I burned out working at consulting firms like KPMG and became a stay-at-home dad. I feel some guilt, but I'm glad I left.
A second kid and three years later, Gilpin has felt guilt for not providing as much financially.
He said the reward of raising his sons outweighs those feelings, and he's glad to be there for them.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Nicholas Gilpin, a 38-year-old stay-at-home dad and entrepreneur from Fair Oaks, California. The following has been edited for length and clarity.
I never planned to be a stay-at-home dad.
When I was an information technology consultant at KPMG, there were some weeks when I worked almost 100 hours across all seven days.
Now, I spend those hours with my sons — a very different environment. Almost three years since becoming a full-time stay-at-home dad, I'm glad to invest this time I can't get back with my sons.
We didn't take our sons' births for granted
At KPMG, the burnout was relentless. I managed million-dollar technology implementations and worked nonstop. In late 2021, I joined Crossfuze, a consulting company, as a project manager and worked there for a little over a year.
In 2022, my wife and I were expecting our first child, and her pregnancy needed more attention from us both. She was also working full-time as a case manager at a health insurance company, but needed to take time off before the birth to keep up with doctor's visits.
Supporting my wife and keeping up with client demands became too much. We felt it made sense for me to take a break from working, so two weeks before my first son was born, I clocked out of the corporate world and clocked in as a full-time dad.
We'd spent years trying to have children, and the months of visits to the doctor's offices took an immense emotional and mental toll on both my wife and me. So, when our first son was born through IVF, and our second two years later naturally, it was a gift we didn't want to take for granted.
Having a parent at home is worth more than a second paycheck
At Crossfuze, I was making $135,000 a year before my son was born. That loss of salary didn't play a large part in my transition to being a full-time dad, though. We'd always planned for one of us to stay home with the kids. Ultimately, we saw having a parent home as more valuable than maintaining two full-time incomes.
We didn't want to outsource parenting. We don't know what a day care or babysitter might be teaching our kids, and the time spent driving them to and from those programs may negate the benefit of sending them there in the first place.
Are you a working parent not paying for childcare? Fill out this quick form or email bdelk@businessinsider.com to share your story.
I'm with my boys every hour of the day, and sometimes, we sleep in the same room throughout the night. My first son is almost 3 years old now, so he requires much more attention and play time, while my other son, almost 6 months old now, spends more time with his mom.
I take care of 70 to 80% of the daytime responsibilities, and my wife takes care of our family when she's not working. She's the most active with our boys in the evenings and weekends.
I feel guilty for not providing as much
Thankfully, my wife and I worked hard early in our careers, and she can support us through her private mental health counseling practice. We also bought a duplex and rented out half of it to help cover our mortgage.
We've really had to get intentional about what matters most. Personally, I don't buy anything unless it's essential — supplements, a gym membership, and basic toiletries. We rarely go out to eat, and I cook nearly all of our meals at home. My mom has also helped provide essentials for our boys, and my wife's parents have contributed financially since our youngest was born.
We're making it work — but every dollar has a job.
A part of me wants to rebuild my career to support my family more financially. Society's expectation for fathers has always hinged on them being providers. While this era of parents is evolving away from stereotypical parenting roles, I still feel a sense of guilt for not providing as much while our sons grow up.
I have to remind myself that I'm doing enough for my family through the hours of spending time with them, potty training, going on walks around the neighborhood, playing in the backyard, and making them breakfast.
This has been my biggest challenge when trying to have it all as a dad.
Being a stay-at-home dad can sometimes feel isolating
I spent most of my adult life connecting with clients, working on projects, and advancing my career. I've invested heavily in my skills throughout my career and obtained my MBA.
When it's just my sons and me during the week, I lack the adult conversations I was used to. It can feel isolating, and like I'm regressing in my career or missing out on the latest tech advancements.
A month after my first son was born, ChatGPT was released to the public. Seeing the way AI has been implemented to outsource work, code, and handle menial tasks around the office makes me feel like I'm missing out on a major tech advancement in my field.
