Why Indonesia's Stock Market Surged Past 7 Million Retail Investors in May 2025
A retail investor is a person who buys stocks, bonds, or other financial products for themselves. They are different from big companies or institutions. In simple words, if you or your friend buys some shares using an app, you're a retail investor.
This jump to 7 million retail investors is not just a number. It means more Indonesians are learning how to grow their money. They are becoming active in the country's financial market. It also shows a big change in how people think about saving and investing.
One of the main reasons for this surge is technology. Investment apps like Ajaib, Bareksa, Stockbit, and Bibit have made it super easy to buy and sell stocks using just a smartphone. These apps are simple, safe, and easy to understand — perfect for beginners.
Young Indonesians are used to doing everything on their phones — shopping, studying, and now investing. These apps often allow users to start with just Rp10,000 (less than $1), making investing possible even for those with little money.
In the past, many Indonesians didn't understand what investing was. But today, things are changing fast. Schools, online courses, and influencers are teaching people how to start investing smartly.
Many YouTubers, TikTokers, and Instagram influencers now talk about Indonesia investment tips. They use simple words and real examples that are easy to follow. This has made investing less scary and more exciting.
The Indonesian government has also played a strong role. The OJK (Financial Services Authority) and IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) run many campaigns to teach people about investing.
They have launched programs in schools and universities. The goal is to start young — teaching students how to manage their money and invest wisely. By giving support and creating safe rules, the government has helped more people trust the system and join in.
In Indonesia today, you don't need to be rich to invest. With the rise of micro-investing, people can buy small parts of a stock (called 'lots') for just a few thousand Rupiah.
This has opened the doors for students, part-time workers, and housewives to join the market. It makes Indonesia investment open to all.
Indonesia has one of the youngest populations in Asia. Most of these young people are tech-savvy and always connected to the internet. They are curious, eager to learn, and open to trying new things.
With job markets becoming more competitive, many young Indonesians are looking for other ways to earn money — and investing has become a popular choice. They are building wealth early in life by putting their savings into stocks.
Back in 2020 and 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic changed everything. Many people lost jobs or worked from home. This gave them more time to learn about investing. Many realized that relying on just one job isn't enough. So, they started exploring other income sources, like the stock market.
This mindset stayed even after the pandemic. It helped create a culture where more people now see investing as a must, not just a choice.
The Indonesia stock market now offers more choices than ever before. From large companies to new tech startups, investors can pick what suits them best.
There are also shariah-compliant stocks for Muslims, which follow Islamic rules. This has encouraged many more people to invest, knowing that there are options that match their values.
Another big reason is social media. When someone shares their success story on TikTok or Instagram, others get inspired. People love to talk about their stock wins — and this spreads fast.
When you see your friend making money through investing, you want to try it too. This kind of peer influence has pushed many first-time investors to open accounts.
Even with all this growth, there are still challenges. Many new investors don't know how the market works. Some treat it like gambling, buying stocks without research.
The rise in investor numbers must come with better education. People need to learn about risks, patience, and how to pick good stocks. The government and private companies must continue their work in teaching safe and smart investing.
The fact that over 7 million retail investors are now active in the market is a big win for Indonesia. It shows that people trust the economy. It also means the country is moving towards financial inclusion — giving everyone a chance to grow their money.
If this trend continues, Indonesia could become a strong investment hub in Southeast Asia. More people investing means more money going into companies, and that helps the whole economy grow.
The rise of retail investors in Indonesia is more than just a headline. It's a powerful sign of change. With the help of technology, education, social media, and strong government support, the Indonesia investment world is opening up to everyone.
From teenagers to office workers, millions are learning how to invest, save, and plan for the future. As long as this growth comes with good education and smart rules, Indonesia's stock market will keep shining — and so will its people.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
01-08-2025
UK lenders await top court's decision over auto finance payments
LONDON -- Millions of motorists in the United Kingdom could be entitled to sizeable compensation payments if the country's Supreme Court decides Friday that certain hire-purchase agreements were unlawful. The three judges are set to rule on the legality of apparently hidden commission payments made to car dealers made before 2021. The outcome could have major consequences for the financial services sector, which has been rocked over the past decade by a series of scandals, notably in relation to the improper selling of payment protection insurance, or PPI, on loans. The Financial Services Authority, the industry regulator, told the Supreme Court last year that almost 99% of the roughly 32 million auto finance agreements entered into since 2007 involved a commission payment to a broker. Some dealers received a bigger commission if they were able to secure a higher interest rate on the loan. These so-called discretionary commission arrangements were banned by regulators in 2021, prompting the subsequent challenge from three motorists. Banks, including Lloyds, have set aside big sums in the event they are liable for compensation. Friday's decision follows a ruling from the lower Court of Appeal in October that discretionary payments were unlawful. The lower court found the three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, had not been told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them and should thereby receive compensation. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, took the dispute to the Supreme Court, telling a three-day hearing in April that the decision was an 'egregious error." The FCA also told the U.K.'s highest court that the Court of Appeal ruling 'goes too far." If Supreme Court judges side with the claimants it could mean many people who took out car loans before 2021 may be due a payout. If the court sides with the lenders, the ruling is likely to significantly limit the scope of potential payouts to motorists. This is not the first time lenders have been accused of mis-selling products. British banks had to pay out tens of billions of pounds (dollars) in compensation over the past decade or so in relation to PPI, which was meant to cover loan payments by individuals or small firms in the event they were not able to make them as a result of illness, for example. The courts ruled that many people often didn't know about the insurance or didn't need it.
