logo
Are existing mechanisms effective in preventing custodial violence?

Are existing mechanisms effective in preventing custodial violence?

The Hindu10-07-2025
The gruesome death of security guard B. Ajith Kumar, 27, while in police custody in Tamil Nadu's Sivaganga district last month, is yet another grim addition to the long and growing list of custodial deaths in India. In response, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has ordered a CBI probe to ensure a transparent investigation, and the Madras High Court has directed the agency to complete its inquiry and submit a report by August 20.
Are the existing institutional mechanisms effective in preventing custodial violence? Here we discuss the question.
Guests: Anup Surendranath, Professor and Executive Director of The Square Circle Clinic, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad; M. Srinivasan, Professor of Criminology at the University of Madras
Host: Aaratrika Bhaumik
Edited by Sharmada Venkatasubramanian
Read the parley article here.
You can now find The Hindu's podcasts on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Stitcher. Search for Parley by The Hindu.
Write to us with comments and feedback at socmed4@thehindu.co.in
For more Parley episodes:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court gives arrest shield to Pharmacy Council president, questions CBI's evidence
Court gives arrest shield to Pharmacy Council president, questions CBI's evidence

Hindustan Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Court gives arrest shield to Pharmacy Council president, questions CBI's evidence

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Thursday granted anticipatory bail to Pharmacy Council of India's (PCI) president Montu M Patel in a corruption case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the health ministry's complaint, saying there was a need to strike a balance between personal liberty and a fair investigation. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) headquarters in New Delhi (PTI) According to the first information report (FIR) filed by CBI, Patel conspired with others to grant approvals to pharmacy colleges in exchange for bribes. Special judge Sushant Changotra told the CBI that it hadn't produced evidence to implicate Patel. 'The courts are under bounden duty to strike a fair balance vis-a-vis the protection of personal liberty of an individual/right of an investigating agency for fair investigation,' the judge said. Changotra added that the court would fail in its duty if Patel's personal liberty were not protected, especially when the allegations against him were not prima facie supported by any cogent material. In March 2023, the health ministry's under secretary complained to CBI about the corruption allegations. A preliminary probe was taken up over the last two years and a casewas registered after the investigation supported allegations of manipulation in the inspection and regulation process of pharmacy colleges. Earlier this month, CBI carried out searches at Patel's Ahmedabad residence. Patel, through senior advocate Vikas Pahwa, moved anticipatory bail before the Rouse Avenue Court, arguing that the allegations against him were 'malicious' and were concocted by certain office bearers of PCI over personal enmity. The court rapped the agency for not being able to produce enough material to seek Patel's custodial interrogation. 'Despite opportunities and having inquired/investigated for more than 2 years and 4 months, the investigating agency has not been able to collect even an iota of material to connect the accused with either of the two co-accused persons or with any other college/authority vis-a-vis the allegations levelled in the FIR,' the court said. The judge also questioned how the CBI arrived at the figure of ₹5,000 crores - the amount of bribes collected by PCI functionaries. 'Despite repeated queries of the court, the IO could not specify as to how he had quoted the bribe amount of Rs. 5,000 crores,' the court said in its order. The court underlined that the properties worth ₹118 crore identified by CBI could not be connected to Patel, or whether he bought it before becoming PCI president or after assuming the office. 'The said facts at the face of it makes the allegations qua the above stated quantum highly doubtful. The said fact on the contrary also makes one wonder that if such allegations were true, then as to how CBI was not able to find any material to support its allegations even after conducting inquiry/ investigation for more than 2 years and 4 months,' the court noted. The court said that the Patel had already cooperated in the investigation by joining the probe on the three dates given to him by the IO and that nothing further needed to be recovered from him in custody. 'In the end, it has to be said that the prosecution has not been able to substantiate even a single set of allegations levelled against the applicant. The FIR shows that the allegations have been levelled against the applicant, even though all the decisions were taken by the Executive Body or Central Council consisting of several other members,' the order said.

Posing as CBI officers, trio held in Lucknow for ₹56L cyber fraud
Posing as CBI officers, trio held in Lucknow for ₹56L cyber fraud

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Posing as CBI officers, trio held in Lucknow for ₹56L cyber fraud

At least three men were arrested on Thursday by the Cyber Crime Police Station here for allegedly duping a woman of ₹56 lakh after posing as Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officers. The accused reportedly forced the woman into digital confinement, claiming she was involved in money laundering and terrorism cases. The arrested individuals were identified as Anurag Katwari from Sultanpur, and Prakhar Pratap Singh and Anupam Singh, both residents of Rae Bareli (Sourced) The arrested individuals were identified as Anurag Katwari from Sultanpur, and Prakhar Pratap Singh and Anupam Singh, both residents of Rae Bareli. All three are in their twenties. Police said two mobile phones, 14 debit cards, and seven cheque books were recovered from their possession. According to Brijesh Yadav, in-charge of Cyber Police Station, Lucknow, the incident occurred on July 18, when the victim, Rita Bhasin, received a phone call from a person claiming to be a CBI officer. She was informed that her Aadhaar and mobile number were linked to illegal activities and that a case had been registered against her in Andheri East, Mumbai. The call was then transferred to a person pretending to be a Mumbai Police officer through a WhatsApp video call. The impersonator, wearing a police uniform, allegedly intimidated her with threats of arrest and legal consequences. To avoid detention, the woman was instructed to isolate herself in a room and remain visible on video calls at all times. She was also warned not to contact anyone and was shown a fabricated arrest warrant and seizure order. Under the pretext of making a court-mandated payment, she was initially forced to transfer ₹47 lakh, followed by further transactions amounting to a total of ₹56 lakh. Additional DCP (Crime/Cyber) Rallapalli Vasanth Kumar said the accused impersonated officials from agencies such as the police, RBI, and CBI. Using fake documents and staged video calls, they allegedly convinced victims they were under 'critical arrest' and that compliance through money transfers was necessary to avoid jail. Investigations revealed that the money was routed through multiple bank accounts, converted into cryptocurrency (USDT), and dispersed among the members of the gang. 'An FIR under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology Act has been registered,' the SHO added.

Madras HC quashes money laundering case against KN Nehru's brother Ravichandran
Madras HC quashes money laundering case against KN Nehru's brother Ravichandran

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Madras HC quashes money laundering case against KN Nehru's brother Ravichandran

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has quashed the money laundering case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against N Ravichandran, brother of Tamil Nadu Minister for Municipal Administration and Water Supply, KN Nehru. A division bench comprising Justices MS Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan passed the orders on Thursday by allowing the petition filed by Ravichandran, True Value Homes (India) Private Limited, TVH Energy Resource Private Limited and others, seeking to quash the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the ED on 27 September, 2024, based on a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case over alleged diversion of loan funds. Considering the fact that the predicate offence case was quashed by a single judge of the court on the grounds that no crime was committed in the alleged diversion of funds and that no public officials were involved, the division bench ordered the quashing of the ECIR. The ED had conducted raids at several premises, including those belonging to Nehru, his son and Lok Sabha Member KN Arun Nehru, and his brother Ravichandran from 7 to 9 April, 2025, which caused ripples in political circles. The raids were based on the CBI case registered in 2021.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store