logo
Illinois allows kids as young as 10 to be put in detention. A bill before the state House could change that

Illinois allows kids as young as 10 to be put in detention. A bill before the state House could change that

Miami Herald19-04-2025
CHICAGO - In more than two decades as a juvenile probation officer in downstate Clinton County, Carla Stalnaker said barely a handful of children younger than 12 have found themselves in her office. And only a small number of those were put in a detention center.
But the juvenile justice veteran thinks it's time to phase out that option.
"The old scared-straight thing … that doesn't work," Stalnaker said. "They want help. They're not hard and bitter about the system yet."
Illinois doesn't allow children under 10 to be held in detention facilities. But last year, there were about a dozen admissions of children under 12 and more than 60 of children who were 12 years old, according to data from the Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission.
Cases like those are the subject of a bill that was passed in the state Senate last week that, if approved by the House and signed by Gov. JB Pritzker, would essentially ban the detention of kids 12 and under, with some exceptions for 12-year-olds accused of certain violent crimes.
The bill would do away with an option for youthful offenders that a report from the state's Juvenile Justice Commission described as "potentially life-altering" and disproportionately detrimental to Black children.
Advocates argue detention can add to trauma for children who in many cases have already experienced problems before they ever get into trouble with law enforcement, adding to risk factors that may lead them to act out again.
Beyond that, younger children can be exposed to danger or negative influences from older teenagers in detention, or face potential issues from isolation if they're sequestered away for their own protection, said Patrick Keenan-Devlin, executive director at the Moran Center for Youth Advocacy.
But opponents say the change would place the onus for overseeing troubled young kids on an already overburdened social services infrastructure.
The Illinois Sheriffs' Association opposes the change and its executive director, Jim Kaitschuk, questioned whether there are sufficient alternatives available to what is essentially jail for 10- or 11-year-olds accused of violent crimes.
"Who's gonna take them?" Kaitschuk asked, pointing as an example to the difficulty the state's Department of Children and Family Services has in finding placements for hundreds of children in its care. "That's the rub, right out of the gate."
The bill came together as an agreement between the Juvenile Justice Initiative, an Evanston-based advocacy group, and the Illinois Probation and Court Services Association, a professional organization that Stalnaker leads. The legislation also is backed by the state Department of Juvenile Justice, spokesperson Dominique Newman said.
In addition to raising the age that kids can be detained from 10 to 12, starting in mid-2027 the bill would also raise the standard for 12-year-olds to be detained to those accused of specific violent crimes including first-degree murder, aggravated criminal sexual assault, some instances of battery involving guns and aggravated carjacking.
The bill also would allow the Juvenile Justice Commission to study the possibility of further raising the minimum age to 14 and make recommendations on services that can be used as alternatives to detention.
Detention for any amount of time can be detrimental to juveniles, and the youngest ones are in an especially critical period, said Sara Thomas, a research assistant professor at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine who studies adolescent development.
Juveniles incarcerated for any amount of time on average only achieved five out of eight measures of basic success in a recently published yearslong study co-led by Thomas, including in areas such as earning a high school degree, holding a job and maintaining a social support system. Those outcomes generally got worse the longer a person was incarcerated, even among those who started with similar risk factors, she said.
The study focused on more than 1,800 youths sampled at intake at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center in the 1990s, and it didn't differentiate between different ages of detained youth.
"Adolescents and especially younger adolescents' brains are so uniquely sensitive to their social environments, and incarceration during that period of time is profoundly disruptive to their development," Thomas said in an interview. "It sets kids up to have long-term consequences that follow them into adulthood."
And at the youngest ages that are the subject of the pending legislation, a disproportionate number of Black children are detained, the Juvenile Justice Commission found in its 2021 report on the issue. While about 15% of children statewide are Black, they made up more than two-thirds of detention admissions for 10- to 12-year-olds in 2019, the report said.
Still, the bill that would end detention for that age group has faced opposition from people who say social services that could be used as alternatives are strained or unsuitable for some children.
