logo
Rewriting the rules of enterprise growth: How LG NOVA is launching AI-native ventures without relying on M&A

Rewriting the rules of enterprise growth: How LG NOVA is launching AI-native ventures without relying on M&A

Fast Company12 hours ago
In early 2025, LG NOVA's Sokwoo Rhee laid out a compelling new model about how large enterprises don't need to rely solely on acquisitions or internal R&D to innovate. Instead, they can co-create new businesses by combining corporate infrastructure with startup agility, outside capital, and shared go-to-market momentum.
Now, that framework is moving from theory to reality. Through its innovation unit, LG NOVA, LG Electronics has launched two new ventures that showcase this collaborative model in action: PADO, an AI -powered orchestration platform for data center energy management, and Primefocus Health, a home healthcare solution focused on chronic disease monitoring and post-discharge care. Each reflects LG NOVA's deliberate pivot toward building AI-native businesses in high-impact categories like health tech, clean tech, and energy optimization.
'These companies aren't just ideas,' says Rhee, executive vice president at LG Electronics and head of LG NOVA. 'They're real-world examples of how a large corporation can create new ventures from scratch—faster, smarter, and without doing everything internally.'
Rather than starting with internal ideas, LG NOVA looks outward to support external innovation. Each year, the team interacts with roughly 1,000 startups to identify patterns across sectors and technologies.
'If you look at one or two startups, you only get part of the story,' says Rhee. 'But if you look at a thousand, you can do real statistical analysis on where the market is heading.'
That analysis results in about two dozen internal business concepts annually. A rigorous funneling process narrows that down to one or two spinouts per year, each built in collaboration with ecosystem partners. PADO and Primefocus Health emerged from that pipeline.
Primefocus, launched in 2024, is tackling the increasingly critical space of remote care.
'When patients are discharged from hospitals, they still need to be monitored, especially those with chronic conditions like diabetes or musculoskeletal disorders,' says Rhee. 'Primefocus gives providers a way to continue managing care at home, with better data and better outcomes.'
PADO, which launched earlier this year, focuses on sustainability in one of the world's most power-hungry industries: data centers.
'There's a surprising amount of energy waste even within a single data center,' Rhee explains. 'PADO uses AI to optimize how power is distributed inside the facility, reducing energy consumption and cost. As AI infrastructure expands, this kind of orchestration will be essential to fueling the growth that AI computing will demand.'
WHY LG BUILDS BEFORE BUYING
Unlike traditional corporate accelerators or M&A-focused ventures, LG NOVA doesn't acquire startups or simply invest passively. It aims to build companies. Each new venture is led by an entrepreneur-in-residence—often a founder with prior exits—who helps develop the concept inside LG NOVA and ultimately becomes CEO of the spinout.
'People assume that if you want startup innovation, you need to buy it,' says Rhee. 'But that's not always true. We build these businesses ourselves, and then we strategically license or partner for key components. It's modular by design.'
That was the case with PADO. While the core AI engine was developed internally, the PADO team didn't waste time trying to build non-core components from scratch. 'We licensed technologies from startups to fill where we didn't need to build,' says Rhee. 'It saved time and let us focus on the parts that mattered most.'
One major advantage of LG NOVA's model is its ability to secure early market traction through ecosystem partnerships. In the case of Primefocus Health, the company had a first customer— Marshall Health in West Virginia—lined up before the product launched.
'As a startup, getting that first customer is often the hardest thing,' Rhee says. 'By bringing in partners early, we de-risk the launch. We've even seen state governments express interest in hosting pilot deployments because it means job creation and economic growth.'
LG NOVA also co-invests alongside outside funders through an external venture fund. While that diversifies risk, it also adds critical outside perspective.
'We don't assume we're always right,' says Rhee. 'External investors challenge our thinking. If they say, 'This is where the market is going,' we take that seriously.'
BALANCING SPEED AND SCALE
Building startups inside a Fortune Global 500 company isn't easy. Timelines, expectations, and resource allocations all look different. That's why LG NOVA's process is uniquely designed to work within corporate constraints without sacrificing startup momentum.
'Large companies want results in a few years—not decades,' Rhee says. 'So, we intentionally focus on ventures that could become billion-dollar businesses within five years. That's our benchmark.'
Resource constraints also influence how ideas are prioritized. 'LG is a big company, but that doesn't mean LG NOVA gets unlimited support,' he adds. 'Every decision has to account for time, capital, and organizational patience.'
As a result, the team is constantly iterating its launch process. Primefocus was introduced with a partially developed product that matured post-launch. PADO, by contrast, was more fully formed at the time of its debut. 'There's no such thing as 100% ready,' Rhee says. 'But the more ventures we launch, the more we refine what 'ready enough' really means.'
A NEW PLAYBOOK FOR CORPORATE GROWTH
For enterprise leaders looking to expand into new markets, LG NOVA's model offers a viable alternative to M&A or long-cycle R&D. It's a repeatable, partnership-driven playbook that blends startup innovation with corporate scale.
'M&A isn't always the answer. Traditional R&D is too slow,' Rhee says. 'But co-creating with startups under the right structure can give you both speed and ownership.'
With more ventures already in the pipeline, LG NOVA isn't just exploring new ideas—it's industrializing a method for building what Rhee calls 'AI-native businesses in asset-light markets.' For companies that want to grow beyond their legacy categories, it's a roadmap worth watching.
'Any big company trying to enter new territory has to ask: Are we willing to build differently?' Rhee says. 'Because the old playbook won't get you there.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Remember ‘The Biggest Loser'? A new docuseries explores the harm the show did in the name of health
Remember ‘The Biggest Loser'? A new docuseries explores the harm the show did in the name of health

