German growth better than expected but tariff turmoil looms
Gross domestic product (GDP) in Europe's biggest economy expanded 0.2 percent from January to March compared to the previous quarter, according to provisional figures from federal statistics agency Destatis.
The expansion, driven by improving consumption and investment, was better than analyst forecasts and meant Germany dodged a recession -- defined as two straight quarters of negative growth -- after a contraction at the end of last year.
It was rare good news for the eurozone's traditional growth engine which has been battling a manufacturing slowdown, rising costs and weak demand in key overseas markets, prompting the economy to shrink in both 2024 and 2023.
The improving picture will come as a relief for incoming chancellor Merz as he prepares to take office next week, with the dire state of the economy one of his most pressing challenges.
Still, any celebrations are likely to be short-lived, with economists predicting that Germany will be hit hard later in the year by US President Donald Trump's tariff blitz.
"This should not be interpreted as the beginning of a sustainable recovery," said Dirk Schumacher, chief economist at German public lender KfW, warning of "uncertainty regarding American economic policy".
The Ifo institute said that the economy likely benefited in the first quarter as companies in the United States -- Germany's top trading partner last year -- rushed to import goods before tariffs kicked in this month, and the levies would weigh on growth later in 2025.
The European Union is currently facing a 10-percent tariff on its exports to the United States as part of Trump's hardball trade agenda. He earlier announced a 20-percent rate on the bloc but then paused the higher levies -- on the EU and many other trading partners -- to allow for talks.
- Deep-rooted problems -
In a further sign of economic weakness for Germany, data released Wednesday showed unemployment edging up to 6.3 percent in April -- the second straight monthly increase.
Following two years of contraction driven by surging energy prices after Russia invaded Ukraine and post-pandemic supply chain woes, the German economy was expected to start making a modest recovery this year.
But the government last week downgraded its growth forecast for 2025 to zero, blaming Trump's sweeping tariffs, in line with economic institutes who have also been slashing their estimates.
Highlighting the economy's woes, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz -- two major players in Germany's flagship auto industry -- reported sharp falls in first-quarter profits Wednesday, and warned of the impact of US tariffs.
Merz has vowed a barrage of measures to boost the economy, ranging from vastly increasing public spending to lowering corporate taxes and energy costs.
He has already succeeded in leading efforts to push changes to Germany's restrictive debt rules through parliament, paving the way for massive extra outlays on defence and infrastructure, which economists say should boost the economy.
But it is expected to take some time before these measures are implemented and have any kind of impact.
And ING economist Carsten Brzeski warned the spending plans, "impressive as they might be, will do very little to improve the economy's competitiveness".
"Modern infrastructure is essential for one of the world's largest economies, but it doesn't inherently drive innovation, sector transformation, or new growth opportunities."
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
an hour ago
- Local France
OPINION: Give up the search for loopholes - French bureaucracy always wins
To egregiously butcher William Goldman's classic line - 'There are no French admin loopholes, Highness, anyone who says differently is selling something'. France's complex admin means that foreign residents and future arrivals are often left looking for shortcuts, easy options and loopholes - an entirely understandable reaction when you consider the bureaucratic pain that France enjoys inflicting on its inhabitants. It's also a famously high tax country, which means that plenty of people are on the lookout for, shall we say, more forgiving tax arrangements. This one is perhaps less understandable - especially if it comes in the next breath after raptures of delight over France's excellent public services - but it's always going to be human nature to try. The thing is - there really are very few genuine loopholes when it comes to French residency and taxes, especially when it comes to non-EU nationals who come within the visa/residency card system. Advertisement Sure, you might think you've found a loophole - but these almost always end up causing you more problems down the line, especially if your goal is to make France your home. When it comes to people who just want to be here for a couple of years there is a little more wriggle room - but for those who intend to stay in France and will therefore eventually be seeking long-term residency and perhaps even citizenship, trying to exploit a loophole is almost always going to cause you further administrative pain in the future. In my experience the people who genuinely set out to cheat the French system are few and far between - a much more common scenario is people who have simply been given bad advice about a shortcut or loophole that they could take advantage of. At The Local we often get emails from readers who are experiencing problems with French systems - and the people stuck in the worst tangles are almost always those who have at one point been given bad advice. Here are some examples; The 80-year-old lady who had been breezily assured that there was no need for her to do a tax declaration in France, and is now living in fear of fines from the tax office for having failed to make the required annual déclaration des revenus . The British second-home owner who had been advised to get a post-Brexit carte de séjour as a way to 'cheat' the 90 day rule and now finds themselves required to make a French tax declaration and re-register their cars. The American tech worker who had been advised to get the 'more straightforward' visitor visa and then simply swap it for a working visa once they arrived and now finds themselves unable to work for months on end while the request to switch statuses is considered, rejected and appealed. Because France is a popular