logo
Ukraine Has Another New SAM System That Fires Soviet R-73 Air-To-Air Missiles

Ukraine Has Another New SAM System That Fires Soviet R-73 Air-To-Air Missiles

Yahoo20-03-2025
Ukraine has unveiled its latest 'FrankenSAM,' a surface-to-air missile system leveraging existing capabilities within the Ukrainian Armed Forces arsenal to help rapidly provide badly needed additional air defenses. The new system fires repurposed Soviet-era heat-seeking R-73 air-to-air missiles as interceptors and joins a growing list of ground-based air defense systems that make use of stocks of this same weapon. The R-73s primarily equip Ukraine's Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter fleets.
Some details of the new system, the name of which has not yet been disclosed, were provided by the Ukrainian Militarnyi news outlet today. This describes a FrankenSAM 'based on a classified platform,' using R-73s — an accompanying photo shows a turret-like launcher with rails for a pair of the missiles on the top. It's not clear how mobile the system is, although its location in a field suggests that it is likely either self-propelled (on a wheeled or tracked chassis) or is otherwise mounted on a towed trailer. Regardless, it looks very compact. It should also be noted that there is a possibility that at least some aspects of the photo may have been manipulated to conceal parts of the system.
An unknown new air defense system with R-73 aircraft missiles in service with the Third Assault Brigade of Ukraine. mil.in.ua/uk/news/tret…

Special Kherson Cat (@specialkhersoncat.bsky.social)
2025-03-20T15:07:22.011Z
The same sources say that the system is in use with the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade of Air Defense and Missile Defense, with the suggestion that it may have been developed within that unit.
'Despite the advanced age of the equipment and its limited tactical and technical characteristics, we find opportunities for modernization and implementation of the latest approaches,' the brigade's commander, Maksym Zaichenko, told Militarnyi.
Zaichenko adds that the R-73 offers the particular advantage of being a 'fire and forget' weapon, thanks to its infrared guidance. This means that the firing unit can 'change its position after firing, so as not to expose itself to a retaliatory strike.' This would also suggest a relatively high level of mobility or at least portability.
This is not the first time that Ukraine has received ground-based air defense systems armed with adapted R-73 missiles.
Earlier this year, we got our first look at the containerized, R-73-based Gravehawk surface-to-air missile system, which the United Kingdom and Denmark developed for Ukraine.
The slightly mad scientists at the UK MOD have revealed the Gravehawk surface-to-air missile system for Ukrainian service. The entire SAM system fits in a standard shipping container, carries a pair of converted R-73 AAMs, and can be quickly deployed off the back of a flatbed. pic.twitter.com/BTF0b7LjCg
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) February 12, 2025
The entire Gravehawk system fits inside a modified ISO shipping container with a retractable roof, and it's intended to be emplaced on the ground before use, although it's unclear if it can be employed while it is still on the back of the truck that transports it. The truck apparently associated with Gravehawk is an eight-wheeled Leyland DAF design equipped with the Demountable Rack Offload and Pickup System (DROPS), which is capable of relatively quickly loading and unloading containers.
Perhaps, the new R-73-based system now revealed as being in use with the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade is operated in a similar way, but without more imagery, we can't say for certain.
For targeting, Gravehawk uses a retractable sensor system containing at least one infrared sensor to spot and track targets and cue the R-73 missiles to them. Again, this is the kind of hardware that could also find its way onto the newly revealed surface-to-air missile system.
Similar, if not identical sensors, also appear on another kind of FrankenSAM that the United Kingdom previously supplied Ukraine. However, this uses the Advanced Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (ASRAAM) as its interceptor rather than the R-73 and is mounted on a 6×6 Supacat High Mobility Transporter (HMT).
Using passive infrared sensors means that the system is not vulnerable to detection by Russian electronic warfare systems, unlike surface-to-air missile systems that rely on active radars. On the new R-73-based system there is also no evidence of an integral radar, although that remains a possibility. Datalinks could also feed the system general situational awareness and targeting data. An array of mushroom-shaped fairings atop the new system are intriguing. The purpose of these is unclear, but they could be related to some kind of passive radio-frequency detection system.
As TWZ has previously written about the R-73, also known to NATO as the AA-11 Archer:
'The R-73, in air-launched form, has a maximum range of 18.6 miles against a head-on target of 8.7 miles against a tail-on target. A ground-launched application would have reduced range since the missile wouldn't benefit from the speed and altitude parameters of the launch aircraft. In this case, it's perhaps more relevant to look at the seeker range of the R-73, which would remain broadly the same for ground launch: 6.2-7.5 miles.'

