
Personal details of UK special forces and spies were included in Afghan data breach
Date: 16:37 BST
Title: Why the latest revelation was allowed to be reported
Content: Joel GunterReporting from the High Court
Very little was
said in court today that the public was allowed to hear – but what was said
paved the way for the dramatic revelation that current and former members of
the UK's special forces and security services were compromised by this leak.
The judge, Mr
Justice Chamberlain, told the court that the barristers for the Ministry of
Defence and for a group of media organisations had reached a compromise in a
closed-door hearing.
That meant that
the media organisations involved in the case – including The Mail, Global Media
and the Independent – could now report that sensitive British officials were in
the leak.
That revelation
had been prevented by an injunction issued earlier this week, but then Defence Secretary John Healey said in Parliament on Tuesday that a "small
number" of senior military officials, MPs and other government officials had
been affected.
Then on Wednesday
the Sun newspaper reported that special forces and spies were involved. It was
enough to push the group of media organisations in this case to request an
emergency hearing and ask the judge to lift the restrictions on them.
Update:
Date: 16:20 BST
Title: The data breach was much worse than we thought
Content: Joel GunterReporting from the High Court
It was already a huge scandal
earlier this week, when the country learned that the details of thousands of
Afghans at risk from the Taliban had been accidentally leaked by someone in UK
Special Forces headquarters, and a secret scheme had been set up to bring them
to the UK.
Today we can report that the
data breach was much worse than previously thought: it contained personal
details of more than 100 British officials including those whose identities are
most closely guarded – special forces and spies.
In the light of today's
revelations, it is no wonder that the British government obtained an
unprecedented super-injunction, a kind of gagging order that prevents the
reporting of even the existence of the injunction.
Taken together, the leak of
the personal information of both at-risk Afghans and some of the most sensitive
officials in the UK make this one of the worst security breaches in modern
British history.
Update:
Date: 16:05 BST
Title: Special forces' identities are tightly kept secrets
Content: Joel GunterReporting from the High Court
The security breach
was kept under wraps by an injunction until today, when the gagging order
was lifted in part by a High Court judge.
Details of more than 100 British officials were included in
the leaked data, which may have fallen into the hands of the Taliban.
The identities of
members of the UK's special forces regiments, including the SAS and SBS, and
the identities of people working in the security services are tightly kept
secrets.
The breach occurred
in February 2022, when a database was accidentally emailed outside of
government by an individual working at UK Special Forces headquarters in
London.
The database also
contained the personal information of
nearly 19,000 Afghans who had
worked with the British during the 20-year conflict in Afghanistan and had
applied to be resettled to the UK after the Taliban retook control in 2021.
Many of those who had applied were judged to be at risk of
serious harm or even death as the Taliban sought revenge against those who had
worked with the British government during the war.
Update:
Date: 15:59 BST
Title: More than 100 British people included in Afghan data leak
Content: The details of more than 100 British people - including spies and special forces - were included in a massive data leak that resulted in thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK.
