Nail bars, trendy brands: 125-year-old department store Myer promises major facelift
Flashy store displays, on-trend beauty and clothing labels, blow-dry services: these are features that Myer is promising Australians as it plots to turn around its reputation for being a decaying department store that only caters to older shoppers.
In a presentation blitz to investors on Wednesday, the first strategy day Myer has held since 2017, chief executive Olivia Wirth offered a glimpse into the work under way to win over younger customers and position the 125-year-old chain as the go-to retailer for the next generation of shoppers.
Wirth, who is nearing the one-year mark in her first CEO job, after nearly 15 years at Qantas, used her speech to set the tone for the company's 'transformation journey' for the next three to five years: no looking back.
'We were no longer hitting the mark in a number of product, brand and customer categories, including our exclusive brands,' she said on Wednesday morning.
'It is no exaggeration to suggest Myer's future would be at risk over the long term if we had continued on the path we were on.
'By knowing our customer, we are better placed to meet their needs, and I know that sounds obvious, but it's not something we have been doing.'
Here are the changes you can expect to see at a Myer department store near you:
Younger shoppers targeted; trendier brands brought in
Myer's biggest customer base is those 44 to 59 years of age, representing 30 per cent of their shoppers. It is 'under-indexed with 31 to 49-year-olds,' and just one in five Myer shoppers are under 30 years old.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
Mercury
3 hours ago
- Mercury
Retail trade falls despite Easter and Anzac Day
Don't miss out on the headlines from Money. Followed categories will be added to My News. Australians are still not spending despite back-to-back public holidays in April, and it could force the Reserve Bank of Australia to come to the rescue with additional rate relief. Retail sales fell by 0.1 per cent in April despite two holidays during the month, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show. This follows growth of 0.3 per cent in March 2025 and 0.2 per cent in February 2025. Food-related spending was up, with cafes, restaurants and takeaway services growing 1.1 per cent to be the standout. Oxford Economics Australia lead economist Ben Udy said the RBA might cut rates even sooner than expected. 'This weakness is one indication that households are being a little cautious in the face of rising global uncertainty,' he said. 'We still expect consumption to rise over the rest of the year, supported by the recovery in real household incomes and RBA rate cuts. 'But unless consumption picks up a little more strongly in the coming months, the RBA may cut rates even sooner than we currently expect.' RBA governor Michele Bullock delivered further rate relief in May. Picture: NewsWire / Nikki Short The RBA began its rate-cutting cycle in February, pausing on the cash rate in April before cutting again in May. It has reduced the official cash rate from 4.35 per cent at the start of 2025 to 3.85 per cent after the second interest rate reduction. ABS head of business statistics Robert Ewing said retail spending eased in April, particularly on clothing. 'Falls were partly offset by a bounce-back in Queensland as businesses recovered from the negative impacts of ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred last month,' he said 'The rise in food-related spending was driven by more dining out in Queensland this month. The bounce back comes after adverse weather negatively impacted cafe and restaurant sales, Mr Ewing said. Australians kept their hands in their pockets in April. Picture: NewsWire / Gaye Gerard There were mixed results across the industries, with the largest falls in clothing, footwear and personal accessory retailing, down 2.5 per cent, while department stores also slumped 2.5 per cent. This was partially offset by rises in other retailing up 0.7 per cent and household goods retailing which rose 0.6 per cent. 'Clothing retailers told us that the warmer-than-usual weather for an April month saw people holding off on buying clothing items, especially new winter season stock,' Mr Ewing said. Retail turnover rose in Queensland by 1.4 per cent and Western Australia 0.4 per cent, with all other states and territories recording a fall since March. 'Queensland retailers recovered from last month's temporary business closures and fewer customers,' Mr Ewing said. 'In April, we saw higher spending in the industries most impacted by ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred. 'More people dined out and made recovery purchases on household items like furniture and electrical goods.' Originally published as Spending falls below estimates, as holidays fail to lift consumer spending