'The R-73 is a high-off-boresight (HOBS) weapon, with a seeker that can articulate in any direction much farther than a traditional heat-seeking air-to-air missile with a fixed non-HOBS seeker that stares directly forward. Aided by a helmet-mounted sight, the Archer can be launched in air-to-air engagements against targets with off-boresight angles of +/-75 degrees. This gives the R-73 the potential to be a particularly potent, albeit improvised threat for locking onto and engaging dynamic targets with minimal assisting sensors when used in a surface-launched form.'
It would appear that, like Gravehawk, the new system relies to a significant degree on the R-73's HOBS seeker since the launch rails otherwise offer a fixed field of fire. The launch rails themselves appear to be the same APU-73 adapters that provide the usual interface between the R-73 and an aircraft pylon.
Ukraine has also fielded modified 9K33 Osa (SA-8 Gecko) wheeled air defense vehicles armed with R-73 missiles instead of their usual 9M33 interceptors. This is notable for being a domestic initiative combining a Soviet-era surface-to-air missile vehicle with Soviet-era air-to-air missiles.
The Ukrainian military has also introduced R-73-armed uncrewed surface vessels (USVs), an application known locally as the Sea Dragon.
GUR the first in the world to destroy an air target using a Magura V5 naval drone. During the battle in the Black Sea and Crimea, a Russian Mi-8 helicopter was destroyed by R-73 'SeeDragon' missiles.
Another similar enemy helicopter was hit by fire and was able to reach its base airfield.

MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2024-12-31T08:38:10.618Z
It would seem likely that the new R-73-based surface-to-air missile system is especially relevant when it comes to dealing with Russian long-range kamikaze drones and cruise missile threats. Ultimately, it might also be intended for static employment defending critical infrastructure. Regardless, the capabilities of the R-73 also make it capable of engaging fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters.
While the missile rails seen in the one photo published so far are specifically for R-73s, it's also possible that the new systems could be adapted to fire other missiles like the aforementioned ASRAAM or U.S.-made AIM-9 Sidewinders, which Ukraine has also received.
Many questions about the new surface-to-air missile system remain — not least what it's called. However, its appearance underlines the fact that Ukraine has plentiful stocks of R-73s and suggests that these missiles are judged to be a very useful addition to its air defense arsenal.
Furthermore, the appearance of the new system is another reminder that Ukraine is still badly in need of additional air defenses, with Western allies so far only providing relatively modest numbers of admittedly generally very capable systems. While there have been repeated warnings that Ukraine's stocks of missiles for its existing Soviet-era air defense systems might run out, repurposing R-73s for the same role currently seems to be a useful stopgap.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats see weaponization blitz in moves from DOJ, intelligence leaders
Democrats see weaponization blitz in moves from DOJ, intelligence leaders

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats see weaponization blitz in moves from DOJ, intelligence leaders