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Remember ‘The Biggest Loser'? A new docuseries explores the harm the show did in the name of health

Millions of Americans watched for 18 seasons as people pushed their bodies to the limits physically, ate as few calories as possible, and underwent sometimes mortifying challenges to be crowned 'The Biggest Loser.' It was discomfort worth grappling with for a shot at better health and a new life, many of the contestants said. But 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser,'' a Netflix docuseries premiering Friday, suggests that the cultural phenomenon may not have been healthy for the contestants or the country at large. When creating the new show, filmmakers asked themselves whether 'The Biggest Loser' was, in fact, part of an industry promoting health and wellness in the United States, said Skye Borgman, the director of the docuseries. 'Everybody always wants a magic bullet that's real. And the thing about magic bullets — they're never real.' 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser'' investigates how the highly popular show affected the contestants and conversations around health. The docuseries also explores the implications of so many viewers being willing to watch –– and sometimes laugh at –– people attempting to lose weight. 'It was such a huge phenomenon and absolutely reflected and perpetuated some of the really harmful messages around weight and weight loss,' said Dr. Rebecca Pearl, associate professor of clinical and health psychology at the University of Florida. Promoting health or harm? In a show claiming to transform people's health, what did the contestants' regimens look like? Men were advised to cut their calories down to 1,500 to 2,000 per day and women to 1,200 per day, said Dr. Robert Huizenga, physician on 'The Biggest Loser,' in the series. But sometimes, trainers might have recommended as few as 800 calories daily, he added. The amount of exercise was also intense, sometimes spanning eight hours a day, former contestant Danny Cahill said in the docuseries. The series showed clips of contestants dropping to the floor from a treadmill run, many people vomiting in the gym, and instances when caffeine pills were utilized to curb appetite. 'There's not any way that an entertaining show and a health show can 100% exist together. … One of them is always going to take the lead,' Borgman said. 'In the case of 'The Biggest Loser,' I feel like the entertainment value of the show far outran the health aspects of the show.' An extreme diet and exercise regimen is associated with significant health risks, Pearl said. Losing too much weight too quickly or not getting enough calories can lead to gallbladder complications, muscle loss and nutritional deficits, she said. Overexercising can result in heart problems, dehydration and injury –– which also prevents people from maintaining healthy behaviors. Eating a balanced diet and getting movement in your day is generally good for health, but the punishing approach to food and exercise showcased on 'The Biggest Loser' also worked against long-term health-promoting activities, Pearl added. 'One predictor and one recommendation for engaging in physical activity long term is to find an activity you enjoy,' she said. 'The kind of grueling, suffering activity that was shown on that show is not setting someone up to build a healthy, positive relationship with physical activity or with their body.' When the weight comes back One theme that may have kept viewers coming back to the show was the hope that someone could make a dramatic, lasting change to their body. But a weight loss transformation that stood the test of time wasn't always necessarily the result even in 'The Biggest Loser,' Borgman said. A 2017 study following 14 contestants in the years after 'The Biggest Loser' wrapped found that many regained much or all the weight they had lost over the course of the show. The return of the weight makes sense, said Dr. Larissa McGarrity, clinical psychologist in physical medicine and rehabilitation at University of Utah Health. The degree of calorie restriction and intensity of exercise were at levels that neither the contestants nor the viewers could implement at home in a realistic way, she said. Also, the amount of weight lost from week to week was extreme. At times, show participants were losing up to double digits at each weekly weigh in. Experts tend to recommend a sustainable weight loss rate of 1 to 2 pounds per week, McGarrity said — adding that the best guidance is to utilize the methods you can keep up long-term. 'The answer instead is probably, 'how do I slowly make changes in my life that help me to get in the right nutrients to help my body feel good? How do I move in a way that will allow my body and mind to feel at its best over time?'' she said. 'Making too many changes at once tends to not go well for most people from a psychological or behavioral standpoint.' Even if viewers at home could implement the stringent protocol followed by 'The Biggest Loser' contestants, research suggests metabolic changes from the dramatic weight loss depicted on the show made it harder to keep the weight off. Six years after contestants were on the show, the 14 studied on average still had a slower metabolisms, even if they had regained about two-thirds of the weight they had lost, according to the study. Their bodies were naturally burning fewer calories throughout the day and increasing hunger cues. 'It essentially means that keeping the weight off long term is nearly impossible without continued extreme measures over many years, because your body will fight against you to maintain that weight or defend that weight at that initially higher level,' McGarrity said. Laughing at fatness Often interwoven into 'The Biggest Loser' –– from coaches, in depictions of bodies, and in the audience interactions –– was a lot of shame, McGarrity said. The format supported a myth around weight: that the size of a person's body is totally under their control, and having a larger body is a sign of lack of willpower or moral failing, she said. That myth ignores the realities of things like genetics, environment and individual metabolisms, and it paves the way for denigration and callousness, she said. 'Cruelty, verbal abuse, sort of indirect physical abuse, in terms of being forced to really torture your body in unhealthy ways –– there was a sense that if you're in a larger body, you deserve this,' said Oona Hanson, a parent coach who specializes in helping families navigate diet culture and eating disorders. 'It made us participate as viewers in kind of like a pity or even disgust response in terms of the way people's bodies were portrayed, in the way they talked about their bodies,' she added. The docuseries showed just how dehumanizing or degrading those images could be, with cameras shaking as contestants fell to make it look like they caused an earthquake or challenges asking contestants to carry whole loaves of bread in their mouths. 'Without really being completely aware of it, the show succeeded in making fun of fat people,' Borgman said. Some contestants did say that they found empowerment and representation in being part of a competition in which they succeeded in goals and accomplished physical feats, she added. But it isn't hard to find a clip from 'The Biggest Loser' in which contestants are put in disparaging situations, Pearl added. Content that stigmatizes the size of a person's body and emphasizes thinness at all costs impacts not just the contestants, but also the viewers at home, Hanson said. It's hard for those viewers not to internalize those negative stereotypes, affecting how people see their communities and themselves. 'The Biggest Loser' may have been canceled years ago, but 'Fit for TV' shares that the reality show's lasting influence underscores the fact that the United States has not elevated the way people talk about weight and bodies, Borgman added. 'We as a culture feel like we're super evolved. … We don't judge. We take people for who they are,' she said. 'I don't think that's true at all. So, I hope people walk away from this series and look at themselves a little bit more and how we treat people.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.

