
British Government to Spend $19 Billion on New Nuclear Plant
The decision likely means that the giant plant called Sizewell C, whose site on the east coast of England was first identified by the government in 2009, will receive a go-ahead. Much of the funding will come from the government.
EDF, the French state-owned energy group, will build the plant and be part owner. Britain hopes to attract other funding.
Nuclear power plants can cost tens of billions of dollars to build, but they have regained favor in recent years in Britain and elsewhere because they produce large volumes of steady electric power with few emissions. The plants are also viewed as way to enhance energy security.
The emergence of artificial intelligence, and the growing demand for data centers to run those systems, has also raised the appeal of nuclear energy.
Nuclear power accounted for about 14 percent of Britain's electricity supply last year.
While announcing funding for the Sizewell plant, the British government also said it had chosen Rolls-Royce SMR, a unit of the aircraft engine maker, as the 'preferred bidder' to build so-called small modular nuclear reactors in partnership with a state company called Great British Energy.
The government said it was planning to spend 2.5 billion pounds on these smaller power plants, which are being designed to be largely built in factories rather than on work sites, theoretically cutting labor costs.
Britain also said it would spend a similar amount on so-called nuclear fusion, a technology that could produce large volumes of clean energy if it ever reaches commercial viability.
'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, ' Britain's energy secretary, Ed Miliband, said in a statement.
EDF, the French utility, has experienced major challenges at the other large nuclear power plant under construction in Britain, known as Hinkley Point C, whose completion has been delayed many years while costs have soared. The final price tag could exceed 40 billion pounds.
Proponents of Sizewell C say that the experience of building Hinkley Point will lower the cost of the new plant. Still, the final price tag is likely to run into tens of billions of pounds.
The new plant will be near Sizewell B, which began operating in 1995 and was the last nuclear power station completed in Britain.
The country has a strong rating in nuclear research, but industry experts say that during its long hiatus, Britain's skills in nuclear construction atrophied, a key reason for the higher costs. The nuclear industry in the United States has also encountered cost overruns.
Still, the British government sees nuclear plants as an attractive option because electric power demand is expected to rise and the existing plants are aging and being gradually shut down.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police make six arrests at asylum hotel protest
Police made six arrests at a protest outside a hotel in London that has been used to house asylum seekers. Protesters gathered outside the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf on Sunday afternoon, with some setting off pink flares and waving England flags. Some demonstrators carried a banner that said: 'We're not far right but we're not far wrong. Don't gamble with our lives. Stop the boats.' The Metropolitan Police said six arrests were made for breaching Section 14 Public Order conditions, possession of Class B drugs, and assaulting an emergency worker. In a post on X, the Metropolitan Police said: 'We have imposed conditions using Section 14 of the Public Order Act to prevent serious disruption at the protests in Canary Wharf. 'The group protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers have been instructed to remain on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel.' The hotel has been the site of numerous anti-migrant protests in recent weeks.


Motor 1
12 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Volkswagen Is Locking Horsepower Behind a Paywall
Automakers are embracing subscriptions whether customers like them or not, often pushing beyond what most of us find acceptable. BMW attempted to charge a monthly fee for heated seats, but users didn't bite . On the opposite end of the spectrum, Mercedes-Benz still offers Acceleration Increase for its EQ models, which initially cost $1,200 a year, and it's an idea that Volkswagen is borrowing for the electric ID.3 in the United Kingdom. Auto Express first reported that the automaker's consumer site in the UK market lists the ID.3 Pro and Pro S as only having 201 horsepower instead of the full 228-hp output. The fine print reads that owners can "activate the optional power upgrade for a fee." VW offers owners the option of a one-month free trial, a monthly or yearly subscription, or the ability to purchase it for the car's lifetime. Those costs are: £16.50 per month, £165 per year, or £649 outright, which is $22.36, $211.41, and $879,52, respectively, at today's exchange rate. It's an odd decision and one that doesn't make much financial sense for a buyer on a car that costs around $50,000 to start. The extra cost is small enough to be hidden in the MSRP, and something most people would likely be willing to pay upfront. But this paywall feels like an unnecessary hurdle designed to nickel-and-dime customers who might be leasing rather than buying. Automotive News Europe reported in late 2023 that more than 40 percent of new lease registrations in the UK were electric vehicles, so someone who only keeps the car for a few years might be able to save a few hundred dollars. Volkswagen ID.3 Interior It doesn't seem worth it, and thankfully VW isn't doing that in