But staying home has also given me the space to build my own business and work on the book I'm writing, "Thriving Dad," during my sons' naps or after their bedtimes.
AI models have leveled the playing field for entrepreneurs like me as I try to rebuild my career a couple of hours at a time, since 100% of my day is invested in my boys.
I use ChatGPT as a personal assistant to help manage all the tasks and coding I want to get done during the day, and chip away at the business I want to sculpt.
Balancing my time between childcare, spending time with my wife, and rebuilding my career is a challenge.
I'm grateful to be able to give my sons what I didn't have
I find spending time with my sons incredibly rewarding. I grew up without a father in my life, and I consider the time I spend with my sons to be unfulfilled time I didn't have with my father. In a way, I'm kind of winging it.
Time is invaluable when children are young, and I want to pour this experience into my sons while I stay home.
While it's difficult to pinpoint the most rewarding experience of being a dad, recently, my oldest said, "I love you, daddy," for the first time. That hit me hard.
Seeing these milestones for both of them and seeing parts of myself in them, I am immensely grateful to give them what I couldn't have and what I needed as a child. When I look at my boys, I see a lot of love every single day.
Do you have a story to share about being a working parent and not paying for childcare? Fill out this quick form or email bdelk@businessinsider.com to share your story.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm 62 and not ready to retire, but over working full-time. How do I make sure I can afford to slash my hours?
Imagine this scenario: Tracey from Philadelphia is going on 62, and while her friends are talking about retirement, she's not quite ready to walk off into her golden years just yet. She loves having structure and purpose to her days, as well as the mental challenge of work. Since she's divorced and her adult children have their own lives, she also looks forward to social interactions at the office. She's even become an informal mentor to some of the younger employees. But her health isn't what it used to be, and she wouldn't mind having a bit more time to putter around the garden and babysit her grandkids. Plus, she's tired of the daily commute to work. Yet she isn't quite ready for retirement, nor does she feel she's saved enough money to do so. Ideally, Tracey would like to cut back her hours to part-time work and slowly make the transition to retirement, perhaps over several years. But she's worried about how that could impact her overall retirement savings, as well as her pension and health insurance. She's also worried about how to broach the topic with her boss. She doesn't want to appear as though she's no longer committed to her role or the company, nor does she want to be relegated to less important 'busy work' until she officially retires. Here's what she needs to consider, and how she can bring this up at work. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it What to consider before reducing your hours Reducing your hours or working part-time is an option for older workers who aren't quite ready for retirement, whether financially or emotionally (or both). For Tracey, part-time work would allow her to stay mentally sharp, continue saving for retirement and gently ease into her golden years. Some employers may even offer this as an option through partial or phased retirement, so it's worth checking in with HR. Retirement savings Tracey will need to crunch the numbers, perhaps with the help of a financial advisor, to see how a reduced salary would impact retirement savings goals. Like many Americans, Tracey probably hasn't met her retirement savings goals just yet. A recent Bankrate survey found that more than half (57%) of Americans (whether working full-time, part-time or temporarily unemployed) feel that they're behind with their savings for retirement. For workers 50 and older, there's the option to make annual catch-up contributions to a 401(k), 403(b) or governmental 457 plans. For 2025, workers can contribute up to an additional $7,500 for a total of $31,000. If you're considering going part-time before retirement, you'll likely have less to put aside in your retirement savings accounts and/or brokerage accounts — and you may not have the extra cash to benefit from catch-up contributions. Cutting down to part-time can also impact your pension (if you have one). Each pension plan has different rules; for example, some may have a provision for annualizing part-time earnings. So it's best to talk to the HR department about your options. If you have a spouse, you'll also want to discuss how going part-time could impact your shared retirement goals. Social Security If Tracey works part-time but still makes enough money to live on, she could potentially delay taking her Social Security benefit until her full retirement age (between age 66 and 67), when she'd receive 100% of her benefit. But Social Security benefits are calculated based on your 35 highest-earning years. If Tracey earned significantly more in her later career, cutting back her hours now could lower her average and slightly reduce