New rules allowing Quebec restaurants to charge for no-shows come into effect
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
Quebec restaurant owners can now charge a fee to people who make a reservation but don't show up.
Under new rules in effect Thursday, restaurants can charge up to $10 for each no-show.
An association representing Quebec restaurant owners has estimated that no-shows cost the average eatery about $49,000 per year.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Meanwhile, the Canadian restaurant industry association says Quebec was the only province with consumer protection laws that expressly forbade restaurants from charging no-show fees.
Quebec restaurants have to follow a number of rules to apply the fee, including reminding customers of an upcoming reservation and giving them an easy way to cancel.
The fee can be applied only to groups of two or more, and only if none of the members of the party shows up.
Story continues below advertisement
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 17, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
an hour ago
- Cision Canada
Small businesses looking to Council of the Federation for support as tariff impacts continue to weigh down economy Français
TORONTO, July 18, 2025 /CNW/ - As Canada's premiers meet in Huntsville next week, the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) has sent a letter to all provincial and territorial premiers, as well as Prime Minister Carney, urging them to ensure small business priorities are at the top of their agenda. "Between tariff uncertainty, rising costs and weak consumer demand, it seems small businesses just can't catch a break. Canada is losing entrepreneurs, and we can't improve our sluggish productivity if we don't make it easier to start, run and grow a business," said Corinne Pohlmann, Executive Vice-President of Advocacy at CFIB. "Canada's premiers have the power to truly create one Canadian economy. We hope they use this meeting as an opportunity to ensure small business policies are a key part of their discussions." Amid ongoing trade challenges, four in ten (42%) businesses have been raising prices. Around a third are shifting to domestic markets (37%) or absorbing some or all the additional tariff costs (31%), and a quarter are exploring non-U.S. markets (25%) or delaying expansion plans (29%). To provide small businesses with greater opportunities to grow and compete, CFIB recommends governments: Lower the small business tax rate with a plan to get it to 0% and raise the threshold to $700,000. Ensure small- to medium-sized firms are included in the planning and execution of major infrastructure projects. Quickly return the federally collected tariff revenues to SMEs and clarify the use of the provincial tariff contingency funds. Keep the momentum going on internal trade and adopt a unilateral direct-to-consumer alcohol shipment approach, as Manitoba has done. "Businesses need targeted policies that would boost our economy and increase Canada's global competitiveness. There has never been a better time to build a more productive Canada than now," said SeoRhin Yoo, senior policy analyst of interprovincial affairs. "We hope to see faster action on key small business priorities following the COF meeting." Methodology Preliminary results for the Your Voice July survey. The online survey is active since July 10, number of respondents = 1,330. For comparison purposes, a probability sample with the same number of respondents would have a margin of error of at most +/- 2.69%, 19 times out of 20. About CFIB The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) is Canada's largest association of small and medium-sized businesses with 100,000 members across every industry and region. CFIB is dedicated to increasing business owners' chances of success by driving policy change at all levels of government, providing expert advice and tools, and negotiating exclusive savings. Learn more at
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Municipalities have $10B from developers saved up. Ontario says they should spend it now
The Ford government is accusing Ontario's major towns and cities of 'sitting' on billions of unspent dollars amidst a growing housing crisis, telling them the money should be used to reduce the cost of building. According to data shared by the provincial government, Ontario's 444 municipalities have roughly $10 billion in the bank between them, funds collected from developers building new housing projects. The data, which Global News requested from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, shows Toronto has $2.8 billion, Durham Region has $1.1 billion and the City of Ottawa has collected over $800,000. Brampton's development charge balance, as of 2023, sits around $412,000. Vaughan's is at 543,000, while Mississauga's has roughly $414,0000. It's money the provincial government argues municipalities should spend — and quickly — to reduce the cost of building new homes. Story continues below advertisement 'Municipalities across Ontario are sitting on $10 billion of development charge reserve funds — funds that could be used to get shovels in the ground,' a spokesperson for Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack told Global News. 'The changes we are making through the Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act will ensure municipalities allocate at least 60 per cent of their development charge reserves, following the examples of Vaughan and Mississauga, who are already using these reserves to reduce building costs and support new housing.' Developers continue to complain that it is too expensive to build new homes in Ontario, despite various fees being reduced. Housing starts across the province are down compared to 2024, which was also a decline from the year before. Municipalities, however, argue the money they have in their reserve accounts isn't simply sitting there. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In Toronto, for example, a spokesperson said the $2.8 billion reserve fund weighs against a 10-year building plan worth $6.1 billion. 'We are also now at a point in time where we are spending development charges at a faster pace than we are collecting them,' they said. Similarly, Mississauga — where the mayor slashed development charges — is predicting a shortfall when spending commitments are taken into account. A spokesperson for Durham Region said that 'funds currently held in the DC reserve funds have already been committed to capital projects that are either underway or about to commence.' Story continues below advertisement Vaughan, which has made cuts to its DCs, said the changes the provincial government would not have a negative impact on its balance. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing urged the cities to use the money in their accounts to unlock new housing. 'We continue to encourage municipalities across the province to use their reserve funds to build more homes in their communities,' they said in a statement. Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed-Ward, who also chairs the Big City Mayors' caucus, said the 'narrative that development charges hold up housing or make it less affordable is a destructive distraction.' 'There's this narrative, there's a single DC rate for everybody and it's too high — without any kind of understanding DCs are developed in the community, with the development industry, based on very restrictive provincial restrictions,' she said. 