Grammy-winning band Los Tigres Del Norte speak about immigrants' right in San Jose
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A beloved San Jose band is speaking out about immigrants' rights. Los Tigres Del Norte has won seven Grammy Awards, 12 Latin Grammys and has album sales in excess of 32-million.
But today they showed up at Sacred Heart Community Service, not to sing but to speak out.
"We are afraid. People are afraid. And we want nothing to happen to our community," says Jorge Hernandez, member of Los Tigres Del Norte.
The band says Trump-era immigration policies have people on edge. They're afraid to go to work and school and afraid to access services at places like Sacred Heart.The group says the community that has supported them wholeheartedly now needs some support in return.
"I think it's very important because right now is when we need to support ourselves and to let people know they have rights too," says another band member, Hernan Hernandez.
And so, Los Tigres Del Norte spoke about standing up for your rights and about standing together.They hope this, along with reassurances from local leaders and police, will help.
"Seeing prominent artists that are able to say we care about what's happening in our community, and we stand up here with you and for you and want to reassure them that they're not alone, that speaks volumes," says Poncho Guevara, executive director of Sacred Heart Community Service.
The message resonated with those there for services, among them Alejandra Arrias. She says she was already a Los Tigres fan but feels an even deeper connection now.
"They're known everywhere. So having them come here and say we're with you guys, we're supporting you, that's just amazing. We feel more empowered," says Arias.
The band took time out of their tour schedule for today's event. They'll be back in San Jose for a concert at the SAP Center on February 15th.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Raskin takes swipe at Trump over price of military parade, GOP megabill
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) slammed President Trump for his Saturday military parade, which is expected to cost millions of dollars. 'As tanks roll down PA. Ave and planes streak above, remember this is all courtesy of the taxpayers,' Raskin wrote in a post on the social media platform X. 'Maybe there will be goodie bags for 14 million people who used to have Medicaid,' he added, referencing Medicaid cuts in the president's spending bill. The celebratory event held in honor of the Army's 250th birthday also coincides with the president's 79th birthday. The parade plans, which feature the public display of tanks and weapons from World War II, are expected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to the Army. 'It's a surprise party! Most people's spouse or family pay for theirs, but—surprise!—you're paying for Donald Trump's $45 million 79th birthday military parade,' Raskin wrote on Saturday. For months, Raskin and other Democrats have rebuked the Trump administration for the House-approved GOP spending bill that would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt while locking out some Medicaid recipients with new work requirements. Republicans have lauded the bill for its extensions to Trump's 2017 tax cuts and $1,000-per-baby investment accounts . The president has suggested that tariffs will mitigate a significant rise in the national debt while encouraging patrons to honor the country's history of servicemembers in the Army during the military parade hosted on Flag Day. 'OUR GREAT MILITARY PARADE IS ON, RAIN OR SHINE. REMEMBER, A RAINY DAY PARADE BRINGS GOOD LUCK. I'LL SEE YOU ALL IN D.C.' Trump wrote in a Saturday Truth Social post. Sixty-four percent of Americans disapprove of the use of state funds for this weekend's military parade, according to results from a NBC Decision Desk Poll.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump OKs Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel with security guarantees
President Donald Trump's Friday executive order inches Nippon Steel one step closer to a planned investment in U.S. Steel, with the caveat that the Japanese company must follow a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. The terms of the national security agreement weren't detailed in the order, but U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement lays out that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. Former President Joe Biden cited national security concerns in December when he denied the deal before leaving office. During their respective campaigns, Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris both said they planned to block the acquisition of U.S. Steel. However, in February, Trump began to try to undo Biden's actions, saying Nippon would drop its $14.1 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel to make an 'investment, rather than a purchase,' according to Post-Tribune archives. The companies thanked the Trump Administration for supporting the partnership. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' the statement said. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' Gary Mayor Eddie Melton, who has been supportive of the deal from the beginning, called the investment 'a pivotal moment for Gary and steelworkers across Northwest Indiana.' 'This development brings hope to steelmaking communities around the country,' Melton said in an emailed statement. 'As the child of a steelworker, I understand firsthand what this means for families who depend on good-paying union jobs. 'This historic partnership with one of our nation's oldest allies delivers exactly what the American steel industry needs — $11 billion in new investments that will ensure the longevity of our facilities, drive environmental sustainability in the process, and protect careers for the next generation of steelworkers.' Melton said he's hopeful that as the details of this partnership emerge, they will provide even greater assurance to workers and their families. United Steelworkers leadership has remained skeptical of a potentiall deal between the two steel companies for months, and last week, the USW filed an information request about the partnership, saying in a statement that union leadership 'have seen nothing credible' about the deal, 'including whether it meaningfully differs from Nippon's initial proposal to acquire U.S. Steel and make it a wholly owned subsidiary.' 'Neither Nippon nor the White House has provided any details on where, exactly, proposed investments will be directed or what kind of accountability or oversight there will be to ensure Nippon makes good on its promises,' said a USW letter to its members. 'We also have seen nothing suggesting that Nippon has backed away from its demand that it would be permitted to pull out of promised investments if we exercise our legal rights during negotiations fighting for a fair contract.' Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. In August, it was announced that Nippon Steel would invest $300 million into Gary Works. A Nippon executive later said the company would invest $1 billion into the local facility. The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, according to Trump's statement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States by the closing date of the transaction. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. Trump has promised that U.S. Steel will keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh, but the companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment, then he said that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump mulls Insurrection Act as he sends troops to LA