her benefit. For those considering going part time, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has a number of online tools that can help you crunch the numbers to figure out how reducing your hours could affect your benefits down the road. Health insurance coverage Even if Tracey has already met her retirement savings goal and money isn't really an issue, she'll still need to consider health insurance. Medicare doesn't kick in until age 65, and employers are not obligated to provide health insurance part-time employees. In fact, only a quarter (26%) of part-time workers have employer-sponsored health coverage, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, anyone who works 30 hours a week or 130 hours a month is considered a full-time employee by the IRS under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). That means, if Tracey continues to work at least 30 hours a week until she turns 65, she'd still hold onto her employer-sponsored health coverage. If you find yourself wanting to reduce your work hours but losing health coverage in the process, you can fill out a Marketplace health insurance application to see if you're eligible for a plan based on your income (or free or low-cost coverage through Medicaid). Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Working it out with your employer If you're in a similar position as Tracey and are ready to bring this topic up with your boss, first make sure to research your company's policies around part-time work. Once you're as aware of the policies as possible, prepare a proposal. Proposing part-time work to your employer The proposal that you bring to your boss should highlight the benefits of this arrangement both for you and for them. You can emphasize how the new arrangement would allow the company to continue to lean on your offerings while also giving you much-needed flexibility. The proposal should also address any potential concerns. According to career advice from Indeed, 'Your supervisor may worry about how the reduction of your work hours might result in a loss of work or impact your colleagues negatively. Try to validate these concerns and offer your supervisor options for overcoming any potential challenge.' For example, perhaps you have institutional knowledge that can help train the next generation of workers. If you're able to negotiate part-time work, it's advisable to sign a new employment agreement (or amend your current one) that outlines the change in hours, pay and benefits. What to do if your employer says no It's possible that, despite a stellar proposal, your boss may not go for it. If that's the case, there are still a couple of options. You could discuss the possibility of working for the company as a freelance consultant, which gives you control over which projects you take on. If you can't negotiate any arrangement with her current employer, you could also consider looking for part-time work elsewhere. This might be a good option for someone who still needs to save for retirement, but finds their current job to be a bad fit. Easing into retirement through part-time work could give Tracey the best of both worlds: the security and social structure of her job, along with the freedom to start enjoying more personal time. And for anyone in her position, the same holds true. As long as you carefully review the impact on savings, benefits and insurance, and work with your employer on a clear plan, you'll be better prepared to step confidently into the next chapter of life. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Amazon looks to ditch homegrown software for Android in Fire tablet revamp, sources say
By Greg Bensinger SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Amazon is plotting a big change to its Fire tablet lineup following years of escalating gripes from consumers and app developers over the company's homegrown operating system. As part of a project known internally as Kittyhawk, Amazon plans to release a higher-end tablet as soon as next year offering the Android operating system software for the first time, according to six people familiar with the matter. Since the Fire tablet's introduction in 2011, Amazon has used what is known as a 'forked' version of Android with custom modifications that make it work like a unique operating system. Amazon has long sought to undercut hardware rivals with inexpensive tablets and other devices that serve as a doorway to the firm's digital content, like e-books, videos and music. The devices have typically sold at or near manufacturing cost. But the focus on simplicity has held back sales, particularly among consumers who seek higher-performing devices. The multiyear project to switch to Android marks a philosophical change for the online retail giant, which has eschewed third-party operating systems and software in favor of its own. As a result, Amazon has offered its own app store requiring developers to make separate versions of their apps for Fire tablets, limiting the store's variety. If Kittyhawk is successful, Fire tablets could be more desirable for consumers who crave compatibility with other Android devices, the people said. They cautioned that Kittyhawk could be delayed or cancelled over financial or other concerns. Amazon declined to comment, saying it does not respond to rumors or speculation. 