‘Wild': Owner of viral Sydney cafe responds to shock decision
'The corporate world just wasn't really rewarding or gave me any satisfaction,' Ms Karakelle told news.com.au.
So, after Covid prompted her to make a career change, she set her sights on opening a 'hole in the wall' sandwich shop, something intimate and local.
And her gamble paid off.
Since opening in March, MLK Deli quickly outgrew the quaint vision she had for it.
'We definitely didn't think it would be a 'destination' spot where people would travel just to try our food,' she admits. 'The original plan was just to serve our community – but it was incredibly rewarding and uplifting to see such a positive response'.
On weekends, people from across Sydney and even Australia line up to try their famous sandwiches, with 'wild' queues often snaking down the street.
Much of this buzz, Ms Karakelle says, is thanks to the now-legendary Risky Brisket sandwich, which catapulted them into the Instagram and TikTok foodie spotlight.
The sandwich became a viral hit thanks to its generous 170-180 gram portion of grass-fed brisket.
'It's a labour of love,' she laughs. 'We brine each slab of brisket for six to seven days, then on the day of serving, we start early at around 5am, rub it with our house spices, smoke it for a few hours, then cook it further'.
To assemble the sandwich, they add melted Swiss cheese and some sauerkraut, and serve it with a side of pickles and salt-and-vinegar chips.
It costs $22.90, and if that seems steep, it doesn't seem to scare off many customers.
'We go through about 15 to 20 kilos of brisket daily, and on crazy days, we sell around 250 sandwiches until we run out,' Ms Karakelle explains.
When demand exceeds supply, fans flood Google reviews and social media to rant about missing out.
And that's exactly what happened this weekend – all because the deli couldn't put the famous sandwich on the menu on one of the days.
'The brisket came out of the oven and didn't meet our quality standards,' she says. 'We had used a different supplier due to current beef supply issues, and it just wasn't tender enough'.
Despite knowing they could 'get away with' still using the brisket by adding extra sauces or slicing it thinner, Ms Karakelle says that wasn't an option for her.
'These are all shortcuts and just not the right thing to do,' she said.
When fans came to the counter disappointed, some quickly took to the internet to vent.
'My phone was blowing up, people were spamming us, and we were getting all these one-star reviews,' she recalls. 'I thought, 'You've got to be kidding me' – it broke my heart'.
Wanting to address the backlash in one go, she decided to make a TikTok video explaining what had happened.
'Even if some people hate us, at least they can understand why we made that decision. It wasn't because 'We don't know how to supply our shop properly,' as some suggested – it was an issue of quality,' she explains.
Support flooded in from commenters and fans.
'You actually chose to be a responsible business and not serve a bad product?! Please don't apologise! You did the right thing!' read one comment.
Another added, 'I'd much rather that than be served something rubbish! Good on you for taking pride in what you serve'.
Despite the tough couple of days, Ms Karakelle is hopeful that the ordeal will only further promote their high standards to customers.
'If this can serve as a reminder of how we operate, then there's a lesson in that. Like all the bad things, they happen for a reason,' she says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
13 minutes ago
- ABC News
Western Sydney Airport official who sought $200k kickback narrowly avoids jail time
The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has claimed its first scalp with the sentencing of a corrupt Western Sydney Airport official who asked for a $200,000 kickback. Sajish Erasery pleaded guilty to soliciting a corrupt commission after he attempted to invite a bribe from a company vying for a $5 million contract to provide automated parking systems at the soon-to-be completed airport. The anti-corruption watchdog found the former executive procurement manager had initially proposed he could "get the deal over the line" if he received $250,000, which equated to 5 per cent of the contract's value. The NACC said in a statement Erasery later reduced this figure to $200,000 and suggested a scheme to repay the business by inflating invoices. The Australian Federal Police arrested the man in March 2024 after his former employer referred the matter to the commission. He has been sentenced to two years' jail, which will be served in the community and require him to complete 500 hours of community service. The airport is due to be complete in 2026. Erasery is the first person to be sentenced following an investigation initiated by the NACC. Since the watchdog's inception, there have been convictions in nine other cases which were inherited from the former Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in July 2023. The latest of those cases involved Anne McCann, a former Department of Home Affairs immigration officer, who abused power in public office by approving a visa application for her brother-in-law. Both matters were prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
ABC News
13 minutes ago
- ABC News
UN climate chief urges Australia to 'go big' on 2035 emissions target
One of the world's top climate diplomats has urged the federal government to commit to an ambitious 2035 target to cut carbon emissions, saying Australia can reap "colossal" economic rewards if it embraces clean energy. The federal government is due to unveil its 2035 target by September this year, while the Coalition continues to be consumed by a furious internal debate on whether it should maintain its commitment to net zero by 2050. The Climate Change Authority is preparing advice on a 2035 target between 65 and 75 per cent, which will inform the target the government will submit to the UN's climate agency. UN climate change executive secretary Simon Stiell, who presides over the agency responsible for managing the Paris Agreement to limit global warming, is visiting Sydney and Canberra this week as he presses countries across the globe to ramp up their climate ambitions. Mr Stiell called the new climate target a "defining moment" for Australia, and said the government had "one shot to build a blueprint that protects Aussie workers and businesses by preparing them for a fast-changing global economy". Mr Stiell used a speech to a group of investors and clean energy representatives in Sydney to warn "unchecked climate change" would be an "economic wrecking ball" for the Australian and global economy, and that action was imperative. Mr Stiell said climate disasters were "already costing Australian homeowners $4 billion a year" and that unchecked climate change would "cripple Australia's food production" and drain trillions from national GDP by 2050. "You know half measures will destroy property and infrastructure, hammer households, bankrupt regions, and punch holes in public budgets," he said. "And you know that real action opens the door to real leadership and big rewards for this ambitious, capable country." Standing alongside Mr Stiell, the Climate Change Authority's (CCA) chair Matt Kean said the stakes "couldn't be higher" for Australia, but that pursuing net zero emissions also presented an opportunity for the sun-rich and mineral-rich nation. "'Shine, baby, shine' and 'store baby store' should carry an Australian trademark and be hollered from our rooftops — perhaps with an Aussie accent," Mr Kean said in a reference to United States President Donald Trump's "drill, baby, drill" remark. The CCA boss also said that, ahead of the next international climate conference, "maximum ambition should be the catch-cry". The United States has slashed clean energy subsidies and pulled out of the Paris Agreement under Mr Trump. However, Mr Stiell said investment in renewables in countries like India and China was "off the chart" and "trillions of dollars are shifting" globally. Mr Stiell said a "bog standard" 2035 target would be "beneath" Australia, and that government and business had the capacity to deliver transformational change. "This is the moment to get behind a climate plan that doesn't just write that vision into policy — but delivers in spades for your people," he said. "So don't settle for what's easy. Bog standard is beneath you. Go for what's smart by going big. "Go for what will build lasting wealth and national security. Go for what will change the game and stand the test of time."
