
CNBC's UK Exchange newsletter: Britain was once known as a ‘nation of shopkeepers.' Now, not so much
These days, he might observe that it is more a nation of administrators, insolvency practitioners and restructuring advisors.
Barely a day passes without news of another retailer going bust or closing dozens of stores.
To take a handful of headlines from the last week: advisors have been appointed to salvage part of Claire's U.K., the British arm of the global accessories chain, which has 281 outlets nationwide; Hamleys, the world famous U.K. toy retailer, has closed 29 stores after shutting 40 in 2023; and Seraphine, the maternity retailer whose customers included the Princess of Wales, has stopped trading altogether.
They are just the tip of the iceberg. Poundland, recently offloaded for just £1 by its Polish-listed former parent Pepco to the U.S. investment group Gordon Brothers, is widely expected to close dozens more stores on top of those already announced as its restructuring begins in earnest. Hobbycraft, the arts and crafts retailer, and the Original Factory Shop, a general retailer, are both closing scores of outlets following their acquisition by Modella Capital, the U.K. private equity firm currently in the process of buying the high street arm of WH Smith, the stationery retailer now best known for its outlets in airports around the world. Some of its branches are also likely to shut.
The pain is being felt most acutely in fashion retail, reflecting increased competition from online competitors like ASOS and Shein.
New Look, which has delighted generations of teenagers and 20-somethings for 55 years, is fighting for its life and earlier this year announced plans to shut 100 outlets, around a quarter of its total, when their leases expire.
The even-older River Island — which dates back to 1948 and, in the swinging 1960s, rebranded itself Chelsea Girl as it rode the mini-skirt boom — has also called in advisors to help with a possible restructuring. It currently employs some 5,500 people across more than 250 stores.
They follow a long line of well-known U.K. retailers to have closed their doors during the last decade or so — some still soldiering on as online-only brands — including Topshop, Dorothy Perkins, Ted Baker, Thorntons, Carpetright, Paperchase and Debenhams. Others, such as the Body Shop and Wilko, are under new owners, which tends to come with a vastly reduced store estate.
The retail sector is not alone in suffering. Hospitality is also afflicted with even established names like Byron Burger, Chipotle, Frankie & Benny's and Papa John's closing sites across the U.K. The most recent casualty was Ping Pong, a popular dim sum chain, which closed for good last week after 20 years in business. There may also soon be closures at Côte, a brasserie chain which once had 100 outlets, whose private equity investors are now seeking new investment.
In all, around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year, with the loss of almost 202,000 jobs, according to the Centre for Retail Research, a data provider. It estimates that, during 2024, some 13,479 stores closed, following 10,494 closures during 2023. To say the trend is accelerating is both accurate and worrying.
There are several short-term reasons for this carnage and plenty of long-term ones.
The most important of the former is the rise in employers' National Insurance Contributions (NICs), a payroll tax, introduced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in April this year. However, more damaging than the increase in the rate — which rose from 13.8% to 15% — was a drop in the threshold at which it is paid from £9,100 to £5,000. That has increased the cost of employing people and, in particular, the part-time workers crucial to retail and hospitality.
A number of employers have blamed it for both job losses and branch closures.
Among them was Bob Wigley, co-owner of Margot, a popular restaurant in London's Covent Garden recently forced to close.
Wigley, previously one of the City's best-known investment bankers, posted on LinkedIn that one of the restaurant's managers had told him: "We survived Covid but we can't survive Labour."
The government told CNBC that its tax changes were "tough but necessary," and are needed to "protect working people's payslips from higher taxes," and invest in public services.
The British Retail Consortium, the main industry body, has estimated that the hike in employers' NICs will cost the retail sector alone some £2.3 billion.
Other near-term factors include the recent rise in the minimum wage from £11.44 ($15.38) an hour to £12.21. The age at which it kicks in was also reduced from 23 to 21 — making it more expensive to hire younger workers — while the rate for 18-20-year-olds rose from £9.60 an hour to £10. Wages have also been rising more broadly, following several years of above-average earnings growth across the economy, a result of the U.K.'s tight labor market and the rise in economic inactivity since the pandemic.
But as unemployment — and with it, job insecurity — starts to rise, consumers are increasingly eating into their savings or becoming more frugal. The U.K.'s savings ratio, which spiked during the pandemic and remained high afterwards, is now falling for the first time this decade.
