
US pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs
Through June, U.S. drugmakers have signed 14 deals potentially worth $18.3 billion to license drugs from China-based companies. That compares with just two such deals in the year-earlier period, according to data from GlobalData provided exclusively to Reuters.
That increased pace is expected to continue as U.S. drugmakers look to rebuild pipelines of future products to replace $200 billion worth of medicines that will lose patent protection by the end of the decade, analysts, investors, a banker and a drug company executive told Reuters.
"They are finding very high-quality assets coming out of China and at prices that are much more affordable relative to perhaps the equivalent type of product that they might find in the United States," said Mizuho analyst Graig Suvannavejh.
The total cost of licensing agreements, including low upfront payments and subsequent larger payouts, averaged $84.8 billion in the U.S., compared with $31.3 billion in China over the past five years, according to GlobalData.
A licensing agreement grants a company the rights to develop, manufacture, and commercialize another company's pharmaceutical products or technologies in exchange for future target-based, or "milestone", payments while mitigating development risks.
China's share of global drug development is now nearly 30%, while the U.S. share of the world's research and development has slipped 1% to about 48%, according to pharmaceutical data provider Citeline's report in March.
Chinese companies have licensed experimental drugs to U.S. drugmakers that could be used for obesity, heart disease and cancer, reflecting abundant Chinese government investment in pharmaceutical and biotech research and development.
While small molecules, like oral drugs, have been the most commonly licensed, there has been a notable shift toward novel treatments such as targeted cancer therapies and first-in-class medicines, Jefferies analysts said in a note in May.
"Chinese biotechs are moving up the value chain by the day. They are... challenging their Western peers," said Macquarie Capital analyst Tony Ren.
The growth is happening even as the U.S. and China have wrangled over tariffs and U.S. President Donald Trump pushes a made in America agenda.
That has cut into traditional mergers and acquisitions, which are down 20%, with only 50 such transactions so far this year, according to data from DealForma.com database.
Roughly a third of the assets that large pharmaceutical companies licensed in 2024 were from China, said Brian Gleason, head of biotech investment banking at Raymond James, who estimated such licensing deals would increase to between 40% and 50%.
"I think it's only accelerating," Gleason said.
The Trump administration is currently doing a national security investigation as it weighs if it will impose tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector.
But one healthcare analyst said licensing deals should continue because the yet to be marketed products are not impacted by tariffs.
"The law that gives the president the right to impose tariffs applies to goods. It explicitly excludes intellectual property," said Tim Opler, managing director in Stifel's global healthcare group.
In May, Pfizer spent $1.25 billion upfront for the right to license an experimental cancer drug from China's 3SBio . That is the largest such deal this year and could be worth up to $6 billion in payments to 3SBio if the drug is successful.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in June paid $80 million upfront in a potential $2 billion deal for an experimental obesity drug from China's Hansoh Pharmaceuticals.
'WAKEUP CALL'
By licensing a drug in development, U.S. and European drugmakers get very quick access to a molecule which would take them longer and cost more to discover or design themselves, analysts say.
U.S.-based drug developer Nuvation Bio bought AnHeart Therapeutics in 2024, gaining access to the China-based company's experimental cancer drug taletrectinib, which received U.S. approval last week.
"We consider our presence in China not only a great avenue for R&D, but we also view it as an inside track on obtaining further assets to grow our company further and find new and better therapies to offer patients," Nuvation CEO David Hung told Reuters.
What makes China attractive, said EY analyst Arda Ural, "a fraction of the cost and then multiples of time."
Analysts have pointed to large drugmakers strategically securing rights to drugs at lower cost and running efficient early-stage trials in China to obtain important data, paving the way for global trials and potential earlier market entry.