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Taking the mick': Tradie furious at bank's refund after losing $17,000 to scammers
A tradie who lost $17,000 in an elaborate spoofing scam has been left feeling mocked after receiving a letter from his bank. Bradley Turner runs a micro cementing company called Pure Deco, and he is still reeling from falling victim to a scam in June of this year. The 33-year-old lost almost $17,000 after transferring money because a scammer hacked into an established text chain he had with ANZ, making him believe he needed to move his money to avoid his account being drained. The tradie has maintained that the bank needs to reimburse the money because the hacker was able to infiltrate the text chain he had with the bank. Mr Turner claimed that ANZ initially closed the case without offering to return any of the funds but, after he complained, agreed to re-open the case. He has now been left furious once more after receiving a letter from ANZ, which has seen, revealing the low amount the bank was able to recover. '$1.86 has been recovered as a result of the process and we've credited this amount to the relevant accounts,' the letter read. The letter did not explain how ANZ came to $1.86 figure, or why the bank could recover this amount but not the almost $17,000 that was lost. has reached out to ANZ for comment. The letter also claimed that, while Mr Turner is a 'valued customer', the bank would not be reimbursing him further. 'There are no other steps ANZ is able to take to try and recover these funds. While you're a valued customer we will not be making a payment to you for the remainder of your loss in these circumstances.' Mr Turner told that hearing he was getting less than $2 dollars back after waiting for months for a final response was devastating. 'I felt horrendous, like they're taking the mick,' he said. 'I've been waiting for that money, and then they tell me, I can get $1.86? It is like they're throwing it in my face.' Mr Turner said it is 'annoying' and he is frustrated that the bank is claiming it is a telecom issue, because he feels it is the bank's responsibility to ensure their texting streams cannot be hacked into. The tradie maintains that he never would have fallen for the scam if it weren't for the fact that the messages appeared in an established text chain he had with ANZ. '(The scammers) are putting you in a position where you believe it is ANZ,' he said. Scammers are becoming more sophisticated and can now use state-of-the-art technology to 'spoof' numbers and get into established texting threads. Mr Turner ended up in this mess because he received a text that appeared to be from ANZ, which he believed to be legitimate because it appeared in an already-established message chain. The message alerted him that his voice ID had been updated and that if he didn't request this change, he should contact the number provided immediately. The 33-year-old panicked because he hadn't updated any verifications with the bank and it was for his business account. The tradie insisted he never would have rung the number if he had just received a text message from a random number, but because it appeared to be from ANZ on his phone and was alongside other official messages, he fell for it. Mr Turner called the number and was instructed by the scammers, whom he believed were ANZ staff, to transfer lump sums into a new secure account because he was being hacked. Mr Turner transferred two separate payments, one totalling $16,941 and another payment of around $7000, to a new bank account. After his panic subsided and he hung up from the phone call, it occurred to him that it may have been an elaborate scam. He contacted ANZ only an hour and a half after making the transfers, but it was already mostly too late. ANZ was able to stop the $7000 transfer, but the almost $17,000 sum was already with another bank. When originally covered Mr Turner's scam horror, ANZ said in a statement that the bank always tries to recover funds. 'However, the ability to recover funds depends on a number of factors including how quickly it is reported to us, whether they are transferred to another financial institution, and the speed in which funds are then on-transferred by scammers,' the bank said. 'In many instances, cyber criminals on-transfer funds within minutes, or use them to purchase cryptocurrency.' ANZ said it works with telecommunications companies on measures that stop scammers from adopting the 'ANZ' label in text messages. This includes 'reporting instances where ANZ has been impersonated for telcos to block and prevent these attempts'. 'ANZ has several measures in place to help detect and protect our customers from fraud and scams and we are continually reviewing and adjusting our capabilities as new fraud and scams emerge and criminals change how they operate,' the bank said. 'A genuine ANZ call, email or text will never ask you to share sensitive details such as passwords and pins, click a link to log into your account, grant remote access to your device, transfer money to another account to keep it safe or join an online chat with an ANZ member.' Mr Turner isn't alone in his experience. In February, reported an eerily similar story about another Aussie tradie who lost $58,000 in a spoofing scam. Furkan Colak, from Melbourne, was in the process of trying to buy a house while also saving up for his dad's knee surgery when he received a text message that looked to be from ANZ but was actually from a scammer. Mr Colak previously told that the whole experience left him 'shaking' and it has been tough to get over losing so much money. 'It comes to the point where you're almost over it and then you think what you could have done with the money,' he said
