logo
Anycubic S1 Combo Review: We Finally Have a Bambu Lab P1S Competitor

Anycubic S1 Combo Review: We Finally Have a Bambu Lab P1S Competitor

Yahoo04-03-2025
See at Anycubic
Over the last year we have seen a lot of 3D printers trying to replicate the success that Bambu Lab has had with its color system. The P1P combo" target="_self (followed up by the P1S combo) are still some of the best 3D printers" target="_self you can buy, and until now, there was very little in the way of competition. The combination of color system, speed and quality seemed like a pipe dream for most manufacturers. That's all changed in early 2025, with several companies finally taking a stab at the color combo.
Anycubic has been making budget 3D printers for a long time so it makes sense for them to try and compete with Bambu Lab in the color system space. Its first foray, the Anycubic Kobra 3 was a fine attempt, but the S1 combo is the company's direct competitor to the Bambu Lab P1S, and it is surprisingly good. Good enough to hold its own in a space long dominated by one company.
Like the P1S, the Anycubic S1 is a core XY 3D printer. Core XY differs from many printers in that the print bed moves up and down, and the print nozzles stay on the same plane. This creates a much more stable platform for the print and reduces the chance of vibration issues. Core XY works very well with a color system because it is often enclosed and allows you to stack the color system (called the ACE on Anycubic machines) on top of the machine to reduce the footprint without introducing major movement issues. The S1 has a plastic door and lid, rather than the glass from the P1S, and while it does make it slightly louder, it also makes the entire machine lighter, so it's a trade-off. I was worried that the lack of glass would make the S1 feel cheap, but it doesn't make as much difference as I had thought.
What does make a difference is the large LCD panel on the S1. My chief complaint about the P1P/P1S has always been that the display is difficult to navigate and feels very cheap. At 4.3 inches, the LCD on the S1 is large and easy to navigate, which makes adjusting parameters on the fly much easier. It's far more similar to the LCD on the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon (a more expensive machine) than the P1S' tiny 1 inch by 3 inch display. The S1 also uses USB thumb drives as its storage of choice rather than the MicroSD cards used by the P1S. I much prefer that as they are easier to load and unload and they are easier to transport. The S1 does have its own internal memory as well, so when you transfer via WiFi, it keeps a copy stored on the machine, making it easier to reprint if you are making batch copies.
The quality of the Anycubic S1 is surprisingly good. Well, maybe surprisingly isn't the right word. Most modern 3D printers are significantly better than they were even 3 years ago, but the S1 is in a price bracket that can fall prey to poor tuning. The machine doesn't seem to have any mechanical issues that could cause bad prints, and my test print showed significant improvements over the Kobra 3, Anycubic's other color system 3D printer. The test print had significantly better towers and dimensional accuracy --something that a core XY printer is very good at -- and shows the cooling is working the way it should.
