US tariffs on steel and aluminium may lead to job losses in Canada
Canada is the largest seller of steel and aluminum to the US.
Unifor, Canada's private sector union, and the Aluminium Association of Canada have expressed serious concerns over the immediate impact of the tariffs.
Unifor president Lana Payne was quoted by the news agency as saying: 'So this is going to have a very quick impact, I will say to you, on steel industry.'
According to the report, members of the Aluminium Association of Canada, including Rio Tinto, are reportedly considering diversifying to Europe in response to the 50% tariffs.
Nova Scotia-based Marid Industries CEO Tim Houtsma highlighted the impossibility of selling to the US market under these conditions, indicating a need for cost-watching and market exclusion fears.
Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced that Canada is ready to retaliate if negotiations with the US fail.
'We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans, and, in parallel, preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed,' he declared to the House of Commons.
Unifor has urged immediate retaliation and suggested halting exports of critical minerals to the US. The union also warned of potential layoffs in the auto and aerospace industries.
Canada imposed 25% tariffs on $21.79bn (C$29.78bn) worth of US imports in March.
Meanwhile, the Mining Association of British Columbia's 2025 economic impact study highlights 27 advanced-stage mining projects in British Columbia that could inject more than $90bn into the economy, potentially creating thousands of jobs and generating significant tax revenues.
Navigate the shifting tariff landscape with real-time data and market-leading analysis. Request a free demo for GlobalData's Strategic Intelligence .
"US tariffs on steel and aluminium may lead to job losses in Canada" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Just say no to Big Dope — and its push for even more legal marijuana
Will more marijuana use make America a better place? Not many who've seen and smelled what legalizing the drug has done to cities like New York, Washington, DC, and San Francisco would say so. Yet President Donald Trump is contemplating a change to marijuana's federal classification that would make it easier to buy and more profitable to sell. The pot industry — Big Dope — is heavily invested in getting its product recategorized from a Schedule 1 to a Schedule 3 drug. Industry leaders ponied up for a $1-million-a-plate Trump fundraising dinner earlier this month to hear what the president had in mind, according to The Wall Street Journal. The president should ignore the well-funded cannabis lobby: What matters is what more and cheaper marijuana will mean for ordinary Americans. Twenty-four states have legalized recreational use of the drug, despite the ugly results experienced by the first state to do so. Taking advantage of high Democratic turnout the year of President Barack Obama's re-election, activists passed a Colorado ballot measure to make pot legal back in 2012. Legalization didn't take effect until 2014, but by 2022 marijuana use in Colorado and other states that had then legalized was 24% higher than in states where recreational use remained illegal. A study by the South Korean scholar Sunyoung Lee published in the International Review of Law and Economics this year examines what's happened to crime levels in US states that legalized pot. Lee reported his findings 'do not yield conclusive evidence supporting a reduction in crime rates after legalizing recreational marijuana. Rather, they underscore notable positive associations with property crimes and suggest potential correlations with violent crimes.' The marijuana lobby claims that drug prohibition, not the drug itself, drives violent crime. That would be a bad argument even without evidence like Lee's, which suggests legal weed makes crime worse. After all, any profit-driven criminal enterprise could be shut down by simply legalizing the crime in question. If bank robbery were legal, bank robbers wouldn't need to use guns. If auto theft were legal, carjackers wouldn't have to use force, and there wouldn't be any violence associated with black-market chop shops because the chop shops would all be as legal as the commercial marijuana industry is today. Legalize everything Tony Soprano does, and Tony won't have to get rough — but he'll only do more of what he was doing before. Libertarians who argue for legalizing drugs to stop drug violence are closer than they realize to the radical leftists who argue property crimes shouldn't be prosecuted. The psychology is the same: They sympathize with the people who make it harder to live in a civilized society and reject society's right to defend its rules. There are downsides to laws against marijuana, just as there are costs to protecting private property and citizens' bodily safety. But the costs are well worth paying when the alternative is passivity in the face of aggression, handing your belongings or your life over to any thug who makes a demand. For a time marijuana legalization was sold to voters as just a matter of leaving people alone to consume whatever they want in private, without bothering anybody else. Yet millions of Americans have now lived long enough with pot legalization, or the non-enforcement of laws still on the books, to know the pot lobby perpetrated a fraud. What the country has actually had to deal with is pot smoking so rife in public that the offensive smell — and the sight and sounds of intoxication — smacks you in your face. It's hardly different from dope-users blowing smoke right in your eyes on the street. That's not the worst crime in the world — but neither is shoplifting, and there's no reason to tolerate that, either. Tolerating such things only breeds more tolerance for worse abuses, which is what has led progressives to treat even violent criminals with the utmost leniency. Two scenes in the suburbs of DC convinced me pot tolerance has gone too far. First was seeing an African-American bus driver, on a blazing hot summer day, order two dope-smoking teens to put out their joints and be aware there were children around. To the extent our cities work at all it's because of working-class men like him — and the rest of us have to decide whether we're on his side or the punks'. A year or so later I watched a young mother one bright October afternoon hold her small daughter's hand as they walked through a neighborhood reeking of high-potency pot. The multibillion-dollar weed industry got to advertise its product to a little girl about 4 years old that day. It's an industry that notoriously even sells its drug in candy form, as 'gummies.' Our cities and towns shouldn't be open-air drug dens — and Trump shouldn't let a lobby get high off of making Americans' lives worse. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.
