-trend beauty and clothing labels, blow-dry services: these are features that Myer is promising Australians as it plots to turn around its reputation for being a decaying department store that only caters to older shoppers.
In a presentation blitz to investors on Wednesday, the first strategy day Myer has held since 2017, chief executive Olivia Wirth offered a glimpse into the work under way to win over younger customers and position the 125-year-old chain as the go-to retailer for the next generation of shoppers.
Wirth, who is nearing the one-year mark in her first CEO job, after nearly 15 years at Qantas, used her speech to set the tone for the company's 'transformation journey' for the next three to five years: no looking back.
'We were no longer hitting the mark in a number of product, brand and customer categories, including our exclusive brands,' she said on Wednesday morning.
'It is no exaggeration to suggest Myer's future would be at risk over the long term if we had continued on the path we were on.
'By knowing our customer, we are better placed to meet their needs, and I know that sounds obvious, but it's not something we have been doing.'
Here are the changes you can expect to see at a Myer department store near you:
Younger shoppers targeted; trendier brands brought in
Myer's biggest customer base is those 44 to 59 years of age, representing 30 per cent of their shoppers. It is 'under-indexed with 31 to 49-year-olds,' and just one in five Myer shoppers are under 30 years old.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Penalty rates bill aims to protect millions of workers
Penalty rates bill aims to protect millions of workers

Perth Now

time38 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Penalty rates bill aims to protect millions of workers

A casual hospitality worker can expect to have weekend penalty rates of about $40 an hour protected under a bid to prevent take home pay for employees from being shaved. Measures to enshrine penalty and overtime rates in law will be introduced in the House of Representatives on Thursday by Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth. The bill aims to prevent variations to awards that would result in lower pay for workers. It will be among the first pieces of legislation introduced by Labor in its second term of power following the May 3 federal election. Workers can be entitled to higher rates of pay when they are required to work particular hours or days including weekends, public holidays or irregular hours. While rates can vary depending on an employee's specific award or agreement applicable to that industry, common pay rates for workers on a Sunday are double time (200 per cent) or time-and-a-half (150 per cent). A calculation of rates on the Fair Work Commission's website show for a casual hospitality worker, common penalties for a shift on Saturday to be $40.85 per hour, while a day's work on Sunday could bring in $47.65 per hour. Protecting penalty rates was an Albanese government election pledge. Ms Rishworth said the bill will ensure the wages of about 2.6 million modern award-reliant workers are protected. "If you rely on the modern award safety net and work weekends, public holidays, early mornings or late nights, you deserve to have your wages protected," she said. "Millions of hard-working Australians rely on penalty rates and overtime rates to keep their heads above water, which is why this bill is so critical and should receive the support of both the opposition and the Greens." Labor's planned changes came after peak retail and business groups put forward proposals for large companies to opt out of providing penalty rates for staff in exchange for a raise on base levels of pay. Opposition employment spokesman Tim Wilson said the coalition supported penalty rates. "We will work through the legislation to make sure we consult the businesses and those it's going to impact to get the best outcome," he told AAP. Mr Wilson said the absence of a regulatory impact statement, which lays out the potential impacts of the proposed changes, meant consultation was even more important to ensure it would be part of the future success of the economy. The coalition also wants to assess how the changes would interact with the Fair Work Commission, which would be required to apply the new rules in addition to the modern awards objective in making its determination.

Calls for consumption tax to be off the roundtable menu
Calls for consumption tax to be off the roundtable menu

Perth Now

time38 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Calls for consumption tax to be off the roundtable menu

A push to raise the GST as part of the government's economic roundtable is being met with resistance, with the community services sector warning it would increase the burden on low-income earners. A number of prominent economists have advocated raising or broadening the 10 per cent GST to fund cuts to less-efficient levies such as income taxes. Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie objects to the proposal on the grounds it would increase inequality. "We need a fairer and more effective tax system that secures the revenue we need to fund essential services and safety nets while encouraging more productive investment to create jobs and lift living standards," she said. "This can be done with reforms that lift productivity and overall revenue without increasing the burden for people on low and modest incomes." While Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said increasing the tax on consumption does not fit with his agenda, Labor is pledging to overhaul Australia's tax system as part of an economic roundtable in August. The summit is aimed at kick-starting the nation's stalled productivity growth and living standards. Shifting from income to consumption tax would ease the burden on younger working Australians but it would also widen wealth inequality, deepen poverty and deliver only modest economic efficiency gains, a report produced by the council found. Broadly speaking, personal income tax is more progressive than the GST because people pay a higher rate the more they earn, whereas low-income earners tend to pay a higher proportion of their money on consumption taxes than people on higher incomes who save more. Instead, the government should take steps that reduce inequality while lifting productivity and revenue, report author Peter Davidson found. To that aim, they could tighten loopholes for family and corporate trusts, limit negative gearing, reduce tax concessions on superannuation and halve the 50 per cent discount on the capital gains tax. Changing the capital gains tax discount has been backed in by the Greens and Labor-aligned think tank the McKell Institute, which argued it could be tweaked to encourage new housing supply and make it easier for Australians to own their own home. Prospective homebuyers hoping for lower mortgage rates could get a clearer indication of the Reserve Bank's next move on Thursday when governor Michele Bullock speaks for the first time since a surprise surge in unemployment last week. Ms Bullock will talk about the RBA's dual mandate of maintaining low inflation and unemployment in a speech to the Anika Foundation in Sydney.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store