logo
Where is the center of the universe? The surprising physics behind an expanding cosmos

Where is the center of the universe? The surprising physics behind an expanding cosmos

Hans India15-06-2025
For centuries, the question 'Where is the center of the universe?' has mystified both scientists and laypeople alike. Thanks to breakthroughs in physics, particularly Einstein's general theory of relativity, we now understand that the universe has no center—at least, not in the way we intuitively think about it.
Initially, Einstein's theory, published in 1915, described a static universe—unchanging and eternal. But as astronomers peered deeper into space using powerful telescopes, they discovered something remarkable: the universe is expanding. This realization didn't contradict Einstein's equations—it expanded their interpretation. The cosmos isn't fixed; it's dynamic, constantly evolving.
This expansion isn't like an explosion from a single point. Instead, galaxies aren't moving through space away from a center—they're being carried apart as space itself stretches. Picture dots on the surface of a balloon: as the balloon inflates, the dots grow farther apart, not because they're moving, but because the surface between them is growing. But unlike a balloon, the universe isn't expanding into anything, nor does it have an 'inside.' The balloon's surface represents our entire universe, and like it, there is no central point.
This expansion occurs in all directions, simultaneously. That means any point in the universe can appear to be the "center" from a local perspective—because every observer sees galaxies receding away.
Complicating matters further is that our universe is four-dimensional, made of space-time—an interwoven fabric of space and time. While we can visualize three dimensions easily, grasping four-dimensional space-time stretches our imagination. Yet, this framework is crucial to understanding why there is no fixed center and why everything appears to be moving apart.
In short, the universe doesn't have a center—not because it's hiding it, but because the concept of a center simply doesn't apply. Instead, every galaxy is part of an ever-stretching cosmic fabric. And while we still don't fully understand what powers this expansion—dark energy being a leading suspect—it's clear that our universe is far stranger, and more beautiful, than everyday intuition might suggest.
📚 Adapted from an original article by Rob Coyne, Teaching Professor of Physics at the University of Rhode Island. Republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought
Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

Economic Times

timea day ago

  • Economic Times

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

The universe may not be heading for an eternal stretch into emptiness, as once assumed. According to new findings from two of the largest astronomical surveys — the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) — the mysterious force known as dark energy could be changing. That shift, if real, has serious consequences. Instead of expanding forever, the universe might one day contract. Scientists now believe a complete reversal could start within 10 billion years, ending in a collapse known as the Big Crunch. These conclusions come from a new theoretical study, currently in preprint and awaiting peer review, that presents a bold reinterpretation of how cosmic forces years, physicists assumed dark energy was steady and uniform, based on a simple number called the cosmological constant in Einstein's general relativity. But the latest analysis challenges that view. The study, reported by introduces two components behind dark energy: the cosmological constant and a particle known as the axion. Axions are hypothetical ultralight particles that rarely interact with matter. Yet, they could fill the universe and account for much of its current accelerated expansion. The cosmological constant, by contrast, is a fixed energy value in empty space. But in this model, it's not positive. It's team behind the research explained their reasoning clearly. 'We are living in a temporary period of accelerated expansion,' they wrote. 'It is heavily driven by the axion field.'Right now, axions are doing most of the work in keeping the universe expanding. But over time, these particles are expected to lose their influence. Once they fade, the negative cosmological constant will begin to dominate. This shift would decelerate the universe's expansion could not only stop but happens next? According to the model, gravity would begin to pull everything back in. Galaxies would start to draw closer, merge, and collapse into each other. Temperatures would rise. Space would grow smaller, hotter, and the final act, all matter and energy would compress into a single point — a singularity. This collapse, termed the Big Crunch, is effectively the reverse of the Big Bang. The study predicts the beginning of this reversal could occur in 10 billion years. The contraction would then take another 10 billion years to complete. The full lifespan of the universe, under this model, would be about 33.3 billion already 13.8 billion years into that DES and DESI surveys have mapped millions of galaxies to measure how the universe expands over time. These surveys are central to modern cosmology, offering one of the most detailed views of the universe's large-scale recently, all observations supported the idea that dark energy was constant. But the new data show signs that it might be insight gave rise to the axion-dark energy model, or aDE, a theoretical framework that incorporates both axions and a changing cosmological explained by 'One of the most striking findings in the new study is the possibility that the cosmological constant — which reflects the energy density of space itself — may be negative.'The study's authors are careful not to overstate their findings. The model, while compelling, is still under review and not confirmed.'These are preliminary findings,' the researchers acknowledged. They stress that deeper space surveys and next-generation telescopes will be crucial for testing whether dark energy really does evolve with the idea is already sparking serious debate among physicists. If it holds, it would force scientists to rethink the universe's timeline — and its theories go further. They suggest the Big Crunch might not be the absolute that final singularity could trigger another Big Bang. A fresh cycle. A new universe. Though these ideas remain speculative, they reflect just how much we still don't understand about the nature of now, the only certainty is that the universe might be less predictable than once believed. As astronomers dig deeper into the skies, the answers we get may continue to surprise us.

