Proposed changes to divorce law could end blame game
A consultation on the divorce process has been launched by the Executive that could see changes to the way people legally separate in Northern Ireland.
The current law requires couples to either go through a lengthy separation before a divorce is granted, or proceedings can begin straight away if one person is at fault either through desertion, adultery, or unreasonable behaviour.
Joan Davis, CEO of counselling service Relate NI, said the current law is "outdated and not in keeping with modern society and how relationships come and go - it's just the reality of life".
The biggest issue, she said, is the length of time that a couple must be separated before being able to begin the process.
Currently, a couple is unable to apply for a divorce, or in the case of a civil partnership - a dissolution, within the first two years of marriage.
Once that time period has been reached, a divorce petition must be based on at least one of five reasons:
two years' separation with the consent of the other spouse to divorce
five years' separation
unreasonable behaviour
adultery
desertion
The same grounds apply for the dissolution of a civil partnership, with the exception of adultery.
The most recent figures for Northern Ireland show that the majority of people who filed for divorce in 2023 list separation as the reason.
"Why would a legal system and a society want to persecute people more when a relationship is broken down by keeping them tied together and increasing that level of anxiety, adding to an already huge mental health crisis?," Ms Davis told BBC News NI.
"Divorce numbers aren't going to change, and if they do change the legislation there's not going to be a rush of people running to the courts for divorce."
Ms Davis said blaming one person for the end of the marriage can have a negative impact on the wider family unit.
"Is that a good thing for a parent to be doing, you know? So the children then know how bad that other parent is?
"If mum or dad has spent so much time explaining how bad they are, and it's all their fault, it's really not good for family life."
Finance Minister John O'Dowd said the options being put forward "could reduce the conflict that can arise from divorce or dissolution".
"Many marriages and civil partnerships are loving, happy and last a lifetime, but unfortunately some don't and break down for a number of reasons," he said.
"This can have a devastating effect on those families, especially where children are involved, and can lead to additional and unnecessary conflict."
Clare Curran, Director at Curran Bowles family law, said Northern Ireland's divorce laws are "very antiquated", adding that they should "fall in line with the English system".
She said the two systems used to be similar, but after many Stormont collapses Northern Ireland has fallen behind in terms of "modernising the application for divorce process".
"It doesn't work. It's slow and arduous, so everybody just gets into this blame game, which is really contentious and actually expensive."
Ms Curran said it's about "striking the right balance, making sure that it's not too easy".
"You don't want to dilute the meaning of marriage and the importance of the consequence of marriage by making it super easy to be able to dissolve a marriage.
"Since the reform in England, it's only been a positive thing. It makes the process easier, more accessible, quicker and cheaper.
"So, what's not to like about that?"
The alternative options included in the consultation are largely based around how divorce works in the Republic of Ireland, England and Wales.
The first is for the current law to remain the same with no change.
Second, is the introduction of an administrative, no-fault divorce, similar to what is offered in England Wales.
This means that one person can apply for a divorce and does not need to prove a reason why beyond the breakdown of the relationship.
Supporters say it allows for a quicker, less contentious divorce with the process typically taking around 6 months.
The third option is also a no-fault divorce, but closer to what is in place in the Republic of Ireland.
Like option two, this means that no specific reason has to be provided to instigate proceedings, and no-one has to take blame for the end of the marriage.
However, it's a lengthier process, as the couple does have to show they have lived apart for at least two out of the three previous years and that there is no possibility of reconciliation.
The consultation will run until 26 September.
End of blame game in divorce laws
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Glastonbury ‘Appalled' by Band's Chant Against Israel's Military
The organizers of Glastonbury music festival said on Sunday that they were 'appalled' by statements made onstage during a performance by the British punk duo Bob Vylan, in which the lead singer led the crowd in chants of 'Death, death to the I.D.F.,' referring to the Israeli Defense Forces. Glastonbury, Britain's biggest music festival, had already been facing criticism for its decision to allow Kneecap, an Irish-language rap group, to perform on Saturday, despite pressure from broadcasters and politicians to cut the act after the band voiced anti-Israel statements and one member faced a terrorism charge. Kneecap's performance was such a draw at the festival that the arena was already full for Bob Vylan's set an hour beforehand. The chants by Bob Vylan's singer, which were broadcast live on the BBC, drew immediate condemnation from politicians in the United Kingdom. Israel's embassy in the United Kingdom, as well as some Jewish groups, accused Glastonbury of promoting hate. Avon and Somerset police said on Saturday that they were reviewing video footage from the stage to determine if any criminal offenses had been committed. 'With almost 4,000 performances at Glastonbury 2025, there will inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share, and a performer's presence here should never be seen as a tacit endorsement of their opinions and beliefs,' said a statement on the Instagram accounts of the Glastonbury Festival and Emily Eavis, one of the festival's organizers, on Sunday. 'However, we are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan yesterday.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Women in UK ‘still not safe' as mourners gather to remember murdered Zara Aleena