Yahoo
01-08-2025
- Yahoo
UK lenders await top court's decision over auto finance payments
LONDON (AP) — Millions of motorists in the United Kingdom could be entitled to sizeable compensation payments if the country's Supreme Court decides Friday that certain hire-purchase agreements were unlawful. The three judges are set to rule on the legality of apparently hidden commission payments made to car dealers made before 2021. The outcome could have major consequences for the financial services sector, which has been rocked over the past decade by a series of scandals, notably in relation to the improper selling of payment protection insurance, or PPI, on loans. The Financial Services Authority, the industry regulator, told the Supreme Court last year that almost 99% of the roughly 32 million auto finance agreements entered into since 2007 involved a commission payment to a broker. Some dealers received a bigger commission if they were able to secure a higher interest rate on the loan. These so-called discretionary commission arrangements were banned by regulators in 2021, prompting the subsequent challenge from three motorists. Banks, including Lloyds, have set aside big sums in the event they are liable for compensation. Friday's decision follows a ruling from the lower Court of Appeal in October that discretionary payments were unlawful. The lower court found the three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, had not been told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them and should thereby receive compensation. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, took the dispute to the Supreme Court, telling a three-day hearing in April that the decision was an 'egregious error." The FCA also told the U.K.'s highest court that the Court of Appeal ruling 'goes too far." If Supreme Court judges side with the claimants it could mean many people who took out car loans before 2021 may be due a payout. If the court sides with the lenders, the ruling is likely to significantly limit the scope of potential payouts to motorists. This is not the first time lenders have been accused of mis-selling products. British banks had to pay out tens of billions of pounds (dollars) in compensation over the past decade or so in relation to PPI, which was meant to cover loan payments by individuals or small firms in the event they were not able to make them as a result of illness, for example. The courts ruled that many people often didn't know about the insurance or didn't need it. Pan Pylas, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
01-08-2025
- Yahoo
UK lenders await top court's decision over auto finance payments
LONDON (AP) — Millions of motorists in the United Kingdom could be entitled to sizeable compensation payments if the country's Supreme Court decides Friday that certain hire-purchase agreements were unlawful. The three judges are set to rule on the legality of apparently hidden commission payments made to car dealers made before 2021. The outcome could have major consequences for the financial services sector, which has been rocked over the past decade by a series of scandals, notably in relation to the improper selling of payment protection insurance, or PPI, on loans. The Financial Services Authority, the industry regulator, told the Supreme Court last year that almost 99% of the roughly 32 million auto finance agreements entered into since 2007 involved a commission payment to a broker. Some dealers received a bigger commission if they were able to secure a higher interest rate on the loan. These so-called discretionary commission arrangements were banned by regulators in 2021, prompting the subsequent challenge from three motorists. Banks, including Lloyds, have set aside big sums in the event they are liable for compensation. Friday's decision follows a ruling from the lower Court of Appeal in October that discretionary payments were unlawful. The lower court found the three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, had not been told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them and should thereby receive compensation. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, took the dispute to the Supreme Court, telling a three-day hearing in April that the decision was an 'egregious error." The FCA also told the U.K.'s highest court that the Court of Appeal ruling 'goes too far." If Supreme Court judges side with the claimants it could mean many people who took out car loans before 2021 may be due a payout. If the court sides with the lenders, the ruling is likely to significantly limit the scope of potential payouts to motorists. This is not the first time lenders have been accused of mis-selling products. British banks had to pay out tens of billions of pounds (dollars) in compensation over the past decade or so in relation to PPI, which was meant to cover loan payments by individuals or small firms in the event they were not able to make them as a result of illness, for example. The courts ruled that many people often didn't know about the insurance or didn't need it.
