Airport Terminal Issue: Were Inappropriate Transactions Conducted Only at Haneda?
Opaque funds were flowing from a firm related to an operating company for Haneda Airport terminal buildings to a company headed by a family member of an influential politician. Why was the cozy relationship not cut off? A thorough investigation is needed, including looking into transactions at other airports.
From 2006 to 2016, a wholly owned subsidiary of the operating company Japan Airport Terminal Co., which is listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange's Prime Market, provided more than ¥400 million to a company run by the eldest son of Makoto Koga, a former secretary general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, over a project to set up massage chairs at Haneda Airport.
The eldest son's company had entirely delegated the actual business operations to another company. The national tax authorities pointed out that the eldest son's company took no part in actual business operations and imposed additional taxes on the subsidiary.
Even after that, the subsidiary continued to provide funds in different forms, and the national tax authorities noted the failure of the eldest son's company to report the income.
Japan Airport Terminal is a highly public company that is allowed to operate on state-owned land based on the Airport Law and other legislation. It is unacceptable for the company to provide opaque funding that would arouse the suspicion of users.
It can be said that the incident has exposed the malfunctioning of corporate governance. It is not surprising that the chairman as well as the president of Japan Airport Terminal, who led the provision of funds, both resigned to take responsibility in response to the revelation of the problem.
In an internal investigation, the president of Japan Airport Terminal was quoted as saying that since the person in question was the son of a former member of the House of Representatives, the president was unable to end their long-standing personal relationship. The president also explained he had never asked for anything in return. The question remains as to whether the 'personal relationship' was the only reason for the massive provision of funds.
The Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry has issued a stern reprimand, which amounts to administrative guidance, to Japan Airport Terminal. It also requested that 25 airport terminal operating companies nationwide investigate the actual situation, including their subsidiaries, to determine if there are any inappropriate funds being provided to business partners.
The eldest son's company has already been found to have had dealings with operating companies at two airports in Fukuoka and Osaka prefectures as well. Each operating company must conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether any improper provision of funds similar to that which took place at Haneda Airport also occurred at other airports.
The government has a responsibility to supervise operating companies for airport terminals under the Airport Law. If investigations are insufficient or inappropriate transactions are suspected, the ministry should launch its own investigation.
The government is aiming to make Japan a 'tourism-oriented country,' but it is not doing enough to check airport operations, which are the key to achieving this goal. The reality is that the selection of tenants in airport terminals and business partners is left to the discretion of the operating companies.
To prevent problematic transactions, it is necessary to require operating companies to report to the government about contract details between them and their business partners, and their actual business situation. For example, the introduction of a system in which the government conducts regular audits may also be something to consider.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, May 30, 2025)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
a day ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Japan proposes nation-by-nation system to reduce U.S. auto tariffs
Ryosei Akazawa, minister in charge of economic revitalization, talks to reporters at Haneda Airport in Tokyo on June 5 before heading to Washington for tariff negotiations. (Yuki Morishita) Japan, expecting the United States to continue rejecting its request for a full removal of Donald Trump's extra auto tariff, has proposed a system to at least reduce the rate, multiple government sources said. The Japanese government will keep pressing the U.S. side to eliminate the flat 25-percent auto tariff that is applied equally to every country. However, Tokyo has also asked U.S. officials at the ministerial level to consider lowering the rate according to the 'degree of contribution' from each country, the sources said. Under the proposal, the auto tariff on Japan would be lowered if Japanese automakers increase production in the United States and export more U.S.-made vehicles. The Japanese government was already considering proposing this system in April, when the United States imposed the 25-percent auto tariff. Ryosei Akazawa, minister in charge of economic revitalization and Japan's chief tariff negotiator, has called on the U.S. side to retract all of Trump's tariffs, including the additional auto levy, since negotiations started. However, in May, the United States and Britain reached an agreement to cut the auto tariff to 10 percent on up to 100,000 auto exports from Britain per year. The tariff was not completely removed, and some Japanese government officials viewed the U.S.-British deal as a sign that it would be impossible to reduce the tariff on Japan to zero. Trump's tariffs are already having a negative impact on the Japanese auto industry, so the government is growing more open to the idea of reducing the levy to limit the damage. However, the ultimate goal is to completely remove the tariff in the Japanese automakers' most important market. 'Even if the auto tariff will be reduced to a few percent, we still need to make efforts,' an official said. Washington reportedly demanded that Japan increase auto production in the United States in exchange for a reduced tariff rate at the fourth ministerial level meeting on May 30. Akazawa on June 5 visited the United States for the fifth round of negotiations. He repeated his request for the complete removal of Trump's tariffs in talks with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick that lasted for about 110 minutes. Akazawa is scheduled to meet with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the chief tariff negotiator of the U.S. administration, on June 6, sources said. (This article was compiled from reports by Narumi Ota and Taro Kotegawa in Tokyo and Chinami Tajika in Washington.)
