Golden Acre Shopping Centre sold: A new chapter for Cape Town's historic site
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
History has been made as the iconic Golden Acre Shopping Centre has been sold for an impressive R781 million, setting the stage for significant changes to this long-standing retail destination in Cape Town.
The sale was officially approved by the Competition Commission following a complex series of negotiations that underscored the centre's importance not only as a commercial hub but also as a cultural landmark, reported the Cape Argus.
For many Capetonians, Golden Acre is synonymous with community events, bustling Christmas shopping, and a vital transit point linking the Grand Parade to the city's public transport networks.
The new owners, Putirex (Pty) Ltd, are poised to enact an ambitious redevelopment plan initially envisioned by Sanlam when they constructed the mall in the 1970s.
The hustle and bustle of the Golden Acre shopping centre - with high foot traffic.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Property mogul Ash Müller, a prominent figure in the local real estate market, confirmed the sale via social media, noting the historic significance of the Golden Acre as a landmark and its extensive 55,730 square metres of retail and office space.
The shopping centre houses around 100 retailers, including well-known names such as Ackermans, Markham, and Shoprite, making it a cornerstone for shopping in the CBD.
Experts suggest that the redevelopment will see the transformation of the existing 110-metre-high tower into modern residential units, responding to the burgeoning demand for urban living spaces. Surrounding retail areas may also undergo a complete overhaul to create a vibrant urban precinct.
This transformation aligns with several ongoing revitalisation efforts in the area, including the already-completed Cape Town Station precinct, which has improved accessibility between Strand Street and the main railway station.
The excavation of the Golden Acre Shopping Centre began in 1975, marking the start of its transformation into a key retail destination in Cape Town.
Image: Facebook
Additionally, the redevelopment of the nearby Mutual Centre promises to introduce a new food retailer and diverse retail experiences. All these projects aim to integrate into a cohesive urban hub, enhancing safety and pedestrian connectivity while preserving the historical character of the area.
While details of the Golden Acre redevelopment remain under wraps, there is a palpable excitement about the local impact of these initiatives. The renovations are expected to attract new investments and tenants, breathe fresh life into the centre, and reaffirm its position as a vibrant social and commercial hub.
Councillor Ian McMahon expressed enthusiasm about the takeover, stating, "As councillor, I'm excited that there is new ownership, as Golden Acre has needed some TLC for years.
It's uniquely situated between two public transport interchanges and has over 700 parking bays, making it a vital component of the CBD's affordable residential sectors."
Golden Acre is set for a major glow up.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Nedbank denies allegations of rand manipulation by Competition Commission
The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg heard arguments by various banks, including Nedbank, that it was not part of a conspiracy to manipulate the rand/US dollar. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers Due to the cryptic nature of the allegations against Nedbank by the Competition Commission that this bank was part of a conspiracy to manipulate the rand, Nedbank has no case to answer as there is not a shred of evidence regarding any wrongdoing against it. This is according to Advocate Anthony Gotz SC, who on Wednesday told the Constitutional Court that Nedbank should never have been added as a respondent in the Competition Commission's referral of the matter to the tribunal. This argument follows the Competition Commission's appeal following last year's judgment in which the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) cleared 13 banks - including Nedbank - from facing the music in a later trial regarding the rand/US dollar manipulation saga. Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, acting on behalf of the Competition Commission, on Monday told the Constitutional Court that there is enough evidence to establish a prima facie case that they were involved in the manipulation of the rand. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The Competition Commission, in its initial referral of the complaint to the Competition Tribunal, did not list Nedbank as one of the suspects. It, however, amended its referral in 2020 during which Nedbank was included as one of the alleged conspirators of the rigging of the rand. Gotz said in its application to join Nedbank, the commission pleaded a broad conspiracy against the bank, but the allegations were narrow. The allegations were based solely on the commission's assessment regarding trading data on the Reuters platform. This platform does not reflect trades - it's a public platform which simply indicates the prices at which traders are willing to buy and sell currency, Gotz said. According to him, the case against Nedbank is based on the commission's assessment of trading data over six years. 'This is not a case of Nedbank being a participant in any chatroom - in this respect Nedbank is different from the other respondents,' Gotz said. He argued that the allegations against Nedbank are skeletal and there are only a few instances which lasted minutes each on the Reuters platform, on which the commission is now relying. Gotz said these allegations are not made specifically against Nedbank, but against other banks that they had withheld quotes. This, he argued, is definitely not enough to establish that Nedbank was part of any conspiracy to rig the rand. He questioned how it could be suggested that this bank was part of an international cartel. Gotz also pointed out that the few instances the commission is relying on happened six months to a year apart. 'The commission cannot make allegations in the air. We accept that in cartel cases, it is difficult to identify each perpetrator, but this is not a licence for the commission to do what it has done,' he argued.
