Satellite Images Show Underground Military Installations Around the World
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Iran's Fordow nuclear facility, buried beneath a mountain near the city of Qom, has become a focus of global military attention following the most recent Israeli airstrikes.
It is one of the most heavily fortified military sites in the world, and its resilience highlights a broader pattern: nations around the world have built underground bases to shield key military infrastructure from attack.
Fordow is dug half a mile underground, lined with reinforced concrete, and surrounded by air defenses. It was built to survive a direct air strike and keep functioning.
"Fordow is the be-all and end-all of Iran's nuclear operation," Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told the Financial Times. The site could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for nine nuclear bombs in about three weeks, according to estimates by the Institute for Science and International Security.
PlanetScope image of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant captured on June 14, 2025.
PlanetScope image of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant captured on June 14, 2025.
Planet Labs PBC
Iran said the facility was attacked last week, though damage was limited. Most military analysts believe the site could only be heavily damaged or destroyed with an American-made bunker-buster bomb and the B-2 stealth fighter configured to drop it. And even then, it is far from a certainty.
Danny Citrinowicz, an analyst at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, told Vijesti, "Without U.S. help, Fordow will be a big challenge. It's heavily fortified and deep in the mountain. I'm not sure how much damage we can do there."
Fordow is one of many such facilities. Most major military powers have built underground bunkers—some dating back to the Cold War, others still active. While estimates suggest there could be over 10,000 of these sites worldwide, only a handful are widely known.
U.S. Sites
In the United States, Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania—also known as the "Underground Pentagon"—connects to Mount Weather in Virginia and Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado. These sites are built to maintain government operations in a crisis.
Satellite view of the Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania, known as the "Underground Pentagon." The facility includes multiple tunnel entrances and surface structures supporting one of the United States' primary Continuity of Government sites.
Satellite view of the Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania, known as the "Underground Pentagon." The facility includes multiple tunnel entrances and surface structures supporting one of the United States' primary Continuity of Government sites.
Google Earth
Cheyenne Mountain houses NORAD operations and was built to withstand a 30-megaton nuclear blast. In North Dakota, Minot Air Force Base hosts a network of underground silos for nuclear missiles.
Texas's West Fort Hood once stored nuclear weapons in tunnels carved into the hillside. During the Cold War, Project Iceworm in Greenland housed nuclear equipment in ice tunnels at Camp Century.
At the entrance to the Cheyenne Mountain Complex headquarters for NORAD two military personnel wait to board a bus May 11, 2004 in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
At the entrance to the Cheyenne Mountain Complex headquarters for NORAD two military personnel wait to board a bus May 11, 2004 in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Getty Images
Russia and China
Russia's secretive underground transport system Metro-2 system, or D-6, is thought to link key command posts beneath Moscow to facilities such as Vnukovo-2 airport. Meanwhile, the mysterious Mount Yamantau in the southern Urals is believed to conceal a vast nuclear weapons storage or command facility.
The Kremlin has never confirmed its purpose.
Mount Yamantau, another secretive site in the Urals, is widely believed to be a command hub for nuclear operations.
Mount Yamantau, another secretive site in the Urals, is widely believed to be a command hub for nuclear operations.
Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Generic
China's Longpo Naval Base, located on Hainan Island, includes a sophisticated tunnel system that enables submarines to discreetly enter and exit from the South China Sea. The facility is believed to play a critical role in supporting China's second-strike nuclear capability.
It features an underground complex designed to shield nuclear submarines from aerial surveillance and potential attack. The base includes six wharves—each approximately 755 feet long—capable of accommodating up to 12 submarines. Longpo is part of the larger Yulin Naval Base complex, which serves as a strategic hub for the People's Liberation Army Navy's South Sea Fleet.
Satellite view of the Longpo Naval Base on China's Yalong Peninsula. Hidden beneath the dense forest, this strategic facility is believed to house underground tunnels connecting directly to the South China Sea, allowing nuclear submarines...