Asahi Shimbun
3 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Imperial couple visits Okinawa for WWII's 80th anniversary
Emperor Naruhito, Empress Masako and their daughter, Princess Aiko, visit Itoman, Okinawa Prefecture, on June 4 ahead of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. (Koichi Ueda) Emperor Naruhito, Empress Masako and their daughter, Princess Aiko, visited Okinawa Prefecture on June 4 ahead of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. This is part of the imperial couple's journey to commemorate the war dead and pass on memories of the deceased 80 years after the war's end. Naruhito and Masako visited Iwoto island, formerly known as Iwojima, in April for the same purpose. The family departed on the morning from Haneda Airport in Tokyo on a dedicated plane for a two-day trip in Okinawa Prefecture. This is the couple's first visit to Okinawa since 2022, the 50th anniversary of Okinawa's return to Japan after being under U.S. rule, and the second since Naruhito's accession to the throne. Aiko is visiting the prefecture for the first time. The Battle of Okinawa, which began in late March 1945 and lasted approximately three months, claimed the lives of more than 200,000 U.S. and Imperial Japanese Army troops and civilians, including 120,000 Okinawans. The southern part of Okinawa Prefecture's main island saw the largest number of casualties that June as retreating Japanese troops and displaced residents packed into the area. The remains of Japanese soldiers and residents are housed at the national war cemetery that the three visited, offering bouquets of white flowers, including lilies, in front of the ossuary. They said a few words to each of the officials of the prefectural bereaved families association who were present. The family next visited the 'Heiwa no Ishiji' (the Cornerstone of Peace) in the Peace Memorial Park, where the names of more than 200,000 war dead are inscribed, regardless of nationality and whether they were military or civilians. They were also scheduled to meet with survivors at the Okinawa Prefectural Peace Memorial Museum located in the same park.
Yomiuri Shimbun
30-05-2025
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Airport Terminal Issue: Were Inappropriate Transactions Conducted Only at Haneda?
Opaque funds were flowing from a firm related to an operating company for Haneda Airport terminal buildings to a company headed by a family member of an influential politician. Why was the cozy relationship not cut off? A thorough investigation is needed, including looking into transactions at other airports. From 2006 to 2016, a wholly owned subsidiary of the operating company Japan Airport Terminal Co., which is listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange's Prime Market, provided more than ¥400 million to a company run by the eldest son of Makoto Koga, a former secretary general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, over a project to set up massage chairs at Haneda Airport. The eldest son's company had entirely delegated the actual business operations to another company. The national tax authorities pointed out that the eldest son's company took no part in actual business operations and imposed additional taxes on the subsidiary. Even after that, the subsidiary continued to provide funds in different forms, and the national tax authorities noted the failure of the eldest son's company to report the income. Japan Airport Terminal is a highly public company that is allowed to operate on state-owned land based on the Airport Law and other legislation. It is unacceptable for the company to provide opaque funding that would arouse the suspicion of users. It can be said that the incident has exposed the malfunctioning of corporate governance. It is not surprising that the chairman as well as the president of Japan Airport Terminal, who led the provision of funds, both resigned to take responsibility in response to the revelation of the problem. In an internal investigation, the president of Japan Airport Terminal was quoted as saying that since the person in question was the son of a former member of the House of Representatives, the president was unable to end their long-standing personal relationship. The president also explained he had never asked for anything in return. The question remains as to whether the 'personal relationship' was the only reason for the massive provision of funds. The Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry has issued a stern reprimand, which amounts to administrative guidance, to Japan Airport Terminal. It also requested that 25 airport terminal operating companies nationwide investigate the actual situation, including their subsidiaries, to determine if there are any inappropriate funds being provided to business partners. The eldest son's company has already been found to have had dealings with operating companies at two airports in Fukuoka and Osaka prefectures as well. Each operating company must conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether any improper provision of funds similar to that which took place at Haneda Airport also occurred at other airports. The government has a responsibility to supervise operating companies for airport terminals under the Airport Law. If investigations are insufficient or inappropriate transactions are suspected, the ministry should launch its own investigation. The government is aiming to make Japan a 'tourism-oriented country,' but it is not doing enough to check airport operations, which are the key to achieving this goal. The reality is that the selection of tenants in airport terminals and business partners is left to the discretion of the operating companies. To prevent problematic transactions, it is necessary to require operating companies to report to the government about contract details between them and their business partners, and their actual business situation. For example, the introduction of a system in which the government conducts regular audits may also be something to consider. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, May 30, 2025)