Law enforcement doesn't "overutilize" its ability to detain children, and taking the option off the table could put other children in the community in danger, Kaitschuk of the sheriff's association said in an interview.
"I'm not pleading with you to say I want to lock up all these kids. I don't," Kaitschuk said. "I want services available to them."
The Senate passed the bill 33-17 with two Republicans voting in favor and a handful of lawmakers sitting it out. If it's brought to a roll call in the House, it likely will follow a vote that saw moderate Democrats defeating a measure related to resentencing reform last week.
During the Senate floor debate, Republican state Sen. Steve McClure of Litchfield said he feared the detention bill would result in more kids diverted into DCFS, which "could be more detrimental than a few hours of detention."
While DCFS can be a possible placement for juveniles diverted from detention in cases of abuse or neglect, there are other alternatives depending on the child's situation and the severity of the alleged crime.
Those could include sending the child back home or to a relative's house to cool off, Elizabeth Clarke of the Juvenile Justice Initiative said. Others are referred to counseling or crisis and mental health services.
The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Robert Peters of Chicago, directs probation and court services to share any instances where alternatives "failed or were lacking."
In rural Clinton County, even crisis services can take a long time to arrive, Stalnaker said. Her assessment is in line with the Juvenile Justice Commission's 2021 report, which found gaps in emergency placements for kids outside of Cook County.
Still, Stalnaker said she is backing the bill as it provides a path to support those services as an alternative to detention.
Along with another Senate bill passed this year to create a reform task force within the Juvenile Justice Commission, Clarke said the legislation creates an opportunity to "frontload the system" with alternatives to detention that could keep kids from repeatedly committing crimes into adulthood.
Chicago has seen a smattering of very young kids accused of violent crimes, with several cases seared into the city's memory.
In 1994, Robert "Yummy" Sandifer was a 4-foot-6-inches tall 11-year-old on the run after allegedly killing his 14-year-old neighbor when he was killed by two fellow gang members, who themselves were only 14 and 16.
Just a few years later, police wrongly accused two boys, ages 7 and 8, of killing 11-year-old Ryan Harris before the charges were dropped. Since they were too young to be placed in detention at the time they were accused, the boys spent three days in a hospital before being sent home with custom-fitted monitoring bracelets. One of the boys exonerated in that case, Romarr Gipson, was later sentenced to 52 years in prison for a 2006 double shooting when he was 21.
Those cases, while memorable, are rare. According to the 2021 report from the Juvenile Justice Commission, the most common charge against preteens locked up from 2017 to 2020 was aggravated battery - also a violent crime, but a broad charge that covers a range of alleged actions.
In total, there were 77 admissions of children ages 10-12 placed in detention last year, including only one instance of a 10-year-old and 12 instances involving 11-year-olds, according to the Juvenile Justice Commission. Cook County saw 20 instances total, all but one involving a 12-year-old.
"I've been to the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center so many times I couldn't even count," Keenan-Devlin added. "The image of my 10-year-old in that facility should shock the conscience."
As someone with experience in the the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center, Eric Anderson is in favor of raising the limit on who can be put there.
At 15, heopened fire trying to hit a gang rival and instead shot two 13-year-old girls in a double murder that made headlines in the mid-1990s. He was charged as an adult and sentenced to life in prison.
He spent months at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center before he was sentenced as an adult. His earliest experiences with detention "set the stage for what is a lifelong battle" in building relationships and finding acceptance with others, he said.
Now in his 40s, Anderson, released in 2023 after being resentenced, works at Precious Blood Ministry of Reconciliation on the South Side.
"Children need the safety of caregivers who are trusted," Anderson said. "To cry to, or to express their hurts or their fears to. And in a detention center, there is none of that. Not for children or for anybody else."
The bill would not change any policies for people detained at 15, as Anderson was. But he said he supports limiting the possibilities for younger kids.
"To do that to an 11-year-old or a 12-year-old is fundamentally harmful," he said.
Peters, the bill's sponsor, said part of his backing of the bill comes from his own personal experience as a kid who "acted out."
"I was very lucky," he said, "and I don't think we should have luck play such an active role."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting
Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting

Chicago Tribune

time27 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting

Hours before the 104th Illinois General Assembly adjourned its initial session May 31 by law, the State Senate voted 32-22 for legislation creating the Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA) to help avoid a $771 million fiscal cliff facing public transportation in northeastern Illinois. With little time remaining in the session, the Illinois House of Representatives was unable to consider the Senate-amended version of the bill, postponing a final vote and elimination of the fiscal cliff until the legislature's veto session in October. Along with helping public transportation keep running in Chicagoland at its current level without reducing service or cutting jobs, the NITA bill provides for a variety of improvements to meet the needs of at least the next two decades. When the coronavirus pandemic shuttered much of the economy in March 2020, state Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said federal funding helped offset the nosedive in revenue to public transportation. When the money runs out at the end of the year, Johnson said Metra, Pace, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), and the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) will be $771 million short of what they need to operate, leading to decreased service and jobs. State Sen. Ram Vallivalam, D-Chicago, chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said keeping public transportation as it is is insufficient for the needs. As he and others went to work on the bill, it became a $1.5 billion package taking the public transit two decades into the future. 'We have a robust public transportation system that moves one million people every day,' Vallivalam said. 'Every dollar we spend on public transportation brings $13 to the local economy. This is a huge undertaking. This is something we have to do.' 'It has to be accessible, equitable, safe, reliable, and affordable,' added Johnson. Johnson, Vallivalam, state Sen. Mary Edly-Allen, D-Libertyville, and Lake County Board Chair Sandy Hart, D-Lake Bluff, presented their ideas on the future of public transportation in the Chicago area at a town hall on Monday in Vernon Hills to gather ideas and urge support. With $200 million earmarked for downstate Illinois, Vallivalam said the rest of the money will be spent on public transportation in Chicago, suburban Cook County, and collar counties Lake, McHenry, DuPage, Kane, and Will counties. Governance of NITA will consist of a 20-person board with five people from collar counties, five from suburban Cook County, five from Chicago, and five from the state. Vallivalam said it is structured to avoid dominance of any area. The current organizations will remain. Part of the funding package includes a $1.50 home delivery fee for goods purchased online and delivered to an individual's home. Vallivalam said legislation must include revenue sources, but he and his colleagues are open to suggestions from state House members. Finding ways to better coordinate bus and train schedules in Lake County is important. Vallivalam said waiting a long time is not helpful to people getting to and from work, especially when traveling between distant suburbs and the city. 'We don't want the last Pace bus to arrive at the Metra station after the last train has left for Chicago,' Vallivalam said. Some things that changed during the pandemic have remained because of the way people work. Vallivalam said Metra ridership has returned midweek but not on Mondays and Fridays. Working remotely on Mondays and Fridays is becoming the norm for some. Not everyone can use an automobile to travel where they need or want to go. Johnson said public transportation is an economic necessity for some, and they need to be accommodated by public transit. All four public officials urged people at the town hall to talk to their state representative and let them know their ideas about public transportation. When they return to Springfield, they want to be in a position to send the bill to Gov. J.B. Pritzker's desk. Vallivalam said he is confident. 'I do believe we're 99% there,' Vallivalam said. 'We have done the heavy negotiating. You need to inform your (state representatives) now because the opponents of this bill are doing that. We don't want to go off the cliff.'

Arizona school funding ruled unconstitutional by state judge
Arizona school funding ruled unconstitutional by state judge

Axios

time27 minutes ago

  • Axios

Arizona school funding ruled unconstitutional by state judge

Arizona's system for funding K-12 facilities violates the state constitution because it doesn't provide for some school districts' minimum needs, a judge said Wednesday in what could be a landmark ruling. Why it matters: If the ruling withstands a planned appeal, the Arizona Legislature will have to provide substantial new funding for school facilities and other capital needs at some point in the future. The big picture: Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Dewain Fox ruled in a major lawsuit that the funding system violates the Arizona Constitution's requirement that the state establish "a general and uniform public school system." Yes, but: The ruling isn't likely to be the final word. Senate President Warren Petersen, who intervened as a defendant, will appeal, a Senate spokesperson told Axios. Attorney Danny Adelman of the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, who led the case for the plaintiffs, said it'll likely be several years before the matter is fully resolved. Flashback: In 1994, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled in Roosevelt vs. Bishop that Arizona's system for funding capital needs — including buildings, buses, technology and books — violated the state constitution's requirement that there be a "general and uniform" school system. Because districts relied on taxes based on property value, the system left districts in less wealthy areas short on funding. To comply with that ruling, the Legislature created the Students FIRST program, which added building renewal grants and funding for new school construction and for districts that exhausted other resources. A group of school districts and education organizations sued the state in 2017, arguing that it hadn't met its obligations from the Roosevelt vs. Bishop ruling. The case finally went to trial in May 2024. Zoom in: On paper, Students FIRST rectified the funding disparities, Fox wrote in his ruling. But in reality, the state hasn't provided sufficient funding for school facilities. Districts can obtain additional funding through bonds and budget overrides, but those are at voters' whims. As a result, many schools are forced to operate with deficient facilities for months or years while they await funding. Adelman told Axios that districts have lost between $6 billion and $7 billion over the past 25 years or so. Between the lines: While disparities in districts' ability to raise money through voter-approved bonds and overrides aren't unconstitutional, inadequate funding leaves some unable to meet their needs without them. "In short, Arizona has returned to a system that forces districts to rely largely on local property taxation to fund their capital needs, and as such, property value is crucial to a district's ability to fund its schools," Fox wrote, comparing it to the system that the Arizona Supreme Court struck down in the original Roosevelt case.

