LGBT veterans 'angry and disappointed' at pace of government compensation scheme
In December, the government announced up to £75 million for the LGBT financial recognition scheme, with payments of up to £70,000 for each veteran 'to acknowledge the historic wrongs they experienced in the armed forces'.
On Thursday, these same veterans expressed anger and disappointment that out of more than 1,000 applications for compensation over the last five months - so far just 24 have been paid.
If applications were to continue being processed at this speed it would take more than 17 years to complete the compensation scheme.
The Fighting with Pride military charity said eight of the 24 payouts were to veterans with life-limiting health conditions.
The charity's chief executive Peter Gibson said older veterans have been left 'furious' and feeling that 'justice delayed is justice denied'.
He has written to Defence Secretary John Healey to convey the 'growing anger, frustration and impatience' of veterans, and to say the scheme 'is sadly not delivering at a pace which meets the expectations of the ageing veterans we are working with'.
Mr Gibson said a staff of 15 people to deal with the scheme 'together with underperforming technology is clearly and simply not enough to meet the demand'.
Emma Storey, who was under investigation by military police and left the Women's Royal Army Corps in 1987, shared her anger over the delays.
She said: 'We feel angry and disappointed. We were treated abysmally during our service. Forced out for our sexuality and loving the people we love, only to be let down by a casual approach to the payments we're owed.
'I'm 64 years old and deserve to enjoy some dignity in the later years of my life.
'After reopening the wounds by applying for the financial recognition scheme, the least I'd expect is to be showed the decency and respect of a prompt resolution.'
For many veterans, who are now in their 60s, 70s, and 80s time is of the essence.
'For many it means justice delayed is justice denied. Fighting With Pride will continue to do everything we can to find every single affected LGBT veteran and ensure they get the reparations they deserve," said Peter Gibson.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'We recognise the need to work quickly through the over 1,000 applications for financial recognition we've received.
'The process of working through the applications requires checking a number of information sources and historical records, however we understand the need for timeliness in delivering this important scheme.
'We are working closely with stakeholder groups and applicants can receive updates on their progress from the team via gov.uk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia, under war spending pressure, set for more austerity, tax hikes
MOSCOW, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Moscow is preparing to raise taxes and cut spending as it tries to maintain high defence expenditure with Russia's economy creaking under the weight of financing the more than three-year war in Ukraine, officials and economists say. President Vladimir Putin has rejected suggestions that the war is killing Russia's economy, but the budget deficit is widening as spending mounts, while revenue from oil and gas is declining under pressure from Western sanctions. Highly anticipated talks between Putin and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump in Alaska last week did not yield a ceasefire, giving Moscow, which would prefer to move straight to a peace settlement, a strategic boost, but a spending headache. Russia's economy is cooling, with some officials warning of recession risks, and though interest rates are starting to come down from 20-year highs, its budget deficit has widened to 4.9 trillion roubles ($61 billion), suggesting Russia will struggle to fulfil its current obligations and keep financing the war at its current pace. "Given the more pessimistic estimates of economic indicators and the decline in oil and gas revenues, we will need to urgently start fiscal consolidation," Anatoly Artamonov, head of the upper house of parliament's budget committee, said in late July. Budget spending has almost doubled in nominal terms since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, a significant fiscal injection that fuelled inflation and forced the central bank to hike rates to as high as 21%, sharply raising corporate borrowing costs. Combined spending of 17 trillion roubles on defence and national security in 2025 is at its highest since the Cold War, accounting for 41% of total spending and making the defence sector the primary driver of economic growth as civilian output declines. Putin said in June that Russia plans to reduce military spending, but for now, officials still expect an increase. "We cannot cut spending on national defence and ... in all likelihood, we will have to increase it," Artamonov said. The 2025 budget, to be presented in September, provides for defence and security spending at 8% of GDP, but a Russian government source said the actual figure was slightly higher. There will be no reduction in defence spending in 2026, the person said, but a decline is possible in 2027 should hostilities cease, as other spending areas fight for resources. "Even with a ceasefire, shells and drones will still need to be made, but on a slightly smaller scale," the person said, noting that Moscow will need to keep up with higher Western defence spending. "There will be no return to the level that existed before the 'special military operation'," the person said. Artamonov, writing for the RBC daily, suggested Russia may need to reduce non-defence spending by 2 trillion roubles each year until 2028 and redirect those savings to the defence budget. "In the next three years, we will not have enough means to live as comfortably as we do now," Artamonov said. This year is the first when total education and healthcare expenditure at the federal and regional level is noticeably decreasing as a share of GDP, said Sergei Aleksashenko, former deputy governor of Russia's central bank and a senior fellow at the NEST Centre in London. Aleksashenko said he expects tax rises and a spending cut in real terms by indexing expenditure on things like pensions below the inflation rate, which the central bank forecasts at 6-7% this year. The government source said raising taxes was unavoidable: "Otherwise, we simply won't be able to make ends meet, even with a reduction in defence spending. Oil and gas revenues are falling and the economy cannot fully compensate for this." Finance Minister Anton Siluanov hinted at austerity measures as early as April, advising government colleagues "to be modest in their desires" regarding spending. Deputy Finance Minister Pavel Kadochnikov in July said spending on soldiers fighting in Ukraine and their families was the priority and that Russia should consider "eliminating" non-priority spending. Budget consolidation ultimately puts more pressure on Russia's economic growth, although a low net debt-to-GDP ratio of around 20% gives Moscow some