'So I can't collect a DC for a community centre and spend it on my fire department. I have to spend it on what it was intended for, it's very prescribed.' In 2022, the Ford government announced audits into the development charge accounts of major municipalities, alleging at the time that they were sitting on billions. Those audits were never made public. Since then, the province has made a number of changes to how development charges work, what can be collected and how they can be spent. Story continues below advertisement In its latest legislation, Ontario reduced the scope and number of studies municipalities can require for new developments, sped up certain minor variances and standardized and streamlined development charges. It also allows municipalities to more easily reduce development charges, allows residential builders to pay those fees at the time of occupancy instead of when a permit is issued and exempts long-term care homes from the fees in order to spur their development. Many of those changes, unlike previous tweaks, were suggested to the government by homebuilders and municipal advocates together. Lindsay Jones, the director of policy and government relations for the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, agreed that 'municipalities are not hoarding development charges.' She said, however, the system would benefit from changes. 'There's no question that there's been really significant shifts in the market, in the overall macroeconomic context, and in the realities of incomes for Ontarians since the development charge regime was put in place almost 30 years ago,' she said. 'No question, there are ways that it can be improved — and we are optimistic about the potential for Bill 17 to be able to have some positive impacts.' — with a file from The Canadian Press
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Open the door to cheaper electric vehicles from Europe, advocates urge
TORONTO – The federal government has stopped the world's cheapest electric vehicles — made in China — from coming into Canada with a 100 per cent tariff, so advocates are pushing to make it easier for automakers to bring in cheaper ones from Europe. 'Right now, there is a blockage, saying that for safety reasons they cannot let these cars in,' said Daniel Breton, head of Electric Mobility Canada. He's pushing to have the federal government rule that EVs deemed safe by European regulators don't need to be re-certified and modified for Canadian standards. The potentially costly process can be a barrier to bringing more compact and affordable EVs to the Canadian market, though demand might be the bigger hurdle. 'Right now Transport Canada is saying, well, we have to change the bumpers and we have to change the headlights and this and that for safety reasons, which, as far as I'm concerned is total B.S.,' said Breton. 'If the car is good enough to be driving on European roads, where you can drive much faster than here, don't come and tell me that they're not safe enough to be driven in Canada.' Attempts to lower the barriers to cheaper vehicles comes as EV sales have been disrupted by the abrupt end of government rebate programs, while tariffs and U.S. moves to end EV supports and mandates are further destabilizing the market. Breton said that allowing a more open flow of vehicles from Europe would fit in well with a push to strengthen and diversify trade ties with the region, as Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he hopes to do, but Transport Canada says it's not so simple. 'The certification requirements of other jurisdictions may not be sufficient to meet the safety needs of Canadian road users due to Canada's distinct driving environment,' said spokesman Hicham Ayoun in an email. He said Canadian test standards are better suited for the road infrastructure, speed limits and larger vehicle sizes found on Canadian roadways. 'Some European crash testing requirements are not as stringent as the Canadian regime due to differences in their driving environment.' While Breton said the idea that European testing is deficient is ridiculous, there is also the question of how much demand there would be for the vehicles. As Transport Canada pointed out, Canadians like big cars and trucks. So much so that a few years ago the International Energy Agency found Canadian vehicles were the largest and second heaviest in the world, resulting in the worst fuel efficiency rating globally. Automakers know that and could be hesitant to bring in smaller cars, said Sam Fiorani, vice-president of global vehicle forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions. 'European EVs are tailored for the European market, and those models don't convert very well to the U.S. and Canada,' he said. 'The small cars that Canadians appreciate are on the fringes — there aren't too many of them.' But even if the potential market isn't much bigger than the cars themselves, Breton said there's still demand from anyone ranging from downtown drivers to households looking to make their second car an EV. He pointed to the Smart EV his wife drives, which is no longer available in Canada. 'If today her vehicle was scrapped, she couldn't find anything on the market, except for the Fiat 500e. But that's it. That's not choice.' The Fiat is the cheapest EV available in Canada, with a base price of $42,290 (though the company is currently offering more than $4,000 in discounts) for an advertised 227-kilometre range. The Nissan Leaf is the nearest competitor, starting at a selling price of $44,596 for a 240-kilometre range. But there are numerous other compact models that aren't available here. Volkswagen sells its ID.4 in Canada, but not the ID.3 that can retail for some 20 per cent less, and Nissan doesn't sell its more affordable Micra model, while other European brands with compact EVs like Citroen, Opel and Peugeot don't sell in Canada at all. Sales numbers for the available compact options aren't high, with Stellantis selling 1,275 of its Fiat 500e model last year, compared with more than 62,000 under its Ram brand and more than 40,000 for Jeep. But the market also needs choice to grow and fewer barriers to entry, said Breton. There does seem to be support for at least the idea of bringing cheaper EVs from Europe, according to a poll released last month from Clean Energy Canada. The results from 2,585 Canadians showed 70 per cent were in favour of allowing European-approved EVs into Canada, with only 10 per cent against and the rest unsure. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The poll also showed a majority supported the other big lever the federal government has to making EVs cheaper, by reducing or doing away with tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The results showed 53 per cent supported mirroring Europe's model that has put tariffs of up to 35 per cent on Chinese vehicles, an approach that balances protecting home industries with improving affordability. Breton said he would also like to see a more nuanced approach to China than the 100 per cent tariff Canada has imposed, to better strike that balance and make it easier to transition to zero-emission vehicles. 'We want to make sure that Canadians have access to affordable electric cars.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 18, 2025.