Lawmakers and advocates are sounding the alarm over a series of actions taken by the Justice Department and intelligence community that they argue are both abuses of power and threats to the traditional independence held by both organizations. The FBI agreed to aid the Texas government last week in tracking down Democratic members of the state's legislature who fled in an effort to block a controversial redistricting plan. The commitment came as it fired a series of agents, including those who had worked on controversial matters related to President Trump, prompting complaints agents were facing retribution simply for taking on assigned cases. Meanwhile, the Justice Department subpoenaed New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) for documents related to court victories against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association. The same day, DOJ also tapped Ed Martin to investigate James as well as Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on allegations of mortgage fraud. DOJ on Monday also launched a grand jury investigation into Obama-era officials they've accused of engaging in a 'treasonous conspiracy' in investigating Russia's efforts to influence the 2016 election. Intelligence community leaders have since come under fire for releasing a number of documents related to the claim. Democrats say the documents expose sources and methods of intelligence gathering. James, through an attorney, said she was targeted as part of 'the president's political retribution campaign.' 'Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration. If prosecutors carry out this improper tactic and are genuinely interested in the truth, we are ready and waiting with the facts and the law,' her attorney Abbe Lowell said in a statement. The other moves are likewise coming under scrutiny. Democrats sent a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for the legal basis under which the bureau could be involved in tracking down the Texas lawmakers. 'These reports suggest that the FBI is diverting federal law enforcement away from fighting terrorism, drug trafficking, and other federal crimes to instead harass and target Texans' duly elected representatives, and thus raise urgent questions about the legal basis, scale, and appropriateness of federal law enforcement involvement in a state-level political matter,' Reps. Robert Garcia (Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (Md.), the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, wrote in a letter also signed by Texas Democrats Reps. Greg Casar and Jasmine Crockett. The group pointed to a 2003 ruling from a state judge that reviewed another incident in which state lawmakers sought to prevent a legislative quorum, determining that the Texas Department of Public Safety was limited in pursuing residents in cases where there was no crime. 'The ruling made clear that the state cannot treat quorum-breaking as a criminal offense subject to law enforcement pursuit,' they wrote. The firing of numerous agents also sparked claims the bureau's leadership was abusing its power and running afoul of civil servant protections in dismissing several career agents. Brian Driscoll previously served as acting FBI director before Patel was confirmed, and during his brief tenure rebuffed an early request from the Trump administration to turn over the names of all agents who worked on the cases of Jan. 6 rioters – a group that includes thousands of people. Also fired was Scott Jensen, who Patel had recently promoted to director of the Washington, D.C. Field Office, and Walter Giardina, an agent who worked for special counsel Robert Mueller and aided in the prosecution of Peter Navarro. In a final note to staff, Driscoll said he was given no reason for his dismissal. The FBI Agent's Association criticized the firing as unlawful. 'The FBI Agents Association strongly condemns today's unlawful firing of FBI Special Agents. These Agents were carrying out the assignments given to them and did their jobs professionally and with integrity,' the group said in a Friday statement. 'This action sets a dangerous precedent. It increases our vulnerability to criminal and national security threats at home and abroad. It prioritizes division over unity, stokes anger instead of solidarity within our ranks, and threatens to chill the work of agents rather than support it.' The move was also blasted by Raskin and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. 'These are individuals [who] have dedicated their careers to protecting the American people, and their firings are part of a disturbing pattern of retaliation and politicization at an institution charged with safeguarding national security and the rule of law,' Warner said in a statement. The FBI and DOJ declined to comment on the firings, their involvement in Texas, the launch of the grand jury, or its probe into James. But the Trump administration has broadly defended such moves, consistently arguing the FBI and the Justice Department were political tools of previous administrations while arguing their own actions help confront those abuses. 'President Trump is restoring integrity to the Department of Justice after four years of weaponization, hoaxes, and attempts to imprison him. The DOJ is upholding Lady Justice and working to execute President Trump's Make America Safe Again agenda, which is lowering crime, holding criminals accountable, and empowering our law enforcement community,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement to The Hill. Trump has at various turns denied asking for Justice Department interventions, though he has not hid his approval of the actions. 'Pam is doing a great job,' Trump said on CNBC when asked about the grand jury investigation into Obama officials. 'I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it.' The mortgage investigation from Martin is one of the first public actions taken by the Justice Department's new Weaponization Working Group, a role he was given after senators signaled their opposition to him for a U.S. Attorney role. Schiff, through an attorney, said Martin has a conflict of interest in the matter as the lawmaker previously placed a hold on his nomination, in part due to Martin's vocal defense of Jan. 6 rioters. 'The allegations against Senator Schiff are transparently false, stale, and long debunked. Now Ed Martin, the most brazenly partisan and politically compromised person possible for the task, has been picked to investigate a political adversary. The bias here is glaring,' said Preet Bharara, a former U.S. Attorney fired by Trump who is now representing Schiff. 'Mr. Martin is a January 6-defending lawyer who has repeatedly pursued baseless and politically-motivated investigations to fulfill demands to investigate and prosecute perceived enemies. Any supposed investigation led by him would be the very definition of weaponization of the justice process.' Also sparking pushback is the decision to open a grand jury inquiry into referrals made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. A memo released by Gabbard last month accuses Obama-era officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' she said was designed to undermine Trump. The documents she released, however, largely show officials discussing something that was never in dispute – that Russia was never able to alter vote totals. She later released a report from House Intelligence Committee Republicans casting doubt on whether Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed to help Trump win the election rather than just sow chaos in the U.S. election. Most other reviews, however, determined Russia wanted to help Trump win. The Justice Department later released a previously classified annex to special counsel John Durham's report on the 2016 election. Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said both the Durham annex and the Republican report were both 'considered so sensitive and revealing of sources and methods that, until last month, [the committee] was not even permitted to retain a copy of either document within a classified safe in our own secure facility.' 'The highly irregular declassification process you engaged in could imperil critical intelligence sources and methods—a destructive action taken in order to advance a patently false political narrative,' he wrote, adding that they failed to consider 'how foreign adversaries might use the information exposed.' 'When done in a cavalier manner for partisan ends, declassification can literally endanger lives and enable adversaries to discover and disrupt the means through which we collect intelligence.' Former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, two of the officials involved in the claims, have called the accusations 'patently false' and rejected claims they attempted to smear Trump. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote. 'Contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment,' they added. The intelligence community under Trump has defended the release of the documents, calling it a transparency measure. 'This effort reflects Director Ratcliffe's continued commitment to elevating the truth and bringing transparency to the American people,' the CIA said in a statement when Gabbard released the documents. Gabbard during a White House press conference also brushed off questions about the release. 'I think it's a disservice to the American people that former President Obama's office and others who are criticizing the transparency that is being delivered by releasing these documents,' Gabbard said. 'They are doing a disservice to the American people in trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal.'

