
As Gaza Starves, Republicans Take Aim at Another Lifeline. Almost No One Noticed.
The GOP-dominated House Appropriations Committee last week voted to bar financial support for the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East, long the main hub of aid distribution in Gaza.
If passed by Congress, the ban would reinforce a financial blockade on UNRWA that began last year as Israel subjected the agency to an intense pressure campaign.
The latest move, however, comes amid an increasingly dire situation, as U.N. experts decried a full-fledged famine, and other Western countries are holding emergency meetings to address the crisis.
The timing of the latest proposed ban dismayed observers who have sought to increase the flow of aid to Palestinians in Gaza.
'It seems incredibly hypocritical to suddenly be shocked by these images when every humanitarian agency has said no one can replace UNRWA,' said Yara Asi, an assistant professor at the University of Central Florida's School of Global Health Management and Informatics.
Congress first banned funding for UNRWA in March 2024 as Israel pushed allegations that the agency's employees were involved in the October 7, 2023, attacks. Democratic President Joe Biden had already paused funding for the agency.
The House and Senate are working to replace that appropriations package with a new one for the next financial year. On July 23, the House Appropriations Committee passed a bill focusing on funding for national security and State Department programs.
The $46 billion bill would slash funding for many foreign aid programs and ban funding for UNRWA, while handing Israel $3.3 billion to buy more American arms.
Taking last year's ban a step further, the House appropriations bill would prohibit funding for the United Nations secretariat, the organization's parent agency, until it released an unredacted copy of an August 2024 investigation conducted by the U.N. into Israel's claims that UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7 attacks.
The U.N. investigation found that nine employees out of 13,000 in Gaza 'may' have played a role in the attacks. UNRWA fired the nine staffers.
In a statement, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, the Florida Republican who chairs the national security and State Department subcommittee of the appropriations committee, hailed the anti-UNRWA measures as 'examples of how this bill strengthens national security and supports an America First foreign policy.'
In the wake of the U.N. internal investigation, European countries have gradually restored funding for UNRWA, which operates in Gaza along with other U.N. agencies such as the World Food Programme.
President Donald Trump has opted to go another route, instead providing funding for the shadowy Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, at whose food distributions hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli soldiers.
On Sunday, 21 Democratic senators led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'immediately cease' funding for the GHF and return to 'UN-led aid coordination mechanisms with enhanced oversight' — without mentioning UNRWA by name.
Read our complete coverage
The growing scenes of starvation in Gaza have prompted even staunchly pro-Israel Democrats to call on Israel to allow more food aid into Gaza. Many of them, however, have avoided blaming Israel for the crisis.
Even Trump contravened Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday by acknowledging that children are starving, while making a vague promise that the U.S. would set up 'food centers.'
By contrast, UNRWA says it is ready to deliver the equivalent of 6,000 truckloads of aid as soon as it receives a 'green light' from Israel.
The link between the pressure campaign against UNRWA and the scenes playing out in Gaza now is clear, Asi said, even if Israeli and U.S. officials don't want to admit it.
'Those lines have not really been connected, between defunding the largest humanitarian response agency in Gaza with obvious humanitarian disaster after. They were warned,' she said.
Rep. André Carson, D-Ind., introduced a bill in March to restore UNRWA funding that has drawn support from dozens of mostly progressive House members.
Supporters of restoring funding for UNRWA acknowledge that Carson's bill is an extreme long shot in a Congress dominated by pro-Israel lawmakers but still say that it is an important symbolic move.
'It's a tough road for UNRWA and U.S. funding for UNRWA for the foreseeable future, unfortunately. But we need to really draw a contrast: We had UNRWA distributing aid across 400 sites across the Gaza Strip before,' said Hassan El-Tayyab. the legislative director for Middle East policy at the Friends Committee on National Legislation. 'We are heading towards a large-scale mass starvation in Gaza if something doesn't happen.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say
By Shivam Patel and Chandni Shah (Reuters) -India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources said, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Trump last month indicated in a Truth Social post that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. The New York Times on Saturday quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy, with one official saying the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters reported this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil in the past week after discounts narrowed in July. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters during a regular briefing on Friday. Jaiswal added that India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia, and that New Delhi's relations with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. The White House in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Indian refiners are pulling back from Russian crude as discounts shrink to their lowest since 2022, when Western sanctions were first imposed on Moscow, due to lower Russian exports and steady demand, sources said earlier this week. The country's state refiners - Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd - have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources familiar with the refiners' purchase plans told Reuters. INDIA'S TOP SUPPLIER On July 14, Trump threatened 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35% of India's overall continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, accounting for about 35% of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian oil, was recently sanctioned by the European Union as the refinery is majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major month, Reuters reported that Nayara's chief executive had resigned after the imposition of EU sanctions and company veteran Sergey Denisov had been appointed as CEO. Three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions on the Russia-backed refiner, Reuters reported late last month. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Boris Johnson blasts PM Keir Starmer for ‘absurd' stance on Gaza