US treasury sanctions 'brutally violent' cartel for timeshare fraud in tourist hotspot, warns Americans
US treasury sanctions 'brutally violent' cartel for timeshare fraud in tourist hotspot, warns Americans

Fox News

time40 minutes ago

  • Fox News

US treasury sanctions 'brutally violent' cartel for timeshare fraud in tourist hotspot, warns Americans

FIRST ON FOX: The Treasury Department sanctioned a network of individuals linked to a "brutally violent" cartel for hundreds of millions of dollars of timeshare fraud targeting Americans in popular tourist destination Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, Fox News Digital has learned. The Treasury Department is now warning current U.S.-based owners of timeshares and those considering the purchase of a Mexico-based timeshare, to conduct "appropriate due diligence." Officials warn that the scams often target older Americans who can lose their life savings. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control imposed sanctions on four Mexican individuals and 13 Mexican companies linked to timeshare fraud led by the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). The individuals linked to the fraud are based in or near Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. "We are coming for terrorist drug cartels like Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion that are flooding our country with fentanyl," Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement. "These cartels continue to create new ways to generate revenue to fuel their terrorist operations. At President Trump's direction, we will continue our effort to completely eradicate the cartels' ability to generate revenue, including their efforts to prey on elderly Americans through timeshare fraud." The three senior CJNG members most involved in timeshare fraud sanctioned Wednesday are Julio Cesar Montero Pinzon (Montero), Carlos Andres Rivera Varela (Rivera) and Francisco Javier Gudino Haro (Gudino). Additionally, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, native Michael Ibarra Diaz Jr. (Ibarra) was sanctioned. Treasury says Ibarra is "engaged in timeshare fraud on behalf of CJNG." The companies sanctioned are Akali Realtors, Centro Mediador De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Integral De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Costa Norte, S.A. de C.V., and Sunmex Travel, S. de R.L. De C.V. They "explicitly acknowledge their involvement in the timeshare industry." Another company involved in timeshare-related transactions that was sanctioned is TTR Go, S.A. de C.V. They claim only to be a travel agency. Three additional companies were sanctioned for their alleged real estate activities: Inmobiliaria Integral Del Puerto, S.A. de C.V., KVY Bucerias, S.A. de C.V., and Servicios Inmobiliarios Ibadi, S.A. de C.V. "This diverse corporate network also includes tour operators (Fishing Are Us, S. De R.L. de C.V.; Santamaria Cruise, S. de R.L. de C.V.), an automotive service company (Laminado Profesional Automotriz Elte, S.A. de C.V.), and an accounting firm (Consultorias Profesionales Almida, S.A. de C.V.). Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion is a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization. Officials said the cartel is increasingly supplementing its drug trafficking proceeds with alternative revenue streams like timeshare fraud and fuel theft. "Treasury has taken a series of actions targeting the diverse revenue streams benefitting the cartels, including fuel theft, human smuggling, extortion, and fraud," the Treasury Department said. "As Treasury and its partners seek to disrupt the cartels' revenue streams, it is important to remind current owners of timeshares in Mexico: If an unsolicited purchase or rental offer seems too good to be true, it probably is." Treasury added: "Those considering the purchase of a timeshare in Mexico should conduct appropriate due diligence." Officials said Mexico-based cartels have been targeting U.S. owners of timeshares through call centers in Mexico staffed by telemarketers in fluent English. Officials said that beginning in 2012, CJNG took control of timeshare fraud schemes in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico, and the surrounding area. The scams often target older Americans "who can lose" their life savings, officials warned, adding that the lifecycle of the scams can "last years, resulting in financial and emotional devastation of the victims while enriching cartels like CJNG." Officials said the cartels typically obtain information about U.S. owners of timeshares in Mexico from "complicit insiders at timeshare resorts." "After obtaining information on timeshare owners, the cartels, through their call centers, contact victims by phone or email and claim to be U.S.-based third-party timeshare brokers, attorneys, or sales representatives in the timeshare, travel, real estate, or financial services industries," the Treasury Department said. Officials explained that the fraud may include timeshare exit scams, or resale scams, timeshare re-rent scams, and timeshare investment scams. "The common theme is that victims are asked to pay advance 'fees' and 'taxes' before receiving money supposedly owed to them," officials warned. "This money never comes, and the victims are continuously told to send these 'fees' and 'taxes' via international wire transfers to accounts held at Mexican banks and brokerage houses." After initial scams, officials warn that "re-victimization scams can occur." In July 2024, Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and the FBI issued a joint-notice on the timeshare fraud associated with Mexico-based cartels and criminal organizations. In the six-month period following that notice, FinCEN received more than 250 suspicious activity reports, and filers reported approximately 1,300 transactions totaling $23.1 million, sent primarily from U.S. based individuals to counterparties in Mexico. Based on FinCEN's analysis, U.S. fraud victims sent an average of $28,912 and a median amount of $10,000 per transaction to the suspected scammers since July 2024. The FBI says approximately 6,000 U.S. victims reported losing nearly $300 million between 2019 and 2023 to timeshare fraud schemes in Mexico. But officials said that figure "likely underestimates total losses, as the FBI believes the vast majority of victims not report the scam due to embarrassment, among other reasons."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store