logo
Carlos Alcaraz faces seven-figure double tax hit on French Open prize money

Carlos Alcaraz faces seven-figure double tax hit on French Open prize money

Daily Mirrora day ago

Carlos Alcaraz may have won his second French Open title, but he'll be left feeling shortchanged after it was confirmed he'll have to pay double tax on his seven-figure prize
Tennis superstar Carlos Alcaraz faces a hefty tax bill on his French Open earnings. And he'll have to file not just once but twice on his seven-figure earnings.
The 22-year-old, who has jetted to Ibiza to celebrate his win, pulled off a stunning victory against Jannik Sinner after trailing by two sets. And the result netted him a cool £2.1million prize as he successfully defended his crown.

But the Daily Express reports the tennis titan will only pocket a little more than half that sum after Spanish Treasury technicians confirmed a slice will go to them. That's in addition to the 15% non-resident levy in France, which equates to roughly £330,000.

Spain's tax authorities will claim 30% of his winnings in personal income tax, even though he won the title abroad. Despite this, Gestha, the union of Treasury technicians, has clarified that normal tax rules apply.
Their statement confirmed Alcaraz "will be taxed under personal income tax as a professional activity, deducting accommodation and stay expenses, expenses incurred for having his team of physical and sports trainers, and other deductible expenses."
When all is said and done, the ace will part with almost £888,000 combined in taxes. That will leave Alcaraz with around £1.3m to take home, which is admittedly still not exactly chump change.
Gestha calculated Alcaraz's total deductible expenses of about £256,000, noting it's tallied "without considering the sum of other incomes and advertising or image revenues he obtains throughout 2025, nor other reductions or deductions."
Alcaraz continued his relentless streak by clinching a historic victory over Sinner in the Roland Garros final. Their decider marked the first time a French Open final featured three tiebreaks and was also the first a singles title was won on a tiebreak.

Intriguingly, runner-up Sinner dodges the financial blow because he's a resident of tax haven Monaco. As such, he theoretically will only parts with £163,000 from his hefty £1.1m prize money pot.
So, despite Sinner taking second and pocketing roughly half of the champion's bounty, he stands to pocket just £350,000 less than Alcaraz. Nevertheless, there may not be any monetary value that could match the youngster's joy at seizing his fifth major trophy.
"To put it into words is really difficult honestly," he told TNT Sports after seizing the title in Paris. "To come from two sets down against the world No. 1, the level that he was playing, it is unbelievable.
"It was the first time that I have come back from 2-0 down and honestly I just put my heart into it. I just tried to keep it going, not thinking about the result.
"I think to say it was one of the best finals in the history of the Grand Slams is really high status. I have to say, there have been better finals."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Louis Vuitton kits out Real Madrid
Louis Vuitton kits out Real Madrid

Fashion United

time28 minutes ago

  • Fashion United

Louis Vuitton kits out Real Madrid

LVMH-owned Louis Vuitton and Spanish football and basketball club Real Madrid have announced a multi-year partnership. The French fashion house will provide formal travel attire for the men's and women's professional football teams, as well as the men's basketball team, Louis Vuitton announced on Friday, June 13. For the first time, Louis Vuitton placed its tailoring "at the service of athletes whose sporting achievements extend far beyond the stadiums". Caroline Weir and Athenea del Castillo in 'Louis Vuitton x Real Madrid' collection Credits: Louis Vuitton "We are proud to support a club whose history, marked by countless national and international victories, continues to inspire generations," said Louis Vuitton CEO Pietro Beccari. "Louis Vuitton and Real Madrid share fundamental values that have led them to the top of their respective disciplines, driven by a continuous quest for excellence, 'self-improvement' and a spirit of innovation." The Louis Vuitton menswear atelier, led by creative director Pharrell Williams, will be responsible for the collections created specifically for the players and other team members of the Spanish professional club. These include ready-to-wear clothing, shoes and accessories to be worn at official events, as well as pieces, bags and backpacks tailored to the players' travels. The focus is on a subtle balance of comfort, performance and elegance. "Real Madrid stands for excellence and evolution – always striving forward," said Williams. "This energy fuels what we do at Louis Vuitton. This wardrobe was created to move with that same spirit – pieces that travel with purpose, strength and style." Dani Ceballos in 'Louis Vuitton x Real Madrid' collection with matching suitcase Credits: Louis Vuitton The 'Louis Vuitton x Real Madrid' collections are intended solely for the teams and will not be available for sale. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

