Eminem vs Meta: Rapper sues Facebook parent for $109million after using his hits on its platform
Eminem is suing technology giant Meta, claiming the social media company distributed over 200 of his songs to users without permission.
The 'Lose Yourself' rapper's music publishing company, Eight Mile Style, accused Mark Zuckerberg's Meta – the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp – of copyright infringement in the May 30 lawsuit.
Potential damages could be more than $109 million. The company is seeking statutory damages of up to $150,000 per song, per platform, according to a copy of the lawsuit obtained by PEOPLE.
The lawsuit alleges Eminem's songs were made available in Meta's 'Music Libraries' to then be used in user-generated content using features such as Original Audio and Reels Remix.
The feature has allowed the Grammy-winning artist's songs to be used in millions of videos and streamed billions of times, according to the suit.
Eight Mile Style claims in the suit that Meta violated the copyright of 243 songs from its catalogue through the 'unauthorized storage, reproduction and exploitation' of the songs on various platforms.
The lawsuit claims that because of this, there is now a 'diminished value of the copyrights by Defendants' theft of them, lost profits, and Defendants' profits attributable to the infringement.'
His company is seeking monetary damages and has asked for the maximum statutory damages, or $150,000 for each song, per platform, which would result in $109,350,000 in damages. Eight Mile Style has also requested a jury trial, according to the report.
Court documents allege that Meta tried to get licenses through Audiam, Inc, a digital royalty collection and payment engine, though Eight Mile Style says it did not give Audiam access.
The lawsuit states that while Meta removed some songs after Eight Mile Style's earlier complaints, they allegedly 'reproduced and stored unauthorized unlicensed copies.'
In comments to The Independent, a Meta spokesperson said, 'Meta has licenses with thousands of partners around the world and an extensive global licensing program for music on its platforms. Meta had been negotiating in good faith with Eight Mile Style, but rather than continue those discussions, Eight Mile Style chose to sue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Why Apple's VisionPro won't make XR headsets mainstream
Major announcements around the VisionPro headset are expected next week and may even confirm tantalizing rumors that a lighter model of the high-end XR device is coming next year. Whatever Apple reveals at WWDC, we can expect another round of analyst predictions that this time, mass adoption of head-mounted displays is finally happening. As Apple, Meta, and other major players continue to struggle with taking the technology mainstream, it's worth addressing the virtual elephant in the room: There's reason to suspect that XR headsets' barrier to success isn't just about cost, headset weight, lack of content, eye strain, or other frequently cited issues. Neuroscience suggests that the sensory experience of XR can't compensate for the value of sharing a physical environment with our screens—especially when it comes to how we form knowledge and memory. Experiments with XR for Full-Time Computing About 10 years ago, I started spending long sessions in VR (4–8 hours daily over several weeks) to see how it might affect my sense of time and attention. I began with the HTC Vive, which was comfortable and fun. Later, I tested the Apple VisionPro with a full virtual workstation of monitors and displays. I was curious whether XR could improve focus and research. It felt like a very different thing to use VR all day, versus a brief demo in a museum or Apple showroom. Early on, I had to stand and move constantly throughout the day. It was exhausting, though it made for a great workout (SUPERHOT was one of my favorites). But this kind of motion-based interaction didn't translate well to daily work tasks. Tossing data around in 3D like in Minority Report might make for compelling cinema, but it's far less practical over time. When the VisionPro arrived, I was excited to use it while seated. A friend set me up with a massive virtual workspace, and I genuinely appreciated the focus it provided when I was digging into something new—say, reading a dense Wikipedia article. Still, when I set up my home office last year, I chose two large physical monitors at eye level and a sit/stand desk. As enjoyable as VR was, the process of setup and adjusting the space took more time and energy than docking a laptop. And even though I was initially thrilled