FDA Monitors Safety Issue with Boston Scientific Defibrillator Leads
FDA Monitors Safety Issue with Boston Scientific Defibrillator Leads

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FDA Monitors Safety Issue with Boston Scientific Defibrillator Leads

Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE:BSX) is one of the best high-volume stocks to invest in. On August 6, the FDA announced that it is monitoring a safety issue with Boston Scientific Corporation's ENDOTAK RELIANCE defibrillation leads, which are used with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to prevent sudden cardiac death. Earlier this year, the company sent a letter to healthcare providers on July 24, warning that calcification of the leads' expanded polytetrafluoroethylene/ePTFE coating could lead to a gradual increase in low-voltage shock impedance/LVSI. This can reduce the effectiveness of life-saving shocks and even result in patient death. A surgeon examining a patient's brain in an operating room, paramedics nearby. The affected leads were manufactured and distributed between 2002 and 2021 and are no longer available. As of July 24, Boston Scientific had reported 386 serious injuries and 16 deaths linked to this issue. The FDA has categorized this as a potentially high-risk problem and is actively reviewing data to determine further regulatory action. Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE:BSX) develops, manufactures, and markets medical devices for use in various interventional medical specialties worldwide. It has 2 segments: MedSurg and Cardiovascular. While we acknowledge the potential of BSX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Salesforce, NICE Expand Partnership for AI-Powered Customer Service
Salesforce, NICE Expand Partnership for AI-Powered Customer Service

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Salesforce, NICE Expand Partnership for AI-Powered Customer Service

Salesforce Inc. (NYSE:CRM) is one of the best high-volume stocks to invest in. On August 12, NICE Ltd. (NASDAQ:NICE) announced an expanded partnership with Salesforce to improve customer service experiences through a deeper integration of their respective platforms. The collaboration focuses on bringing NICE's AI-powered CX and intelligent orchestration capabilities together with Agentforce in Salesforce Service Cloud. The partnership builds on the companies' previous collaboration, which started in 2022 with the launch of 'Bring Your Own Telephony' with Salesforce Service Cloud Voice. The new agreement will further invest in enabling 'Bring Your Own Contact Center' and integrate NICE's Workforce Engagement Management/WEM capabilities into the Service Cloud's unified desktop. A customer service team in an office setting using the company's Customer 360 platform to communicate with customers. As part of this collaboration, NICE plans to join the Salesforce Zero Copy Partner Network. This will make it the first company in the Contact Center ecosystem to enable a bidirectional Zero Copy integration with Salesforce Data Cloud. This integration will create a shared data foundation between NICE CXone Mpower and Salesforce Data Cloud, eliminating data silos and allowing for real-time, AI-driven orchestration using complete customer journey context. Salesforce Inc. (NYSE:CRM) provides customer relationship management/CRM technology that connects companies and customers worldwide. NICE Ltd. (NASDAQ:NICE) provides cloud platforms for AI-driven digital business solutions worldwide. While we acknowledge the potential of CRM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store