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought
Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

What the new model proposes Live Events Big Crunch: The opposite of the Big Bang The evidence behind the claim Still just a theory, for now (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The universe may not be heading for an eternal stretch into emptiness, as once assumed. According to new findings from two of the largest astronomical surveys — the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) — the mysterious force known as dark energy could be shift, if real, has serious consequences. Instead of expanding forever, the universe might one day contract. Scientists now believe a complete reversal could start within 10 billion years, ending in a collapse known as the Big Crunch These conclusions come from a new theoretical study, currently in preprint and awaiting peer review, that presents a bold reinterpretation of how cosmic forces years, physicists assumed dark energy was steady and uniform, based on a simple number called the cosmological constant in Einstein's general relativity. But the latest analysis challenges that study, reported by introduces two components behind dark energy: the cosmological constant and a particle known as the axion. Axions are hypothetical ultralight particles that rarely interact with matter. Yet, they could fill the universe and account for much of its current accelerated cosmological constant, by contrast, is a fixed energy value in empty space. But in this model, it's not positive. It's team behind the research explained their reasoning clearly. 'We are living in a temporary period of accelerated expansion,' they wrote. 'It is heavily driven by the axion field.'Right now, axions are doing most of the work in keeping the universe expanding. But over time, these particles are expected to lose their influence. Once they fade, the negative cosmological constant will begin to dominate. This shift would decelerate the universe's expansion could not only stop but happens next? According to the model, gravity would begin to pull everything back in. Galaxies would start to draw closer, merge, and collapse into each other. Temperatures would rise. Space would grow smaller, hotter, and the final act, all matter and energy would compress into a single point — a collapse, termed the Big Crunch, is effectively the reverse of the Big Bang The study predicts the beginning of this reversal could occur in 10 billion years. The contraction would then take another 10 billion years to complete. The full lifespan of the universe, under this model, would be about 33.3 billion already 13.8 billion years into that DES and DESI surveys have mapped millions of galaxies to measure how the universe expands over time. These surveys are central to modern cosmology, offering one of the most detailed views of the universe's large-scale recently, all observations supported the idea that dark energy was constant. But the new data show signs that it might be insight gave rise to the axion-dark energy model, or aDE, a theoretical framework that incorporates both axions and a changing cosmological explained by 'One of the most striking findings in the new study is the possibility that the cosmological constant — which reflects the energy density of space itself — may be negative.'The study's authors are careful not to overstate their findings. The model, while compelling, is still under review and not confirmed.'These are preliminary findings,' the researchers acknowledged. They stress that deeper space surveys and next-generation telescopes will be crucial for testing whether dark energy really does evolve with the idea is already sparking serious debate among physicists. If it holds, it would force scientists to rethink the universe's timeline — and its theories go further. They suggest the Big Crunch might not be the absolute that final singularity could trigger another Big Bang. A fresh cycle. A new universe. Though these ideas remain speculative, they reflect just how much we still don't understand about the nature of now, the only certainty is that the universe might be less predictable than once believed. As astronomers dig deeper into the skies, the answers we get may continue to surprise us.

Could copper in your diet help prevent memory loss, as new study suggests?
Could copper in your diet help prevent memory loss, as new study suggests?