to be in a virtual workspace, I found myself feeling more distant from the real world. I wanted to go outside more, and didn't feel like looking at any screen at all by day's end. I also noticed the difference in eye strain from screens so close to my face. I prefer to work near a window where I can shift my gaze into the distance. That rhythm of looking away and refocusing helps me process thoughts—especially after encountering something new. The Trouble With Losing Touch I asked my colleague Dr. David Sisson, a neurophysiologist, why XR adoption hasn't matched media hype. He reminded me that audio and visual inputs—the primary senses XR taps into—aren't the full picture. Then there's the matter of touch in XR. 'Without touch, there's no 'intimacy.' You're not really interacting with what's going on,' David told me. 'You can hit a ball—and hear the 'crack' in VR—but you're not feeling anything other than a little jerk in the controller that makes you feel like there's some inertia happening.' In short, headsets deprive us of the tactile and physical context that supports memory formation. Contrast that with playing a console game: you're anchored in a physical space, hands on colorful controllers, with the screen at a distance. If you're like me, you vividly remember not just the game, but the exact couch you sat on and the friends or family who played with you. The Neuroscience of Virtual Experience This sense of 'placeness' goes beyond just touch. As David explained, '[C]hemical senses are not a part of [the VR experience] . . . There's a well-considered idea, a linkage between olfaction, smell between memory—that you're living that out of the [VR] picture entirely.' Attempts at incorporating virtual smells into XR exist, but it's unclear whether they're effective—or even desirable. Recent research supports what French literature has long told us: smell powerfully evokes memory. Studies show scent not only enhances recall but may also support learning across other sensory areas. While XR devices like VisionPro do re-create home and office setups and allow for vast screen real estate, they lack a true sense of location. Evolution shaped our brains to operate differently depending on whether we're traveling or at home. Researchers call this the encoding specificity principle —our memories link closely with the environment where they were first formed. With a headset on, our minds don't fully orient to a place, and so we never quite settle in. Apple offers a vast virtual workspace you can take on the go, but that benefit comes at the cost of the sensory richness and physical grounding of a real-world setup. Neuroscience, not just practicality, suggests that working in a physical space—with monitors, windows, textures, smells, and distance—offers deeper engagement and memory retention. Putting the 'Pro' in VisionPro To be clear, XR headsets excel in specific contexts like rehabilitation or short bursts of fully embodied interaction, where body motion tracking is vital. Some content creators might find immense value in a distraction-free, multiscreen virtual studio. But that's not a mass-market audience. XR evangelists may continue promoting VisionPro as the breakout device, but we—and Apple, for that matter—should remember that 'Pro' isn't just branding. It reflects the narrow set of advanced use cases that justify immersion. For most of us, computing still works best in a physical world that engages all five senses. And that's not something XR can replicate—at least, not yet.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The two rules investors need to follow right now as the S&P 500 eyes a return to 6,000
The stock market has almost regained a foothold at the 6,000 level, recovering over a tumultuous eight weeks in which it fell almost 20% into a bear market. Big round numbers don't necessarily signal anything special for stocks, but they can serve as a psychological hurdle that, once overcome, could add to an existing rally — or serve as a gut check. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? The two rules investors need to follow right now as the S&P 500 eyes a return to 6,000 10 nuclear stocks expected to rise as much as 94% after Meta-Constellation deal 10 stocks in this year's strongest sector expected to grow fastest through 2027 Investors and 401(k)s have recovered significant ground since President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs announced April 2 dealt a blow to the S&P 500 index SPX and other major U.S. equity gauges. Stocks have continued climbing even as U.S. courts have entered the mix, adding yet another potential wrinkle to the on-again-off-again tariff dynamic. For the most part, however, tariff jitters were being offset by a view on Wall Street that the worst-case tariff scenario appears to be off the table. That's been credited with helping the S&P 500 climb back to 5,970 as of Wednesday's close, 19.8% above its April 8 low, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Yet a firm grip on the 6,000 level could prove hard to achieve. 