I printed models in PLA, TPU, ABS, and PETG and all of them printed well. The enclosure means that even hot materials like ABS can print well, though I recommend taking the lid off to print PLA. The interior can get a little warm, and it just prints better at cooler temperatures. The best models seemed to come from PLA and PETG in terms of quality, and I had some issues getting the TPU through into the nozzle due to the flexibility and length of the PTFE tube. Aside from that, the S1 performed admirably.
Color systems are on the rise and Anycubic's take is likely to give us a good idea of what the budget market systems are going to be like. The ACE unit itself is fine. There is nothing to distinguish it from other color systems as it doesn't have a heated chamber or anything like that, but it works as it is supposed to. I'm a little concerned that the entrances to the material feeds will grind down over time as they are in a fixed position, but they do look like a replaceable part, which is good.
The color prints themselves are excellent. You can see from the cheerful pilot and the purge tower behind it there there was very little in the way of bleeding, and that the purge tower is clean along the margins. That means the "poop chute" and nozzle cleaner are doing what they are designed for, which is unusual for a lot of these Bambu Lab clones. Honestly, even the P1S can struggle with this, so seeing Anycubic work to get this right is a welcome change.
The Anycubic S1 has the same issue as with any color system, the waste. The amount of printer poop -- the colloquial term for printer waste -- that the S1 produces is very similar to that of the P1S. Though I think I could reduce it if I spent a little more time with the software, which creates challenges of its own. The Anycubic slicer is based on several others, including Bambu Slicer, Orca Slicer and Prusa Slicer. Unfortunately, it seems to have removed some of the more helpful settings, like the one that allows me to adjust the purge levels on the printer. Those settings are important if you want to reduce your printer's waste without creating color bleed issues. The Anycubic slicer is certainly better than its last version, but it still has a way to go to make itself as simple to use as its competitors.
This is one of the biggest issues with even the best budget 3D printers" target="_self. These days, 3D printers often come with apps which are usually subpar (like their slicers tend to be). The S1 uses the same app as the Kobra 3, which is, frankly, awful. It is loaded with ads and just feels like an afterthought in a way that the Bambu app and now the Prusa app don't. It feels like it's trying to sell you something, and that's just not what I need from a 3D printing app. It needs to monitor my machines and help me printer quicker or better, but the app struggles to do that effectively.
Overall, my experience with the S1 from Anycubic is positive. For $400 for the standalone machine and $600 for the color system combo, it stands up to the P1S in almost every way, and beats it on price. The P1S with color system sells for around $700 and, from what I can see, doesn't offer anything more than the Anycubic.
Only the software reduces the overall experience of using the Anycubic S1, though I find the better LCD on the printer makes up for some of that shortfall. Software issues aside, the S1 is a sturdy entry into the Core XY with color system pantheon and can be considered one of the best in its price bracket.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This 3D Printer Has Four Different Extruders. It's the Best Thing Snapmaker's Ever Made
This 3D Printer Has Four Different Extruders. It's the Best Thing Snapmaker's Ever Made