Labour had the chance to finally kill off HS2. Instead, it's throwing more money into the pit
Labour had the chance to finally kill off HS2. Instead, it's throwing more money into the pit

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Labour had the chance to finally kill off HS2. Instead, it's throwing more money into the pit

Where was the elephant in the room? It received not a mention in the spending review. In among the hospitals and schools, the highways and the prisons, the great beast wandered, a ghostly presence cursing all from whom it stole. I found it in a Whitehall handout, sandwiched somewhere between Leeds station and a Welsh level crossing. The transport department did not even include it in its railway plans for the parliament. It was relegated, as if an extinct species, to just one short sentence. It said it would spend £25.3bn 'to address longstanding delivery challenges' for HS2. Is it a train or not a train? This means that over the remainder of this parliament, Rachel Reeves's Treasury intends for HS2 to consume between a fifth and a quarter of the government's entire investment budget of £113bn. Yet this staggering fact was not so much as murmured in the Commons or in any subsequent media comment. There was certainly no mention of the project's constantly soaring cost on completion in the mid-2030s. According to the last public accounts committee report, even the slimmed down railway has raced to more than £80bn and is usually said to be approaching £100bn. Reeves's extravagant nuclear reactors will cost far less than that and she was happy to boast of them. Because few can easily distinguish billions from millions, let us look at the comparisons. Reeves now wants to build a railway from Birmingham to Euston at a price that is more than double the £39bn that she wants to spend over the same decade, 2025-2035, on social housing. Over the course of this parliament, the £25.3bn extra that Reeves will spend on HS2 is significantly more than the outlay on prisons and new classrooms. So by the next election, HS2 will have received £25.3bn, while two east-west railways, in the Midlands and the north, will have received £6bn between them and poor Wales just £300m. These projects got a mention, but why not HS2? Is it perhaps because Reeves is ashamed? She knows that HS2 will principally benefit commuters into London. London always wins the vanity projects. At first HS2 was built to be high-speed – requiring wide tunnels and pathways – and then reduced in speed but not in cost. Then it was said to be about capacity not speed, but this did not appear to lessen the cost. Then it was cut from 11 platforms to seven at Euston. This was a really stupid train. The project soon lost any serious supporters outside railway addicts and political cheerleaders. In 2021 ,after Rishi Sunak as chancellor cancelled the Leeds extension, the government's infrastructure projects authority gave HS2 a 'red rating', which bluntly meant 'delivery of the project appears unachievable'. The Commons public account committee said that 'value for money was at risk'. Then in 2023, Sunak as prime minister cancelled the second northern leg, to Manchester. This stripped the project of all 'levelling up' value. The most hair-raising Common minutes I know are those of the public account committee's inquiry into HS2 last December. They read like a banana republic at work. The company's umpteenth chief executive, Mark Wild, was just 17 days into his job, presumably on something like his predecessor's £650,000. Forty-three HS2 staff were identified as earning more than £150,000 a year. Meanwhile, whistleblowers alleged that costs forecasts were being manipulated to secure funding. One of them was last week paid more than £300,000 compensationafter being excluded from two roles as a result of his whistleblowing. The PAC chair, Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, said that HS2 is 'a cautionary tale ... in how not to run a major project' and that Department for Transport mismanagement is 'likely to have wasted billions of pounds of taxpayers money in delay and overspends.' Yet with 33,000 staff employed and 2,000 sub-contractors and consultants having already worked their way through tens of billions at current prices, HS2 clearly knew how to relieve the taxpayers of cash. It tried to claim that, unlike schools or hospitals, it was due its money 'under contract'. The PAC caved in. It merely suggested the HS2 team perform a 'reset'. This week the reset took the predictable form of a demand for more money. The Treasury caved in too. The final fiasco surrounds the funding of HS2's destination. This is planned to be Old Oak Common in Acton, due to be completed between 2029 and 2033. The supposed extension to Euston is now not envisaged until 2038, which in public investment is close to never. Work at Euston has stopped, leaving a reported 400 families evicted from their homes and 25 hectares of dirt. This is in Starmer's constituency. Sunak said Euston would one day be rebuilt 'by the private sector', possibly implying a Canary Wharf style cluster of skyscrapers overlooking Regent's Park. Even that outrage would not realise the necessary £6bn – if not £10bn. The new Euston would merely send a handful of trains an hour to a less convenient Birmingham station than the old one. With rail travel still not back at pre-pandemic levels, Euston needs not another train but a politician with guts. The whole of Whitehall now knows HS2 makes no sense. At times like this, parliament is hopeless. Most MPs, at some time in the past, voted for its various mistakes and hate changing their minds. HS2 is the Iraq war of Treasury spending. Starmer should surely know that, on the day he took office, he should have done what Chris Christie of New Jersey did. The governor simply told the contractors of two massive Hudson River tunnels to pack up and go home. Starmer could still kill it, recouping some billions from selling HS2 land. At the same time, Reeves could have gone wild. She could have doubled the number of projects she listed this week. Hospitals could have soared in number, schools multiplied, prisons renewed. I cannot believe Reeves really thinks Britain needs them less than it needs a new railway to Birmingham. As it was, she flunked it. She took a weak decision, and could not even bring herself to mention it. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist

Trent Alexander-Arnold slammed as he goes public with new girlfriend
Trent Alexander-Arnold slammed as he goes public with new girlfriend

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Trent Alexander-Arnold slammed as he goes public with new girlfriend

Trent Alexander-Arnold was presented as a Real Madrid player on Thursday and introduced his girlfriend to the world, but the press conference has been overshadowed by the right-back's new language skills England footballer Trent Alexander-Arnold used his unveiling as a Real Madrid player to go public with girlfriend Estelle Behnke. The 26-year-old right-back sat next to his model partner as he was presented to Spanish media and introduced himself to Real Madrid fans. Trent, who previously dated actor Jude Law's daughter Iris, has been in a relationship with Esetelle since October 2024. She boasts more than 75,000 followers on Instagram and recently posted pictures from a trip to Beverly Hills. ‌ Last year, the happy couple enjoyed a romantic getaway at the exclusive £6,000-per-night Soho Farmhouse in the Cotswolds and were also seen dining at the celebrity favourite Cibo in Hale, Cheshire. ‌ Trent and his new flame turned heads as their shared location tags at an exclusive members' club in the Cotswolds sparked romance rumours. Eagle-eyed supporters had already picked up on signals of blooming love between the two following individual holiday posts. And the relationship was confirmed on Thursday when Estelle joined the Trent's family to watch his press conference at Real Madrid City, Madrid, and sported a stunning in a white one-shoulder dress. But, in what should have been a great day for the footballer, both personally and professionally, has been tainted due to a social media storm over Trent's new language skills. The 26-year-old England international, who signed a six-year deal with the Spanish giants after his contract with English champions Liverpool expired, spoke fluent Spanish confidently at his official presentation ahead of a press conference. His choice to speak in the language of his new club and not English surprised many, but showed the preparation which had gone into this move, something for which he was criticised by sections of the Liverpool fanbase after running down his contract with his hometown club. ‌ "A SCOUSER speaking fluent spanish? lmaooo trent has been plotting and preparing for this move since the summer of 2022," one Twitter (X) used commented as the clip of Trent went viral. "Nah Trent was speaking intermediate level Spanish. He has been planning to leave for YEARSSS LOOOOOOOOOOOL," another mused, with a third fuming: "Trent cost his boyhood club the winning goal in a Champions League final and immediately started learning Spanish to help orchestrate a move to the club he'd just lost too, don't let anyone tell you he's not a rat." Acknowledging that many - including former Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp - criticised Reds fans for booing Trent during one of his final games for the club after confirming his exit, another Twitter (X) user wrote: "LOOOOOOL na we all need to apologise to Liverpool fans because Trent is all of a sudden fluent in Spanish???? I am so sorry Liverpool fans." ‌ Trent admitted during his presentation that Real Madrid was the only team he would have left boyhood club Liverpool for and was comfortable he made the right decision. The 26-year-old, who has signed a six-year deal after Real Madrid paid £8.5million to release him from a contract expiring this month, rejected suggestions he had been heavily influenced by close friend and England team-mate Jude Bellingham. ‌ He also denied he had been orchestrating the move for a long time but impressing president Florentino Perez and assembled club dignitaries by surprisingly addressing them in Spanish did nothing to calm the anger a significant section of the fanbase have felt about the way he handled his exit after 20 years at Liverpool. 'To be honest, it was never a question of where, it was whether to go or not to go but I always knew, I've probably known it for a long time, if I was ever to leave Liverpool, it would only be to go Real Madrid, that would be the only club for me,' said Trent, who told a press conference he had been learning Spanish 'for a few months'. 'Then it gets to a point where you have to make a decision whether to go or stay and making that decision was not an easy decision because I'd been there so long, but eventually you have to make a decision and in my mind, I've made the right one.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store