destination to move to, attracting all groups from retirees to young families, students to workers, a whole industry has grown up around giving advice on navigating the French immigration and tax system. Advertisement There's an entire sector of 'relocation experts', 'hand-holders' or 'concierge services' which specialise in helping foreigners to move to France. Many of these services are great and offer sound advice and insight based on experience with French systems. The good ones should also explain future ramifications of your decisions. However, some give wildly differing advice and it's not always easy to know who is right and who to trust. There's no doubt some of these services can be very helpful when it comes to finding a place to live and setting up services like utilities - I used one when I first moved and they were worth every centime in helping to navigate the notoriously tricky Paris rental market. However, if emails from readers are anything to go by, there also seems to be an increasing trend of these services offering legal advice on issues such as residency, visas and tax status. Advertisement While many are very knowledgeable and diligent with their guidance, the reality is this sector is completely unregulated - meaning that you have absolutely no comeback if you are given incorrect advice. More importantly, you will be then one then left struggling to deal with your irregular residency or tax status while the hand-holder has banked the cheque and moved on. Take this one email we received from an American reader who wanted to warn others of the "pain and damage" one expat visa adviser caused them. He said: "We contacted a well-known expat who is regarded as an expert in visa related issues in France. "We paid them €5,000 to organise a passport talent visa. At first, all was fine, but they soon stopped responding to our emails. To make matters worse, they barely did any work for us. "It turned out that there are dozens of fellow expats in the same position." Advertisement So what can people do? The standard advice is to talk to a lawyer for anything related to residency, and an accountant for tax advice. But even here there are caveats - first you need to ensure that your expert is qualified and registered in both France and your home country, and that they specialise in advising expats/immigrants. Second is that you need to speak to both - a lawyer will undoubtedly give you good advice about visas, but will that leave you with tax problems? The lawyer might not flag that up, because its not their area of expertise, but that doesn't mean there won't be problems. And vice versa, your accountant's advice might be perfectly sound when it comes to tax but it might screw up your residency. It's also well worth speaking to several experts, especially if your personal situation is complicated or you're trying to do something slightly out of the usual run of things. When it comes to tricky issues like remote work while on a visitor visa , different lawyers will tell you different things. It's tempting to go with the one who tells you what you want to hear, but it's a better idea in the long run to get several viewpoints on a situation. Even though you do have more recourse if you get bad advice from a lawyer or accountant , it's ultimately you who will have to deal with any ensuing problems with French admin. If you find yourself in breach of the rules, saying 'my lawyer said it would be OK' is unfortunately no defence at all. Remember also that getting your French visa is only the first step - ask questions about what happens next; will you be able to renew it or obtain your carte de séjour easily? Will you be able to get long-term residency one day? What will your plans mean for your tax status? Will your chosen path make it difficult for you to get French citizenship one day? The French residency card and tax systems are designed to be used by individuals; beware of anyone suggesting that you will need a lawyer or accountant for every renewal/annual tax declaration - they're either just trawling for business or they're setting up a residency or tax status so complicated that you'll be forced to pay for professional advice for every dealing with French admin. And above all, remember the old saying - "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is". If there truly were a quick and easy shortcut to long-term French residency with no taxes, then everyone would be using it - we're not handing over a third of our monthly income and spending hours in a queue at the préfecture because we find this a fun hobby. It's because we have learned the greater truths - French admin always wins; there are no loopholes; liberté, égalité, bureaucratié . You can find more information on all things residency and tax related in our Moving to France section. Feel free to share your experiences in the comments section below
Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US-China trade talks on export controls to resume for a second day
Top U.S. and Chinese officials will resume trade talks for a second day in London on Tuesday, hoping to secure a breakthrough over export controls for rare earths and other goods that have threatened a fresh rupture between the two superpowers. Investors are hoping for an improvement in ties after the relief sparked by a preliminary deal agreed in Geneva last month gave way to fresh doubts after Washington accused Beijing of blocking exports that are critical to sectors including autos, aerospace, semiconductors and defence. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. was likely to agree to lift export controls on some semiconductors in return for China speeding up the delivery of rare earths. U.S. President Donald Trump said the talks were going well: "We're doing well with China. China's not easy." Trump's often erratic policymaking on tariffs has roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The second round of U.S.-China talks, which followed a rare phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week, comes at a crucial time for both economies. