Byju's Learning app delisted from Google Play Store
Beleaguered edtech firm Byju's learning app has been delisted from Google Play Store due to non-payment of dues to its vendor Amazon Web Services, according to sources.
AWS has been trying to resolve payment issues with Think and Learn, which operates under the Byju's brand, since April last year.
"BYJU's Learning app has been delisted from Playstore because of non-payment to Amazon Web Services (AWS), which provides support to the app. Byju's business is now being managed by an Insolvency Resolution Professional who has to manage all payment-related issues as well," a source told PTI.
An email sent to Think and Learn's Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) Shailendra Ajmera did not elicit any reply.
"Apps, which are being handled by other vendors, are functional as of now," sources aware of the development said.
Byju's Premium Learning app and Byju's Exam Prep app continue to be available on Google Play Store.
When contacted, an AWS spokesperson said, "AWS has been working with Think and Learn Private Limited since April 2024 to resolve its outstanding AWS account balance. We remain hopeful that this matter can be resolved. Separately, we are unable to comment on any actions taken by other technology providers with respect to the BYJU'S app".
Byju's Learning App covered mathematics, physics, chemistry and biology for classes 4-12 and social studies for classes 6–8 as well. The app also provides preparation support for competitive exams like JEE, NEET, and IAS.
The app continues to be available on Apple's App Store.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has started insolvency proceedings against Byju's on appeal by various investors, including lender-authorised agency Glas Trust.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi HC rules in favour of Amazon, says earnings from cloud services not taxable: ‘Customers do not acquire any right…'
Amazon has won a major tax battle as the Delhi High Court has ruled that cloud payments made by Indian companies are not taxable. The court said that payments made by Indian companies to foreign cloud service providers for standard cloud computing services do not constitute royalty or fees for technical services (FTS) under the Income Tax Act, 1961, or the India-United States Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). This decision is set to have significant implications for the taxation of cloud services in India. A Division Bench comprising Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tejas Karia delivered the verdict in a series of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) against US-based cloud giant Amazon Web Services (AWS). According to a report by Live Law, the Court rejected the IT department's argument that receipts from Indian clients by AWS should be taxed as royalty or FTS simply because the services involve access to servers, APIs, or data infrastructure. The ruling clarifies the tax treatment of payments for standardised cloud offerings. What the Delhi High Court judges said in the ruling Agreeing with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that ruled in favour of Amazon, the judges said (as reported by Live Law): 'The customers do not acquire any right or title or any IPR that would entitle them to exploit or commercially monetise the said assets on their own. There is no material to establish that a grant of such service entails transfer of any technical know-how, skill, knowledge or process… The customers of the assessee do not acquire any right to commercially exploit any of the assessee's IPRs. The fact that the assessee lends certain support and assistance to its customers… does not in any manner support the view that the assessee makes available technology or technical skills. The issue involved in the present appeal is also covered in favour of the assessee…We find no merit in the contention that the amount received by the assessee for providing services would be taxable as equipment royalty.' The dispute stemmed from reassessment proceedings against AWS for assessment years 2014–15 and 2016–17, where the Indian tax authorities claimed that AWS' earnings from Indian clients were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services (FTS). The Department argued that AWS' cloud services involved the use of scientific equipment and software, making the payments liable under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act and Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. AWS maintained that it provided standardised, automated cloud services through pre-set contracts and interfaces, without transferring technical knowledge, intellectual property, or usage rights. The Court upheld the ITAT's view, stating that AWS' services were automated, offered remotely without human input or transfer of proprietary rights. It found no transfer of technical know-how, no access to infrastructure by customers, and no sharing of source code. The Court also dismissed the claim that AWS' support services constituted technical or consultancy services that made technology available to customers. iPhone 16e: 5 Reasons to buy the most affordable iPhone 16 series model! AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
New Indian Express
14 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Byju's insolvency: SC admits cases filed by company's promoters
BENGALURU: The Supreme Court on Thursday admitted the cases filed by the promoters of edtech firm Byju's in connection with the ongoing insolvency proceedings. The apex court has scheduled the next hearing on July 21. Byju's lawyers challenged the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench decision that denied withdrawal of insolvency proceedings initiated by the BCCI. Senior Counsel KK Venugopal said, 'A Rs 158 crore settlement between Byju's and BCCI was fully agreed upon, paid, and formally communicated to the IRP (The resolution professional) well before the CoC (Committee of Creditors) was constituted.' Senior Counsel Guru Krishna Kumar sought relief from the Supreme Court, 'The Resolution Professional (IRP) handling Think & Learn's (Byju's) insolvency in India, has withdrawn legal proceedings in the US initiated by Think and Learn against the lenders. This is leading to substantial assets of the company in the US being disposed off."
Indian Express
21 hours ago
- Indian Express
Instagram caused battery drain on Android phones, confirms Google
Instagram is undoubtedly one of the most used apps on Android devices. The Meta-owned social media platform, which has more than a billion users worldwide, is one of the most preferred ways to share images, videos and see what others are up to. In the last few weeks, several Android smartphone users have been complaining that the Instagram app has been eating up a large amount of battery. As it turns out, the app was consuming power even when even it was not active in the background. While the app developer did not say anything about the problem, Google is now advising Android users to update to the latest version of the app to fix the issue. In a new support post, Google said that Instagram on Wednesday, May 28, is rolling out an 'updated app that should fix a battery drain issue on Android devices.' The tech giant is also advising users to head over to the Google Play Store to install Instagram build 382.0.0.49.84 to prevent battery drain. However, neither Google nor Instagram has clarified as to why Instagram was suddenly draining battery. Some users who downgraded to an older version of the app to fix the battery drain problem said that their device heated up significantly, while others said that they temporarily switched to Instagram Lite and confirmed that the problem was caused by the Instagram app. While Google did not specify which phones or Android versions were affected by the battery drain issue, it did say that all Pixel devices which received the May update were affected by the problem. Also, it is still unclear if Android phones from other manufacturers were affected by the Instagram battery drain issue, or if it is something else eating up their battery. Recently, the US Federal Trade Commission accused Meta of acquiring potential rival platforms Instagram and WhatsApp to establish an illegal 'social network monopoly' of sorts.
