logo
iPhone 16 Pro gets a massive price slash as Flipkart GOAT sale heats up, drops prices just before iPhone 17 arrives

iPhone 16 Pro gets a massive price slash as Flipkart GOAT sale heats up, drops prices just before iPhone 17 arrives

Economic Times3 days ago
Is it worth buying right now?
More premium deals in the mix
Live Events
How the base iPhone 16 fits in
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
While Apple loyalists keep an eye out for the iPhone 17, Flipkart is busy clearing the decks. The Flipkart GOAT Sale 2025 has slashed the price of the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max quite heavily. The iPhone 16 Pro Max now sits at Rs 1,09,900 instead of its launch price of Rs 1,29,900. The iPhone 16 Pro is down too — Rs 1,54,900 from Rs 1,64,900. Throw in an extra Rs 4,000 off if you've got a Flipkart Axis Bank credit card and the deal gets even sweeter.These phones still hold their own. The iPhone 16 Pro brings a 6.3‑inch Super Retina XDR OLED display. The Pro Max stretches that to 6.9 inches. Both run Apple's A18 chip and carry 8GB RAM plus 128GB storage at the base. The cameras remain a highlight — a triple rear setup with a 48MP main sensor, 48MP ultra‑wide and 12MP telephoto. Selfies and video calls? A crisp 12MP front camera sorts that. Battery life is decent too: 3582mAh for the Pro, 4685mAh for the Pro Max, both supporting 25W wireless charging. They're offered in Titanium White, Titanium Desert and Titanium Black.'The iPhone 16 series made a lot of buzz at the time of launch,' as tech insiders pointed out last year. And rightly so. The Pro versions stand apart with high-end displays, solid build and a camera system that can still rival the best.The big question. With the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max set to land soon, some might think waiting makes more sense. But not everyone wants to pay top dollar for the very latest. 'It is worthwhile to note that the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are expected to go up the price ladder when launched,' say market analysts. If you want a top-tier iPhone but don't fancy stretching your budget, these GOAT Sale deals look very appealing.Flipkart isn't stopping at iPhones. If you want an alternative, the Google Pixel 8a is now Rs 37,999 — decent price for a phone that's all about clean Android and sharp cameras. The Samsung Galaxy S24 sits at Rs 46,999, packing a punch with the Exynos 2400 chip, a vibrant AMOLED display and a triple camera. If you're leaning Samsung but want it a bit cheaper, the Galaxy S24 FE is Rs 35,999.Don't overlook the standard iPhone 16. At launch in India it started at Rs 79,900 for 128GB. Now, Flipkart's sale has dragged it down to Rs 69,999. Early shoppers even grabbed it for Rs 59,999 when the sale kicked off on 12 July. Bank offers, cashback and EMI deals make it lighter on the wallet too.The iPhone 16 holds up well: 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED, A18 Bionic chip, 48MP main camera with next-gen stabilisation, 12MP ultra-wide, and a 12MP TrueDepth front camera. It runs iOS 18 and folds in Apple's new AI smarts through Apple Intelligence.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Toll on SP Ring Road to be revised
Toll on SP Ring Road to be revised

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Toll on SP Ring Road to be revised