As Clive Black, head of consumer research at the investment bank Shore Capital and one of the City's most renowned retail-watchers, put it in a recent client note: "U.K. consumers are low on confidence, fed up with broken Britain."
Local councils have also pushed up parking charges and introduced so-called "low traffic neighborhoods," making high-street shopping tricky for those who rely on their cars, prompting many bigger operators —the likes of Next and Marks & Spencer — to shift to out-of-town retail parks.
But there are also longer-term factors. Business rates — a tax dating back 400 years levied on the "rateable value" of most non-domestic properties such as shops, offices, pubs and warehouses — hit bricks-and-mortar retailers much harder than online retailers like Amazon, which is also blamed for sucking business away from the high street.
In its election manifesto last year, the governing Labour Party promised to "level the playing field between the high street and online giants," but its solution — hitting larger properties more heavily to fund lower rates for smaller premises — has alarmed many in the sector, including supermarket multiples like Tesco, Sainsbury's and the Co-op. The government says its business rates system is designed to "protect the high street" and support investment.
Regardless, the acceleration in store closures has raised fears that this is a structural downturn, rather than just cyclical. There is some evidence for this.
In the past, when an established retailer was forced out of business, other operators stepped in to take its place. A good example is the U.K. arm of Woolworths, the much-loved variety store chain, whose 807 outlets closed — with the loss of 27,000 jobs — in late 2008 and early 2009 at the height of the financial crisis. New tenants were quickly found for many of these as rivals, such as B&M, stepped in to take the sites at a cheaper rent. Many of these, including the likes of Poundland, Poundstretcher and Original Factory Shop are now themselves struggling.
However, more recently when a store has closed, it has remained closed, which, added to the exodus to retail parks, has left many high streets with a sense of decay. When a big retail destination closes or moves out, footfall is reduced.
Accordingly, a typical British high street, which in the 1980s or 1990s boasted familiar names like Boots, Woolworths and Marks & Spencer, is more likely these days to be home to vape shops, American-style candy stores, tattoo parlors and charity shops (the latter of which benefit from significantly lower business rates).
The sense that this is a structural change also reflects a shift in retail property ownership. The big U.K. commercial property players such as Land Securities and British Land, where they have exposure to the retail sector at all, will do so largely via retail parks or shopping centers. The typical high street landlord is more likely these days to be a "mom and pop" operator unable to offer tenants better terms when they run into difficulty.
All of this sounds like a perfect storm, yet there is another, less frequently acknowledged factor at play: going into the 21st century, when Amazon began eating the lunch of the old bricks-and-mortar retailers, there were simply too many players.
Many retailers will not countenance the idea, but perhaps what we have seen over the last quarter century is simply over-capacity being taken out of the market.Britain's Rachel Reeves faces mounting pressure
Investors are looking for clues on how Reeves plans to fill a black hole in the budget as we approach the Autumn Budget, when next year's fiscal plans are announced.
UK GDP underperforms on the month — what happens now?
The U.K. economy unexpectedly shrank again in May and economists expect growth to slow in the rest of the year amid a weaker jobs market and ongoing economic uncertainty.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon tells Europe 'you're losing' on competitiveness
Jamie Dimon last week lamented Europe's lack of competitiveness in comparison to the U.S. and China. Listen in to see what he had to say, and how CNBC's anchors reacted to his comments.With an exodus of millionaires, businesses and workers, has London lost its spark? London has taken a bit of a battering lately. CNBC asked analysts whether the city is on downward trajectory, or just experiencing some bumps in the road.
The UK's budget gap is widening and markets want to know Reeves' fix. Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Mansion House is a crucial opportunity to signal the steps she will take to inject growth back into the U.K. economy.
UK economy contracts again in May, missing expectations for slight rebound. The U.K. economy unexpectedly shrank again in May, data showed Friday, failing to shake off the impact of U.S. tariffs and business uncertainty.U.K. stocks have been strong outperformers over the past week, with the FTSE 100 gaining 1.6%. The index notched a record intraday high above 9,000 points on Tuesday.
London-listed companies have been boosted by the fact that the U.K. has already negotiated a trade deal with the White House, while business in the European Union remain mired in uncertainty — and under threat of 30% U.S. duties — heading into earnings season.
Further support has come from a decline in sterling, which has dropped 1.5% against the U.S. dollar to $1.339 over the past week, as Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey suggested the central bank would be more forceful with interest rate cuts if the labor market weakens. A weaker pound can be beneficial to FTSE 100 firms, a majority of which derive their revenue overseas.