Us to Take Cut of AI Chip Sales to China. Security Risk or Easy Money?
Us to Take Cut of AI Chip Sales to China. Security Risk or Easy Money?

Newsweek

time15 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Us to Take Cut of AI Chip Sales to China. Security Risk or Easy Money?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has cleared semiconductor giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) to resume sales of certain artificial intelligence chips to China — on the condition that the U.S. government receives 15 percent of the revenue from those sales. The unusually structured deal followed a White House meeting last week between Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and President Donald Trump. Licenses were issued two days later. "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets," Nvidia said in a statement, adding that it hoped the policy "will let America compete in China and worldwide." AMD did not immediately respond to Newsweek for a request for comment. Under the agreement, confirmed by officials and company statements, Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 processors — less powerful versions of their top AI processors — will be licensed for sale in China. From Ban to Revenue-Sharing In April, the Trump administration extended Biden-era export controls to block even these downgraded chips. Those rules built on 2022 restrictions designed to prevent exports of high-performance processors that U.S. officials feared China could use to aid its military. By June, Trump signaled a policy shift was coming after meeting with Huang. The administration announced in July that sales could resume, but licenses were only granted once the 15 percent payment condition was in place, the Financial Times first reported. U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang after Huang delivered remarks in the Cross Hall of the White House during an event on "Investing in America" on April 30, 2025 in... U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang after Huang delivered remarks in the Cross Hall of the White House during an event on "Investing in America" on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. More Photo by"This is unprecedented," Deborah Elms, a Singapore-based trade policy expert, told the BBC. No American company had ever been required to hand over a share of revenue to secure an export license. Analysts at Bernstein Research estimate Nvidia could sell about 1.5 million H20 chips in China this year, bringing in some $23 billion in revenue. A 15 percent cut could yield the U.S. government more than $3 billion. Security or Strategy Some U.S. lawmakers and security officials warn that even limited AI chips could strengthen China's military and surveillance capabilities. "Beijing must be gloating to see Washington turn export licences into revenue streams," said Liza Tobin, a former National Security Council China director, in comments to the Financial Times. Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, the top Democrat on a House panel focusing on competition with China, also raised concerns over the reported agreement, calling it "a dangerous misuse of export controls that undermines our national security." "Chip export controls aren't bargaining chips, and they're not casino chips either. We shouldn't be gambling with our national security to raise revenue," he told the Associated Press. A NVIDIA chip is displayed at the NVIDIA booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing on July 16, 2025. A NVIDIA chip is displayed at the NVIDIA booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing on July 16, 2025. Jade Gao/AFP via Getty Images Nvidia disputes that the H20 poses military risks and denies Chinese state media claims that its chips contain "backdoors" or "kill switches." Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the chip licenses are linked to talks with Beijing over rare-earth minerals, a sector dominated by China. The deal also comes as a U.S.-China trade truce that reduced triple-digit tariffs nears expiration. In some ways, the structure of the deal resembles Trump's June approval of Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel, which gave the U.S. government a "golden share" in the company. In both cases, corporate approvals were tied to financial returns for Washington. A Precedent in Question Yet critics say the move risks turning export controls from a security tool into a revenue generator. "Turning export controls into a 15 percent revenue tax changes their purpose," one former U.S. security official told the Times. Some warn it sets up "pay-to-play" licensing and may raise constitutional questions, since the Constitution bars taxes on exports. The administration calls the 15 percent payment a licensing condition, not a tax. For Nvidia and AMD, the agreement reopens access to a market projected to spend $100 billion on AI this year — but with lower profit margins and heightened political scrutiny. For Beijing, it could mean renewed access to technology it needs without having to invest in building out that tech domestically. As one trade adviser told the BBC: "The message this sends is that national security has a price — and in this case, it's 15 percent."