Women in Britain are 'still not safe', the aunt of Zara Aleena said as mourners gathered in east London to mark three years since the law graduate's 'preventable' murder. The 35-year-old was walking home from a night out when she was stalked, assaulted and killed by a sexual predator on 26 June 2022 in Ilford, east London – just minutes from her front door. The outrage and protests which followed her death, along with her inquest last year, have thrown a harsh spotlight on the failings of institutions to protect women, according to Ms Aleena's aunt Farah Naz. Ms Aleena's murderer Jordan McSweeney, a known violent offender, had been released from prison nine days before her brutal killing. On Sunday, Ms Naz led a vigil to honour her beloved niece who 'embodied fairness and justice' and used tell her 'I am going to put things right' in the world. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who was Ms Aleena's local MP, and justice minister Alex Davies-Jones both urged the well-wishers to hold the Government accountable on its promises to try and tackle violence against women, including a target to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade. Ms Naz told the PA news agency her niece 'has become a symbol of what needs to be different, and also of what's possible' adding that for the family 'her legacy isn't just about systems, it's about values: fairness, courage, care for others.' The vigil included a moment of reflection and a walk from the spot where Ms Aleena was murdered to her home. Ms Naz said: 'Progress has been made but women are still not safe. 'We hope the vigil offered a space for quiet reflection and also for shared resolve. It's a moment to remember Zara, and also to recognise the depth of the injustice. 'We stand together against the violence and the systems that still enable it. We walk Zara home, and we say: 'no more'.' The probation system has faced scrutiny and reform, emergency call handling has improved and offender risk tools are being used more effectively since Ms Aleena's murder, the vigil organisers said. They said survivors are speaking out and being heard but a misogynistic culture still underpins institutions and streets, prevention remains secondary to response and specialist services, especially those led by and for black and minority women, remain underfunded. Women's safety is still vulnerable to political cycles, plus probation and prison services remain under-resourced and overstretched which may hamper efforts to effectively manage high-risk individuals, they added. Ms Naz said: 'Zara's legacy is already taking shape through policy shifts, public conversation, and the determination of so many people working for change.' Ms Naz said 'some things have changed but not enough,' adding: 'The inquest exposed the failures clearly. There's been progress, but real safety for women and girls will take more than policy. It needs a shift in culture, in how institutions work, how women are treated, and how accountability is held. 'We're not there yet – that's why we keep going.' The jury at Ms Aleena's inquest last year found: 'Zara's death was contributed to by the failure of multiple state agencies to act in accordance to policies and procedures – to share intelligence, accurately assess risk of serious harm, (and) act and plan in response to the risk in a sufficient, timely and coordinated way'. Evidence to the inquest prompted the coroner Nadia Persaud to issue a prevention of future deaths report warning there is a risk similar killings could occur unless action is taken. She instructed the Probation Service and Metropolitan Police to improve their services. Low staffing levels, poor understanding around risk assessment and a 'lack of professional curiosity' within the Probation Service were all listed as matters of concern, as was a lack of 'rigour, detail and independence' of a Met investigation into the case, Ms Persaud concluded. Mr Streeting told the crowd: 'We have come together to celebrate and recognise a life that was tragically and horrifically cut short and to recognise the damage it has inflicted on our whole community. 'Women and girls who were already afraid to walk our streets are now even more afraid looking at the consequences of what happens when, on a normal night out and on your way home, something so horrific can happen in our neighbourhood.' Ms Naz was also joined by the relatives of other women who have been murdered – primary school teacher Sabina Nessa and mother-of-three Jan Mustafa. They too 'campaign for change and stand in remembrance, protest and solidarity,' she said. All the bereaved relatives hope to meet the Prime Minster next month about their campaign for a new law to force offenders to attend their sentencing hearings. Ms Davies-Jones said: 'Today, we stand with Zara's family. With her friends. With Farah Naz, who has carried Zara's legacy with extraordinary strength and purpose. 'We stand with the families of Sabina Nessa and Jan Mustafa, who know this pain too deeply. Your grief has become a rallying cry. Your courage has driven real change.' She added: 'We've set an ambitious target: to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade. We owe it to every woman and girl to see that through. To say – with one voice – enough is enough. 'That means coming together, across Government, across Parliament and across the whole justice system to fundamentally tackle how we approach violence against women.' McSweeney was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 38 years at the Old Bailey in December 2022 after admitting sexually assaulting and murdering Ms Aleena. In November 2023, he won a Court of Appeal bid to reduce the minimum term of his life sentence to 33 years.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'How Is That Fair?': Victoria Derbyshire Confronts Wes Streeting Over Labour's 'Two-Tier' Welfare Plan
Victoria Derbyshire accused Labour of implementing a 'two-tier' benefits system as she confronted Wes Streeting over the plans. Keir Starmer was forced to make major changes to his government's blueprint for slashing billions from the welfare budget following a backbench rebellion. Under the new plan, current recipients of personal independence payments (PIP) and universal credit will continue to get the same amount of money. However, those who claim in the future will receive less. On the BBC this morning, presenter Derbyshire read out the views of one viewer, called Matt. She said: 'The big concern from a lot of people, including Matt, one of our viewers, is that you are creating a two-tier system. 'He says 'I still don't understand the logic of applying cuts to future applicants. Is that just so there are fewer people who are directly affected to protest the cuts?'. How is it fair that there's a two-tier system?' Streeting, the health secretary, replied: 'You can say that about a number of other systems.' But Derbyshire interrupted to tell him: 'I'm asking about this.' Streeting snapped back: 'Yeah well I'm answering the question, which is when things change and evolve, as you bring in new systems, it does change sometimes from group to group, student finance being an example.' Derbyshire then asked: 'My question is how is that fair?' Streeting said the government needed to make sure the welfare system is 'sustainable'. He said: 'Even before the changes were made this week, the cost of the welfare bill is growing enormously. There's a real risk to it, both in terms of financial sustainability and democratic support and legitimacy.' Disability Charities Urge MPs To Defeat Starmer's Plans For 'Two-Tier' Welfare System Keir Starmer's Authority In Tatters After Humiliating U-Turn On Welfare Cuts 'Has He Got A Grip?': Naga Munchetty Skewers Minister After Starmer's Welfare U-Turn