News18

time2 days ago

  • News18

Could copper in your diet help prevent memory loss, as new study suggests?

Agency: PTI Loughborough (UK), Jul 27 (The Conversation) More and more research suggests that the copper in your diet could play a bigger role in brain health than we once believed. A recent study found that older Americans who ate more copper-rich foods did better on memory and concentration tests. The findings, published in Nature Scientific Reports, looked at people's diets using detailed food diaries and tested their cognitive function. Those who ate more foods that were high in copper – which include shellfish, dark chocolate and nuts – did better on tests that are used to spot early signs of age-related memory loss and dementia. But the results aren't straightforward. People who ate more copper-rich foods were mostly male, white, married and had higher incomes. They were also less likely to smoke or have high blood pressure or diabetes – all factors linked to a lower risk of dementia. People who consumed more copper also had more zinc, iron and selenium in their diets, and consumed more calories overall. People with higher incomes often have better access to healthy food, medical care, cleaner environments and more education – all of which help protect against memory loss and dementia. It's hard to separate the effects of diet from these other advantages, although some research we reviewed suggests that improving nutrition might be especially helpful for people from less privileged backgrounds. What other research tells us The current study's limitations are notable. It captured brain function at only one point in time and relied on participants' food diaries rather than blood measurements of copper levels. However, long-term studies support the idea that copper might matter for brain health. One study that tracked people over time found that those who had less copper in their diet showed more pronounced declines in memory and thinking. More intriguingly, when researchers measured copper levels directly in brain tissue, they discovered that higher concentrations were associated with slower mental deterioration and fewer of the toxic amyloid plaques characteristic of Alzheimer's disease. Curiously, brain copper levels bore little relationship to dietary intake, suggesting the body's processing of this mineral is more complex than simple consumption patterns might indicate. There's a good biological explanation for why copper might help protect the brain. This essential metal plays several important roles: it helps prevent brain cell damage via antioxidant effects, with production of the chemicals (neurotransmitters) that let brain cells talk to each other, and helps the brain produce energy, by working via particular enzymes. Copper deficiency is thought to be relatively uncommon, but it can cause noticeable problems. If someone feels tired and weak and has anaemia that doesn't improve with iron or vitamin B12 supplements, low copper might be to blame. Other signs can include getting sick more often, losing bone strength, and nerve damage that gets worse over time. Copper is naturally found in high amounts in foods like beef, offal, shellfish, nuts, seeds and mushrooms. It's also added to some cereals and found in whole grains and dark chocolate. People who have had gastric bypass surgery for obesity or have bowel disorders may have trouble absorbing copper – and these conditions themselves could be linked to a higher risk of dementia. It's best to be cautious about taking copper supplements without careful thought. They body needs a delicate balance of essential minerals – too much iron or zinc can lower copper levels, while too much copper or iron can cause oxidative stress, which may speed up damage to brain cells. Studies examining mineral supplements in people already diagnosed with Alzheimer's have shown little benefit. Paradoxically, people with Alzheimer's often have higher copper levels in their blood, but key brain areas like the hippocampus – which is vital for memory – often show lower copper levels. This suggests that Alzheimer's disrupts how the body handles copper, causing it to get trapped in the amyloid plaques that are a hallmark of the disease. Some researchers suggested that after Alzheimer's develops, eating less copper and iron and more omega-3 fats from fish and nuts might help, while saturated fats seem to make things worse. However, a lack of copper could actually increase plaque build-up before dementia shows up, highlighting the need for balanced nutrition throughout life. There seems to be an optimal range of copper for brain function – recent studies suggest 1.22 to 1.65 milligrams a day provides copper's cognitive benefits without causing harm. This mirrors a broader principle in medicine: for many biological systems, including thyroid hormones, both deficiency and excess can impair brain function. The human body typically manages these intricate chemical balances with remarkable precision. But disease and ageing can disrupt this equilibrium, potentially setting the stage for cognitive decline years before symptoms emerge. As researchers continue to unravel the relationship between nutrition and brain health, copper's role serves as a reminder that the path to healthy ageing may be paved with the careful choices we make at every meal. (The Conversation) NSA NSA First Published: July 27, 2025, 08:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store