wiggle room. "Russia's economy is struggling under the weight of high interest rates and the ongoing war effort," said Liam Peach, senior emerging markets economist at Capital Economics. "A prolonged period of weak growth lies in store." Analysts expect Russia's budget deficit, which exceeded the full-year target in January-July by over 1 trillion roubles, to be wider than planned. The government source estimates this year's deficit at around 5 trillion roubles, or 2.5% of GDP. CentroCreditBank economist Yevgeny Suvorov said the deficit could stretch to 8 trillion roubles as Moscow's spending would require an almost 20% year-on-year real-terms cut in August-December to meet the 2025 spending target of 42.3 trillion roubles. "The central bank is in no hurry to lower the key rate, including because the budget deficit may be higher than planned," said a senior source familiar with finance ministry plans. Last week, Putin called Russia's current budget situation stable. ($1 = 80.3500 roubles)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Tommy Robinson's message is bigoted regardless of who supports him
First, Murphy insists that 'both left and right have mishandled' immigration. This is misleading. The left has had no influence on immigration policy for decades. What Murphy calls 'mishandling' on the left is, in practice, grassroots defence of refugee rights and asylum protections. Policy has been entirely shaped by the right, whose governments steadily dismantled the progressive values and legal structures that once enabled newcomers to settle, gain citizenship, and contribute as taxpayers. Labour, since July 2024, have adopted Tory policy wholesale. To pretend this is a problem of 'both sides' is a false equivalence that lets those responsible off the hook. READ MORE: Reform UK hiring staff in London to write Holyrood manifesto Second, Murphy conflates Asian identity with Islam and sets 'Muslims' in opposition to 'LGBT people". This is simplistic and divisive. Asian communities are religiously and culturally diverse; Muslims themselves are not a monolith. To treat them as interchangeable is to erase that diversity. More importantly, Murphy ignores intersectionality. Queer Muslims and LGBT people of colour exist. They face both racism and homophobia, often simultaneously. Any analysis that sets one group against the other misses this lived reality. Third, Murphy tells of four young Muslim men shouting homophobic abuse outside a Manchester gay club, framing it as evidence of imported prejudice. Yet LGBTQI+ people in Britain have faced centuries of harassment from straight white Christians – and 'cultural Christians' – who still moan about being banned from gathering to intimidate women at health clinics in broad daylight. If abuse from four men in a car is treated as more threatening than that, it suggests a racial hierarchy in how prejudice is judged. And while Murphy highlights one incident involving Muslims, he ignores the fact that the vast majority of serious offenders across all crimes in Britain are straight white men. It is also that same demographic which makes up the bulk of mobs outside hotels housing refugees, spurred on by politicians and pundits urging them to see migrants as a threat to 'British values.' READ MORE: I can take on 'climate change denying' Farage in TV debates, says Lorna Slater Fourth, Murphy uses the example of Tommy Robinson's growing online following – including among LGBT people and Black men – to suggest that Robinson's message cannot be written off as 'pure racism.' But the issue is not the diversity of Robinson's supporters; it is the bigotry of his message. Far-right movements have long sought to co-opt grievances across identity groups. That does not legitimise their message; it shows how far-right narratives adapt to exploit fears. Finally, Murphy's silence is deafening where it matters most. The upsurge in anti-LGBTQI+ prejudice in Britain is not 'imported'. It stems directly from right-wing policy and rhetoric, especially the deliberate targeting of trans people. These attacks, now pursued as eagerly by Labour as by the Conservatives, have eroded protections and emboldened prejudice. To attribute fear in LGBT communities solely to migrants, even by citing a no-doubt-frightening experience, is to erase the role of Britain's governing parties in creating the climate of hostility. Murphy is right that refugees like Bella, a transgender teacher from Afghanistan, deserve protection. But unless we are honest about the real sources of threat – homegrown, political, and systemic – appeals to 'balance' risk becoming cover for injustice. Ron Lumiere via email
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Man claims 3 inch penis is so small he could not have ‘raped woman in alleyway after party'
A MAN has claimed his three inch penis is so small he could not have raped a woman in an alleyway at a party, a court heard. Hossein Mohmoudi, 34, is accused of dragging the woman to the ground in Stratford, East London in the early hours of the morning. 1 He then allegedly pulled up her skirt and raped her before he was interrupted by a passing cyclist. But defence counsel David Harounoff questioned whether the woman could have felt Mohmoudi's penis. He told jurors at Snaresbrook Crown Court that Mohmoudi has a small penis and cannot "get it up". Giving evidence, the complainant grabbed a 30cm ruler from beside the witness stand and asked Mr Harounoff if he wanted an exact measurement. He responded: "I'm going to suggest to you what you said is untrue. He has erectile dysfunction. He can't get it up. "It's the defence case that he has erectile dysfunction and his penis is three inches long. "The defence case is it would be physically impossible to have attempted or actually raped you." But the complainant responded: "That's not true." The court heard the woman was returning home from a Christmas party in December last year when the alleged horror unfolded. She had jumped out of a taxi to be sick before boarding a bus to Stratford. Just before 1am, the woman claims she was "dragged" to the floor and raped by a 6ft, "Middle-Eastern-looking" man with "yellowy, pale skin" and a "messy beard". She told jurors: "I just remember thinking he was foul. Really disgusting. Not clean. The smell. He was a smelly man. I think it's still on me. A smoker. Not somebody who looks after themselves.' The woman claims she could not have consented to sex because she did not see her alleged attacker "until it was happening". She also told the court she recalls "freezing" in horror during the 20 to 30 second attack. Mohmoudi has claimed he thought he recognised the woman so approached her to help. He said he then ran off when she "became hysterical" and started shouting at him. CCTV played to jurors showed the woman entering the alleyway before Mohmoudi follows her in. Hidden behind a large gate or fence, she shouts: "Wait, wait, wait. F**k you. F**k off. F**k you. F**k off". A cyclist then passes in the background before Mohmoudi runs away from the scene. Mohmoudi denies rape and the trial continues.