The gilt market has been relatively calm following its recent spell of volatility. The 10-year yield has eased to 4.62% from 4.63% over the past seven days, while the 2-year yield is down to 3.83% from 3.88%.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it.
Tech companies' lack of transparency and accountability in developing surveillance tools that governments can use is unacceptable. President Donald Trump recently gathered CEOs for a summit about renewing the United States 'spiritually and financially.' At the top of the agenda was a closer look at 'American values' such as faith and freedom. There is cause for alarm, however. Centuries after Americans declared independence from the British monarchy, our freedom and liberty are under threat − not only from foreign governments like China, but potentially our own. America's surveillance state is spreading as the federal government collects personal data of hundreds of millions of Americans. In the age of artificial intelligence, with data collection accelerating at an unprecedented rate, our privacy has never been more vulnerable. Who is the culprit? The data collectors range from the National Security Agency to Silicon Valley's cadre of data-hungry technology companies. Add to that list a new organization: Palantir. While it is not a household name like Google or Netflix, it is soon to be a common domestic concern. The technology company's surveillance operation has exploded in recent months, raising the possibility of creating a full-fledged surveillance state. Opinion: AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it. Since January, Palantir has received more than $113 million in federal funds, according to The New York Times, not including a $795 million Defense Department contract awarded in May. While the federal government increased data sharing across agencies (with Palantir's help), the company continues to shop its technology to the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. AI technology could be repurposed for sinister uses We are talking about technology that can be weaponized. While Palantir's current focus is to identify people in the United States illegally, tracking movements in real time, the company is also building the infrastructure that could be used for a massive surveillance state. Former Palantir employees have warned about the potential for the company's AI tools to surveil American citizens with a disregard for personal privacy. It is not so far-fetched. Palantir's AI software is used by the Israeli Defense Forces to strike targets in Gaza. It is used to assist the U.S. Defense Department in analyzing drone footage. And it has been used by the Los Angeles Police Department to forecast crime patterns. This is called 'predictive policing.' If "Minority Report"was not a horror movie before, it is now. Given the government's penchant for abusing power (see: COVID-19 censorship or the NSA spying scandal), does this not seem like an obvious move against our civil liberties? For years, the NSA engaged in the mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records, as was exposed in 2013. Between 2001 and 2007, government wiretapping − executed without warrants − affected millions of U.S. citizens. Now, the same agencies are tapping into the power of AI to expand government surveillance in once unimaginable ways. Opinion: AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality? Of course, the federal government can already access a wide range of our personal data, but it is often separated by agency. Washington, DC, can create exponentially more detailed profiles on all of us by sharing data with the help of Palantir's AI tools. Even when surveilling noncitizens, the government's data collection inevitably tracks individual Americans based on their own interactions with these noncitizens. The government's data collection is based on information from police departments, financial institutions and other entities, like Palantir. Big government and big tech partnership raises concerns Even if the alliance between the government and Palantir works as intended, it is a potential threat to our civil liberties. Political dissidents could become targets. Not even those with limited public personas are safe from the state's detailed profiling machine. These systems are not perfect, and neither are our leaders. What happens when AI systems fail? What happens when data collection goes haywire? Palantir is hardly alone. OpenAI recently launched OpenAI for Government, which aims to equip federal, state and local leaders with advanced AI tools. OpenAI claims to serve the 'public good' and 'bolster national security readiness,' but why would private citizens take that at face value? What does 'readiness' actually mean, in practice? At the moment, many of our elected officials do not have answers to these questions, or they are just ignoring them. The same goes for OpenAI and Palantir, which are all too comfortable amassing ever-larger federal contracts and greater market share. This lack of transparency or accountability is unacceptable. The only thing worse than the overreach of Big Government is Big Tech in bed with Big Government. For those who care about freedom and liberty, now is the time to speak up, before it is too late. Peyton Hornberger serves as communications director at The Alliance for Secure AI, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced artificial intelligence.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Report: Newcastle Utd face £150M decision over top scorer's future