This is a breaking story and we will bring you more information shortly - stay with us.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment drunken yobs spark emergency at 30,000 feet by refusing to stop vaping - forcing plane to turn back an hour into flight
Two drunken yobs caused a plane to return to the UK an hour into their flight as they refused to stop vaping in their seats. Police were called to Stansted Airport, where they waited for a Jet2 flight bound for Heraklion in Crete to return to London. Families were left extremely frustrated that the two men who were 'drunk as skunks' were allowed on board before take-off. Passengers said the pair started drinking alcohol after the scheduled 5.55am departure on Tuesday was delayed. Once the flight took off, pilots were forced to declare an emergency an hour into the flight and turn back to Stansted Airport. Footage shows the moment officers rushed onto the twin-jet Airbus A321 at 9.36am to cheers from passengers on he plane to detain the duo. One of the men was arrested after he was allegedly carrying cocaine and MDMA. Angry passengers let out their frustrations as one woman tells the men to 'get off!' while another shouts 'loser! before describing the pair as 'f****** b***ends!'. 'Do not get on a flight if you cannot control your drink!', another says before adding 'we love you police - thank you!'. However, one passenger was able to crack a joke as she quipped, 'nothing beats a Jet2 holiday' following the viral ad campaign starring pop star Jess Glynne. The duo, one of whom was wearing a back-to-front black baseball cap, ignored a cockpit announcement that warned that if they didn't stop vaping, the flight would have to return to the UK, one passenger revealed. The passenger said: 'On the flight the duo were so obnoxious. They began vaping, then kicked off when told to stop smoking. 'They couldn't understand or care just how dangerous it was for everyone on the plane. A source told The Sun: 'Passengers were livid. Everyone was looking forward to the start of the holiday.' They added: 'There were lots of kids on the plane and the airline should not allow these lunatics to spoil hard earned holidays.' The holidaymakers on the plane had to wait at Stansted Airport throughout the day for a service that evening that could take them on the four-hour journey to Greece. It is understood that Jet2 gave passengers a £10 voucher to be redeemed in WHSmith at Stansted. The airline has confirmed that a passenger has been handed a life ban as they described the behaviour as 'disgraceful' and 'aggressive'. A Jet2 spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that a customer has been issued with a lifetime ban following a catalogue of disgraceful and aggressive behaviour, which led to flight LS1577 from London Stansted to Crete Heraklion having to return to Stansted so that police could offload them. 'We would like to thank the police and our crew for their handling of this difficult situation. 'As a family friendly airline, we take a zero-tolerance approach to disruptive passenger behaviour and we will fully support the authorities with any subsequent investigation, including prosecutions and pursuing civil proceedings if necessary.' An Essex Police spokesman said: 'We were called at around 8.40am on Tuesday 5 August to reports of a disruptive passenger on board a flight bound for Greece. 'Officers were alerted to the flight's imminent return to Stansted Airport and detained two passengers for searches. 'A man, aged in his 20s, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, was taken into custody after a quantity of suspected Class A drugs was found. 'He has since been released under investigation.' The second passenger was detained by officers for a stop and search but was not arrested.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves should exempt defence pledge from budget rules, says Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown has said Chancellor Rachel Reeves should exempt the Government's defence spending pledge from her borrowing rules to help free up economic headroom. The former prime minister said the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035 should be dealt with jointly as a ' Nato initiative', with costs shared across Europe. Leading economists have warned the Chancellor will likely have to raise taxes in the autumn budget to plug a £51 billion black hole in the public finances. Ms Reeves is currently on track to miss one of her borrowing rules by £41.2 billion and needs to rebuild a fiscal buffer of nearly £10 billion that has been wiped out, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). Mr Brown, who served as chancellor for a decade in Sir Tony Blair's Labour administration, said on Thursday that the rise in defence spending should be treated as 'exceptional', as it has been in Germany. 'When you come to the fiscal position, look, there's one thing that's happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented – to spend 5% on defence expenditure as we want to spend by the 2030s,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. 'We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules. 'That would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Germany has exempted some defence spending from its strict borrowing rules – the so-called 'debt brake' – to allow an increase in expenditure. When she entered the Treasury, Ms Reeves set out two key fiscal restrictions which she has said are 'non-negotiable'. The first rule is to ensure that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues so the Government only borrows to invest, and the second is to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Ministers have already announced a cut to overseas aid to fund a boost in defence spending but economists have said the new Nato target of 5% by 2035 could increase expenditure by a further £38.6 billion. The Treasury has been contacted for comment.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘One in, one out' deal now active with first migrants detained
The first migrants to cross the English Channel have been detained under a new 'one in, one out' deal. The detentions began on Wednesday, the initial day the pilot scheme became active, for people arriving in Dover. The agreement, announced by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, stipulates that adult migrants crossing the Channel risk return if their asylum claim is deemed inadmissible. Under the scheme, for each small boat migrant returned to France, an asylum seeker will be allowed to enter the UK from France via a legal route. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said that this sends a clear message to migrants and organised crime gangs.