logo
Opposition Moves SC Over Bihar Voter List Revision; EC Says No Rule Change Amid Row Over Ad

Opposition Moves SC Over Bihar Voter List Revision; EC Says No Rule Change Amid Row Over Ad

News18a day ago
Last Updated:
INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit birth documents
Opposition parties have intensified their criticism of the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, with TMC MP Mahua Moitra and RJD's Manoj Jha moving the Supreme Court seeking to quash the EC order claiming that it violated the Constitution.
Besides Moitra and Jha, several NGOs have also petitioned the court against the special intensive revision (SIR), even as the Election Commission (EC) issued a statement on Sunday saying it has not changed its instructions on the revision process.
This came after several social media posts, including one by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, cited an advertisement by the EC published in newspapers to suggest that showing documents is not necessary.
The Congress and other INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit documents related to birth.
'Why are people who have been voting in election after election being asked to show their documents for voting ?" Kharge said in a post on X. 'When the pressure from the opposition, the public and civil society increased, the Election Commission hurriedly published these advertisements today, which state that now only a form needs to be filled and showing documents is not necessary."
WHAT DID THE EC SAY?
In a statement, the EC made it clear that while voters were required to 'submit their documents anytime before July 25, 2025", those who failed to do so would get an opportunity 'during the Claims & Objections period also".
The poll body also urged people to 'beware of statements being made by a few persons, who without reading the SIR order dated 24 June 2025… are attempting to confuse the public with their incorrect and misleading statements".
WHAT DID THE PETITIONERS SAY?
Moitra, who moved the SC seeking quashing of the June 24 EC order under which special intensive revision (SIR) is being conducted, alleged that it violates several provisions of the Constitution and the Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950.
In her plea, she submitted that if not set aside, it can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country, thereby undermining democracy and free and fair elections.
'The present writ petition has been filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking setting aside of order dated 24.06.2025 issued by Election Commission of India under which SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar is being conducted in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and provisions of Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960…," her plea stated.
Moitra sought a direction from the apex court to restrain the EC from issuing similar orders for SIR of electoral rolls in other states.
'They have now introduced it to deprive the bonafide young electorate of Bihar, where elections are slated to be held shortly. Later, they will target Bengal, where elections are due in 2026," Moitra told news agency PTI.
Jha, meanwhile, alleged in his plea that the EC order violated Articles 14, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution of India. He stated that the impugned order 'is a tool of institutionalised disenfranchisement and it is being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities, as such, they are not random patterns but it is engineered exclusions".
A similar plea has also been filed by the NGO, Association of Democratic Reforms, through advocate Prashant Bhushan. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL and activists like Yogendra Yadav have approached the top court against the EC's direction.
While the opposition has been questioning the timing and intent of the exercise, the BJP has defended it. Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal assembly Suvendu Adhikari, however, welcomed the SIR and said such an exercise should also be conducted in the TMC-ruled state.
The last such revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. According to the EC, the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants.
top videos
View all
The EC said it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions as laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in carrying out the revision.
(With PTI inputs)
First Published:
July 06, 2025, 23:20 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC transfers Malinga assault case from Dholpur to Jaipur
HC transfers Malinga assault case from Dholpur to Jaipur

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

HC transfers Malinga assault case from Dholpur to Jaipur

1 2 Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court Monday ordered the transfer of a high-profile assault case involving former MLA Girraj Singh Malinga from Dholpur to Jaipur, citing concerns over witness safety and the accused's influential status in the region. The single-judge bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas issued the transfer order while hearing a criminal transfer petition filed by assistant engineer Harshadhipati, the victim in the case. The case stems from an alleged assault on Harshadhipati and junior engineer Nitin Gulati at the Bari discom office in Dholpur on March 28, 2022. Malinga, who is currently out on bail, has faced multiple charges of assault on public servants. He was a Congress MLA from Bari but switched over to BJP prior to assembly elections in 2023. He, however, lost the election. "We told court that victim and witnesses face life threats in Dholpur as the accused is a strongman," said Akhil Simlote, counsel for the petitioner. The court noted that a procession organised by Malinga's supporters following his bail release demonstrated his significant influence in the area. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The case will now be heard at the SC-ST Court in Jaipur district, with Justice Vyas directing for a timely completion of the trial. The high court has directed the Jaipur Police Commissioner to implement robust security measures during the case hearings. "The high court has directed appointment of one SI and two ASIs under the Case Officers Scheme in the matter to assist the lower court and the prosecution," Simlote said. Malinga's bail history has been contentious. Initially granted in May 2022 due to Covid-19, the bail was cancelled by the high court on July 5, 2024, because of the celebratory procession organised by his supporters. Though he again surrendered and was jailed on the high court's directions, the Supreme Court stayed the bail cancellation on Dec 13, 2024.

