Washington Post declares Americans deserve thorough investigation into Biden's health, possible cover-up
The board noted Biden's personal physician, Kevin O'Connor, refused to disclose Biden's health information in a House Oversight Committee hearing this week and said that members of Congress need to make sure they get to the bottom of the situation.
"Congress should thoroughly investigate whether Biden was physically and mentally capable of carrying out his duties — and not just to sate understandable public curiosity about the previous administration," the board declared, adding, "O'Connor could probably reveal more than anyone else about how White House officials seek to control the public's perception of a president's fitness."
During the congressional hearing this week, O'Connor pleaded the Fifth Amendment multiple times regarding his tenure with the former president.
The House Oversight Committee has been investigating whether Biden's former top aides covered up evidence of his mental and physical decline while in office, which they have denied.
The Post noted how Republicans responded to the physician's tactic as evidence that he was engaged in a cover-up, while Democrats dismissed the hearing and called concerns about Biden's health overblown.
The board said both sides are "getting this wrong."
The editorial continued, "Biden's case is only the latest evidence that lawmakers should take on the difficult but unavoidable topic of whether to set transparency rules on presidential health. This means Democrats cannot deny that the Biden health story is important. It also means the Republicans running the probe should be more interested in getting relevant information than in embarrassing Democrats."
The Post argued that reports of Biden forgetting the names of his top aides, using a teleprompter for "minor events," needing cabinet meetings scripted, and not being able to work the long hours of the job all "raise legitimate concerns that Biden's health threatened national security and continuity of government."
"Lawmakers have a responsibility to carefully examine the matter and use their findings to consider reforms that would preserve Americans' confidence in their leaders," it argued.
The board acknowledged that Biden's doctor was in a complex situation during the hearing because he has "ethical and legal obligations to protect private patient information" and had concerns that the "Justice Department could use his testimony against him." However, it said that he could provide testimony about whether "he ever felt pressure to sanitize his annual public reports on Biden's health."
Representatives for the former president did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
6 minutes ago
- The Intercept
As Gaza Starves, Republicans Take Aim at Another Lifeline. Almost No One Noticed.
As the world watches Gaza starve, Republicans in Congress quietly advanced a new ban on funding a United Nations agency that delivers food aid to Palestinians. The GOP-dominated House Appropriations Committee last week voted to bar financial support for the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East, long the main hub of aid distribution in Gaza. If passed by Congress, the ban would reinforce a financial blockade on UNRWA that began last year as Israel subjected the agency to an intense pressure campaign. The latest move, however, comes amid an increasingly dire situation, as U.N. experts decried a full-fledged famine, and other Western countries are holding emergency meetings to address the crisis. The timing of the latest proposed ban dismayed observers who have sought to increase the flow of aid to Palestinians in Gaza. 'It seems incredibly hypocritical to suddenly be shocked by these images when every humanitarian agency has said no one can replace UNRWA,' said Yara Asi, an assistant professor at the University of Central Florida's School of Global Health Management and Informatics. Congress first banned funding for UNRWA in March 2024 as Israel pushed allegations that the agency's employees were involved in the October 7, 2023, attacks. Democratic President Joe Biden had already paused funding for the agency. The House and Senate are working to replace that appropriations package with a new one for the next financial year. On July 23, the House Appropriations Committee passed a bill focusing on funding for national security and State Department programs. The $46 billion bill would slash funding for many foreign aid programs and ban funding for UNRWA, while handing Israel $3.3 billion to buy more American arms. Taking last year's ban a step further, the House appropriations bill would prohibit funding for the United Nations secretariat, the organization's parent agency, until it released an unredacted copy of an August 2024 investigation conducted by the U.N. into Israel's claims that UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7 attacks. The U.N. investigation found that nine employees out of 13,000 in Gaza 'may' have played a role in the attacks. UNRWA fired the nine staffers. In a statement, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, the Florida Republican who chairs the national security and State Department subcommittee of the appropriations committee, hailed the anti-UNRWA measures as 'examples of how this bill strengthens national security and supports an America First foreign policy.' In the wake of the U.N. internal investigation, European countries have gradually restored funding for UNRWA, which operates in Gaza along with other U.N. agencies such as the World Food Programme. President Donald Trump has opted to go another route, instead providing funding for the shadowy Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, at whose food distributions hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli soldiers. On Sunday, 21 Democratic senators led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'immediately cease' funding for the GHF and return to 'UN-led aid coordination mechanisms with enhanced oversight' — without mentioning UNRWA by name. Read our complete coverage The growing scenes of starvation in Gaza have prompted even staunchly pro-Israel Democrats to call on Israel to allow more food aid into Gaza. Many of them, however, have avoided blaming Israel for the crisis. Even Trump contravened Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday by acknowledging that children are starving, while making a vague promise that the U.S. would set up 'food centers.' By contrast, UNRWA says it is ready to deliver the equivalent of 6,000 truckloads of aid as soon as it receives a 'green light' from Israel. The link between the pressure campaign against UNRWA and the scenes playing out in Gaza now is clear, Asi said, even if Israeli and U.S. officials don't want to admit it. 'Those lines have not really been connected, between defunding the largest humanitarian response agency in Gaza with obvious humanitarian disaster after. They were warned,' she said. Rep. André Carson, D-Ind., introduced a bill in March to restore UNRWA funding that has drawn support from dozens of mostly progressive House members. Supporters of restoring funding for UNRWA acknowledge that Carson's bill is an extreme long shot in a Congress dominated by pro-Israel lawmakers but still say that it is an important symbolic move. 'It's a tough road for UNRWA and U.S. funding for UNRWA for the foreseeable future, unfortunately. But we need to really draw a contrast: We had UNRWA distributing aid across 400 sites across the Gaza Strip before,' said Hassan El-Tayyab. the legislative director for Middle East policy at the Friends Committee on National Legislation. 'We are heading towards a large-scale mass starvation in Gaza if something doesn't happen.'
NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
House Oversight Committee rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's request for immunity in exchange for her testimony
WASHINGTON — The House Oversight Committee on Tuesday declined a request from Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers to grant her immunity in exchange for providing testimony to Congress. Maxwell's lawyers said in a letter on Tuesday that Maxwell would be willing to testify before Congress if she received formal immunity, alongside other requests. If Maxwell "were to receive clemency, she would be willing — and eager — to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.," her lawyers wrote. Otherwise, she would assert her Fifth Amendment rights and decline to testify, they said. But a spokesperson for House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said the committee would respond to the letter "soon" but "will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony." The committee subpoenaed Maxwell last week for a deposition from prison to take place on Aug. 11. In the letter, addressed to Comer, Maxwell's lawyers laid out several requests. "First, public reports—including your own statements—indicate that the Committee intends to question Ms. Maxwell in prison and without a grant of immunity," wrote lawyers David Oscar Markus, Leah Saffian and Melissa Madrigal in the letter. "Those are non-starters." Maxwell's lawyers argued that she "cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity," adding that a prison setting for a deposition increases the possibility of leaks and "creates real security risks and undermines the integrity of the process." They also requested that the committee provide questions in advance and wait to schedule an appearance until after the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in on Maxwell's request that her conviction be overturned. "Please let us know whether the Committee is amenable to these conditions," the letter said. "If not, Ms. Maxwell will have no choice but to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights." The Trump administration has faced increased scrutiny over its handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. The move marks the latest development in the controversy over the Epstein saga, which has proven to be a rare source of conflict in President Donald Trump's base. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted in 2021 on federal sex trafficking charges. Maxwell met privately with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week for about nine hours over two days. In a statement released earlier in the week, Blanche said that "President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ghislaine Maxwell has offered to testify to Congress about Epstein case but with major conditions: report
Ghislaine Maxwell has offered to testify before Congress about the case of her accomplice Jeffrey Epstein but with major conditions, her attorneys said. Lawyers for the convicted sex trafficker and former girlfriend of the late convicted pedophile have sent her demands to the House Oversight Committee, CNN first reported. Maxwell was subpoenaed to testify next month by House Oversight Chair James Comer. Her attorneys said in the letter Tuesday that she would cooperate 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.' Maxwell's demands reportedly include a grant of formal immunity, and any interview would need to take place away from the correctional facility where she is currently serving her 20-year sentence. If her demands are not met, Maxwell 'will have no choice but to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights,' her attorneys wrote in the letter, seen by The Independent. The letter also said Maxwell would be willing to testify 'openly and honestly' in public if she received clemency from President Donald Trump. Trump acknowledged Monday that he has the power to pardon Maxwell, but didn't say he would. 'Well, I'm allowed to give her a pardon, but I — nobody's approached me with it,' the president said. 'Nobody's asked me about it.' 'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.,' her attorneys said. 'She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning.' The idea of granting Maxwell immunity was swiftly rejected by the Overnight Committee. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' a spokeswoman told CNN. It comes a day after Maxwell filed an appeal with the Supreme Court in the hope of overturning her conviction of sexually abusing and grooming underage girls and young women for years with Epstein. Maxwell argues that she was unlawfully prosecuted and last week met with a senior Justice Department officials to answer questions about the case. This is a breaking story, more follows