Satellite view of the Longpo Naval Base on China's Yalong Peninsula. Hidden beneath the dense forest, this strategic facility is believed to house underground tunnels connecting directly to the South China Sea, allowing nuclear submarines to enter and exit covertly. More
Google Earth
Project 131 in Hubei was another Cold War-era command site, though it has since been decommissioned.
North Korea
North Korea has built extensive underground missile bases, including the Kumchang-ri facility discovered in 1989. While Pyongyang claimed it was a food storage site, U.S. intelligence suspected it was used for nuclear work. These bases are carved into mountains and designed to survive strikes.
Satellite imagery of the Kumchang-ri underground facility in North Korea. Discovered in the late 1990s, the site was originally claimed to be agricultural, but U.S. intelligence identified it as a suspected nuclear-related complex hidden beneath...
Satellite imagery of the Kumchang-ri underground facility in North Korea. Discovered in the late 1990s, the site was originally claimed to be agricultural, but U.S. intelligence identified it as a suspected nuclear-related complex hidden beneath mountainous terrain. Its exact purpose remains classified. More
Google Earth
Iran's Expansion
Fordow is not Iran's only secure site. Tehran is believed to be is building an even more protected facility at Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La—also known as Pickaxe Mountain—south of Natanz. This site is planned to be even deeper underground, with at least four tunnel entrances and larger internal space. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has not been allowed to inspect it.
Fordow was built in secret and revealed publicly in 2009 when U.S., British and French officials declassified intelligence on its existence. The disclosure led to increased sanctions and was central to the 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration and known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
After Trump withdrew from that agreement during his first term in 2018, Iran resumed higher levels of uranium enrichment by restarting operations at Fordow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
DeepSeek reportedly urged by Chinese authorities to train new model on Huawei hardware — after multiple failures, R2 training to switch back to Nvidia hardware while Ascend GPUs handle inference
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A new report claims that after successfully training its R1 model on Nvidia hardware, DeepSeek was urged by Chinese authorities to switch to using Huawei Ascend-based hardware for its next model. However, according to the Financial Times, training for R2 was met with persistent Huawei hardware failures, delaying the release of the model. DeepSeek was reportedly forced to switch back to Nvidia chips for training while using Huawei's for inference. Following the success of R1, Chinese authorities allegedly encouraged DeepSeek to rely on Huawei's Ascend-based platforms instead of Nvidia for training, according to three individuals with knowledge of the matter cited by FT. DeepSeek followed that advice during R2's development, but the move quickly ran into a bunch of issues, including unstable performance, slower chip-to-chip connectivity, and limitations of Huawei's CANN software toolkit. As a result, DeepSeek reverted to using Nvidia's AI accelerators for training the R2 model, while keeping Huawei's hardware for inference. On the one hand, this mixed approach was a compromise born out of necessity rather than preference. But on the other hand, given the shortage of Nvidia processors in China, it makes sense to ensure that a new AI model works on Huawei hardware, as many of DeepSeek's customers will use R2 on such platforms. Huawei reportedly sent a team of engineers to DeepSeek's data centers to try to resolve the training problems. Despite their presence, the company has reportedly never managed a fully successful training run on the Ascend platform. Efforts continue to make the new model compatible with Ascend for inference purposes. The inability to complete training on Ascend was a primary factor behind delaying the R2 launch from its planned May date, a source familiar with the project told FT. However, the shortage of high-performance Nvidia GPUs in China also affected the R2 schedule, according to a previous report. It is still unknown whether R2 has already been fully pre-trained. DeepSeek reportedly trained its R1 model on a cluster of 50,000 Hopper-series GPUs — made up of 30,000 HGX H20 units, 10,000 H800s, and 10,000 H100s — that were supplied through its investor, High-Flyer Capital Management. For natural reasons, R2 will require a substantially more powerful cluster for training, so DeepSeek and its backer will have to land them somewhere (which may not be that hard, given plenty of AI data centers in China).There might be another issue, though. Reports indicate that DeepSeek's AI platform is tuned specifically for Nvidia hardware, which not only leaves the company vulnerable to the availability of Nvidia GPUs but also makes its clients depend on the supply of AI accelerators like Nvidia's HGX H20. To that end, it is crucial for DeepSeek to make R2 inference work on domestic hardware platforms, such as Huawei's Ascend. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