26/11 plotter Tahawwur Rana exposes Pakistan Army's terror links
26/11 plotter Tahawwur Rana exposes Pakistan Army's terror links

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

26/11 plotter Tahawwur Rana exposes Pakistan Army's terror links

The Election Commission's special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar has sparked controversy, with opposition parties filing petitions in the Supreme Court challenging the move. The revision requires voters added since 2003 to submit proof of date and place of birth, effectively their citizenship. Opposition parties claim this targets poor, Dalit and Muslim voters and could lead to disenfranchisement. The EC maintains the revision is working smoothly, with 2.88 crore forms collected covering 37% of Bihar's voters. However, ground reports show many citizens struggling to provide the required documents. Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa says while roll purification is legitimate, the timing and new procedures raise questions. The Supreme Court will hear the petitions on Thursday. Concerns have been raised about the Election Commission of India's voter registration drive. A former Election Commissioner states there are practical and conceptual issues that need clarification, such as the acceptance criteria for enumeration forms and required documents. He calls for establishing open and credible channels of communication to address doubts, though stops short of saying the EC faces a crisis. The discussion also touches on allegations by some politicians that the EC is acting as a rubber stamp for the government, which the former official suggests should not be assumed without evidence.

Minister Bandi Sanjay Attacks Congress, Alleges Special Treatment To Akbaruddin Owaisi
Minister Bandi Sanjay Attacks Congress, Alleges Special Treatment To Akbaruddin Owaisi

NDTV

time2 hours ago

  • NDTV

Minister Bandi Sanjay Attacks Congress, Alleges Special Treatment To Akbaruddin Owaisi

Hyderabad: Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar launched a scathing attack on the Telangana government on Monday, questioning alleged special exemptions granted to AIMIM leader Akbaruddin Owaisi's family and condemning alleged threats against media houses. Speaking to reporters in Jagtial district after inaugurating Central development projects, the Union minister alleged double standards and demanded a clarification from the Congress-led Revanth Reddy government in Telangana. Bandi Sanjay specifically questioned the Hyderabad Development Authority (HYDRA), stating, "Are the HYDRA authorities demolishing the houses of the poor in the name of encroachments, but giving exemptions to Akbaruddin Owaisi's family, who have built buildings in lakes and ponds and are running colleges and businesses there?" He cited claims by HYDRA that they cannot demolish illegal constructions at Mr Owaisi's college due to the presence of 10,000 students, contrasting this with the demolition of "small houses and huts built by poor people in the Musi river catchment areas, who have no source of livelihood or shelter". "Do only the lives of Akbaruddin Owaisi's family have value? Don't the lives of poor people matter? Are they not human?" the minister asked, accusing the government of turning a blind eye to alleged transgressions by AIMMIM leaders, including non-payment of electricity bills and encroachment. The Union Minister also strongly criticised the alleged preparations by Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leaders to attack the offices of Andhra Jyothi and other news outlets for publishing critical stories. "When media houses are being attacked, what is the chief minister doing? What is the government doing?" he demanded. Reminding Chief Minister Revanth Reddy of the time he was jailed, Mr Sanjay asked, "Weren't you jailed unjustly and denied bail? Have you forgotten all that and now joined hands with them (the BRS)?" The BJP, he said, would "always stand at the forefront in protecting democracy and press freedom". Daring BRS leaders, he added, "Attack the media houses and see what happens. Within two hours of your attack, our BJYM (BJP youth wing) activists will take care of your BRS office and the TV channel in it. Telangana is no longer BRS' fiefdom."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store