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Banks implicated in alleged rand manipulation likened to international cartels
Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, representing the Competition Commission,asked the Constitutional Court to rule that it has jurisdiction over international banks implicated in the alleged rand fixing saga. Image: File The alleged collusion by some of South Africa's leading banks alongside their international counterparts to manipulate the Rand has been described as a quintessential example of a transnational cartel. This assertion was made by Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, representing the Competition Commission, during a hearing at the Constitutional Court. Ngcukaitobi articulated a compelling narrative, stating, "They targeted our sovereignty - our rand - driven by profit. We are the only ones who have an interest in prosecuting them." His remarks come as the Competition Commission seeks to overturn the majority of findings of the Competition Appeal Court (CAC), particularly regarding the jurisdiction over the international banks involved. The court, which heard arguments on Tuesday, is expected to deliberate until Friday. A critical point of contention revolves around the extent of the commission's authority to act against foreign banks implicated in what is alleged to be a single overarching conspiracy related to rand manipulation. The suggestive conspiracy reportedly includes local giants such as Standard Bank, Nedbank, and First Rand Bank, who are accused of colluding to manipulate the exchange rate of the Rand against the US dollar. Ngcukaitobi's argument hinges on whether the commission has the jurisdiction to enforce regulatory action on banks without a local physical presence, termed peregrinus. According to the Cape Times, during the hearing, Ngcukaitobi emphasised that the impact of alleged rand-fixing has tangible consequences for South African consumers, particularly when purchasing imported goods. He stated, "Price manipulation has a permanent effect. It introduces a permanent structural price. A distortion affects the value of imported products.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The discussion included critical legal considerations, with judges questioning the enforceability of any potential orders against foreign banks in South Africa. Ngcukaitobi assured the court that many implicated institutions maintain a presence within the country, thereby allowing for compliance measures should the court rule in favour of the commission. Listening to arguments regarding the CAC's previous ruling that denied the majority of implicated banks a case to answer, Ngcukaitobi insisted that all involved were, or should have been, aware of the collusion occurring in private chatrooms among agents manipulating the rand/dollar exchange. The advocate vigorously defended the commission's position, asserting that even local banks that claimed no participation in the conversations within the chatrooms could not distance themselves from the effects of collusion. "They did not have participants in the chatrooms, but if your trading pattern fits the fact patterns in the chatrooms, you are in the SOC," he argued, underscoring the systemic nature of the alleged conspiracy. As the proceedings unfold, Ngcukaitobi has laid out a clear challenge: to recognise that South Africa is uniquely positioned to seek justice in this matter, given its direct effects on the nation's economy. He observed, "It is often straightforward to prosecute firms accused of cartel conduct, as the conduct is usually clear. But cartels have evolved over the years; they are now bigger and transnational." Ngcukaitobi concluded by arguing that the CAC's judgment contained legal errors and implored the Constitutional Court to allow the matter to proceed to trial, where the merits of the case could be thoroughly examined. IOL
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
Turning a shock into strategy: South Africa's measured response to the US 30% tariff hike
Washington's 30% tariff on South African goods took effect on August. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers When Washington's 30% tariff on South African goods took effect on August 7, outrage was the easy emotion. The better response is discipline. Within days, Pretoria set out a five-pillar plan that blends firm diplomacy with market diversification and practical support for businesses. If we execute with urgency and transparency, this shock can become the push we needed to reset and broaden our export mix. Keep talking, not shouting The first pillar is engagement, not escalation. Cabinet has approved a revised offer that answers the issues highlighted by the US Trade Representative in its 2025 National Trade Estimates. The logic is straightforward: clear the technical hurdles, keep negotiations alive, and create room for the tariff to be reduced or removed. That is not capitulation. It is the work of professional tradecraft: deal with the specifics on paper, then work through the politics. Some of those specifics are already moving. South Africa has confirmed sanitary and phytosanitary arrangements for poultry, blueberries and pork. These are dry terms, but they decide whether containers move or sit. The USA–Africa Trade Desk has signalled that shipments of poultry and pork are expected within about two weeks, using the ports of New Orleans, Savannah and Norfolk. Containers on the water build more confidence than any podium statement. Buy time, protect capacity The second pillar is an economic response package that gives firms breathing space and preserves productive capacity. An Export Support Desk is