FIA Plans Major Shake-Up to Boost F1's Underdog Teams in 2026
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Formula One's governing body, the FIA, has been working to help underdog engine manufacturers in a big way from 2026, when the sport enters a new era of regulations. This will be possible through a new program called 'additional development opportunities for performance gaps,' which could prove highly beneficial for teams struggling to find performance. With the reset in chassis and engine regulations from 2026, the FIA has been taking significant steps to ensure no single manufacturer dominates the new era of regulations. Mercedes was one such recent engine supplier that dominated the hybrid era that began in 2014, winning eight Constructors' Championships until 2021. Speaking on the topic, FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazi told Auto Motor und Sport: "I don't think we'll ever see such a dominant engine manufacturer again as we did in 2014. Back then, the powertrain became much more complex than its predecessor. This time, we're doing the opposite. We're simplifying the technology. Drivers take the start to the Formula One Hungarian Grand Prix at the Hungaroring circuit in Mogyorod near Budapest, Hungary, on August 3, 2025. Drivers take the start to the Formula One Hungarian Grand Prix at the Hungaroring circuit in Mogyorod near Budapest, Hungary, on August 3, 2025. Attila KISBENEDEK / AFP/Getty Images "Originally, we wanted to go even further, but we couldn't get it done. The new powertrains are simpler. They no longer have MGU-H, and there are stricter limits in some areas. "On the other hand, we have newcomers among the manufacturers, and of course, there's always the risk that one of them will miss the mark with the first attempt. Despite budget constraints and limited test bench time." When put to him if struggling power unit suppliers would receive support to boost performance, he said: "Yes. We've introduced a program for this that we call 'additional development opportunities for performance gaps.' It was in the rules from the beginning. In recent months, we've refined how we want to manage it. "Essentially, we'll measure the average performance for each manufacturer every six races. For those below a certain level, there will be an upgrade option depending on how far behind." Tombazis explained that the trailing manufacturers can bounce back in three ways. He added: "This can be represented at three different levels: more money for development. More dyno hours. More time for specification homologation. So, those who are behind have a chance to catch up." He was asked if the new system was similar to the Balance of Performance in endurance racing. While he denied the similarity, he emphasized that the FIA was making "final adjustments" to ensure the same rules apply to all engine suppliers and teams while providing struggling teams a much-needed push to improve their competitiveness. The FIA head said: "That's not the case. The rules remain the same for everyone. No one gets more displacement or more fuel. If there were no budget cap, the lagging manufacturers would invest more money. When Honda entered in 2015 and was lagging behind, they had to invest a lot of money for a certain period of time to catch up. With a cost cap, there's a risk that you'll never be able to catch up. And no one wants to be humiliated forever. "That wouldn't be fair either. We're currently working on the final adjustments to this system. The engine manufacturers have been extremely cooperative." Given that the 2026 car will be entirely new, Tombazis revealed a system through which a manufacturer will be able to upgrade their components in case of reliability issues in the early stages. He explained: "There's also another initiative. If someone has major reliability issues at the beginning, they can also upgrade. It's pointless to leave someone out in the cold who has engine failure every weekend. "These engines are expensive. In extreme cases, someone would quickly reach the limits of the cost cap if they didn't simultaneously scale back development. This proposal still has to be approved. One idea is that once a certain number of engines are used, additional units will be exempt from the budget cap."
Indianapolis Star
8 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S.
