Ferrero to take over US breakfast cereal giant Kellogg
Ferrero said it planned to invest and expand WK Kellogg's "iconic" brands, which include Froot Loops and Rice Krispies.
The private, family-owned Ferrero has been pushing to expand in recent years, buying Nestle's confectionery business and several other food firms.
But with its latest deal it is taking on a portfolio facing challenges, as rising prices and health concerns erode the popularity of boxed cereals.
Founded in 1946, Ferrero is one of the world's biggest players in the chocolate market, with more than 30 brands sold globally. Those include Nutella, Kinder, TicTac and other confectionery, such as Jelly Belly and Trolli.
The new acquisition will give the firm, which already has more than 14,000 staff in North America, a dominant position in the US breakfast cereal market.
The company said it was paying $23 per share for the company in cash. Reports that a deal was imminent had sent the firm's share surging by more than 56% in overnight trading.
Chief executive Lapo Civiletti said the deal would complement Ferrero's existing offerings "expanding Ferrero's presence across more consumption occasions".
Kellogg boss Gary Pilnick said he expected the deal to provide the firm with more resources, and that Ferrero, which is a private company not subject to the pressures of the public market, would provide a "great home for our people".
Kellogg founder Will Keith Kellogg, who started the business in Michigan nearly 120 years ago, is widely considered to be the inventor of corn flakes.
Its mascots, such as Frosted Flakes' Tony the Tiger, helped make it one of the most recognised American companies of the 20th century.
But the firm, which also makes Kashi and Raisin Bran, has been seen sales flatten in recent years and has more than $500m of debt.
In 2023, it was split off from its former parent company's international and snacks business, which was renamed Kellanova and later sold to confectionery giant Mars for $36bn.
Households pressured by the rising cost of living have also increasingly opted for cheaper store brands over typically more expensive brand names.
The industry has also come under pressure from the Trump administration, which has targeted artificial colouring in brands like Froot Loops as part of its "Make America Healthy Again" campaign.
Kellogg has said it will remove the synthetic colours from cereals eaten in schools by the 2026-27 school year. But it has not yet set a timeline for taking them out of cereals sold to the general public.
Is RFK Jr's divisive plan to Make America Healthy Again fearmongering - or revolutionary?
Why food firms are scrambling to cut down on ingredients
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
China probes Nvidia over AI chip 'tracking' security risks
While Nvidia has been given assurances by Washington that it will be allowed to resume exports of its made-for-China H20 general processing units, the AI chips may be met with increased scrutiny from Beijing. According to the Cyberspace Administration of China, Nvidia met with Beijing officials on Thursday regarding potential national security concerns posed by its H20 chips, which recently saw restrictions on their export lifted following an effective ban in April. Nvidia was requested 'to clarify and submit relevant supporting documentation regarding security risks, including potential vulnerabilities and backdoors, associated with its H20 computing chips sold to China,' according to a CNBC translation of a statement from CAC. In a post, the regulator said that Nvidia's computing chips were reported to have serious security vulnerabilities, also noting calls from U.S. lawmakers for mandatory tracking features to be placed on advanced chips exported from the country. In its statement, CAC added that American AI experts had already revealed that Nvidia's computing chips pose mature 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' technologies. The statement appears to be referencing a report from Reuters in May that said Bill Foster, a Democrat lawmaker from Illinois, was planning to introduce legislation that would require advanced AI chipmakers like Nvidia to include a built-in location reporting system. Forester, who once worked as a particle physicist, and independent technical experts reportedly agreed that the technology to track chips was readily available, with much of it already built into Nvidia's chips. Forester's bill would also seek to give U.S. authorities the power to remotely shut down chips being used without proper licenses, in a measure to fight chip smuggling and export loopholes. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC. In recent weeks, many American lawmakers have also taken issue with the reported rollback of restrictions on Nvidia's H20 chips, warning they will advance Beijing's AI capability. This week, Nvidia reportedly placed orders for 300,000 H20 chipsets with contract manufacturer TSMC as it seeks to meet Chinese demand.
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Is India is the first to face Trump's 'secondary' tariff on Russia?