'The number itself doesn't matter,' Donald Calcagni, chief investment officer at Mercer Advisors, said in a phone call Wednesday. What ultimately matters is corporate earnings, interest rates and valuations, he said. In that regard, the S&P 500's recent price-to-earnings estimate of around 21 suggests equity valuations look 'pretty high,' Calcagni said, especially given all the uncertainty on the horizon. Richard Steinberg, chief market strategist at Focus Partners Wealth, also sees potential stumbling blocks to holding on to the 6,000 milestone, especially with the Federal Reserve, big companies and investors stuck in wait-and-see mode on several fronts. 'I think it's a tough road for the president,' Steinberg said, referring to the Republican tax and spending megabill awaiting action in the Senate, but we are in 'a healthy part of the phase' in terms of pushback on the sweeping proposal. It might end up being a case where, for Republicans, you 'can't always get what you want,' he said. 'I think the markets are OK with that.' Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA and until recently a top adviser to Trump, added to the uncertainty around the bill's fate Tuesday, calling it an 'abomination.' Concerns about the economy also were in focus Wednesday after data suggested surprising weakness in private-sector jobs in May and signs of other potential cracks emerging in what's known as the hard data. See: Car buyers drove sales to a 4-year high to beat tariffs. Now sales are running out of gas. Calcagni at Mercer said he sees the stock market as 10% to 15% overpriced at the moment and expects 'the next shoe to drop' likely 'on or around July 9.' That's when a 90-day pause on some of Trump's tariffs is due to expire. Meanwhile, Wall Street equity strategists have been busy increasing their year-end targets for the stock market. Barclays bumped its S&P 500 target up slightly to 6,050 from 5,900, becoming the latest big bank to make upward adjustments. As of Wednesday, the S&P 500 was still 2.8% below its Feb. 19 record close. Calcagni expects fallout over tariffs and the U.S. deficit to loom large over stocks in the weeks ahead, making it important for investors to diversify their holdings beyond U.S. stocks and bonds. 'It's the bond market that's going to finance all this debt,' he told MarketWatch, which gives it the 'ultimate power.' The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Wednesday that the Republican bill would add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit. A review of CBO forecasts showed they have consistently underestimated actual U.S. deficits over the past 25 years. 'The No. 1 rule is this is not a hero's market,' Calcagni said, adding that investors shouldn't own just one stock or even one single asset class. And Rule No. 2? 'Yesterday's safe-haven assets will not be tomorrow's safe-haven assets,' he said. 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? Options traders pile into bearish bets on Tesla at fastest pace on record as Musk-Trump feud escalates Buy-the-dip retail investors are getting bolder, just when the risks are getting bigger, say analysts What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WhatsApp 都可以自己寫 AI 機器人？官方確認正在測試
ChatGPT、DeepSeek 的使用介面都有一個共通之處，就是以對話方式呈現，而本來就是通訊軟件的 WhatsApp 也相當有潛質可以成為一個 AI 平台。WABetaInfo 就發現 WhatsApp 正向小部分 beta 測試者開放試用 AI Studio 的新功能，讓用戶可以自行創作 AI 對話機器人。 母公司 Meta 旗下的 Messenger 和 Instagram 其實都已經在海外加入了 AI Studio，也有專屬的網頁版本，不過這次就是給 WhatsApp 這個不一樣的用戶群體也可以使用。在 AI Studio 裡面，用戶可以設計對話機器人的性格、角色，包括是熱情、直接的旅遊顧問；具自信、有魄力的教練，當然背後會是由 Meta AI 模型驅動。 相對於 OpenAI 的 GPTs 和 Google Gemini Gem 服務，WhatsApp 的版本更著重於私人使用，因為使用者需要自行把 AI 機器人的連結分享出去，而不像其他服務會有個市集般的地方讓其他人發掘使用。 目前未知 AI Studio 什麼時候才會正式推出，更未知會否開放到我們本地用戶，但反正 Meta 是在密密加強 WhatsApp 的能力。 更多內容： Introducing GPTs Build custom experts with Gems WhatsApp beta for iOS 25.17.10.75: what's new? WhatsApp to let users build their own AI chatbots to use in the app Perplexity AI 加入 WhatsApp，香港可用、免登入、免 VPN！吉卜力風格、中文對答都可以！ 遲到好過冇到！iPad 版 WhatsApp 終於登陸 App Store 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！ 🎉📱 Tech Facebook： 🎉📱 Tech Instagram： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道： 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道：