'Consumers have always expressed a concern about not having access to the latest Android versions, not having access to some of their apps because Amazon used their own store,' said Jitesh Ubrani, a researcher at IT advisory firm IDC. 'It's meant more work for developers in this day and age of largely free apps or services.' Ubrani noted that Amazon has nonetheless sold many millions of the tablets. Amazon has forfeited profits on the devices themselves in favor of making money on selling their associated services, like streaming movie rentals. But such inexpensive devices typically come with compromises like lower screen quality or battery life compared with pricier options. Amazon is the world's fourth-largest tablet seller, with 8% of the market, just behind Lenovo's 8.2%, according to second-quarter IDC data. Apple and Samsung were the market leaders with 33.1% and 18.7%, respectively. PRICIER TABLET The first Amazon Android tablet, slated for next year, will be pricier than current models, the people said. One of them said Amazon had discussed a $400 price tag, nearly double the cost of its current higher-end $230 Fire Max 11 tablet. IPads, by comparison, range from $350 to $1,200. Reuters could not learn additional specifications for the planned Amazon tablet, such as screen size and speaker quality or memory capacity. Amazon historically has avoided using software or other products from third parties, preferring to develop the services in-house or, barring that, to acquire a competitor. The Fire Phone smartphone championed by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and released in 2014 failed to win over buyers in part because of its reliance on Fire OS, as well as its high price tag. Amazon canceled the device and took a $170 million writedown. But the Seattle retailer has more recently shown a willingness to use rivals' services, particularly through its investment in startup Anthropic, whose Claude artificial intelligence software is the primary underpinning of Amazon's Alexa+ voice assistant and a chatbot used by employees known as Cedric. The new Fire tablet, the people said, will use the open-source version of Android, meaning it does not require direct coordination with Google and can be customized. Amazon is planning to roll out some lower-priced tablets with its Linux-based Vega operating system now in some Fire TV devices, some of the people said. The full slate of tablets will eventually be powered by a version of Android, the people said. The Fire project's internal code name of Kittyhawk seems to derive from the North Carolina town near where the Wright brothers conducted the first powered flight in 1903. But it is also the name of a failed flying car startup backed by Google co-founder Larry Page that burned through hundreds of millions in cash. Amazon declined to discuss the meaning behind its Kittyhawk project name. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SoFi teams up with Lightspark on blockchain remittances
Fintech firm SoFi Technologies has partnered with Lightspark to power blockchain-enabled international money transfers. The anticipated launch of SoFi's international money transfer service is set for later this year. The service will be embedded within the SoFi app, offering a direct platform for international financial transfers without the necessity of external applications. Lightspark, which specialises in providing enterprise infrastructure by utilising the Bitcoin Lightning Network, will implement the technology through Universal Money Address (UMA). SoFi CEO Anthony Noto said: 'For many SoFi members who regularly send money to loved ones internationally, the ability to quickly transfer money at low cost isn't just a convenience, it's a meaningful improvement to their everyday financial lives. 'By embedding this directly into SoFi's app, we're unlocking the value of blockchain technology, to give members faster, smarter, and more inclusive access to their money.' Users will be provided with information on exchange rates and fees before they execute a transfer. The underlying mechanism of the service involves real-time conversion of US dollars into Bitcoin, followed by the transfer of funds via the Bitcoin Lightning Network. Upon reaching the destination, the Bitcoin is then converted into the local currency and deposited into the recipient's bank account. Lightspark CEO and co-founder David Marcus stated: 'SoFi is one of the most innovative and forward-thinking financial platforms in the US today. 'UMA on SoFi means customers can move dollars instantly, any time, globally, and we're excited to see the demand via SoFi's waitlist, proving that people are ready for the future of payments.' Initially, the service will be made available to users transferring funds to Mexico. The intention is to expand the service to include additional countries soon after the initial launch. Later in the year, SoFi intends to integrate this international money transfer service with SoFi Checking & Savings. "SoFi teams up with Lightspark on blockchain remittances " was originally created and published by Electronic Payments International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data