In the frenzied run-up to Friday, Aug. 1 — the day when U.S. President Donald Trump's new tariffs come into effect (no more delays!) — America's major trading partners such as Japan, the European Union and now, South Korea, have come to an agreement with the country. All of them will be subject to 15% tariffs on U.S. imports of their goods. But India? Not only has there not been a deal yet, Trump unilaterally imposed a 25% tariff on the South Asian country — a higher-than-expected number, as analysts had widely expected India to secure a favorable deal with America. Worse, the tariff will exist alongside an additional "penalty," which Trump said is the price India has to pay for its military and energy transactions with Russia. That essentially sounds like the "secondary tariff" Trump had previously threatened to slap on Moscow. In doing so, Trump's actions seem to be suggesting that the White House's trade policies is not based simply on the balance of trade, as Trump is fond of bringing up, or even how much he likes you — see his admiration of the U.K.'s King Charles and the country's 10% tariff rate. It's also about who your friends are. Essentially, Trump appears to be implying that, even if you are an up-and-coming influential figure, if you hang out with the uncool kids (who buy Russian arms), you can't sit with us. Perhaps Trump can afford to alienate allies because the U.S. economy is still unexpectedly strong. It expanded 3% in the second quarter, much higher than the 2.3% Dow Jones estimate, and Magnificent Seven earnings are handily topping estimates. Much has been discussed about the decline of American exceptionalism, but, for now, the U.S. is still the queen bee. The Federal Reserve holds interest rates. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-2 on the decision — the first time since late 1993 that multiple governors cast "no" votes. Chair Jerome Powell said the Fed still needs to see the effects of tariffs on inflation. India to pay 25% tariffs on exports to the U.S. On top of that, Trump said Wednesday that the South Asian country will also face a "penalty" for dealing with Russia. Separately, South Korea has reached a deal with the U.S. that will see it subject to a 15% tariff rate, Trump announced. Meta Platforms and Microsoft beat earnings expectations. Year on year, Meta's revenue grew 22%, while that of Microsoft increased 18%. During extended trading, Microsoft shares jumped more than 8% to put the company's market cap above $4 trillion. U.S. stocks are weighed by Fed conference. The S&P 500 fell Wednesday. Asia-Pacific markets mostly declined Thursday. Shares of Samsung Electronics retreated after the firm reported a 93.8% year-over-year plunge in profit. Chinese markets fell on disappointing data on the country's manufacturing activity in July. [PRO] Investors are aggressively borrowing money to buy stocks. It's a sign of market exuberance, according to Jim Reid, head of macro and thematic research at Deutsche Bank, who added that this pace was last seen during market bubbles. Trump's tariff deadline is near. Here's a look at countries that have a deal — and those that don't Come Friday, the world will have to contend with higher tariff rates from the Trump administration, raising the specter of even more economic uncertainty. For most countries, that can of worms has been kicked twice down the road, from "Liberation Day" on April 2, to July 9, and now to Aug. 1. Here are where things stand in global trade. —
11 minutes ago
Triumphant in trade talks, Trump and his tariffs still face a challenge in federal court
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has been getting his way on trade, strong-arming the European Union, Japan and other partners to accept once unthinkably high taxes on their exports to the United States. But his radical overhaul of American trade policy, in which he's bypassed Congress to slam big tariffs on most of the world's economies, has not gone unchallenged. He's facing at least seven lawsuits charging that he's overstepped his authority. The plaintiffs want his biggest, boldest tariffs thrown out. And they won Round One. In May, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court in New York, ruled that Trump exceeded his powers when he declared a national emergency to plaster taxes — tariffs — on imports from almost every country in the world. In reaching its decision, the court combined two challenges — one by five businesses and one by 12 U.S. states — into a single case. Now it goes on to Round Two. On Thursday, the 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which typically specializes in patent law, are scheduled to hear oral arguments from the Trump administration and from the states and businesses that want his sweeping import taxes struck down. That court earlier allowed the federal government to continue collecting Trump's tariffs as the case works its way through the judicial system. The issues are so weighty — involving the president's power to bypass Congress and impose taxes with huge economic consequences in the United States and abroad — that the case is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, regardless of what the appeals court decides. Trump is an unabashed fan of tariffs. He sees the import taxes as an all-purpose economic tool that can bring manufacturing back to the United States, protect American industries, raise revenue to pay for the massive tax cuts in his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,'' pressure countries into bending to his will, even end wars. The U.S. Constitution gives the power to impose taxes — including tariffs — to Congress. But lawmakers have gradually relinquished power over trade policy to the White House. And Trump has made the most of the power vacuum, raising the average U.S. tariff to more than 18%, highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. At issue in the pending court case is Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs without seeking congressional approval or conducting investigations first. Instead, he asserted the authority to declare a national emergency that justified his import taxes. In February, he cited the illegal flow of drugs and immigrants across the U.S. border to slap tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. Then on April 2 — 'Liberation Day,'' Trump called it — he invoked IEEPA to announce 'reciprocal'' tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and a 10% 'baseline'' tariff on almost everybody else. The emergency he cited was America's long-running trade deficit. Trump later suspended the reciprocal tariffs, but they remain a threat: They could be imposed again Friday on countries that do not pre-empt them by reaching trade agreements with the United States or that receive letters from Trump setting their tariff rates himself. The plaintiffs argue that the emergency power laws does not authorize the use of tariffs. They also note that the trade deficit hardly meets the definition of an 'unusual and extraordinary'' threat that would justify declaring an emergency under the law. The United States, after all, has run trade deficits — in which it buys more from foreign countries than it sells them — for 49 straight years and in good times and bad. The Trump administration argues that courts approved President Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in a 1971 economic crisis. The Nixon administration successfully cited its authority under the 1917 Trading With Enemy Act, which preceded and supplied some of the legal language used in IEEPA. In May, the trade court rejected the argument, ruling that Trump's Liberation Day tariffs 'exceed any authority granted to the President'' under the emergency powers law. 'The president doesn't get to use open-ended grants of authority to do what he wants,'' said Reilly Stephens, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal group that is representing businesses suing the Trump administration over the tariffs. In the case of the drug trafficking and immigration tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, the trade court ruled that the levies did not meet IEEPA's requirement that they 'deal with'' the problem they were supposed to address. The court challenge does not cover other Trump tariffs, including levies on foreign steel, aluminum and autos that the president imposed after Commerce Department investigations concluded that those imports were threats to U.S. national security. Nor does it include tariffs that Trump imposed on China in his first term — and President Joe Biden kept — after a government investigation concluded that the Chinese used unfair practices to give their own technology firms an edge over rivals from the United States and other Western countries.