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. While the impact on U.S. inflation and the jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered U.S. business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure. The two sides, led at the talks by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, with the Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng, are meeting at the ornate Lancaster House in the British capital. The talks ran for almost seven hours on Monday and are set to resume after 0900 GMT on Tuesday, with both sides expected to issue updates later in the day. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. He did not attend the Geneva talks, when the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains and sparked alarm in boardrooms and factory floors around the world. Kelly Ann Shaw, a former White House trade adviser during Trump's first term and now a trade partner at the Akin Gump law firm in Washington, said she expected China to reaffirm its commitment to lift retaliatory measures, including export restrictions, "plus some concessions on the U.S. side, with respect to export controls measures over the past week or two". But Shaw said she expected the U.S. to only agree to lift some new export curbs, not longstanding ones such as for advanced artificial intelligence chips. In May, the U.S. ordered a halt to shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
LA imposes downtown curfew as Newsom criticises Trump
A ten-hour curfew for downtown Los Angeles took effect on Tuesday as officials attempted to stop vandalism and looting during protests over US President Donald Trump's immigration raids. The city's mayor Karen Bass said the curfew would run from 8 pm on Tuesday to 6 am on Wednesday local time, as she declared a local emergency. 'We reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted, Bass said. The curfew will be in place in an area covering a just over 2.5 square kilometre section of downtown, including the area where protests have been raging since Friday. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 2,295 square kilometres. The curfew doesn't apply to residents who live in the designated area, those who are homeless, credentialed media or public safety and emergency officials, according to Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell. McDonnell said 'unlawful and dangerous behaviour' has been escalating since Saturday, prompting the need to impose the curfew. 'The curfew is a necessary measure to protect lives and safeguard property following several consecutive days of growing unrest throughout the city,' said McDonnell. Meanwhile, California's Governor Gavin Newsom accused Trump of 'pulling a military dragnet' across Los Angeles, after the leader ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines despite Newsom's objections. Troops were deployed to protect federal buildings but are now also protecting immigration agents as they carry out arrests. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said in a statement that the troops were providing security at federal facilities and protecting federal officers 'who are out on daily enforcement operations.' Newsom says Trump's immigration crackdown has gone far beyond simply arresting criminals and that 'dishwashers, gardeners, day labourers and seamstresses" are among those being detained. He said Trump's decision to deploy the California National Guard without his support should serve as a warning to other states as to the kind of disregard to federal laws the incumbent administration is willing to engage in. 'California may be first — but it clearly won't end here,' warned Newsom. Earlier on Tuesday, Newsom had asked a federal court to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist in ICE raids across Los Angeles. The California Governor argued that this would only cause tensions to soar further and trigger further civil unrest. The Trump administration said Newsom was seeking an unprecedented and dangerous order that would interfere with its ability to carry out enforcement operations. A judge set a hearing for Thursday. Trump left open the possibility of utilising the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion and domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters at the Oval Office. He later called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at the Fort Bragg army installation in North Carolina, where he marked the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump has described the unfolding chaos in Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The US president has also pledged to 'liberate' the city. 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said. Trump has been under fire after the Pentagon revealed that his National Guard and Marine deployment cost $134 million (€117.4 million). Critics have slammed him for reckless government spending, after his administration had vowed to eliminate wasteful expenditure with the creation of agencies such as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But, the 47th US president argues that the deployment was absolutely necessary, saying that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' had he not ordered the deployment. Democratic members of California's congressional delegation accused Trump of creating a 'manufactured crisis' to advance his personal agenda. A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday to allow the White House to continue collecting the extensive import taxes imposed by US President Donald Trump, as challenges to his prominent trade policy remain under appeal. The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit builds upon a comparable decision it issued following another federal court's annulment of the tariffs on 28 May, which indicated that Trump had exceeded his presidential authority. Acknowledging that the disputes regarding Trump's tariffs present "issues of exceptional importance," the appeals court announced it would accelerate the proceedings and conduct hearings on 31 July. The case involves the 10% tariffs which Trump imposed in April on nearly all nations, as well as the bigger tariffs that he implemented and subsequently paused on countries with which the United States has trade deficits with. It also includes tariffs that Trump levied on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico in an effort to compel these nations to take further action against the unlawful influx of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the US border. In implementing the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralysed businesses and spooked financial markets.