(NewsNation) — Boris Johnson is blasting his successor, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, for saying the U.K. will recognize Palestinian statehood if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire in Gaza and take steps to end suffering there. Johnson, a former Conservative Party leader, says Starmer is bowing to pressure within his Labour Party in an effort to retain support of Muslim voters, and the result is a boon to Hamas. 'We seem to be giving a big path, a big reward to Hamas, and it's absurd,' Johnson told 'On Balance' on Friday. Journalist tries to set record straight on Gaza food distribution Starmer has said the U.K. would recognize a Palestinian state in September if Israel does not back a ceasefire but repeated demands that Hamas return all remaining hostages that were taken during the deadly incursion into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Starmer also said Hamas must disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza.' Johnson has supported a so-called two-state solution giving Palestinians limited governing power but not control of an army. He said Gaza could thrive in the future but not with Hamas at the helm. The erosion of support for Israel in the U.K.'s government seems to be materializing in the United States, as well, Johnson said. 'I just notice that things are changing a bit, particularly in the Democratic Party,' he said. 'I notice a change in the conversation about this issue. There's now a constituency that has a particular view, and I think it's very, very regrettable.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
I was Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen's rabbi and friend. He was not killed in my name
My friend, Awdah Hathaleen, was killed on Monday — supposedly in my name. I was one of his rabbis; he was my teacher. On Monday, unarmed and posing no danger to anyone, he was killed by an Israeli settler who believes that Palestinians have no right to live in the West Bank, or in any of Israel/Palestine, and that Judaism requires Jews to expel them from it. I disagree, and furthermore, claiming that my religion justifies Awdah's death is a sacrilege. I had known Awdah for eight years, since I first visited to his village, Umm al-Khair. I came as a rabbi who was disturbed by the many reports of how the Palestinians were treated in the occupied West Bank by Jewish settlers. Maybe it was my Jewish ethics, or maybe it was a guilty conscience that called me to see the situation for myself. Once I saw that degrading behavior, I could not turn away. What had been abstractions gleaned from daily news reports turned into real people trying to keep their children safe, to raise them with love even while living under a Damocles sword. These Palestinians became people with names: Awdah, Eid, Tariq. The villagers were happy to have visitors who would, like me, inevitably join them in any way we could to help them in their nonviolent resistance to the encroachment of Carmel, the illegal Jewish settlement growing ever bigger every year that abuts the village and threatens its future existence. When I met Awdah, I was so touched by what a good soul he had and what a creative organizer he was. He was diligently studying English. He wanted to communicate the plight of Palestinians under occupation. He believed that when people understood what was happening, they would become allies. That is why he was active in the creation of the acclaimed film 'No Other Land,' to let the world to know what was taking place in his neighborhood. Piedmont's Kehilla Community Synagogue became allies when we formed Face-to-Face under the inspiration of our founder, Rabbi Burt Jacobson. Every month we would meet with Awdah on Zoom and get often-depressing updates from the village. We raised money for Umm al-Khair when its cars and equipment were destroyed by settlers or the Israeli military. We raised money for school books. It was the least that we could do. In June, Face-to-Face worked with Awdah and Eid Suleiman to bring them to the Bay Area. After the many times they welcomed me in their village, I looked forward to greeting them at our shul. Finally, they would be face-to-face with our congregants and be able to talk to audiences at other places around the United States. Phil Weintraub, a Kehilla member who worked on the lengthy effort to obtain visas for Awdah and Eid, went to pick them up at the airport. Hours passed after their plane landed, but they did not emerge from customs. We were finally told that they were being detained. We asked public officials to intervene, and demonstrated at the airport. All to no avail. After 26 hours the two men were put on a plane to return them home. Despite their absence, we gathered that evening to share our anger and disappointment, and to affirm our conviction to keep supporting the village. From my own interactions with him, I know that Awdah, who was just 31, was dedicated to the principles of nonviolent resistance to end the occupation. Yinon Levi, identified in videos shooting at the villagers and killing Awdah, is a settler famous for his zeal in terrorizing Palestinians. President Joe Biden had him sanctioned in 2024 for his alleged role in violence against Palestinian civilians. President Donald Trump lifted that sanction on the first day of his second term. When the Israeli authorities finally showed up to the scene where Awdah had been murdered, Levi himself pointed out the people that he wanted arrested. Amazingly, his wishes were granted. Eid Suleiman and 13 others are in detention in Ofer prison as of this writing. Levi was briefly detained overnight and released to house arrest, but no one, not the villagers nor the settlers, expects him to suffer any serious consequences. No consequences is what killed my friend. Israel won't impose them, nor the United States. Neither will our American Jewish legacy institutions, who, while claiming to support a two-state solution, have never seriously criticized the expansion of the occupation. In my final in-person conversation with Awdah last August, he confided he was struggling with what to tell his children. 'I can't tell them that everything will be OK and I can't say that they'll be fine.' I'd never seen sadness disrupt his optimism. And I never expected that his children would be fatherless within a year. David J. Cooper is rabbi emeritus at Kehilla Community Synagogue, which he co-founded with Rabbi Burt Jacobson in 1984.