America, but it reveals where the industry stands and what it's thinking. Automakers are seeking new revenue streams during a complex and costly time in the industry, and a recurring income from thousands or millions of drivers is enticing. You'd think spending tens of thousands of dollars would guarantee you can purchase and fully own a complete vehicle, but that's no longer the case when software sits between the user and the actual hardware. Software licenses and end-user license agreements restrict ownership while the Digital Millennium Copyright Act dictates what a user can and cannot do with that license. In 2023, Mazda sent a cease-and-desist letter to a developer who had made integrations that connected Mazda vehicles to Home Assistant, an open-source home automation software. The automaker accused the developer of writing code that infringed on its 'copyright ownership,' which provided similar functionality to that offered by Mazda through its apps. While the DMCA allows owners to modify what they own, it's illegal to distribute the software or tools to do it, especially if it violates copyright, and today's cars are packed with copyrighted software. American automakers are already making the argument in court that customers don't fully own the vehicles they paid for, pointing to software and software licenses in their attempt to restrict right-to-repair laws. As automakers embed more software into cars, EVs or ICE, it will make paywalling horsepower, safety features, or access to other hardware features even easier because you can't own someone else's copyrighted code, and VW's UK experiment should be a red alert for car buyers everywhere. Too Many Subscriptions: The New Audi A3 Is Amess With In-Car Subscriptions [Update] Mazda Now Requires Monthly Subscription for Remote Start Stay informed with our newsletter every weekday back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Sources: Auto Express , Automotive News , Ars Technica , Volkswagen UK Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool Set Deadline for Alexander Isak Deal Amid Newcastle Stalemate
Liverpool Set Deadline for Alexander Isak Transfer Resolution Liverpool's pursuit of Alexander Isak has become one of the defining sagas of this summer window. While the Swedish forward has made it clear that Anfield is where he wants to be, negotiations with Newcastle United have been far from straightforward. The latest developments have been disclosed by Sacha Tavolieri, who has reported on Liverpool's growing impatience in the deal. Deadline Set for Newcastle United and Isak Tavolieri stated that 'Liverpool FC won't wait forever for Alexander Isak. Despite mutual interest and the Swedish being the top priority, the Reds have set a deadline. If no agreement is reached with Newcastle by next week, the door will be wide open for… other targets.' It is a stark warning that Liverpool's efficiency in the market will not be compromised by drawn-out negotiations. The club has handled business quickly and decisively under Arne Slot's watch, and they expect the same momentum when pursuing their primary striker target. Isak's Strike and Newcastle's Stance Isak has forced the issue from his side. Reports confirm the forward has gone on strike at Newcastle, refusing to feature in the club's Premier League opener against Aston Villa. His absence is set to bring a club-record fine, but the Swede's determination remains unshaken. He is adamant he wants Liverpool and has no interest in rebuilding trust with the Magpies. Despite the disruption, Newcastle remain stubborn in their position. They are under no financial pressure to sell and continue to value Isak as an essential part of Eddie Howe's long-term project. The belief among the Newcastle hierarchy is that re-integration is possible, even if bridges appear burned. Liverpool's Transfer Balancing Act Liverpool must weigh their ambitions carefully. The club have admired Isak for some time, but their opening bid was swiftly rejected. Without encouragement from Newcastle, they are unwilling to return with an inflated offer. The Reds are mindful of strengthening other areas of the squad, and overcommitting to one player risks upsetting the balance of their spending strategy. Photo: IMAGO Patience may be running out, but the plan remains pragmatic. Isak is still the first-choice option, yet the club are prepared to pivot quickly if progress is not made. As Tavolieri highlighted, Liverpool's stance is simple: deliver an agreement soon, or they will move on. Our View – Anfield Index Analysis For Liverpool supporters, this saga is becoming a test of nerves. On the one hand, Isak looks the perfect fit for Arne Slot's system, combining movement, finishing and the ability to lead the line in a way that would complement Mohamed Salah and Cody Gakpo. On the other, fans understand the club's reluctance to get dragged into an endless negotiation with Newcastle. The player has made his wishes abundantly clear. A striker willing to go on strike, miss games and risk his reputation is someone who desperately wants the move. That commitment appeals to Liverpool fans, who have long wanted players that see Anfield as the pinnacle. Yet there is also recognition that the squad requires depth across multiple positions. Supporters know that a reliable and committed forward is a necessity, but so is ensuring the club's wider rebuild remains on track. The prevailing fan opinion is simple: sign Isak if it can be done within reason, but do not let Newcastle dictate the entire window. If the deadline passes, supporters will expect Liverpool to act swiftly and secure another forward capable of delivering immediately.