Ahmedabad: From Jan 1, 2027, the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (Auda) itself will collect toll tax on the six-laned SP Ring Road. The toll tax will be revised, and as per new tender provisions, contractor companies developing the road will be paid annuities every six months. The current concession company's toll collection term ends on Dec 31, 2026. Whether LMV passenger four-wheelers will continue to be exempt from the tax will be decided by the state govt at a later stage, officials said. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad On Feb 1 this year, Auda floated two tenders worth Rs 2,200 crore for six-laning of the 76km SP Ring Road. With the bids now opened, contracts are expected to be awarded soon. Package 1 of the project involves six-laning the road's 37km stretch in the city's eastern area while Package 2 involves six-laning of a 39.25km stretch in the western part. It has also been decided to widen the 34km two-lane service road to four lanes, and the 15km three-lane service road to four lanes. An Auda official requesting anonymity said, "Auda floated two separate tenders for the two packages on the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM). Nine companies have bid for one package, while 11 have bid for the other. The bids for both packages have been opened and contracts will be finalised soon." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo "According to the tender provisions, 60% of the cost of six-laning will be borne by the contractor, while Auda will take care of the remaining 40%. New toll booths will be set up and Auda will collect revised toll tax for 15 years. According to the tender formula, a certain amount from toll tax revenue will be paid to the contractor companies as an annuity every six months." Auda laid the SP Ring Road in 2006 on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis. As traffic increased, it was decided to six-lane it with an expansion report prepared in 2017 and later approved. In Oct 2017, the Auda board, through resolution No. 267, exempted LMV passenger four-wheelers from toll tax on SP Ring road under its jurisdiction. Auda pays the concession company ARRIL Rs 40 to 50 crore annually to compensate for this loss in revenue. In Feb 2019, ARRIL submitted a request letter expressing willingness to spend Rs 200 crore for the six-laning without funds from Auda. In exchange, it requested an extension of its concession agreement, which ends on Dec 31, 2026, by three years and six months. The company also mentioned the possibility of amending the concession agreement regarding incremental costs and project revenue as guided by its financial lenders. While Auda okayed the concessionaire bearing the six-laning expenses, it did not agree to extending the concession period. The authority then appointed a third-party consultant to determine the bill of quantity and put a condition that if toll revenue increases, the additional amount should be given to Auda. The six-laning proposal was approved based on these conditions, but later cancelled in 2021.

Punjab & Haryana high court denies relief to reconstruction company in perjury case
Punjab & Haryana high court denies relief to reconstruction company in perjury case

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Punjab & Haryana high court denies relief to reconstruction company in perjury case

Patiala: In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana high court declined to grant interim relief to an asset reconstruction company in a writ petition seeking to quash perjury proceedings initiated against it. The case, filed by veteran journalist Kanwar Manjit Singh, also includes a Rs 5-crore defamation claim, accusing the company of reputational damage and unlawful actions. On July 14, the high court, while disposing of the petition, refused to stay or quash the perjury complaint currently before the district magistrate, Patiala. Instead, the court directed the district magistrate to consider the matter "strictly in accordance with law", allowing EARC a chance to be heard, but enabling the perjury proceedings to continue. The complaint followed alleged forcible and unlawful possession of K M Singh's business premises — located at Focal Point, Patiala — in July 2024. Kanwar Manjit claimed that the possession was carried out in gross violation of the SARFAESI Act and due legal process. He accused the company and its senior officers, including group chairman and other officials, of submitting forged documents and false affidavits before multiple forums such as the high court, district magistrate, local courts, and the debt recovery tribunal (DRT) in Chandigarh. In a legal notice issued earlier, K M Singh demanded Rs 5 crore in damages from the company, its group chairman, and others, citing defamation, reputational harm, and business losses. He also sought an unconditional apology and immediate return of all assets allegedly removed during the controversial possession. According to K M Singh, the possession drive was executed in full public view and involved unauthorised participation of govt officials and police. Loud public announcements and forced entry were made in front of the staff, neighbours, and media, portraying him as a loan defaulter. Singh claimed that this not only damaged his reputation but also resulted in unlawful seizure of valuable assets, including cash, manuscripts, business documents, digital archives, and rare books, worth over Rs 50 crore. A similar incident in June 2022 was cited in the legal notice, where the said company's recovery agent allegedly entered K M Singh's premises in violation of a stay order, leading to verbal abuse and manhandling. Despite repeated representations to the company's top management, K M Singh said no corrective action was taken, reflecting what he described as an "institutional disregard for law and ethics". Alongside the ongoing perjury complaint, Kanwar also filed a separate case under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, currently under adjudication by the DRT-III in Chandigarh. Additionally, a complaint concerning the role of certain govt officials during the possession is under review by the Punjab vigilance bureau. Reacting to the high court's order, K M Singh said: "These actions were not just legally untenable but clearly aimed at public humiliation and destroying my reputation. The company even approached the high court to block the perjury proceedings, but the court refused to grant them any relief and allowed the process to continue. This legal battle is not just about my rights but also about resisting the misuse of power by financial entities that trample upon citizens' dignity and due process. " With the high court declining to interfere, the spotlight now shifts to the district magistrate, Patiala, who has been tasked with deciding the perjury complaint on its legal merits. Meanwhile, the defamation notice and associated demands by K M Singh continue to mount pressure on the company and its leadership. MSID:: 122767795 413 |

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store