&w=3840&q=100)
Remarks against Col Sofiya Qureshi: SC raps MP minister over public apology
A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said the conduct of the minister was making the court doubt his intentions and bonafide.
Senior advocate K Parmeshwar, appearing for Shah, said he had issued a public apology, which was online, and would be placed on court's record.
The bench asked the special investigation team (SIT) constituted to probe the statements made by the minister to submit its report by August 13.
The top court noted 87 people were examined by the probe team, which was currently examining the statements.
The bench also refused to examine a plea filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur seeking Shah's resignation but said some of the allegations made in the writ petition about the past instances would be looked into by the three-member SIT.
The top court posted the hearing for August 18.
The SIT constituted by the Madhya Pradesh government was in compliance with the top court's order.
On May 19, the top court chided Shah and constituted the SIT to probe the FIR lodged against him.
Shah came under fire after a video, which was circulated widely, showed him allegedly making objectionable remarks against Col Qureshi, who gained nationwide prominence along with another woman officer, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, during the media briefings on Operation Sindoor.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court rebuked Shah for passing "scurrilous" remarks and using "language of the gutters" against Col Qureshi, and ordered police to file an FIR against him on the charge of promoting enmity and hatred.
After drawing severe condemnation, Shah expressed regret and said that he respects Col Qureshi more than his sister.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
When US armed Pakistan: Indian Army's throwback post after Trump's India funding Russia's war charge
At a time when US President Donald Trump has accused India of funding the Russian war on Ukraine, the Indian Army has shared newspaper clippings from 1971 with reports of US assistance to Pakistan ahead of the war in India. The United States sided with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan War of 1971. read more A US Navy SH-60 helicopter hovers off the bow of the USS Enterprise July 20, 1998, during a training exercise near Puerto Rico. The United States had deployed USS Enterprise and the 7th Fleet to intervene in the India-Pakistan War of 1971 on Pakistan's side. (Photo: Timothy Smith/US Navy/AFP) At a time when US President Donald Trump has accused India of funding the Russian war on Ukraine, the Indian Army has reminded the world of the US role against India in the India-Pakistan War of 1971. In a post on X, the Eastern Command of the Indian Army on Tuesday shared newspaper clippings from August 5, 1971, with reports of US military assistance to Pakistan at the time. In 1971, India and Pakistan fought a 13-day war in which India scored a decisive victory that led to the creation of the nation of Bangladesh that had until then been a part of Pakistan called East Pakistan. While the United States supported Pakistan ahead of the war —as news clippings shared by the Army show— it also supported Pakistan during the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After Pakistan attacked India, formally starting the war on December 3, 1971, the United States came to the active military support of Pakistan and dispatched the 7th Fleet of the US Navy towards Indian shores to pressure India and break the blockade of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), led by the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise. US support to Pakistan haunts India-US ties again In the Cold War, India and Pakistan were on the opposite camps. While Pakistan was aligned with the West led by the United States, India was aligned with the Soviet Union even though the country was formally non-aligned. In the India-Pakistan War of 1971, the United States and allies like the Shah of Iran helped Pakistan whereas the Soviet Union helped India. The US military intervention against India in 1971 tainted the India-US ties for decades and turned the public opinion in India against the United States for generations. Once India detected the US military movement, India reached out to the Soviet Union for help. The Soviet Union dispatched its own warships and submarines that shadowed and encircled US warships, forcing them to halt their mission and preventing any armed confrontation.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
UP says Banke Bihari Temple ordinance for better administration
The Uttar Pradesh government informed the Supreme Court on Tuesday that its objective for enacting an ordinance for Banke Bihari Temple trust was aimed at better administration of the religious place at Vrindavan in Mathura. On August 4, the top court said it would keep in abeyance its May 15 nod to the ambitious scheme to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor at Vrindavan in Mathura for the benefit of devotees as key stakeholders were not heard. Appearing before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj said the 2025 ordinance had nothing to do with the pending litigation of ownership of the temple administration. "Let me clarify at the outset that the ordinance has nothing to do with the pending writ petition. There was a PIL filed for better administration of the temple before the high court and directions were passed," Nataraj said. He said the ordinance was issued for better administration of the temple which witnesses about two-three lakh devotees every week. The bench then told Nataraj that his arguments might be good, but could be made when the challenge to the ordinance is relegated to the high court. Nataraj handed over the proposal of the state government to the bench, which upon examination was found to be the same as suggested by the court on August 4. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioners, urged the bench to be allowed to give a proposal and suggestions on the issue of administration of temple by August 8. The petitioners have challenged the validity of Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, for reportedly taking over the management of the ancient temple and the recall of the top court's May 15 order. On May 15, the top court allowed an impleadment application filed by the state while paving the way for a Uttar Pradesh government scheme to develop the corridor. It allowed the state's plea to utilise the funds of the Banke Bihari temple only for the purchase of a five-acre land around the temple to create a holding area. The top court, however, said the land to be acquired for the purposes of development of the temple and the corridor should be in the name of the deity or the trust. The bench posted the matter for August 8 while allowing the petitioners to give their suggestions on the issue. On August 4, the bench deprecated the approach of the state government in moving the court in "clandestine manner" and questioned the hurry for enacting an ordinance. The top court has said that it would appoint an interim committee headed by a retired high court or district judge to manage the affairs of the temple in the interest of lakhs of devotees besides including the main stakeholders in the managing committee. It asked Nataraj to seek instruction and submit a proposal for administration of the temple and clarified that the court was at present not adjudicating the constitutionality of the ordinance and the high court will look into it. The plea before the bench, filed through advocate Tanvi Dubey, of the management committee of the Thakur Shree Banke Bihari Ji Maharaj Temple in Mathura, challenges the ordinance, which vested the control of the shrine's administration with the state.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Judges can't decide who's a true Indian': Priyanka after SC slams Rahul
Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday came out strongly in support of her brother Rahul Gandhi, a day after the Supreme Court criticised him over his past remarks on the Indian Army. The top court had questioned his statement made during the 'Bharat Jodo Yatra' in December 2022, where he claimed that China had occupied 2,000 square kilometres of Indian land. Priyanka Gandhi, speaking to journalists at the Parliament complex, said, 'With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the Opposition leader to ask questions and challenge the government.' She said, her brother would never speak against the Army. 'He holds the Army in the highest respect. So it is a misinterpretation (of his remarks),' she added. As the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi's role is to question the government, she said, adding that this responsibility should not be mistaken for disrespect. SC pulls up Rahul Gandhi During a press conference in December 2022, Rahul Gandhi said, 'Before I came to this press conference, I was having lunch with my friend and said I can bet that the media will not ask any question about China. They will ask about yatra, Sachin Pilot, Ashok Gehlot, everything but not China who captured 2,000 square km area of India, who martyred 20 jawans, who is thrashing our jawans in Arunachal. But the Indian press will not ask anything about this on me. Brother, desh dekh rahe hai. Don't think the country is not seeing.' Congress hits back with 'DDLJ' jibe Soon after the court's remarks, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh criticised the Modi government, accusing it of avoiding serious questions about the China border issue. In a post on X, he said the government has followed a 'DDLJ' approach — 'deny, distract, lie, and justify'. He noted that since 20 Indian soldiers were killed in the Galwan Valley clash in June 2020, the government has failed to give clear answers to the nation. In response, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) responded by accusing Rahul Gandhi of trying to 'strengthen China', while the Congress said it is only raising questions that matter to every patriotic Indian. [With agency inputs]