CNET

time2 days ago

  • CNET

This 3D Printer Has Four Different Extruders. It's the Best Thing Snapmaker's Ever Made

Snapmaker's 3D printers don't always follow trends. The original Snapmaker was a small three-in-one machine that could be a 3D printer, laser cutter or CNC, depending on the type of tool head you use. For years, the company has iterated on that idea, culminating in the much larger Artisan model. After that, Snapmaker tried a dual-nozzle 3D printer called the J1. In my review of the J1, I liked that the nozzles could print two models at the same time, reducing the time it takes to print batches, but I felt the cost was prohibitive. With the advent of multicolor systems, Snapmaker could have gone the way of Bambu Lab, Anycubic and other companies and made an AMS system to filter four colors into one nozzle, but -- true to form -- it went in another direction. The U1 is a four-tool head 3D printer that uses independent tool heads to print four different colors or even four different materials. It's a system that can work well or fail utterly. Now, Snapmaker has made a tool changer that not only works well but works out of the box with little to no setup time. I've been having fun with it for a few weeks now. This tool is a smart way to do multimaterial printing that reduces almost all of the waste that most color systems produce. It's a joy to use and I can see it becoming a staple in many workshops this year. James Bricknell/CNET What's the difference between a tool changer and an AMS? Tool changers and AMS are both mechanisms to allow a 3D printer to use different materials -- often different colors of the same material, or a material used to support a different material -- without the need to swap the filament manually. The AMS does this by automatically loading and unloading the filament from the hot end each time a color change is needed. The advantage of the AMS is that it only requires one fairly standard hot end with a splitter on the 3D printer itself. The AMS unit, which can be bought separately, does most of the heavy lifting in this situation rather than the printer itself. The disadvantage is the large amount of waste the AMS produces. It has to purge a lot of filament from the nozzle each time it changes colors and materials to make sure they don't mix on the print itself. The Snapmaker U1's waste, shown on the right, is far less than that of a normal AMS color 3D printer James Bricknell/CNET A tool changer like the Snapmaker U1 circumvents the waste issue by having four separate hot ends and, therefore, four separate nozzles. This allows each nozzle to stay uncontaminated by any other material, thereby reducing the waste output to just the purge tower. This also speeds up the entire process, as the mechanical switching of the tool heads is much faster than the purging required by the AMS. I printed the same model on the Anycubic S1 and the Snapmaker U1, and though the colors are a little different, you can see that the S1's waste (pictured on the left) is far greater than the U1's. The big disadvantages of a tool changer are the extra mechanisms that can malfunction and the price. Four tool heads mean four more areas for things to go wrong, like blockages, worn nozzles and, because the tool heads need to be swapped, a chance for them to be knocked over as they load and unload. The price is also a limiting factor as tool changers tend to be more expensive than their AMS cousins. The Snapmaker U1 is available on Kickstarter as of Aug. 19, 2025, with an early-bird price of $749 and a standard Kickstarter price of $799. Even the suggested retail price is competitive with other high-end 3D printers at $999, keeping it suitable for small businesses and hobbyists. It's also worth noting that having four tool heads doesn't change the natural properties of the materials you're using. PLA still won't stick to PETG, and TPU won't magically start sticking either. What it does allow, though, is to use these products in conjunction with each other without risk of mixing them up in the nozzle. While some of these prints aren't perfect, that seems to be an issue with the software rather than the hardware James Bricknell/CNET My Snapmaker U1 makes good-quality prints. Some have even been great, but there's still work to be done. I don't think the issue is mechanical, though. The Snapmaker uses a forked version of OrcaSlicer, and while I like Orca as a slicer, this version isn't yet finished. I'm using a prerelease version, and I hope to see many more updates to the software before the end of the Kickstarter. Right now, it lacks good profiles for the most common filaments, and this causes a lot of stringing if you don't tune the settings yourself. The tool changers work well in delivering material, with no break in the printing process. The entire 3D printer is fast, accurate and, with some fine-tuning, will be capable of truly excellent prints in short order. I used it to make my kids some flexi dragons with a touch of color -- just white eyes, teeth and claws -- and it printed them at the same speed as if it were only one color. That type of speed is going to be what separates the U1 from the competition, especially with such a competitive price tag. While almost all of the prints had stringing on them, there was little in the way of defects. The single-color prints were all as flawless as you would expect from a modern 3D printer and could be easily sold on an Etsy shop -- while you still can, that is -- with no real post-processing needed The initial setup was also fast and simple compared to other tool changers I've used. The entire 3D printer was already assembled, and the configuration took around 15 minutes to make sure the tool changers were aligned and ready to go. This kind of out-of-the-box printing is becoming a prerequisite for consumer printers, so it's good to see that Snapmaker is trying to simplify the startup procedure. Simplification is a big part of the U1. Each filament roll has an auto loader that makes loading the filament a breeze, and you can unload all the material at the same time if you want. Fast and simple. I would like to see a few changes to the onboard operating system, but they will likely happen as the platform evolves. The color selections for each filament are terrible and need to be addressed, as it's hard to select a color that matches your filament. That being said, if you're using a USB dongle to transfer files, you get to map the colors on the file to the colors on your printer, so that's handy. James Bricknell/CNET This hands-on has given me a chance to see what the Snapmaker U1 is capable of and while I haven't spent enough time with it to give it a definitive review, I do think it's worthy of your time and money. The prints are of good quality, and the four tools give you a lot of scope to try new and interesting ways to combine materials. Tool changers are still a niche style of 3D printer, and they need a few good products in the space to help them gain more popularity. The Snapmaker U1 is going to be a great way to enter this new market, and with the Kickstarter offering a decent discount, you can do so without breaking the bank.