Player push sparks £150M transfer dilemma for Newcastle Utd Newcastle United's summer strategy faces a significant test amid growing uncertainty surrounding their star forward, who has made clear his desire to explore options elsewhere. The player in question has not travelled with the squad for their pre-season tour of Singapore and South Korea, officially due to a minor thigh complaint. However, senior figures at Newcastle are aware of his inclination to consider a move in the current transfer window. With three years remaining on his existing contract, the club is under no immediate pressure to sell. Talks had been expected this summer over a potential new deal, with Chief Executive Darren Eales indicating earlier in the year that negotiations would be addressed once the season concluded. At present, those discussions have not materialised. Despite the player's current stance, Newcastle's preference is to retain him and reopen talks on an extension. If needed, a transfer could be revisited in 2026. Liverpool interest adds weight to potential £150M record deal Interest from Liverpool has intensified in recent weeks, with the Premier League giants exploring the possibility of submitting a British record bid, understood to be in the region of £150M. Such a figure would surpass the £116M Liverpool recently paid for Bayer Leverkusen's Florian Wirtz, underlining their ambition in the transfer market under new manager Arne Slot. While Newcastle are reluctant to lose their leading scorer, they recognise that any bid close to £150M — combined with the player's own willingness to move — could compel them to enter negotiations. Howe's plans unsettled as forward stays behind Eddie Howe's preparations have been disrupted by the ongoing uncertainty. The forward did not feature in Newcastle's recent 4-0 defeat against Celtic and was granted leave to return home. Officially, this was attributed to managing his recovery, but sources suggest the decision also took into account the speculation surrounding his future. Howe indicated post-match that he expected the player to rejoin the group during the Asia tour. However, that now appears unlikely as the situation remains unresolved. The forward has scored 62 goals in 109 appearances for the club and has become a pivotal figure under Howe, whose coaching has elevated him to among the most in-demand attacking players in Europe. Contract strength may yet shift Newcastle's stance While Newcastle remain firm in their stance to retain the forward, their contractual position gives them leverage. They are not under financial pressure to sell, and any transfer would have to be on their terms — both in valuation and timing. Should a suitable offer materialise and the player continue to push for a move, the situation could develop rapidly in the final weeks of the window. For now, Newcastle remain calm but are aware that circumstances may force a decision sooner than they'd prefer.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Report: Newcastle Utd face £150M decision over top scorer's future
Player push sparks £150M transfer dilemma for Newcastle Utd Newcastle United's summer strategy faces a significant test amid growing uncertainty surrounding their star forward, who has made clear his desire to explore options elsewhere. The player in question has not travelled with the squad for their pre-season tour of Singapore and South Korea, officially due to a minor thigh complaint. However, senior figures at Newcastle are aware of his inclination to consider a move in the current transfer window. With three years remaining on his existing contract, the club is under no immediate pressure to sell. Talks had been expected this summer over a potential new deal, with Chief Executive Darren Eales indicating earlier in the year that negotiations would be addressed once the season concluded. At present, those discussions have not materialised. Despite the player's current stance, Newcastle's preference is to retain him and reopen talks on an extension. If needed, a transfer could be revisited in 2026. Liverpool interest adds weight to potential £150M record deal Interest from Liverpool has intensified in recent weeks, with the Premier League giants exploring the possibility of submitting a British record bid, understood to be in the region of £150M. Such a figure would surpass the £116M Liverpool recently paid for Bayer Leverkusen's Florian Wirtz, underlining their ambition in the transfer market under new manager Arne Slot. While Newcastle are reluctant to lose their leading scorer, they recognise that any bid close to £150M — combined with the player's own willingness to move — could compel them to enter negotiations. Howe's plans unsettled as forward stays behind Eddie Howe's preparations have been disrupted by the ongoing uncertainty. The forward did not feature in Newcastle's recent 4-0 defeat against Celtic and was granted leave to return home. Officially, this was attributed to managing his recovery, but sources suggest the decision also took into account the speculation surrounding his future. Howe indicated post-match that he expected the player to rejoin the group during the Asia tour. However, that now appears unlikely as the situation remains unresolved. The forward has scored 62 goals in 109 appearances for the club and has become a pivotal figure under Howe, whose coaching has elevated him to among the most in-demand attacking players in Europe. Contract strength may yet shift Newcastle's stance While Newcastle remain firm in their stance to retain the forward, their contractual position gives them leverage. They are not under financial pressure to sell, and any transfer would have to be on their terms — both in valuation and timing. Should a suitable offer materialise and the player continue to push for a move, the situation could develop rapidly in the final weeks of the window. For now, Newcastle remain calm but are aware that circumstances may force a decision sooner than they'd prefer.