
Australian government gave $2.7m to Elon Musk's X for advertisements in billionaire's first year as owner
The Australian government spent nearly $3m of taxpayer dollars advertising on Twitter/X in the first year after the world's richest man, Elon Musk, took over the platform, despite warnings of brand reputation damage that caused the government to initially pause ads.
Data obtained by Guardian Australia, after a protracted freedom of information battle with the federal finance department, revealed $2.7m was spent between November 2022 and November 2023. Musk finalised his purchase of the platform on 28 October 2022.
The data covers all ad spending on government department campaigns including health advisories and messaging around budget initiatives. In 2022-2023 this included advertising around the voice referendum and vaccine advertisements, among others.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
The spending comes despite the government pausing ad spend on what was then called Twitter on 29 September 2022, following reports of a number of brands' advertisements appearing next to inappropriate content on Twitter, a report from the Australian National Audit Office revealed last week.
A spokesperson for the finance department said it was suspended 'to evaluate brand safety measures' and restored shortly after.
'Following further review, the government's master media agency that manages advertising placement advised that sufficient brand safety measures were in place and advertising could return to the platform on 5 October 2022 with the exception of placements on Twitter profiles,' the spokesperson said.
The following year's data – accounting for the shift when Musk became a full-throated supporter of Donald Trump – is being withheld until January 2026. The department said in its decision that releasing the data now would weaken the government's ability to negotiate with media on advertising.
Sources have told Guardian Australia the total ad spend for the year is similar to 2022-23.
Axel Bruns, professor in the Digital Media Research Centre at Queensland University of Technology, said the spend could reflect the uncertainty the government had around whether the platform would continue to be popular under Musk's leadership.
'With hindsight, there now seems little value in government advertising on X – the platform is overrun with disinformation, abuse, hate speech and spam bots, and most sensible users will have left by now,' he said.
'This might not have been as clear at the time when this advertising was purchased, though.'
Bruns said any continued government advertising on X is 'unlikely to make its desired impact on audiences' but could be seen to be soft diplomacy to win favour with the Trump administration, but said it would not be a 'useful investment' given the reputation damage to continue to advertise on X in its current form.
The continued ad spend comes despite Musk describing the Albanese government as 'fascist' over its now-abandoned misinformation legislation, and engaging in several legal battles with the Australian online safety regulator over content moderation on X, one of which was heard in the administrative review tribunal last week.
Musk has become inexorably entwined with Trump and subsequently the new US administration in the past few months. Prior to running the US government's department of government efficiency (Doge) tasked with slashing government programs and spending, Musk became Trump's biggest campaign donor in the 2024 presidential election, and invested millions in his failed attempt to have a conservative judge win the Wisconsin supreme court's election last week.
Musk's personal popularity has tanked this year, as a result, with a recent poll finding more than half of Americans believed Musk and Doge were harming the US.
The finance department, which collects data from every government agency on ad spending, does not typically break down spending on individual platforms. Total digital ad spending for 2022-2023 was $56.3m. Guardian Australia filed a freedom of information request with the finance department for data specifically on X spending last year, but was initially refused.
After seeking a review of the decision by the Australian information commissioner, the finance department agreed to release the first year of data this week.
X was contacted for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say
WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX , Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system. Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. 'We'll take a look at everything,' the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency 'will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment. The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is 'for political ammunition,' one of the people said. Whether the U.S. government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest. 'There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts,' said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. 'Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security.' Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the U.S. government in much of its aerospace and defense work – launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the 'Golden Dome' missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president – such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender – his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Musk's role in building Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile shield in doubt
The White House has tamped down talk of punishing Elon Musk's billions of government contracts now that he and president Trump have tamped down their epic feud. But a pivotal role floated for his SpaceX company to build Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome could now be under threat. 'No efforts have been made on that front, as far as I'm aware,' is how White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded when asked whether the White House was looking at nixing Musk's contracts. That came after the president wrote publicly about terminating his 'governmental subsidies and contracts' and warned of 'serious consequences' if Musk decided to financially support Democrats while he was railing against Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' for after forecasts showed it would tack trillions onto the national debt. Now, the role for his company has come into question, Reuters reported, citing three people familiar with the project. It would be a major conceptual turnaround. abrupt turnaround from when Trump sat next to a graphic poster board showing a protective dome intended to shield the nation from incoming missiles. The White House had been pushing consideration of a plan where Musk's rocket and satellite company – which ferries astronauts and payloads to the International Space Station – would be a key partner in the project. Also involved would be Palantir and drone maker Anduril. And in an indication of how personalities and affiliations could be playing in the ambitious projects, a 'new framework' is now under consideration which would scrap the need for Musk's network of orbiting satellites. It would focus on 'existing ground systems for missile defense instead,' according to the report. It is unclear how this reworked system would counter the growing threat of hypersonic missiles, which can travel up to 10 times the speed of sound and change direction mid-flight. The Pentagon had been considering various plans, including some relying on multiple satellites and even space-based interceptors. A Defense official told Reuters that DOD 'has no announcements regarding future contracts associated with the Golden Dome effort.' The White House said said the administration is 'committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts. Trump announced his Golden Dome to much fanfare from the Oval Office. Republicans put a $25 billion line item for it in the House version of his 'big, beautiful' bill now making its way through the Senate.


The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Deaths in San Antonio flooding rise to 10 and some are still missing, officials say
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.