Best 3D Printers (2025)
Best 3D Printers (2025)

CNET

time14-08-2025

  • CNET

Best 3D Printers (2025)

What I like: I rarely find a product that impresses me, but the A1 Combo from Bambu Lab left me genuinely amazed with its performance and value. This 3D printer is excellent, with fast, quality printing at a great price. Adding the AMS Lite elevates it to the best printer you can buy right now. Plus, its four-color printing capability for less than $700 is such a good deal; I'm still baffled by how the company pulls off that pricing. The CNET test print from the Bambu Lab A1 is nearly perfect. Only the Prusa Mk4s and Core One have managed to beat it overall. The overhangs were excellent, showing that the cooling on the A1 is working well, even at high speeds. I was also able to remove all four of the 3D printed sticks used to test tolerance, though the 0.2mm stick took some wiggling to come free. There is a lot more that I can say about this machine, most of which can be read about in my A1 Combo review, but the most important part of it is how simple it is to use. From opening the box to printing my first quality print took minutes, and it continues to produce fantastic models months after my first try. The A1 creates a lot of waste when printing in color, but that is not a good reason not to buy this Bambu Lab machine. Whether it's your first printer or another one for your collection, the A1 Combo is the number one printer to buy right now. Who should get it: There are very few people that the Bambu Lab A1 combo isn't good for. I would especially point it out to anyone who is new to 3D printing or wants to get started and doesn't know how. This is it. This is the place to start. You won't be disappointed. Who should avoid it: If you already have a 3D printer or two, you likely don't need the Bambu Lab A1 Combo unless you're looking to break into color printing. If you're already using a different style of machine, like a CoreXY, you'll be better off sticking to that.

Listen to Music While Riding Your Bike With Sena's Smart Cycling Helmet
Listen to Music While Riding Your Bike With Sena's Smart Cycling Helmet

WIRED

time10-08-2025

  • WIRED

Listen to Music While Riding Your Bike With Sena's Smart Cycling Helmet

One of the most important senses we have as bike riders is our hearing. Whether you're in a group ride, where other riders are calling out road and traffic hazards, or alone, to keep ears out for vehicles or other rides coming from our rear, our ears are nearly as essential as our eyes. Bone-conduction headphones—which sit outside the ears and deliver sound through vibration—have been around for some time. But Irvine, California-based Sena has consistently raised the bar on bicycling helmets with integrated speakers. Their newest offering, the S1, blends Sena's audio technology with the aerodynamic advantages craved by so many road cyclists. Wind Resistance Photograph: Michael Venutolo-Mantovani With a smooth outer shell, the Sena S1 looks, fits, and feels every bit the aero road helmet that has boomed in popularity over the last decade. It's sleek, with a quintet of front-facing vents and a pair out the back to keep your head cool during hot rides. Its mixture of flat and gloss finishes gives the helmet a modern contrasting style that would look at home in the Tour de France peloton. It's light, weighing just 360 grams, and at $229, it's priced like a higher-end aero helmet, despite the fact that it's equipped with a pair of over-ear speakers and a microphone, Bluetooth connectivity, a built-in taillight, and Sena's proprietary Mesh Intercom system, which allows you to communicate with other riders wearing any variety of Sena helmets. I tested the Sena S1 on one of the stupidest rides I've done in a long time: that is, when I set out to ride a hundred miles around a quarter-mile asphalt track near my home. (I'm not totally insane. I swear I was doing it for another story.) For a ride as boring and monotonous as the ¼-mile century I was set to undertake, I needed a bit of distraction. Luckily, I had a Sena S1 sitting in my office. I've never really messed with any sort of headphones while on my bike for a few reasons. First and foremost, safety. I like to hear what's happening around me, especially when riding on the road. Second, as far as I'm concerned, hearing the wind in my ears, the birds chirp above my head, my tires cruising smoothly over the pavement or crunching the dirt beneath my wheels, is as much a part of the bike-riding experience as turning my pedals. Third, we live in an age in which we're all subject to a constant onslaught of content. The bike is my sanctuary from all that, a place where no Instagram Reel or hot take on a podcast can find me. Photograph: Michael Venutolo-Mantovani

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store