Analysis-Just in time? Manufacturers turn to AI to weather tariff storm
Despite five years of dramatic supply disruptions, from the COVID pandemic to today's trade wars, Toro is resisting any temptation to stack its warehouses to the rafters.
"We are at probably pre-pandemic inventory levels," says its chief supply-chain manager, Kevin Carpenter, looking relaxed in front of a whiteboard at his office in Minneapolis. "I mean 2019. I think everybody will be at a 2019 level."
Among U.S. manufacturers, inventories have roller-coasted this year as they rushed to beat Trump's deadlines for tariff hikes, only to see them repeatedly delayed. But since their post-pandemic expansion, inventories have mostly contracted, according to U.S. Institute for Supply Management data.
Instead, "just in time" inventory management - which aims to increase efficiency and reduce waste by ordering goods only as they are needed - is back.
But how can firms run lean inventories even as tariffs fluctuate, export bans come out of the blue, and conflict rages?
One of the answers, they say, is artificial intelligence.
Carpenter says he uses AI to digest the daily stream of news that could impact Toro's business, from Trump's latest social media posts to steel prices, into a custom-made podcast that he listens to each morning.
His team also uses generative AI to sieve an ocean of data and to suggest when and how many components to buy from whom.
It is a boom industry. Spending on software that includes generative AI for supplychains, capable of learning and even performing tasks on its own, could hit $55 billion by 2029, up from $2.7 billion now, according to U.S. research firm Gartner, driven in part by global uncertainties.
HYPE
"The tool just puts up in front of you: 'I think you can take 100 tonnes of this product from this plant to transfer it to that plant. And you just hit accept if that makes sense (to you)," McKinsey supply chain consultant Matt Jochim said.
The biggest providers of overall supply chain software by revenue are Germany's SAP, U.S. firms Oracle, Coupa and Microsoft and Blue Yonder, a unit of Panasonic, according to Gartner.
Generative AI is in its infancy, with most firms still piloting it spending modest amounts, industry experts say.
Those investments can climb to tens of millions of dollars when deployed at scale, including the use of tools known as AI agents, which make their own decisions and often need costly upgrades to data management and other IT systems, they said.
In commenting for this article, SAP, Oracle, Coupa, Microsoft and Blue Yonder described strong growth for generative AI solutions for supply chains without giving numbers.
At U.S. supply chain consultancy GEP, which sells AI tools like this, Trump's tariffs are helping to drive demand.
"The tariff volatility has been big," says GEP consultant Mukund Acharya, an expert in retail industry supply chains.
SAP said the uncertainty was driving technology take-up. "That's how it was during the financial crisis, Brexit and COVID. And it's what we're seeing now," Richard Howells, SAP vice president and supply chain specialist, said in a statement.
An AI agent can sift real-time news feeds on changing tariff scenarios, assess contract renewal dates and a myriad of other data points and come up with a suggested plan of action.
But supply chain experts warn of AI hype, saying a lot of money will be wasted on a vain hope that AI can work miracles.
"AI is really a powerful enabler for supply chain resilience, but it's not a silver bullet," says Minna Aila, communications chief at Finnish crane-maker Konecranes and member of a business board that advises the OECD on issues including supply chain resilience.
"I'm still looking forward to the day when AI can predict terrorist attacks that are at sea, for instance."
Konecranes' logistics partners are deploying AI on more mundane data, like weather forecasts.
The company makes port cranes that are up to 106 metres (348 ft) high when assembled. When shipping them, AI marries weather forecasts with data like bridge heights to optimise the route.
"To ship those across oceans, you do have to take into consideration weather," Aila says.
RISING COSTS
By keeping inventories low, firms can bolster profit margins that are under pressure from rising costs. Every component or finished product sitting on a shelf is capital tied up, incurring finance and storage costs and at risk of obsolescence.
McKinsey has been surveying supply-chain executives since the pandemic. Its most recent survey showed that respondents relying on bigger inventory to cushion disruptions fell to 34% last year from 60% in 2022. Early responses from its upcoming 2025 survey suggest a similar picture, Jochim said.
Gartner supply chain analyst Noha Tohamy says that without AI, companies would be slower to react and be more likely to be drawn into building up inventories.
"When supply chain organisations don't have that visibility and don't really understand the uncertainty, we go for inventory buffering," Tohamy says.
But AI agents won't put supply chain managers out of work, not yet, consultants say. Humans still need to make strategic and big tactical decisions, leaving AI agents to do more routine tasks like ordering and scheduling production maintenance.
Toro supply chain chief Carpenter says that without AI, supply chain managers might need to run bigger teams as well.
Is he worried that AI is coming for his job one day? "I hope it doesn't take it until my kids get through college!"