NBC News
18 minutes ago
- NBC News
These are smart moves for required withdrawals in retirement when you don't need the money
As year-end approaches, some older Americans must soon take required withdrawals from retirement accounts — and there are several options if you don't need the money, experts say. Most retirees must take required minimum distributions, or RMDs, from pretax retirement accounts starting at age 73 or face an IRS penalty. The first deadline is April 1 of the year after turning 73, and Dec. 31 is the due date for future years. But some retirees have 'a lot of guaranteed income' before RMDs, or spend less than they have coming in, according to Judy Brown, a certified financial planner who works at C&H Group in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore area. In 2024, Social Security was the most common source of retirement income. But 81% of retirees had one or more types of private income, such as pensions, investments, rental income or employment, according to a Federal Reserve report published in May. When retirees have more than they need, there could be decisions about how to spend or reinvest their RMDs, experts say. 'It can definitely impact a lot of people,' and the right choice depends on your financial needs and goals, said Brown, who is also a certified public accountant. Here are some options to consider. Reinvest with exchange-traded funds If you still want long-term growth, you can reinvest RMD proceeds into a brokerage account. But you need to choose assets carefully because the account incurs yearly taxes, experts say. Typically, experts suggest exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, over mutual funds in a brokerage account because the assets are less likely to distribute capital gains or dividends throughout the year. 'It's also easier for tax-loss harvesting,' which involves selling a losing brokerage account asset to offset other portfolio gains, Brown said. Since ETFs trade throughout the day like a stock, you have more control when selling specific assets, she said. 'Skip the tax bill' with a transfer to charity For charitable investors, you could also consider a so-called qualified charitable distribution, or QCD, experts say. Open to retirees age 70½ or older, QCDs are a direct transfer from an individual retirement account to an eligible non-profit organization. For 2025, the limit is $108,000 per investor. Once you're 73 or older, you can use QCDs to satisfy yearly RMDs and the transfer won't increase your adjusted gross income. 'It's the IRS' best-kept secret for retirees,' said CFP Ashton Lawrence at Mariner Wealth Advisors in Greenville, South Carolina. 'Skip the tax bill and help a cause you believe in.' Legacy planning with a 529 contribution If legacy planning is important, you can also consider using RMDs to contribute to a 529 college savings plan for your family, experts say. As of May 2025, more than 30 states offer a state tax credit or deduction for 529 contributions, according to education website Saving for College. In most cases, this requires a deposit to your state's plan. There is not currently a federal income tax break for contributions.'It's not going to be enough to offset all of their state [income] taxes,' said Brown. But you can 'get a benefit going for the grandchildren' while securing a state tax break for yourself, she said.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP alerts investors of the imminent September 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action filed on behalf of investors who acquired XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP ('XPLR' or the 'Company') (NYSE:XIFR) securities during the period from September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025 ('the Class Period'). The firm encourages investors to contact the firm as soon as possible to be appointed lead plaintiff. [ LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION ] On January 28, 2025, XPLR announced that it would suspend cash distributions to common unitholders entirely and essentially abandon its yieldco model. In a press release, XPLR revealed a strategic repositioning and stated that the Company was moving from a business model that focused almost entirely on raising new capital to acquire assets while distributing substantially all of its excess cash flows to unitholders to a model in which XPLR Infrastructure utilizes retained operating cash flows to fund attractive investments. In addition, XPLR announced that the Company's CEO and CFO had both resigned and been replaced. On this news, the price of XPLR's common units declined by $5.31, or approximately 33.6%, from $15.80 per unit on January 27, 2025 to close at $10.49 per unit on January 29, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that XPLR made materially false and/or misleading statements regarding the Company's: (i) struggle to maintain its operations as a yieldco; (ii) financing arrangements which were made while downplaying the attendant risks; (iii) inability to resolve those financings before their maturity date without risking unitholder dilution, and (iv) plan to halt cash distributions to investors and redirect funds to resolve those financings. If you purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@ or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters without any cost to you. [ CONTACT FORM ] Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP's website. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