up and running, with companies already getting help. The government has also announced a Localisation Support Fund and an Export and Competitiveness Support Programme to provide working capital and finance for plant and equipment. The competition authorities are preparing a narrowly defined block exemption for exporters so that businesses can coordinate on logistics and market information without falling foul of the law. In a world of tight margins and unpredictable freight, that kind of focused, time-limited coordination can be the difference between staying open and switching off a shift. Diversification is the strategy, not the Plan B The third pillar is diversification. We have lived with concentration risk for too long. Relying heavily on any single market means every policy swing abroad lands on our factory floors and farm gates. Diversification must be a pipeline of products, protocols and dates, not a slogan. Here, there is tangible movement. China has tabled a draft protocol that covers five stone fruit types: apricots, peaches, nectarines, plums and prunes, with a target to sign in September on the margins of the G20 Agriculture meetings. If that timeline holds, first consignments could move in the coming season. This is the kind of high-value, horticulture-led opening that suits South Africa's strengths. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Diversification is also sound risk management. The United States accounts for about 4% of our agricultural exports, roughly R9.8 billion, and that share has grown strongly since 2018. Important, yes, but not destiny. A strategy that leans harder into the AfCFTA, deepens access in the European Union where protocols allow, and opens demand in Asia and the Gulf can smooth cash flows across seasons and reduce the volatility premium that investors currently price into South African agribusiness. Defend fairly, compete confidently The fourth pillar is trade defence. When the US restricts access for many countries at once, diverted goods look for new homes. Some arrive at dumped or subsidised prices. The government has indicated it will use anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures, within World Trade Organisation rules, to protect local producers if surges materialise. That is not protectionism for its own sake. It is a rules-based tool to preserve production capacity while exporters rebuild demand elsewhere. Use local demand as a bridge The fifth pillar is demand at home. Proudly South Africa's Shop Proudly SA and Market Access Platform launched in July to help buyers find accredited local suppliers quickly. These platforms are not a detour from competitiveness. They are a bridge that keeps order books ticking over while new export lanes bed down. Big retailers, manufacturers and public entities can strengthen the bridge by publishing monthly targets for local spend and reporting against them. That level of practical accountability will matter to a small factory in Ekurhuleni or a packhouse in Ceres facing a tighter quarter. What leaders should do now For business leaders and policymakers, three ideas should shape the next quarter. Be radically transparent. A simple, living dashboard should separate what has been announced from what is operational. List the filing date of the revised offer, the gazetting of the block exemption, approvals under the Export and Competitiveness Support Programme, and actual container arrivals. Weekly, dated updates help CFOs plan cash, reassure lenders and send a clear signal that execution, not spin, is the priority. Treat diversification as an investment case. Replicate the stone fruit opportunity across a pipeline of products and markets. Publish a grid of protocol gaps to close. Resource laboratories and inspectors so certificates do not become the new bottleneck. Task missions abroad with commercial outcomes and report results. Countries that win in agri-trade do not rely on luck; they rely on relentless, technical market opening. Use the rules to keep the field fair while firms adapt. A well-drafted, time-limited block exemption can enable shared freight and information that lower costs without dulling rivalry. Keep the scope tight, set clear sunset clauses, and report uptake publicly. Pair this with ready-to-use trade remedies and we can protect capacity without freezing the market. None of this is easy. Tariffs at this level squeeze margins, unsettle contracts and test leadership. But the direction is right: negotiate hard, support firms, defend fairly and diversify quickly. If we treat this moment as the catalyst to reduce concentration risk and build new demand for South African products, we will come out leaner, more agile and less exposed the next time geopolitics intrudes on trade. Success will not be declared at a press conference. It will show up in containers shipped, workers retained and new markets opened. In the weeks ahead, look for concrete markers: acknowledgement of the revised offer by Washington, publication of the exporter block exemption, the arrival of US meat shipments, and the signing of China's stone fruit protocols. If those dominoes fall, optimism will not be wishful thinking. It will be a strategy, working. Dr Brett Lyndall Singh is a medical doctor, Chief Executive of AOM Group and a scholar at theTsinghua University Vanke School of Public Health in Beijing, China. Image: Supplied Dr Brett Lyndall Singh is a medical doctor, Chief Executive of AOM Group and a scholar at theTsinghua University Vanke School of Public Health in Beijing, China. He is a Brand South Africa Play Your Part Ambassador and member of the G20 Young Entrepreneurs Alliance. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