(Reporting by Mark Bendeich; Editing by Sharon Singleton)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
11 minutes ago
- Barnama
Brazil Presents Aid Package For Businesses Impacted By US Tariffs
President of the Chamber of Deputies Hugo Motta, Brazil's Vice President Geraldo Alckmin, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, President of the Federal Senate of Brazil Davi Alcolumbre and Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira attend a ceremony to sign a provisional measure establishing an initial set of actions to mitigate the economic impact due to U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to raise import tariffs on Brazilian products by up to 50%, at the Planalto Palace, in Brasilia, Brazil, August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Adriano Machado RIO DE JANEIRO, Aug 14 (Bernama-dpa) -- The Brazilian government on Wednesday presented an aid package worth billions of dollars for companies affected by US tariffs, reported German press agency (dpa). "Brazil and the world are witnesses that this situation, which we consider to be true blackmail, was provoked by those who tried to abolish the democratic rule of law and now answer for their crimes before the law and justice," said Institutional Relations Minister Gleisi Hoffmann. The core of the package is a credit line of 30 billion reais (US$5.5 billion), the granting of which is linked to the preservation of jobs. Additionally, export credits will be granted and tax payments for particularly affected companies will be postponed. bootstrap slideshow President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed the measure into provisional law, which must be approved by Congress within 120 days to remain in force. Lula stressed during the package's announcement in Brasilia that his government was "not announcing reciprocity measures". 'We don't want, in first instance, to do anything that could worsen our relations," he said, adding that his government was instead focussing on greater diversification of export markets and was negotiating alternative sales opportunities with partners such as India, China and Russia. US President Donald Trump last week imposed 50 per cent import duties on a wide range of Brazilian products including meat and coffee, though key exports such as orange juice, civilian aircraft, oil and fertilisers are exempt. The US administration has said the tariffs were in part triggered by the prosecution of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro. Washington argues that Brazil's actions threaten US national security, foreign policy and economic interests. Some view the move as an attempt by the US to exert political pressure in favour of the right-wing former president.
The Star
38 minutes ago
- The Star
Companies are pouring billions into AI. It has yet to pay off.
Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence. According to recent research from McKinsey & Co, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using generative AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots such as ChatGPT, fuelled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and superrich startups and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind – but it could be years before the technology delivers an economywide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'the gen. AI paradox', as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in generative AI by businesses are expected to increase 94% this year to US$61.9bil (RM259.82bil), according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42% by the end of 2024, up from 17% the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said Alexander Johnston, a senior analyst at S&P Global. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles', predicts that AI is sliding toward a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment'. The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said John-David Lovelock, the chief forecaster at Gartner. That was the pattern with past technologies such as personal computers and the internet – early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own workforces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford Motor Co, said, 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US.' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI – although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call centre software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centres field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more – a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time everyone will use it,' said Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI. Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant – essentially a business chatbot – from their work computers for tasks such as retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialised AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' McAfee, the MIT research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI-consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Oil climbs on supply risks; weak fundamentals weigh
TOKYO: Oil prices climbed on Thursday as investors remain cautious the U.S.-Russia summit on Ukraine on Friday will lead to a loosening of Russian crude sanctions and may even result in further action against buyers, while a weak market outlook capped gains. Brent crude futures were up 24 cents, or 0.37%, at $65.87 a barrel at 0356 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose 21 cents, or 0.34%, to $62.85. Both contracts hit their lowest in two months on Wednesday after bearish supply guidance from the U.S. government and the International Energy Agency (IEA). Trump on Wednesday threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine. Trump did not specify what the consequences could be, but he has warned of economic sanctions if the meeting in Alaska on Friday proves fruitless. 'The uncertainty of U.S.-Russia peace talks continues to add a bullish risk premium given Russian oil buyers could face more economic pressure,' Rystad Energy said in a client note. 'How Ukraine-Russia crisis resolves and Russia flows change could bring some unexpected surprises.' Trump has threatened to enact secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, primarily China and India, if Russia continues with its war in Ukraine. 'Clearly there's upside risk for the market if little progress is made' on a ceasefire,' said Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING, in a note. The expected oil surplus through the latter part of this year and 2026, combined with spare capacity from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, means that the market should be able to manage the impact of secondary tariffs on India, Patterson said. But things become more difficult if we see secondary tariffs on other key buyers of Russian crude oil, including China and Turkey, he said. Expectations the U.S. Federal Reserve will cut rates in September is also supportive for oil. Traders are almost 100% agreed a cut will happen after U.S. inflation increased at a moderate pace in July. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he thought an aggressive half-point cut was possible given recent weak employment numbers. The market is putting the odds of a quarter-percentage point cut at the Fed's September 16-17 meeting at 99.9%, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Lower borrowing rates would drive demand for oil. Oil prices were kept in check as crude inventories in the United States unexpectedly rose by 3 million barrels in the week ended on August 8, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration on Wednesday. Also holding oil prices back was an International Energy Agency forecast that 2025 and 2026 global supply would rise more rapidly than expected, as OPEC and its allies increase output and production from outside the group grows - REUTERS