"It's a little bit of a wakeup call to our industry," said Chen Yu, Managing Partner at U.S.-based healthcare investment firm TCGX.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
38 minutes ago
- The Star
These kinds of social media videos are most likely to convert shoppers
As for product recommendations, a higher proportion of respondents – 66% – say they trust those made by everyday social media users. — Pixabay Social media is becoming increasingly integrated into American shopping habits. And not just because many of the major platforms now have dedicated e-commerce features. According to a recently published survey by marketing platform Omnisend, consumers lean on social media in several ways as they make purchase decisions. More than half of the 2,000-plus social media users surveyed by Ominsend admit that content on platforms like TikTok and Instagram have directly inspired them to buy something. If a product or category is trending online, 45% say they're more likely to purchase, per the survey. Only about 13% link their choice to buy with 'specific TikTok content types,' however. Still, Pija Ona Indriunaite, Omnisend's director of brand, said in the London-based company's press release that 'repeatedly seeing certain products on the platform primes consumers to notice and trust these items elsewhere.' This makes 'TikTok an important starting point' for businesses, she added, 'even if it doesn't always get credit for the sale.' Shoppers also use social media to research products. When asked how they determine whether 'an item is worth buying,' 70% of respondents point to social media content. Users rank verified reviews as their most trusted source of information on these platforms, followed by other users' comments. As for product recommendations, a higher proportion of respondents – 66% – say they trust those made by everyday social media users. Fewer have confidence in the endorsements celebrities and influencers make – 38% and 49%, respectively. This is perhaps because public figures often get paid by brands to promote products. Wondering how your business can create social media content that consumers will trust? By analysing the 25 highest-selling products of 2024 across several Amazon categories along with the TikTok videos that featured them, Omnisend found that 10 to 15 second-long videos 'filmed as informal, first-person recommendations consistently outperform other formats.' – Inc./Tribune News Service


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
U-Blox says in talks about takeover by Advent
FILE PHOTO: A freeway intersection is seen in Pasadena, near Los Angeles, California, U.S., April 20, 2020. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo (Reuters) -Switzerland's U-Blox Holding, a maker of microchips and software for car navigation, said on Friday it was in talks with Advent International about being taken over by the private equity firm. "Whether a transaction will materialise is open at this stage," the company said in a statement. Advent declined to comment. Bloomberg reported the talks earlier, adding a deal might value U-Blox at more than 1 billion Swiss francs ($1.2 billion). U-Blox shares were up 19% at 1422 GMT at a three-year high, giving it a market value of about 1 billion francs. The technology group, which went public in 2007, said last week its first-half loss before interest and tax had reduced to 7.7 million francs from a loss of 28 million a year earlier. It cited cost cuts and a 32% jump in revenues to 123.4 million francs. Earlier this year, the company sold a unit making cellular modules for wireless communication to focus on fast-growing navigation and positioning technology used in cars, robots and farm equipment. Globally, dealmaking is up year-to-date, driven by a quest for growth in corporate boardrooms, falling interest rates in many countries, and the impact of a surge in AI activity. ($1 = 0.8048 Swiss francs) (Reporting by Ludwig Burger and Emma-Victoria Farr in Frankfurt. Editing by Rachel More and Mark Potter)


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Democrats decry move by Pentagon to pause $800 million in nearly done software projects
FILE PHOTO: The Pentagon building is seen in Arlington, Virginia, U.S. October 9, 2020. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrats took aim at the Trump administration after Reuters reported on Wednesday that the Navy and Air Force were poised to cancel nearly completed software projects worth over $800 million. The reason for the move was an effort by some officials at the services to steer new projects to companies like Salesforce and Palantir, in what could amount to a costly do-over. 'The Pentagon has yet to show that it had a good reason for halting these contracts in the last inning and scrapping work American tax dollars have already paid for," Democratic Senator Tim Kaine said in a statement. "If it can't show its homework, then this announcement - just days after Palantir's CEO spoke at Mike Johnson's Wyoming donor retreat - reeks of corruption.' Punchbowl reported this month that Palantir CEO Alex Karp planned to address Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson's annual big-donor retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The Pentagon and Air Force did not respond to requests for comment. The Navy declined to comment. Trump officials have said the administration is striving to make the contracting process more efficient. The comments show growing concern among Democratic lawmakers over waste at the Pentagon, even as Donald Trump took office vowing to rid the government of waste and abuse. The website of the Department of Government Efficiency, the agency he created to spearhead those efforts, lists over $14 billion in Defense Department contracts it claims to have canceled. But seven months into his presidency, some of his own actions have complicated DOGE's work, from firing the Pentagon's inspector general to issuing an executive order prioritizing speed and risk-taking in defense acquisitions. 'If you're serious about cracking down on waste, fraud, and abuse, the last thing you'd do is cancel $800 million in projects that are nearly ready to roll out just to turn around and steer the same work to corporations of your choosing," said Democratic Representative Maggie Goodlander, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee and served as an intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve. "This maneuver is an insult to taxpayers and servicemembers across America," she added. Salud Carbajal, another House Democrat who sits on the Armed Services Committee, said the behavior was part of a pattern of waste at the Pentagon under Trump. 'I understand that our military's acquisition and procurement processes aren't flawless, but this administration has repeatedly shown a blatant disregard for the responsible use of taxpayer dollars,' said Carbajal, citing "lavish" military parades and "unnecessary" troop deployments in Los Angeles. Democratic U.S. Representative Jill Tokuda, who also sits on the committee, echoed Carbajal's remarks. "Stripping away critical oversight guardrails is unnecessary and downright reckless," she said, adding that after many delays, the Pentagon was finally poised to implement military pay systems that could pass an audit. "Taxpayers should not fund sweetheart deals for the well connected." (Reporting by Alexandra Alper; Editing by Andrea Ricci)