Republican Blake Tillery announces bid for Lt. Gov.; pledges to cut state income tax
Republican Blake Tillery announces bid for Lt. Gov.; pledges to cut state income tax

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Blake Tillery announces bid for Lt. Gov.; pledges to cut state income tax

A South Georgia state senator announced a bid for lieutenant governor in Savannah Monday morning, pledging to run on what he called "Georgia values." Blake Tillery (R-Vidalia) spoke to a small crowd of supporters at Sheltair Aviation, a private and recreational fixed-base aviation operation at 100 Eddie Jungemann Drive, during his first stop on a seven-city tour around Georgia to launch his campaign. Tillery touted his record of advancing conservative policies in the state Senate while outlining a platform to cut the state income tax and fight illegal immigration. "I have a record of conservative results here in Georgia," Tillery said. "I've stood against woke ideologies; I've stood against DEI mandates and gender extremism." Tillery was elected to the state Senate in 2016 and is also the managing partner at the Tillery Firm law practice in Vidalia, where his work touches on worker's compensation, real estate closings and probate cases, according to his biography. Before being elected to state Senate, Tillery served as the Toombs County Commission chairman. The South Georgia native said he decided to run based on promises kept as a state Senator, where he pledged jobs, expanded broadband access and kept taxes low. Tillery pointed to a 15% reduction in the state income tax during his Senate tenure. "I think that voters judge candidates based on what they have accomplished ... We've accomplished those (priorities)," Tillery said in an interview. In Georgia, the lieutenant governor is the state's number two executive―after the governor. A primary role for the lieutenant governor is presiding over the Senate as Senate president. Tillery said he gained key experience for the role as chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. Various priorities from "election integrity" to immigration enforcement all have budget line items attached to them, providing a comprehensive view of state government, he said. "I think chairing the budget committee helps you learn every aspect of the state." Tillery joins other high-profile Republicans from the Georgia General Assembly who have entered the 2026 race. Senate Pro-Tempore John Kennedy (R-Macon) and Senate Majority Leader Steve Gooch (R-Dahlonega) have also announced candidacies for lieutenant governor. Democratic State Senator Josh McLaurin is, thus far, the only Democrat to announce a big for the seat. Current Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones is running for Governor, making the race for the state's number two spot an open seat. Tillery's campaign launch day also includes stops in Atlanta, Albany, Augusta, Columbus, Perry and Vidalia. The stops include the Georgia State Capitol and local airports, with each scheduled for roughly 45-minute appearances. "I'm doing this because Georgia is a big state, and every voice in Georgia matters," Tillery said. Evan Lasseter is the city of Savannah and Chatham County government reporter for the Savannah Morning News. You can reach him at ELasseter@ This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: Georgia Republican state Sen. Blake Tillery launches Lt. Gov. campaign

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store